Australian Insurance Law

On 15 January 2021 the UK’s Supreme Court handed down it’s decision in the Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd & Ord [2021] UKSC 1 which considered the extent to which business interruption cover may cover claims resulting form COVID-19 lockdowns and business closures. Discuss the reasoning of the UK Supreme Court and comment on whether a similar approach should be adopted in Australia.

The assessment must answer the above question (bolded) drawing on the Insurance Contracts Act 1984, the Australian Insurance regulation and policy response during COVID-19. This includes assessing the case Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd & Ord [2021] UKSC 1 and its reasoning, commenting on similar cases within Asutralia and answering whethre a similar approach to the UK should be adopted in Australia.

All referencing must be in accordance with the AGLC Melbourne

Understanding Globalization

Part A. (15 marks)
Project – Report on Globalization
· Prepare 2000-2500 words Report on Globalization. Following topics MUST be discussed with supporting data and graphs.
· Explain concept of Globalization and its history as well.
· What is need, significance and characteristics of globalization.
· Advantages and disadvantages of globalization.
· Share of top 10 countries in global GDP and international trade (table, graph and description).
· Prepare 5 years data tables and graphs separately with Exports and Imports.
· Impact of globalization on Canadian economy (economic and social).
· (Any other aspect of Globalization you think is relevant)
· Provide proper references using APA Style.

please write can get 85% and just focus on part A

Privacy Issues

Write a 3- to 4-page paper in which you present:
three (3) different workplace scenarios in which healthcare patient privacy issues occur
explain the privacy issue
identify where HIPAA, OSHA, ethics, or confidentiality have been violated
provide a strategy to avoid the identified violation(s)
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

analysis of nutrition information

Analysis of 3 meals, with nutrition information provieded. mainly focusin on creating a chart ddisplaying macro/micro nutrients and fiber. Full instructions and options for sources included in attachments.

Reading Response questions: Getting Asia Wrong – PDF is attached

ONLY USE THE ATTACHED FILE: Please answer the following questions based on the attached reading
As briefly as possible the
responses must answer the following questions:
1. What is the research question?
2. What is the central argument?
a. What is the central outcome (dependent variable) of interest the
author is trying to explain?
b. What is(are) the central independent variable(s) of interest the
author argues drives this outcome?
3. What approach does the author take to provide evidence for this
argument? What is the research design?
4. How could the work be made better? What is your opinion on the
findings?
5. Further Questions or Questions for Discussion?
To re-iterate, these memos are not intended to be heavily work-intensive, but to
help structure your reading and guide your understanding of the reading. Please
keep responses to 1-3 as brief as possible (1-2 sentences or even bullet points)
and focus your time more on putting careful thought into 4 and 5 (2-4
sentences)

Art Museums

For assignment 1, you have visited a museum – either in person or virtually. You had the opportunity to choose from a few options, but there is one commonality among all of the museums that you had to choose from: they contained a valuable collection of art that you were able to see. Museums have been around for centuries and are used to contain and display the objects that a collector thinks are important and valuable. It gives the public an opportunity to see the relics from ancient civilizations or contemporary artists. Museums are considered assets in a community, and are centers for culture and learning.
Sometimes, though, the objects that are displayed have been stolen, or mis-appropriated or out of context. They are often seen as places of privilege – the collections were created by extremely wealthy individuals or communities. Additionally, many museums disproportionally highlight works by western, Christian, white and male makers. Marginalized communities are often even more marginalized in museums. Contemporary museums are trying hard to fix some of the wrongs that have been made throughout museum history, but like in the rest of our society, they have a long way to go.
For this discussion, I’d like for you to address the following questions in your thread:
Name a positive effect that museums have had on Art. How did this affect your interpretation of the works you viewed when you did your museum visit?
Name a negative outcome of museums on Art. Was there anything that you saw that you thought wasn’t quite right on your visit?
What is something that you think could change to make museum spaces more accessible to more people?
What is your favorite way to view art in your daily life?
Please write a minimum of 200 words and a maximum of 300 words in your post. Your original thread should appear on the discussion by Thursday of this week. Then take until the end of the day on Monday (6/28) to respond to a minimum of 3 classmates’ threads. As you are responding to your classmates threads, please choose one of their points, and compare or contrast it to your own post – how are you thinking similarly? How are you thinking differently? Your responses should be at least 75 words long.

