Best Writer

Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance, with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.
Introduction
In the era of health care reform, many of the laws and policies set forth by government at the local, state, and federal levels have specific performance benchmarks related to care delivery outcomes that organizations must achieve. It is critical for organizational success that the interprofessional care team is able to understand reports and dashboards that display the metrics related to performance and compliance benchmarks.
Maintaining standards and promoting quality in modern health care are crucial, not only for the care of patients, but also for the continuing success and financial viability of health care organizations. In the era of health care reform, health care leaders must understand what quality care entails and how quality in health care connects to the standards set forth by relevant federal, state, and local laws and policies. An understanding of relevant benchmarks that result from these laws and policies, and how they relate to quality care and regulatory standards, is also vitally important.
Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy-in from stakeholders.
Note: Your evaluation of dashboard metrics for this assessment is the foundation on which all subsequent assessments are based. Therefore, you must complete this assessment first.
Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.
Review the performance dashboard metrics, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Structure your report so that it will be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need, and be sure to cite the relevant health care policies or laws when evaluating metric performance against established benchmarks.
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft report to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.
Preparation
Choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your evaluation:
Option 1: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation Simulation
Use the data presented in the Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation multimedia activity as the basis for your evaluation.
Note: The writing that you do as part of the simulation could serve as a starting point to build upon for this assessment.
Option 2: Actual Dashboard
Use an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation. If you decide to use actual dashboard metrics, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:
The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
The specific type of care delivery.
The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.
Note: Ensure your data are Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.
Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard
If you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be underperforming the prescribed benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:
The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
The specific type of care delivery.
The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.
Note: Ensure your data are HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.
Note: Your evaluation of dashboard metrics for this assessment is the foundation on which all subsequent assessments are based. Therefore, you must complete this assessment first.
Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.
Review the performance dashboard metrics, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Structure your report so that it will be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need, and be sure to cite the relevant health care policies or laws when evaluating metric performance against established benchmarks.
Requirements
The report requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
Which metrics are not meeting the benchmark for the organization?
What are the local, state, or federal health care policies or laws that establish these benchmarks?
What conclusions can you draw from your evaluation?
Are there any unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where additional information could improve your evaluation?
Analyze one challenge that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team.
Consider the following examples:
Strategic direction.
Organizational mission.
Resources.
Staffing.
Financial: Operational and capital funding.
Logistical considerations: Physical space.
Support services (any ancillary department that gives support to a specific care unit in the organization, such as pharmacy, cleaning services, dietary, et cetera).
Cultural diversity in the organization and community.
Procedures and processes.
Address the following:
Why do the challenges you identified contribute, potentially, to benchmark underperformance?
What assumptions underlie your conclusions?
Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
Focus on the benchmark you chose to target for improvement. Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?
State the benchmark underperformance that is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team.
State the benchmark that affects the greatest number of patients. Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff?
Include how this underperformance affect the community that the organization serves.
Include the greatest opportunity to improve the overall quality of care or performance of the organization or interpersonal team and, ultimately, to improve patient outcomes, as you think about the issue and the current poor benchmark outcomes.
Advocate for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance.
Who would be an appropriate group of stakeholders to act on improving your identified benchmark metric?
Why should the stakeholder group take action?
What are some ethical actions the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Proofread your report, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your evaluation and analysis.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 1 Example [PDF].
Report Format and Length
Format your report using APA style.
Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]. An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your report. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
A running head on all pages.
Appropriate section headings.
Be sure your report is 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 4–6 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your analysis of challenges, evaluation of potential for improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.
Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your report to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze relevant health care laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.
Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team.
Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
Advocate for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance.
Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform health care laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.
Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Analyze and compare the roles international alliances played in world politics on the eve of WWI, WWII, and during and after the Cold War.

