Best Writer

In December 2015, the FBI obtained the iPhone of one of the shooters in an ISIS-inspired terrorist attack that killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California. As part of the investigation, the FBI attempted to gain access to the data stored on the phone but was unable to penetrate its encryption software. Lawyers for the Obama administration approached Apple for assistance with unlocking the device, but negotiations soon broke down. Ultimately, the FBI dropped the case because it was able to circumvent the encryption on the iPhone without Apple’s help.
Do you support Apple’s refusal to grant the FBI access to the iPhone? Provide two reasons for your position.
SOURCES MUST BE APPROVED BY GOOGLE SCHOLAR.

Here is some good news for the Final Exam: I do care about there being 8- 10 complete sentences. Complete means no choppy, short, 3 or 4-word sentences. I do care that you answer the question to the best of your ability. If you can answer it using your own words, that is fine, as long as the information makes sense, and the question is answered.

You cannot use any citing from any other source.

Please typing question you are answering!
Answer each comprehensively and provide sufficient details, breadth, and depth

Your responses must demonstrate critical thinking, analysis, and an understanding and knowledge of the subject matter

Please Please no citations and don’t plagiarism

In consideration of Sara’s privacy and in an effort to educate members of the organization of the possible outbreak, what strategies/steps should the Department of Human Resources (HR) do to ensure health information is provided to all stakeholders? Explain each strategy and offer concrete information to support your viewpoint.
Explain the implications of this problem for the stakeholders involved in this home health organization. Be sure to compare and contrast the implications for the different stakeholders and give special attention to the residents that Sara visited in their homes.
Length: 3-4 pages, excluding title page and references.
SLP Assignment Expectations
Assessment and Grading: Your paper will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric. You can view it under Assessments at the top of the page. Review it before you begin working on the assignment. Your work should also follow these Assignment Expectations.
*** this is a follow on of Sara’s scenario from prior assignments. Please ensure this is taken into account. If you need additional information or a refresher of this scenario please don’t hesitate to ask.

Instructions: In 750-1,000 words, create an analysis of how a Christian worldview could impact your company’s Mission and Vision statements and its business practices. Include the following:
Review the Southwest airline company’s Mission and Vision statements.
Describe elements of your company’s Mission and Vision statements that reflect the organization’s commitment to the greater social good
Explain how the company’s commitment to the greater social good relates to elements of a Christian worldview.
Are the company’s practices consistent with a Christian worldview? Explain.
Be sure to cite three to five relevant and credible sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library or those provided in Topic Materials.

Critique of level of evidence (LOE) grading
5 pts
Full Marks
Critique of evidence grading processes.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Gives evidence ratings, but no description of what ratings are based on and/or if the ratings are appropriate (failure to describe why or why not)
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critique of guideline recommendations.
10 pts
Full Marks
Critique of guideline recommendations. Are they explicit, clearly stated, valid for practice? Reflect of value judgements about outcomes.
5 pts
Partial Marks
Minimal information given on value judgements and/or no description what judgements are based on.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critique of peer review process.
5 pts
Full Marks
Critique of peer review processes used and if they were appropriate. If no peer review used, then describe why this is a problem for validity of recommendations.
1.88 pts
Partial Marks
Students states that no guideline peer review done, but fails to discuss why this is problematic.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critique of intent of use.
5 pts
Full Marks
Describe intent of authors in providing these guidelines. Local, national, international use? Is the intent appropriate? Why or why not?
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Intent of use described, but lacks detail as to why or why not intent is appropiate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critique of clinical relevance of guideline to practice
5 pts
Full Marks
Identify how the recommendations are clinically relevant in intended practice setting. Different from current practice? Are recommendations feasible? What resources are required? Costs of additional equipment needed.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
States recommendation is relevant or not relevant, but give minimal or lacks reasons for why or why not.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critique of outcome measures.
5 pts
Full Marks
Describes how patient care outcomes or management outcomes could be measured. for each recommendation. Discuss how outcome measure provides evidence to support guideline or provide evidence for change of practice.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Addresses only some outcomes and does not provide information on how outcome measures could support use of recommendation or need for recommendation changes.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Summary of overall evaluation of the guideline.
15 pts
Full Marks
Summarize the overall evaluation of the guideline. Main points of paper are addressed. Include discussion or level of evidence provided (or lack of) to support recommendations. Discuss author expertise, guideline development processes and validity. Summarize recommendations and fit of these in current practice, recommendations for further changes, feasibility in practice, and measurable outcomes.
7.5 pts
Partial Marks
Minimal discussion of overall evaluation of guideline. Does not include development processes, level of evidence, feasibility, outcomes or future needs in detail. Lacking comprehensive evaluation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA style
5 pts
Full Marks
Professional writing used. Includes all important elements of APA including title page, headings (Questions of Appendix are not section headings), citations, appropriate font, spacing, tables, references.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Has some elements of APA, but lacking some important elements of APA such as headings, font, spacing, title page, citations, references.
0 pts
No Marks
Majority of APA elements are not addressed and/or are incorrect
5 pts