Reply to amy
To me I believe that museums have played a huge role in the representation and development of art at large. One of the effect towards art that I can think of is that they keep art alive. What I mean by this, when people who are so interested in art visit museums and get a momentous experience, they to develop interest into doing art work and becoming artists themselves, and this is improving art works. Better development of art results in production of quality work and that is more appealing and easy to interpret. During my visit I was thrilled to see some artworks that represented my culture and the extraordinary work motivated me to look more into art and hence development ability to best interpret the nice sculptures.
During my visit the only downfall of museums that I saw was loose rules of protecting the artworks. With the big crowds in the museum people tend to touch the pieces of art and some stand in front of them taking pictures and these kind of actions can be demoralizing to the pro art individuals. So I have reasons to believe that this can be destructive to art sculptures and also to the art world as a whole if more people get a demoralized and change their mind from supporting and improving art.
I think museums should not people to come in large groups and be taking pictures of each other in front of the nice works. Also there should be a time limit on the viewing platform so that there is no over crowding to allow free flow of people while viewing. Normally i did not visit museums much but I believe it’s something that I want to do more often after starting this class.

reply to mark
1. a positive effect museums have had on art is, the culture. There where African and Egypt exhibits, along with other nationalities/locations. This helps people have appreciation for all cultures. This effected my interpretation because museums where started by white, Christian, money owning males. At the beginning of museums they probably had lots of western white peoples art and not a lot of representation. So it shows that people are trying to make an effort to include more pieces from other cultures.
2. A negative, museums have had on art is how they are set up. It makes it very easy to walk by art and not truly take in the art. it is more of art work on walls and a lot of walking, instead of truly sitting down and observing a piece.
3. Something that could change to make museum spaces more accessible to more people, is having more slops for people in wheel chairs near all the stairs. Some museums also lack elevators for the elderly or people who have difficulty walking. They could also utilize outside space more and displays more work outside
4. I view art in my daily life through paintings, books, and Technology

reply Isabelle
In my opinion, museums have become so unrated because of Technology. Almost everything accessible into someone’s cellphone, but that doesn’t make museums any less dominant. An advantage of having museums can go to one place and let the art speak to you. It’s a place where you can alone or a group. The art and background information given to visitors is critical information of a person’s culture. It’s an excellent source for classes and learning and seeing new things. I don’t think it was anything specifically with these advantages of why I chose my art, but I can say the culture and learning something new was my broad focus of picking my two favorite pieces. I then was able to see what spoke to me. It’s not very many negative advantages of a museum, but the few that come to mind would be cost and design. Some Art exhibits are costly, and being for that causes for art that is only diverse to specific groups of people and not meant for everyone. Or you have the free museums, but the look on the outside is outdated, looks dull, or too prestigious that people won’t visit. I think as well some museums don’t give the new artist a chance either. A piece is a worth so much money that they instead keep it. Luckily I didn’t experience any of that. I felt the place I saw did a great job of trying to have different pieces of art that draw people to it. My only suggestion is that we make museums back to what it was about the art. Update some buildings, get newer art, or rotate art out so that other artists have a chance to speak to the world as well. I always enjoy new contemporary art by seeing it and, of course, hearing it (poetry).

Read three lectures(Zelda Fitzgerald, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernst Hemingway & The Great Gatsby), and write a response. Responses are simply a paragraph on your personal responses to the people and art covered. What engaged you and what did not? Also you could Compare and contrast.

Read three lectures(Zelda Fitzgerald, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernst
Hemingway & The Great Gatsby), and write a response. Responses are simply a paragraph on your personal responses to the people and art
covered. What engaged you and what did not? Also you could Compare and contrast.

What is the question that the philosopher is trying to answer? How does the philosopher answer the question? Why should we care?