Personality Theory
[WLOs: 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
For your Final Paper, you will identify and synthesize the concepts and constructs of personality theory that you find to be the most accurate and appropriate in explaining personality and development.
Throughout the course, you have engaged, probed, picked apart, and evaluated the thinking of a large number of theorists who wrote during different historical periods from different disciplinary, paradigmatic, and ideological perspectives. Based on different realms of human experience, the theorists moved toward a fundamental understanding of a single topic and fundamental question: What is the human personality, and, more generally, what makes us what we are as individuals and as a species?
You have already begun this task by identifying what you feel are the most compelling concepts in the first four of the seven theoretical models covered in the course during the Week 3 Primary Concepts assignment. You will continue that process in the first part of this Personality Theory Final Paper by identifying what you find to be the most compelling concepts in the remaining three models. Then you will continue that assessment by synthesizing the concepts of personality that
Best explain the roles of heredity and environment.
Provide the best means of assessing personality.
Provide the best theoretical explanation for your personal journey of personality development.
Provide the most useful applications for you as a scholar and professional.
Your paper should be organized according to the following scheme, with sections organized under the following APA-formatted headings. Address the following specifications for each heading. (For instructions on writing proper headings and other document elements, see the Writing Center’s APA Style Elements.)
In your paper, include the following:
Introduction
Start your paper with a general, academic introduction to the topic of theories of personality.
Explain what you plan to cover and the direction your paper will take.
Major Concepts
In Week 3, you identified what you considered to be the most important concepts from the psychodynamic, the neurobiological, the cognitive, and the trait models of personality. In this section of the Final Paper, you will present a concept from each of the remaining three models—behavioral, interpersonal, and self-psychology models.
For each of these three concepts:
Apply a proper APA heading to separate the section.
Describe the concept.
Identify the theorist associated with the concept.
Provide a rationale for why the selected concept is the most applicable from that model.
Keep in mind that the object of this assignment is to identify and discuss a specific concept from each model and not to focus on just one model or provide overviews of the models per se.
The Roles of Heredity and Environment
In this class, we have explored the roles heredity, the environment, and epigenetics play in the development of personality. In this section,
Synthesize your views on how heredity and the environment affect personality development.
Assessment in Personality Theory
In this section, reflect on the various methods for assessing personality that have been presented in this course, and select one that you feel is most useful.
Describe briefly the assessment method that you believe is most useful in assessing personality.
Justify your selection of this method.
Personal Applications
In this section of the paper, reflect on your personality and address the following items:
Identify which of the seven models best explains your developmental journey.
Provide at least one specific example of an element or elements of your personality that are explained by your selected model.
Career Applications
In this section, consider how you can use the knowledge from this course as a professional, addressing the following item:
Explain how you can use the knowledge you have gained about personality development to help achieve your career goals.
Conclusion
Provide a brief conclusion, addressing the following:
Summarize the ideas presented in your synthesis of, and reflection on, personality theory.
The Personality Theory Final Paper
Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and must use proper APA headings with all document and citation formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word resource.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Student’s name
Name of institution (University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Due date
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voiceresource for additional guidance.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions as well as Writing a Thesis Statement, refer to the Writing Center resources.
Must use at least six scholarly sources in addition to the course text and other required sources to support your conclusions, including at least one scholarly source for each substantive section.
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view The University of Arizona Global Campus Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper guide.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
To help you to do really well on the Week 5 assignment, I will provide some advice that is based on some of the issues I identified in the Week 3 Assignment for some of the submissions I have received.
First of all, you do not need to write anything about the four models that we dealt with in the Week 3 Assignment. Secondly, please keep in mind that the following is needed for each of the models: (a) identification of the theorist, (b) identification and a detailed description of the concept, (c) a connection needs to be made between the concept and personality development, and (d) a clear statement and a detailed (comprehensive) rationale about why the chosen concept is most appropriate for the model of personality needs to be included. Starting your rationale with a sentence such as the following will be helpful: This concept is the most appropriate for this model of personality because…
For the section on heredity, the environment, and epigenetics, be sure to discuss epigenetics at length. Also, be sure to discuss heredity and environment as well. Finally, make certain to apply all of them to personality development.
For the question about assessments, please refer back to the Week 1 Assignment to refresh your memory about the types of assessments that exist. Note that an instrument, such as the MMPI, is not an assessment method.
For the discussion about personality development, be sure to state the model of personality. It would be good to also discuss a concept that comes from within that model of personality to illustrate how that model of personality explains your personal journey.
For the discussion about how you can use the knowledge you gained about personality development to help achieve career goals, be sure to state your own career goals and to discuss them at length.
Be sure to use scholarly sources throughout your entire paper. This can sometimes mean the difference between a “proficient” and a “distinguished” rating.
Be sure to submit your work to Turnitin before submitting it for evaluation.
For your final paper, the location of concepts are as follows:
(a) From your chapter on the behavioral model of personality…
Do not use theories from Chapter 5.1 and 5.2 (e.g., Pavlov, Skinner, etc.) as these theorists did not have a behavioral theory that applies to personality.
Do use concepts from Chapter 5.3: Theoretical Models Applied to Personality and 5.4 is okay, too.
From your chapter on the interpersonal model of personality…
Do not use theories from Chapter 7.1, but do use information from 7.2
From your chapter on the self-psychology model of personality…
Do not use theories from Chapters 9.1 and 9.2, but do use information from 9.3
(b) The link to the video, which might be helpful in understanding the differences between concepts, theories, and models follows:
The difference between Concepts Models and Theories (Links to an external site.)

