Best Writer

Write a 3-4 page (750-1000 word) thematic analysis of this module. In your essay, you must discuss the main reading (Things Fall Apart), at least two secondary readings (“The Second Coming,” The Epic of Mwindo, and/or Antigone), and at least two artists/works of art or movies.
Choose and analyze one of the following themes, using examples from each of the required elements:
the image of the hero (verbal and visual)
tradition and change
the way culture impacts ideas of heroism, or tradition, or change
the roles of women and/or children
resistance

You have just been hired as a new leader within your department. The department currently has low employee morale and engagement. There is currently a lack of trust due to several business changes within your department, including letting go of several nurses and replacing their their position their positions with LPN’s. Additionally, the volume within your department is beloww budget, impacting employee’s work schedules, which has also led to decrease engagement.

There have been several leadership changes over the past couple of years within your department and the employees feel as though these changes have led to reduced communication. Your task as the new leader within your department is to come up with an action plan to address the aforementioned concerns, rebuild trust, and increase employee engagement and morale.

You will have 15 minutes to present your engagement plans to the panel. Please be specific with your action items and include pertinent details and timelines that you would use to address the above.

In a well-organized essay of a recommended
minimum of 1500 words (three
double-spaced pages typed in 12-point Times Roman font), identify and explain
the Oedipal pattern and the varying “instructive” implications of its manifestation
in the following five works: either the Adam and Eve or the Cain and Abel
episode of the Old Testament, Oedipus the
King, “Medea,” Morte D’Arthur, and
Othello. Please note that this essay exam, like all
others that have been given in this class this semester, is primarily a test of
your knowledge and grasp of concepts that have been taught in this class this
semester and that it is a test as well of your basic skills in composition and
text-based analysis. The further
recommendation is that you devote at least one “chunky” support paragraph to
each of the five aforementioned works and that your paper include a descriptive
definition of the Oedipal pattern as that pattern has been descriptively
defined in this class. Your papers will
be graded accordingly.
This paper has to be on Oedipus the king, Adam and Eve in Genesis 1-3, Medea, death of Arthur, and Othello. The paper has to explain the Oedipal patterns of all five stories.

In many computer classes we use the OSI model as a mechanism for describing digital communications. In the context of digital network traffic analysis, why is observing a common taxonomy and lexicon so important? Imagine if the OSI model had not been created, how would investigators be able to describe their findings?

Please avoid generalities and discuss specific issues with respect to that worldview.

You must include at least one scholarly citation. This is not a “book report”, so please use your citation to underpin your understanding of the subject matter but do not simply summarize your source. You are also not allowed to use quotations from your source, nor are you allowed to plagiarize.

· Relevant and appropriate use of literary vocabulary throughout
· An introductory paragraph that explains what happens in the poem, the same way you would summarize a story.
· A thesis that answers the above question
· Three body paragraphs that provide support for your thesis
o Three topic sentences – one for each body paragraph – that make a claim requiring support (do not put quotes into your topic sentences) and which are driven by your thesis. They must align with your thesis viewpoint.
o Supporting discussion that focuses on imagery, word choice, metaphors and similes.
o Explanation of each quoted word, phrase or line, showing how this evidence supports your claim.
· A concluding paragraph that leaves the reader some food for thought
· MLA formatting, in-text citations, and Works Cited page.

In Article I of the Florida constitution, there is a declaration of rights…
Name 5 of the many rights included in the declaration:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Now, briefly describe (don’t block quote!) each right in your own words. Then make a note if the Florida right has an equivalent in the US Constitutio
website for the florida constitution:
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?submenu=3#A1S02

How to Organize ESSAY III (400 words)
[Intro./5 lines]: Define the idea of “friendship,” using a dictionary definition (be sure to cite the website at the end of the paper). Then define the idea of friendship in your own terms. Preview in the Introduction what will follow in the Body Paragraphs: you will discuss the idea in the poem; what defines a “genuine” friendship and the destructive process the friendship undergoes in the poem; and then, on the basis of your experience, describe a friendship you had; and suggest how disagreements between friends can be settled amicably.
[Body Para. 1]: Describe what happens between the “two friends” in the poem (lines 1 to 16). A process unfolds, starting with a “quarrel” and ending with separation. What is needed in this section is a summary of the story-line.
[Body Para. 2]: Can a genuine friendship undergo the destructive process outlined in the poem? Is a real friendship something that lasts and endures during hard times? Explain
[Body Para. 3]: We all have had friendships. Can you describe one or more friendships you have had? Was one different from another? How? Do you think the relationship of the “two friends” in the poem was a genuine friendship? What qualities does a real or true friend have? You need not respond to every question, but you should try to compose a coherent paragraph.
[Body Para. 4/ Conclusion]: Everyone quarrels from time to time. Explain ways quarreling friends can reconcile with each other? What behaviors and attitudes are necessary for two friends to overcome differences? Are some things beyond reconciliation?
based on:

Link 1: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/errico-malatesta-anarchy-and-violencehttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/errico-malatesta-anarchy-and-violenceobjective is fairly straightforward: provide a substantive summary of the readings of that
week, highlighting the themes that they cover and the
perspectives they offer.
For full credit, you
must include ALL of the readings in your summary
.

