Best Writer

Select one use of emerging technology (such as those explored in the previous modules), and develop a final project using that technology. You will not receive instruction on how to use the specific technologies, it is your responsibility to find examples of emerging technology that may apply to your situation and search for tutorials. Please test out a few ideas, then submit a project proposal before you begin.

In addition to the project, develop a 5-7 page paper that explains your project from beginning to end including how the technology you selected will be used in your classroom/program. Assess your choice of technology. Is it user-friendly? Is it too costly for teacher/school? Would the learning curve be too high? Does it protect student/classroom privacy? If you can find a professional article to support your assessment, even better!

Some examples include:

Develop a video for families that includes the current recommendations for the use of technology. Your paper might outline the research on this topic and explain how your presentation was developed. Then you might show the presentation to some families and then assess their response to the presentation in your paper. Do you think it was effective?
Develop a website that provides information and resources for the families in your program. Your paper might explain how and why you developed the website, the lessons learned and future professional recommendations. You might share the final website with families and ask for their feedback. Is it helpful? Then explain how it aligns with NAEYC standards for parent involvement and technology.
Rubric: Please provide the following components in your paper:

Topic or purpose of project explained (include link to your project if possible)
Success and challenges discussed
Assess your technology; Did it serve it’s purpose? Why or why not?
Discuss how the project falls within NAEYC and ITSE recommendations and guidelines
Find at least two outside resources to support your work and add a reference page at the end of your paper.
Upper level writing and APA style is expected

Primary Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 200–250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
For this Discussion Board, please complete the following:
This week you will learn about fiduciary duty. Fiduciary duty is the legal obligation of one person or party to act in the best interest of another person or party. A common example of fiduciary duty is when top management of an organization is acting in the best interest of the shareholders who own the organization.
Charles is the CEO of a car company. Charles knows that the car has a defect and should be recalled. If Charles recalls the car the company will go bankrupt. Does Charles have a fiduciary duty to tell the car company’s shareholders? Why or why not?
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 50–100-word reply about their Primary Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following question:
What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Discussion Board Rubric
Expectation Points Possible Points Earned Comments
Application of Learning Material Content: Post demonstrates understanding of Learning Material content.
20
Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from discipline.
20
DB Responses: Responds substantively to two posts. Responses encourage interaction in the Discussion Board and classroom community.
20
Organization: Post presents information logically and is clearly relevant to discussion topic.
8
Professional Language: Posts contain accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few or no errors. (APA formatting is not required.)
7
Total Points
75
Total Points Earned

Who are you? What do you believe? What cognitive biases do you have? These are big questions to answer, but necessary to consider before moving forward in your professional life.
In a one- to two-page paper, consider the people and experiences that have shaped how you see yourself, how you see life, and, most importantly, how they have shaped your biases.
List and then describe a minimum of three things you believe to be true, such as the existence of God, right vs. wrong, morality, and what it means to be a “good” person.
Explain, in detail, how you acquired these beliefs (including the other people or experiences that have influenced you most), why these beliefs are important and how these beliefs will influence how you engage with people and policies in your future career. Do not simply say something like, “I believe in doing the right thing because it is the right thing.” You must really dig deep into your psyche and analyze your own perspective of the world; make your brain hurt!
Most importantly, discuss at least two cognitive biases discussed in Chapter 1 that you might be most subject to and why. Integrate these into your three beliefs and analyze the ways in which they shape you.
There is no right or wrong answer to these questions, but your in-depth insight is important.
Your paper must be in APA Style, typed, and proofread. You do not need an abstract or outside references for this paper

Article Review Assignment:
Locate a scholarly article on leadership. Write a 3-4 pages APA format summary of your article. This does not include your cover sheet and references. Include the following in your written summary.
Title of the article
Author of the article
Title of the journal
Year of publication
Summarize the main ideas of the article, arguments, positions, and findings in your own words.
Critique the contributions of the material, identify the gaps, contradictions, and any inconsistencies in the article. Look for unanswered questions in the article
Conclusion: Write your own opinion about the significance of the article. What did you learn from the article? Give reasons why you support the work of the author. If you disagree, give your reasons for your decision.

Critique-Consistently employs critical analysis to research and analyze the scholarly article; effectively synthesizes data to draw strong conclusions and value for the article. Excellent job in critiquing the contributions of the material, identify the gaps, contradictions, and identifying any inconsistencies in the article. Clearly notes and discusses any unanswered questions related to the article. Uses other sources and show strong connections to that interview. Accurately adheres to APA standards; the reference page and citations are correct.