Guideline Evaluation Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to help the DNP student to work in a team environment and determine the quality of a professional practice guideline. Not all guidelines are created equal and not all are formulated well. The ability to review the quality of a practice guideline is critical in the process of determining quality evidence in which to base policy and practice. In practice, guideline development or revision is done in a group of professionals, so this assignment will be done in groups. You will review a professional clinical guideline and make decisions as per the checklist as a group.
Instructions for Group Sign-Up:
This is a team effort paper. Go to the “People” tab to sign up for teams of 2 or 3 students each group – Groups are numbered using small group faculty names.
The computer automatically chooses a team lead (you will see name posted in blue in group tab) This person is charged with uploading the draft and final paper into Turnitin and canvas for each group. How teams disperse the work on this project is up to the team.
Assignment Instructions:
Obtain an original guideline. Professional organization guidelines, clinical practice guidelines and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (https://www.thecommunityguide.org/resources/national-guideline-clearinghouse (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
) are great places to start looking. Chapter 8 in your textbook has additional information and resources for finding guidelines.
Do not use the same guideline (can be same topic) as another group (check the Guideline Paper discussion board for student uploads in your small faculty group).
Introduce your guideline and identify the rationale for selection of this guideline related to your clinical practice.
Critique the original guideline using the grading rubric criteria and Rapid Appraisal Questions for Evidenced-Based Guidelines Checklist (RCA) in Appendix B of your textbook to guide you. Critique & address each section in detail in the paper (see #6 below).
Do not use the long questions on The RCA Checklist as paragraph headers (Use APA level I & II headings)
Do not give one sentence answers to each question, provide information as to why you are making the evaluator statement. Professional writing is expected.
Provide rationale for each of your evaluator statements in an APA formatted paper detailing how the process was accomplished or any bias/validity issues. Faculty are evaluating you on substance and detail of your evaluation.
Identify applicability to your patient population.
Suggest ways in which this guideline could be used in your practice setting.
Provide an overall summary of your evaluation.
Using your chosen guideline, place the information into an evaluation table according to the template provided below.
Limit to 10 pages (not including the title page or references)
Upload paper draft into the Turnitin Draft plagiarism software upload provided – only one member (team leader) should upload one copy and not everyone on the team
Upload final copy into Turnitin
Also post the guideline used when uploading final copy of assignment to Canvas.
Evaluation Table: The guideline article you are critiquing should be placed in an evaluation table using the template provided.
Guideline Paper Evaluation Table.docx
download
****Make sure that tables are APA formatted
Do not use “Evidence Table” as your table title. The title should reflect what you are presenting in the table. See “General Guidance on Tables and Figures” in your APA textbook.
Additional Information:
Use the assignment & rubric & Rapid Critical Appraisal checklist to help guide paper composition. Also review Chapter 8: Advancing Optimal Care with Robust Clinical Practice Guidelines.
**Use APA Guidelines for Student Papers (Not Professional Papers)***

Harm Reduction is a central part of strength-based helping strategies. But there is much debate regarding harm reduction programs in this US.
Watch the following documentary about Insite, the first safe consumption facility in Canada:
Insite – Not Just Injecting, But Connecting (Sub: Eng, Spa, Ger, Hun, Rus, Ser, Bul)
(Links to an external site.)
Campaigners in NYC are actively trying to get safe consumption facilities legally opened here (they already operate underground in NYC- but are not fully licensed as safe consumption facilities yet).
Check out the status of facilities in NYC: https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/newsletters/politico-new-york-health-care/2020/02/28/lawmakers-renew-push-for-supervised-injection-sites-332982
(Links to an external site.)
Then watch this film about supervised injection facilities in NYC called “Everywhere But Safe”if you want to learn more about the status of these in NYC: https://vimeo.com/140074355
Then watch this short news clip:
Mayor wants supervised injection facility for heroin users
(Links to an external site.)
And this short news clip:
De Blasio Backs Plan To Open Supervised Injection Sites
(Links to an external site.)
And then compose a 300-word top-level post in ESSAY format that responds to these questions:
Discuss the pros and cons of harm reduction in general as a strength-based helping strategy as it pertains to addiction treatment.
Discuss the debate over safe consumption facilities, in particular (also referred to as safe injection facilities). Refer to the specific issues in the Vancouver and NYC examples.
Where do you stand in this debate over harm reduction?