Paper 2 – A DIFFERENT topic from your first paper: a) Reality, b) Truth and Knowledge, c) Ethics, or d) Justice
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PRESENT ONE PHILOSOPHER’S ARGUMENT FROM THE TEXTBOOK, AND DO ALL STEPS A THROUGH D. THE BULK OF YOUR PAPER WILL BE TAKEN UP BY SECTIONS B AND C:
A. What is the question that the philosopher is trying to answer? How does the philosopher answer the question? Why should we care?
B. Identify and explain every part of the philosopher’s argument, including their reasons or evidence (premises) and the conclusion they draw from these reasons or evidence. This argument should reveal the philosopher’s proposed answer to the question in b. References and quotations: Don’t just quote – put it in your own words (and cite passage page or reference numbers), and explain why you are including them and what you think it means. Then the reader can compare the quote with your interpretation of it, and measure it against their own. (See the Analytic Questions below)
C. Concede something, but then point out a problem: Tell them what they did right: good definition, true premises, valid conclusion? Say so. Then point out one of three things: a key definition is unclear or unacceptable (circular, too narrow, to broad, etc.), the conclusion does not follow (the argument is invalid or weak), or one or more of their premises (their reasons or evidence) is unclear or false (the argument is unsound or uncogent). (See the Critical Questions below)
D. Give a possible response to the problem– It is easy to point out a problem, but more challenging to come up with a response. Suggest a way for the philosopher to improve their argument? How can they improve their key definition? What other conclusion might they draw to make the argument valid or stronger? What premises are truer but still achieve the desired conclusion? Or do you concede their whole argument? If so, then explain why there is no way to improve on the philosopher’s argument. You had better be right!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read analytically and sympathetically. ANALYTIC Questions that you can ask and answer as you read.
1. What is the thesis (the central idea or main point?)
2. What are the major points made in developing and supporting the thesis?
3. How are key terms defined?
Definitions. A good definition should be:
Clear and precise
Stated in a positive form
Noncircular
Broad enough to include all cases designated by actual usage
Narrow enough to exclude cases beyond range of actual usage
4. What are the basic assumptions made by the author?
5. What are the important implications of the author’s position?
6. “I-don’t-understand…” list (brainstorm)
Read Critically. CRITICAL Questions
1. Is what is said clear? How is it unclear?
2. Are adequate definitions given for important concepts? Can you think of counterexamples?
3. Are the arguments adequate to support the claims? Are the premises true? The assumptions dubious?
4. Do the implications of the text lead to absurd or false consequences?
5. Are important aspects of the issue overlooked?
6. How well did the author accomplish her or his goal?
7. “I-don’t-agree-and-here’s-why…” list (brainstorm)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Make sure to identify and explain:
The key issues that are related to the topic and discussed in the passage.
The fundamental philosophical terms and concepts associated with your topic and are discussed.
The key teachings and methods of the philosophical figure and tradition you read about in the passage and discuss.
Also:
Be clear, careful, and correct –Your audience is your roommate. Assume your roommate has never taken a philosophy class before; can they follow along in the paper and know what is happening? Think it through. In general, avoid technical terms and jargon, or explain what they mean if you must.
Use analytic and critical questions on your own essay to check it
Read the whole assignment, and
Do every piece of the assignment!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PAPER FORMAT REQUIREMENTS:
Paper 1: 750-1000 words (3-4 pages)
Paper 2: 1250-1500 words (5-6 pages)
Post to drop box by dates listed in syllabus
“.doc”, “.docx” or “.rtf” formats only
Your full name is name of document submitted e.g. lolasmith.doc or jesusgarcia.docx (not the paper title)
Word count on front page
Name on front page
Double spaced
Spell checked
Typed in 10 to 12point font in essay form
1 inch margins on the left, right, top and bottom
Numbered

Discussion: Early European Philosophy

Discussion
Assignment

You
will complete 4 Discussions in this course.
· Initial Thread: Post one thread of
at least 300 words using at least one reference.
· Replies: Post 2 replies of at
least 150 words each using at least one reference.
References &
Citations: All Discussion posts—both initial threads and replies—require an
in-text citation and a reference at the bottom. Include at least one reference for each post. You may cite
the textbook, academic journal articles, course videos, and relevant books.
To cite does not necessarily mean to
quote. Direct quotes should be used sparingly and should make up no more than
10% of your work. It is always preferable to paraphrase, analyze, and
synthesize in your own words and to cite the source of ideas being discussed. Ensure
all citations are in proper APA format.

General Guidelines:
Statements such as “I like what you said,” “That is a good comment,” and “I
disagree with your comment” do not count as complete replies in and of
themselves. Rather, state why you liked or disliked a peer’s thread with proper
rationale to justify your response. Present additional thoughts or ideas and provide
alternative viewpoints. Courtesy in any disagreement is expected; see the Student Expectations for more
information on proper online etiquette.

If the cost of debt is the lowest choice among financing options, would increasing our percentage of debt always reduce our cost of capital? Why or why not?

If the cost of debt is the lowest choice among financing options, would increasing our percentage of debt always reduce our cost of capital? Why or why not?

What is capital structure and how important it is? What is the basic goal of financial management with regard to capital structure? How is the cost of capital related to capital structure?

answer these two questions 200 words each