Using the information provided in the case study, complete Sections B, C, and D (pp. 5–10), typing your answers into a separate document.
Be sure that your completed document contains your responses to all questions from Sections B, C, and D of the case study.
Prior to submitting your Epidemiological Measures Case Study, review the Module 3 Case Study Assignment Rubric located in the Course Information page.

Compose an argument of evaluation in your favorite genre (my favorite genre are technology, working out. family, and sell improvement.) : make and defend a claim about the quality of some object, item, work, person, or place within your area of interest or special knowledge. Let your argument demonstrate an interest you hold, as well as an expert you gain through research for this writing project. Integrate at least two visuals into your paper. These visuals should support and develop your claims and must be formatted using the following guidelines, as part of your grade will rely on proper formatting of your visuals:
“MLA Format – Visual Aids – MLA Style” from Rutgers University
(Links to an external site.)
“Using Figures in MLA Format” from Sierra College
(Links to an external site.)
You should also integrate at least three outside sources to support your and develop evaluative claim. These sources do not include your visuals–they are separate.
STEPS TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT:
1. Research Your Topic
You can research issues of evaluation by using the following sources:
journals, reviews, and magazines (for current political and social issues)
books (for assessing judgments about history, policy, etc.)
biographies (for assessing people)
research reports and scientific studies
books, magazines, and websites for consumers
periodicals and websites that cover entertainment and sports
blogs and social media sites that explore current topics
2. Formulate a Claim
After exploring your subject, try to draw up a full and specific claim that lets readers know where you stand and on what criteria you’ll base your judgments. Come up with a thesis that’s challenging enough to attract readers’ attention. In developing a thesis, you might begin with questions like these:
What exactly is my opinion? Where do I stand?
Can I make my judgment more clear-cut?
Do I need to narrow or qualify my claim?
By what standards will I make my judgment?
Will readers or viewers accept my criteria, or will I have to defend them, too? What criteria might others offer?
What evidence or major reasons can I offer in support of my evaluation?
3. Articulate a Thesis
For a conventional evaluation, such as a book or restaurant review, your thesis should be a complete statement. In one sentence, make a claim of evaluation and state the reasons that support it. Be sure your claim is specific. Anticipate the questions the readers might have: Who? What? Where? Under what conditions? With what exceptions? In all cases? Don’t expect readers to guess where you stand.
For a more exploratory argument, you might begin (and even end) with questions about the process of evaluation itself. What are the qualities we seek–or ought to–in our political leaders? What does it say about our cultural values when we find so many viewers enthralled by so-called reality shows on television? What might be the criteria for collegiate athletic programs consistent with the values of higher education? Projects that explore topics like these might not begin with straightforward theses or have the intention to persuade readers.
Examples of Evaluative Claims (Thesis Statements)
Though they may never receive Oscars for their work, Tom Cruise and Angela Bassett deserve credit as actors who have succeeded in a wider range or film roles than most of their contemporaries.
The much-vaunted population shift back to urban areas in the United States has really been mostly among rich, educated, and childless people who can afford the high costs of living there.
The most remarkable aspect of Elon Musk as an entrepreneur is the way he blatantly uses public money to build his companies–from Tesla to SpaceX.
Jimmy Carter has been praised for his work as a former president of the United States, but history may show that even his much-derided term in office laid the groundwork for the foreign policy and economic successes now attributed to later administrations.
Young adults today are shying away from diving into the housing market because they no longer believe that homeownership is a key element in economic success.
4. Organize Your Argument
Your evaluation should include each of the following elements:
a clear evaluative claim that makes a judgment about a person, idea, or subject
the criterion or criteria by which you’ll measure your subject
an explanation or justification of the criteria (if necessary)
evidence that the particular subject meets or falls short of the stated criteria
consideration of alternative views and counterarguments
All these elements are present in strong arguments of evaluation, but they don’t follow a specific order. In addition, you’ll need an opening/introductory paragraph to explain what you’re evaluating and why. Tell readers why they should care about this subject and take this claim seriously.
5. Revise and Edit
Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis organized around a definite topic.
6. Format Properly
Your final draft should be 3-4 pages (double-spaced, TNR font, 1” margins). This length requirement does not include your images, so plan accordingly. When citing your outside source(s), follow MLA format–see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/
(Links to an external site.)
for an excellent resource on MLA. Don’t forget to include your visual aid and format it properly (see the resources listed above).
Grading Criteria: Your essay should
(1) make an evaluative claim (a thesis) about a person, idea, or subject;
(2) identify the criterion or criteria by which you’ll measure your subject and offer an explanation or justification of the criteria (if necessary);
(3) provide sufficient evidence and analysis that the particular subject meets or falls short of the stated criteria;
(4) offer consideration of alternative views and counterarguments; and
(5) integrate at least two visual aids AND at least three additional outside sources using correct MLA format to support your evaluation.