complete a research paper on AT &T.
provide a detailed
history of the organization.
provide details on the type of leadership that the
organization has.
Provide an overview of the products and services that the
organization offers.
identify what has been the effect on the organization due to
COVID19.
Identify what are they doing differently since being in a
pandemic to continue to serve their customers.
What is the organization’s outlook after COVID19 has ended?
Share with us something about the organization that you were
not aware of.
paper should be a full two to three pages.
use APA formatting.
You will create a PowerPoint presentation from the
information in your paper.
Please provide speaking notes for this – The oral presentation should be a minimum of 2 minutes and with a max of 3.

Please provide any references used and use at least one a peer reviewed research article published between 2016 – 2021. This assignment
uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. The
purpose of this assignment is to develop an awareness of challenges associated with interoperability. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

analyze the current state of interoperability. Include the following:

1. Describe the importance of data integrity in health care.
2. Explain barriers to interoperability and health information exchange.
3. Identify at least five key challenges of data storage and maintaining data integrity.
4. Propose one solution to each challenge you have researched.
5. Describe at least five standards recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC-HIT) that are applicable to interoperability.

This week, reflect on all that you have accomplished in this course and throughout your program. Consider the following items for this week’s discussion, and discuss a minimum of two. You are welcome, and encouraged, to discuss as many as you like.
Do you think you will use the ePortfolio you created as a career tool or for other purposes? How can the ePortfolio support the professional goals you set?
How have you evolved as a nurse throughout the course of your studies? Were there any unexpected gains? Did you achieve all that you hoped you would when you began the program?
What challenges did you overcome during your studies? How did you rise above them?
Will your professional role with your colleagues, formal or informal, change now that you have furthered your education and gained new insights into the profession? Explain.
Recall one of your most memorable and/or most challenging courses or assignments or academic experiences. Describe how this experience impacted you professionally and/or personally.
What recommendations would you have for other RNs coming into the program? What tips or words of advice would you offer?

