Best Writer

an analysis essay in which you will examine the setting of a story and examine how the location functions to support larger themes of the narrative. You must write on at least one of the stories from this semester (“The Whore’s Child,” “Sonny’s Blues,” “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World,” “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings,” “Cathedral,” “Hills Like White Elephants,” No Exit, “Rhinoceros,” “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” “The House on Mango Street,” or “Harrison Bergeron”) and it may NOT be the same story that you examined for Essay #1. You may also choose to compare the settings of different stories if the comparison aids your overall argument.
The essay should be a minimum of TWO pages with an emphasis on research as a means to support your argument. In order to provide an effective analysis, you will need to first establish the central idea of the story and how the setting is constructed. You should be able to provide your reader with a thorough and well thought out argument that proves how the setting influences the central theme of the story. The purpose of an effective analysis is to carefully examine and evaluate your subject. By doing so, you should be able to present your reader with a process to better understand and appreciate the many levels at work in the story.
As support for your argument, you should find and utilize a minimum of TWO SECONDARY sources. PRIMARY sources are the readings that we have used this semester. SECONDARY sources are things like reviews, interviews, and critical analysis essays written about the same (or easily related to the) primary source. (You are welcome to use any of the materials provided under Supplemental Materials on Blackboard.) Any sources used in your essay should complicate or provide additional reasons to believe the conclusions your analysis puts forth. Sources which are not relevant or not sufficiently reliable (Wikipedia, SparkNotes, Shmoop, anonymous comments) will not help your argument, but will instead hurt your credibility. Additionally, they will not count towards the source minimum. Each missing source will be a deduction of ten points. So, the highest grade an essay without sources can receive will be a C. All sources must be properly cited in MLA format both in-text and in a works cited page.

The purpose of this assignment is for you to deliver an effective and appropriate informative speech to a live audience on a topic of social relevance.

Speech content: must cite a minimum of 4 credible sources in the speech. The speech should be organized appropriately with a clear introduction, main points, and conclusion. Words should be chosen effectively to clarify and illustrate the ideas presented.

Find three articles (3) related to the topic of improving student learning outcomes by teaching brain-based learning to educators through professional development training.

Develop a 1- to 2-paragraph PROBLEM statement that is the result of a review of the three (3) articles you located on your topic. In the paragraphs clearly answer the following:
Briefly describe the phenomena you are interested in studying.
Briefly summarize the key findings or what is understood about this phenomena based on the three articles you reviewed.
Briefly identify the “gap”—what do you see as an important, relevant, next step in learning more about this topic that would be appropriate for a qualitative study.
3. Write a PURPOSE statement using terminology of qualitative research. The purpose statement should contain:
A statement using the following template: The purpose of this qualitative study is to [choose one: explore, describe, understand, explain] the meaning/experience/culture/stories of [phenomenon of interest] in [population/setting].
A justification of why the purpose of your study is suited for the qualitative approach in terms of:
The phenomena you choose
-The “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology
-The relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest
Based on your knowledge of reflexivity, explain your relationship to the problem; and the issues of bias and positionality to be addressed. Include a brief description of the setting (P-20 classrooms) and possible sources of data.
4. Write a RESEARCH QUESTION using terminology of qualitative research.
The research question should incorporate and mirror the purpose statement using the following template: What is the meaning/experience/culture/stories of [phenomenon of interest] in [population/setting]?
5. Use APA 7 in articles from the last five (5) years
6. Write annotated bibliography from articles used.

Topic References:

improving learning outcomes for students by teaching brain based learning to teachers – Bing

– improving learning outcomes for students by teaching brain based learning in Professional Development Trainings for educators – Bing