Choose articles (newspaper, magazine, industry journal) that relates with one of the management functions or more than one but not required to do all (planning, leading, oranizing, and controlling).
Submit an APA formatted Word document approximately 5-7 pages not including cover and reference page.
An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess another person’s article. It entails a logical evaluation of the central theme of the article, supporting arguments and implications for further research.
-Provide an indepth summary, application to management functions, and thorough answers to :
How does the article relate to course readings?
Describe relevant history, theories or laws.
Who, What, When, Where, Why, & How? Star the one you think is the most important. Why?
What is its impact? How many people were
affected by it?
Who are the sources in the article itself?
(Examples: journalist, lawyer, doctor,
neighbor, police officer, forensics expert)
What do you think of this article? (Discuss in
at least five complete sentences)

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the discussion of genre in Chapter 3 of Film: From Watching to Seeing, as well as your instructor’s guidance and lecture materials, and Chapter 11 in Film Genre Reader IV. The ENG225 Research Guide in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library will be particularly helpful in locating required sources. This assignment is your opportunity to demonstrate understanding of one selected genre. To do that, you will watch a full feature-length film from that genre.
Please choose a film from this list of approved choices.
Note: You should watch your chosen film twice—once to ensure that you have grasped the storytelling and once to take more specific notes on aspects of the film you wish to discuss. If you would like to write about a film that is not on this list, you must email your professor for approval in advance or you may not receive credit on this assignment.
It is recommended that you look ahead to the Week 3 written assignment and Week 5 Final Paper guidelines to ensure that you choose a film for this assignment that will work with the requirements on those later assignments. You may opt to write about the same film in your Week 3 and Week 5 written assignments, and applicable pieces of this assignment can be used to write that assignment. If you do this, you should reflect on and revise this assignment based on the instructor’s feedback before you incorporate it into any future writing assignment.
Your paper should be organized around a thesis statement that focuses on how your chosen feature-length film both aligns with and expands upon your chosen genre. Consider using the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center Thesis Generator to help develop your thesis. Review the Week 2 sample paper, which provides an example of a well-developed analysis as well as insight on composition.
In your paper,
• Explain genre theory and, using Chapter 3 of the text as a reference, describe the conventions and attributes of the genre you have selected.
• Identify a feature-length film that fits your selected genre and briefly summarize the movie. As you develop this summary, remember the differences between a film’s story and a film’s plot and be sure to highlight specific genre elements.
• Interpret at least two genre conventions exhibited in your chosen feature-length film that help classify it in the selected genre. Be sure to provide a specific example of each convention (e.g., a particular scene or plot component).
• Provide an example of a third convention from your chosen feature-length film and explain how this convention expands the boundaries of the specified genre.
The Genre and Genre Theory paper
• Must be 900 to 1200 words in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center’s APA Style
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
◦ Title of Your Essay (in bold)
◦ Your First and Last Name
◦ University of Arizona Global Campus
◦ Course Code: Name of Course (e.g., ENG 225: Introduction to Film)
◦ Instructor’s name
◦ Due Date
For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013.
• Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice resource for additional guidance.
• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
◦ For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions as well as Writing a Thesis Statement, refer to the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center resources.
• Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
◦ The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
◦ To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this University of Arizona Global Campus Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
• Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper guide.
• Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List resource in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center for specifications.

Your hospital is participating in an educational project for medical students. Under the proposal, they will videotape the events of the emergency department 24/7 for one week.

Research the applicable laws and standards associated with videotaping and write a policy for them to adhere to. And reference the applicable law and standard.

Also see attached file for example of writing policy

To complete this assignment, use “You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students” and the guidelines for writing in the topic study materials.
Write a 250-500-word summary of the article that includes paraphrases of the article, the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This is an academic exercise that should not be written in first person. This is an APA paper that includes a separate title page and a reference page.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Article Review
No of Criteria: 6 Achievement Levels: 5
Criteria
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00 %
Satisfactory
79.00 %
Good
87.00 %
Excellent
100.00 %
Content
60.0
Summary of Article
30.0
Summary of the article is insufficient or not present. Guidelines were not followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials.
Summary of the article is unclearly written. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials, but summary is incomplete or rudimentary.
Summary of the article is written clearly with paraphrases. Guidelines were sufficiently followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials.
Summary of the article is written clearly and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner.
Summary of the article is written clearly, thoroughly, and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of academic writing.
Research Problem, Questions, Method, Findings, and Implications Discussed by the Authors
30.0
Summary does not present the research problem, questions, method, findings, and/or implications discussed by the authors.
Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications, but explanation is insufficient or rudimentary.
Summary sufficiently presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.
Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors in an academic manner.
Summary thoroughly presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of the overall concept made by the author.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
40.0
Language Use and Audience Awareness (e.g., sentence construction, word choice)
10.0
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
10.0
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
10.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Percentage
100