Write a three-page paper regarding Unions. How they came about. Why they came about. What do the unions do for the workers in today’s work environment? Or write a three-page paper about the labor market and why it is important. What are the different aspects of the labor market? How does the labor market affect the Foodservice industry? must include three sources and Also I need a draft.

Commercial insurance ranges from individual health coverage to automobile liability coverage. All commercial policies have similarities and differences, and there are critical areas to address in billing for each type.
Tasks:
Describe at least three commercial insurance programs.
Provide the major features of each program.
Discuss how these programs differ from each other.
Briefly describe how to bill for each program.

ASSIGNMENT: Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below,
choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic
throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this
assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The
topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic,
meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot
be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society.
You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and
logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research
question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this
pre-writing process.

A. Topic Selection Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: You may choose any topic you wish as long as the
topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society.
Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and
should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be
newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be
sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the
Touchstone.
B. Research Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Research Question and Working Thesis
Keep in mind: The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed
as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.
2. Detailed Outline
Keep in mind: Your detailed outline provides a map of the
argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key
claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your
sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your
essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require
researched evidence as support.
❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s).
❒ An introduction, at least five body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each paragraph, as relevant, indicating the support for the key points
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or
information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping
corn/soy and production”).
3. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and
included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
C. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
Learning to conduct research is important because it is a skill you
will use both in academia and in your professional life. It improves
critical thinking and empowers you to find information for yourself.
Consider the process of researching as a whole. What was the most
challenging aspect of the process for you? (2-3 sentences)
The working thesis statement is a proposed answer to your research
question. It should clearly identify a debatable topic and take a
position on one side of that topic. Analyze the effectiveness of your
working thesis statement. (3-4 sentences)
A detailed outline is an effective tool for laying out the
progression of an argument. It allows you to consider the arrangement
and organization of your ideas, as well as choose places to incorporate
outside source materials. Review your detailed outline and summarize the
argument you’ve presented. (3-4 sentences)
You will use the same topic on three of the remaining Touchstones in
this course. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you? What are
specific questions you might have as you go deeper into the research
process? (2-3 sentences)
E. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Double-space the outline and use one-inch margins.
Use a readable 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
Submission must include your research question, working thesis, outline, and reflection questions.
Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

Analyze the case and opinion in Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir.) located in your textbook on pp. 337-342.
Write a case study review of Judge Griffin’s opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.
What are the legal issues presented in this case? Did the plaintiff establish a valid claim of failure to reasonably accommodate? What did the appeals court decide?
What accommodations was Keith requesting? Was it reasonable? Support your opinion with an argument based on the course concepts and existing legal evidence or precedents.
Did the county follow the interactive process required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? What did they do well? What could they have done differently?
Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

This exercise tests your critical thinking and analysis skills of basic geographic phenomena from this week’s reading. It has TWO parts.

Part 2
Identify sources where necessary, unless explicitly stated, and be sure to list them at the end of your response. Please be respectful and considerate of the diversity of worldviews and opinions shared by those in the class as you reflect and write on this week’s prompt.

Read:
Breaking Barriers: The Role of
Community-Based and Systems-Based Victim Advocates ✓
Training Module (pp. 1-62)
Shepherds of the Criminal Justice System:
County Program Helps Victims through the Adjudication Process ✓
Full Article (https://www.bendbulletin.com/localstate/shepherds-of-the-criminal-justice-system/article_ca68cccd-f7df-557b-b77e-a4f28e390ec8.html)
Sexual Assault Survivors Turned Activists ✓
Full Article (https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a16068/women-sexual-assault-activists/)
Webster defines an “advocate” as a
person “who supports or promotes the interests of a cause or group.”
In victim services, advocates play a critical role in helping
individuals whose lives have been disrupted and forever changed by crime.
Referencing this week’s readings, answer the following questions:
·
Is a systems-based
advocate truly able to “advocate” for victims as defined above?
·
Some community-based
domestic violence organizations and rape crisis centers have been known to
employ survivors. Can you think of any potential risks to having a
survivor work at these agencies in a direct services capacity?

·
When considering
Webster’s definition, is there an advocacy role that would lend itself
particularly well to a survivor? In other words, in what ways might a
survivor be effective in advocating for victims beyond a direct services
role?

·
Discuss systems-based
advocacy, community-based advocacy and survivor-based advocacy as symbiotic.
In other words, how can different advocacy fields complement one another in
promoting and advancing the interests of victims at large?