Survey Question Development and Choice of Validated Measures One of the main course objectives in this course is to generate and analyze new data related to a specific domain through the conduct of original research. This may also be one of the more exciting things we will work on together, so we hope you will enjoy this experience.
Background on Research Questions, Hypotheses, Validated Measures, and Survey Questions
We will use this discussion forum to develop and submit survey questions to practice developing, administering, and analyzing the results from a cross-sectional survey. In addition, as part of this discussion, you will search for validated measures of a health topic of interest.
Validated measures are typically surveyed instruments, or sets of survey questions, that have been tested to ensure that they measure the item or concept of interest accurately and reliably.
Before you can begin searching for validated measures to inform writing the actual survey questions, you need to:
Develop an overall research question of interest (Note: We are somewhat limited in the scope of the question because it should be something that can be addressed in a cross-sectional survey of fellow students. Please avoid highly sensitive questions and anything that would ask students to self-disclose illegal behavior.) but do keep questions within the general realm of health or health behavior.
Develop a directional hypothesis, and
Specify the predictor and outcome variables.
Let’s review the following example that demonstrates this process.
Critical Thinking Question: Finding Validated Measures, Instruments, and Survey Questions
Let’s say you are interested in the extent to which someone experiences discrimination in health care settings and self-reported measures of stress (this is the overall research question). Because of your BBH coursework and your own studies, you hypothesize that people who report experiencing more discrimination in health care settings will also report higher stress (this is the directional hypothesis).
Check yourself! Can you identify 1) the predictor, 2) the outcome, and 3) the direction of the hypothesis based on this example? Try to answer the question before checking the answer. Note, you will not need to submit anything here.
Check the answer to Finding Validated Measures, Instruments, and Survey Questions.
Other Researchers and Validated Measures
At this point, you may be wondering, have other researchers investigated similar questions? Have they developed and tested specific survey questions? You could now do a library and/or internet search for validated measures of your predictor and outcome variables, discrimination, and perceived stress, respectively.
In doing so, you would discover that indeed, others have explored these topics and developed surveys with validated measures and scales (several questions that ask about a single concept).
The Validated Measures for Research with Vulnerable & Special Populations
(Links to an external site.)
website, is just one resource where you can start that discusses validated measures and includes many examples.
Note that some measures on this site aren’t necessarily relevant to the types of relationships we can investigate in the class survey, nevertheless, they can give you some good examples to study this concept, overall. When you spend time reviewing this source, you’ll also find many links to the research that has been conducted to validate these measures. See if you can find some examples.
Specifically, with regard to the example hypothesis and corresponding survey questions mentioned in this assignment, you can see that both discrimination in healthcare and stress/allostatic load are domains of research on this site. Take a few minutes to review the site and find the:
Everyday Discrimination Scale (Williams, 2012) (This is located under the Discrimination in Healthcare section. Then go to The Original and Still Recommended Scale section (page 2) to see recommended questions and response options), and
Global Measure of Perceived Stress Scale (Cohenm Kamarack, and Mermelstein, 1983) under the Stress section. This article is a bit older; be sure that you scroll through to the end, Appendix A, to see the survey questions. Note: If this article is not available for you on the Validated Measures website, please use the direct link to the Global Measure of Perceived Stress
(Links to an external site.)
article.
Validated Measures and Your Own Variables
As you compare the validated measures to the questions you developed, you might decide that you think using validated measures or questions would provide better data. Many validated measures and scales include LOTS of individual questions. Why do you think that may be the case?
For the purpose of this assignment, please identify validated measures for your variables. If the validated measures include many questions (more than 5 or so) choose just a few questions from the overall scale that you would like to include in the course survey.
Please be sure to follow the Discussion Guidelines and Policies in the Student Resource module, which includes information related to:
discussion guidelines and policies for engaging in class discussions,
posting to discussions,
responding to peers, and
grading criteria.
Discussion Questions
For this discussion, you need to complete the following steps for your initial post:
Step 1: At the top of each post, in all caps, provide a subject heading that identifies the topic of your question: STRESS. For the example that was provided earlier, we would use the subject heading: STRESS.
Step 2: A statement of your hypothesis, phrased as a complete sentence. It should mention both your predictor variable and your outcome variable, but it should not say the word “predictor” or “outcome” in the sentence. It should use grammatical structure to make it clear which factor you think is likely to influence which potential result. Similarly, make it clear if you hypothesize a direct or inverse association—again don’t use those words, but make it clear.
Step 3: A well-crafted survey question that measures your predictor variable. Keeping it simple is OK, but be sure to follow the guidelines in the lesson related to avoiding problems in survey questions.
Step 4: A well-crafted survey question that measures your outcome variable. Keeping it simple is OK, but be sure to follow the guidelines in the lesson related to avoiding problems in survey questions.
Step 5: A summary of what happened when you searched the literature for validated measures of your predictor. Use references and citations, as appropriate.
Step 6: A summary of what happened when you searched the literature for validated measures of your outcome. Use references and citations, as appropriate.
Step 7: Your choice of validated survey questions to measure the predictor variable, if you were able to identify validated measures.
Step 8: Your choice of validated survey questions to measure the outcome variable. It is acceptable to use validated measures/questions word for word from the source, but indicate that you are doing so.
Remember to provide complete references to all sources discussed in your post.