After viewing the movie, “The Breakfast Club,” write a 4-5 analysis of group development and group dynamics displayed. Be detailed in your paper by providing vivid examples seen in the movie. Be sure to use the character names. I’m mostly interested in measuring your ability to capture the life of a group from beginning to end along with identification group dynamics (covered in chapters 1-4 in your textbook). Your book details what the different stages of group development look like in chapters 10-12. I also want you to include narrative on problem members from the movie (covered in chapter 13 of your textbook). Use the group role theory handout provided to aid you with defining group member roles seen in the movie. You will include the following in your paper based in the movie:
Address the following concepts as displayed in the movie-
Group dynamics (Chapter’s 1-4 in the textbook)
Group development (Chapter’s 10-12 in the textbook)
Problem Members and Group Role Theory (Chapter 13 in the textbook and course handout)
Analyze the group in the movie on four issues-
Leadership- Describe the different approaches to leadership represented by the group. What theory or theories explain(s) the leadership of this group?
Participation-What were some of the participation problems confronted by the group? How did the group deal with these problems?
Climate- Describe the communication climate throughout most of the day in detention. What specific verbal and non-verbal behaviors contributed to this climate?
Conflict- What were some of the conflict styles of group members? How successful were conflicts resolved in the group?
4 to 5 page in length, plus a title page and reference page (6-7 total pages).
Paper should follow APA mechanics and be in paragraph form.
12 point font using Time New Roman or Arial
1″ margins, doubled spaced
Textbook must be used and properly cited as well as the movie.
Any additional sources used must be properly listed and identified in a reference page and in alphabetical order.
You must cite your sources (author’s last name and year) throughout your paper or you will risk a failing grade on your paper.
Proper grammar and spelling is required.

Samuel Beckett, Company and Selected Plays (Dr C. Gordon)

A voice comes to one in the dark. Imagine.
(Company)
… she did not know … what position she was in … imagine! … what position she was in! . . whether standing … or sitting … but the brain– … what?… kneeling? … yes … whether standing … or sitting … or kneeling … but the brain– … what? … lying? … yes … whether standing … or sitting … or kneeling … or lying …
(Not I)
Beckett uses the word ‘imagine’ and variations on it throughout Company and Not I, but its meaning and significance do not remain constant across all these texts, opening it up to myriad interpretations. Closely analyze how Beckett uses and reuses the word and, drawing on a range of carefully chosen examples, write about how he challenges assumptions about the role of imagination in literature and theatre in Company and Not I.
NOTE: The first sentence of Company generates (at least) three possible readings if read carefully. Read all your examples with attention to who is speaking, who is being spoken to, and the potential for ambiguity.

After reviewing the Study Materials for this module on free speech, trolls, and disinformation campaigns, consider your own experience online. Have you or someone you know ever had an experience with challenging online phenomena like trolling, cyber-hate speech, or disinformation campaigns? Who do you think should be responsible for overseeing the web—individuals, online communities, corporations, governments, or international coalitions?
Choose one of the themes discussed in The Future of Free Speech,Trolls, Anonymity, and Fake News Online and, in a paper of 500 to 750 words (approximately 2 to 3 pages), develop a policy to address the issues raised by your selected theme. Discuss steps that individuals, online communities, scholars, corporations, governments, and/or international coalitions can take to successfully address the issues. Support your analysis with one or more of the ethical frameworks (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, social justice and social contract theory). Use properly cited evidence from the Study Materials to support your points.

The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity and Fake News Online

Pleasde please follow all instructions and If you are telling me the assignment that you are doing for me will not be plagarized please make sure its not. I just recieved a zero for an assignment being plaragized and possibly getting kicked out of school.

Choose one of the questions below and respond (if all of the questions are taken, make sure that your response is still unique). Put the question you’re responding to in the title of the post. When you complete your TWO replies later, make sure at least one of them is to a post about a different question from the one you answered.
1. What effect did World War II have on people of color at home and on the war front?
2. How did women contribute to the war effort, and why was that significant?
3. Trace various aspects of U.S. war efforts on the home front during World War II, including manpower, gender roles, and means of financing military operations.
4. Discuss the process of the USA moving from isolation to intervention between the end of World War I and the beginning of World War II.
5. How did World War II transform America’s standing in the world?
General Instructions:
When making your choice, remember that each question can have a maximum of 10 threads (meaning that no more than 10 people can post about the same question). This set up favors those who get their work done early, so if you’re picky, don’t wait until the last minute.
Your initial posts should be at least 200 words. Your answer should begin with a concise thesis as a direct answer to the question, analyze the main ideas presented in the readings and videos, and cite specific supporting details from the reading (I mean that you need to bring in specific examples). Answers should be original (can’t be something you copied and can’t be something that someone else has already said), detailed, and include specific examples to back up your points and/or quotations from the primary source readings (which must be accompanied by your analysis of that quotation).