1. The research paper will be a total of five (5) pages:
Page one (1): Title/Cover page;
Pages two – four (2-4): body of paper – body will be three (3) typed pages total;
Page five (5)/ last page: Reference page
2.
Page One (1): The Title/Cover page will be as follows:
a. Title of paper centered on the page;
b. In bottom, right-hand corner of title page:
i. Your name;““““““““““““`1
ii. Due date;
iii. Class period;
iv. Instructor’s name: Dr. Rouse pPages two through four (2-4): The body of the paper begins on the second page and
continues through page four (4).
The body of the paper is actually three (3) typed pages.
Page five (5): The last page of the paper is the Reference page.
The proper way to cite`
references is included. (May want to utilize: http://easybib.com/.)
5. Plagiarism will be rewarded a grade of “0”.
6. You must have at least three (3) references for the paper. Paraphrase and use in-text
documentation. DO NOT use quotes.

Use these headings as the title of each body ( the typed pages) “Introduction,” “Cause,” “Symptoms”, and
“Treatments, cures, or prevention” of the condition.

416784
8 minutes ago
I would like if you could also to write about its origin, if its a DNA virus, family inherited, why is not curable, how it effects the immune system, when its the most active, can you still give blood. thank you

Review the Walden and
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 1: Developing an Academic and Professional Network
When was the last time you read Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions and Several Steps in my Sickness—Meditation XVII?
Unless you are a student of 17th-century poetry, you may not be all that familiar with this piece by author John Donne. However, you may be much more familiar with one of its well-known phrases: “No man is an island.”
As you begin your journey toward achieving your academic and professional goals, you have a great opportunity to network with academics and professionals who can help ensure you do not travel alone. This network can help to clarify your own vision for success and can help guide you now and in the future. To paraphrase Donne, no one is an island.
Begin creating an academic and professional network by identifying which academic and professional connections and resources you need to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
To Prepare:
Consider individuals, departments, teams, and/or resources within Walden University and within your profession that you believe can support your academic and professional success.
Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals, colleagues, or teams to collaborate with to help you be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
Download the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
The Assignment:
Academic and Professional Network
Complete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template. Be sure to address the following:
Clearly and accurately identify at least two academic individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
Clearly and accurately identify at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
Clearly and thoroughly explain in detail why the academic and professional individuals/teams were selected to support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
Clearly and accurately explain how the academic and professional individuals/teams will support success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
By Day 7
Submit Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.
Submission and Grading Information

no soucre needed
Describe a game or activity that you would modify to meet the needs of a child with a hearing or vision impairment or loss. Tell about the modifications Between 150-250 words.

—-Instructions—-

The paper should be 6 pages single spaced; not including the works cited page and title page.
However, the paper sources should be MLA and should contain in-text citations.
Also, before you send it to me, please provide me with a .docx copy of the research paper that you wrote.
The sources should contain 3 sources in JSTOR. If you don’t have access to JSTOR, then leave this requirement to me.

—-DIRECTIONS—-
I would also like to provide you with an understanding of what this paper is about. It is about OPEC, or the Organization of Petroleum-Exporting Countries, and understanding how it sets the prices of petroleum around the price. What is the criterion that they use to set the prices (Is it mathematics? or Is it pure will?). What effect does the price that they set have on the global economy?

Page 1: Introduction (What is OPEC? What is its history?)
Page 2: How does it set the price? (How does it calculate projected supply of member’s nations.)
Page 3: Continuation of Page 3.
Page 4: Add graph and explain. (The explanation should be about 2/3 of the page.)
Page 5: How does it affect other producers of oil, outside of the OPEC constituent states. (Does Russia change their production in accordance? How do the oil majors react to this?)
Page 6: How does it affect the commodity price of oil? Internationally.
Page 7: Add a graph (The explanation should be 2/3 of the page).
Page 8: Conclusion (Summarize everything that has been said before.)

Citation is important!

Describe and discuss (at least) two aspects of the story of Arachne that are typical or characteristic of Greek myth or of Ovid’s Metamorphoses.
Which characteristic conflicts or patterns does the story of Arachne illustrate? Are there ways in which this story differs or departs from expected patterns?

The story is uploaded and aspects, and characteristic conflicts or patterns are uploaded

USE Three quotes

Study the paintings “The Third of May,” by Francisco Goya on page 826, and “Guernica,” by Pablo Picasso on page 1033.
Choose one of paintings listed above, research the history and subject matter of that painting and read about the artist’s life, temperament, etc. Then write a paper using the following directions:
Describe in detail the shapes, lighting and the colors used in the painting.
Describe the subject matter of the painting.
Analyze how the shapes, lighting and colors support or detract from the subject matter of the painting?
Analyze how the shapes, lighting and colors work to express a particular mood or emotion in the painting you chose.