Does knowledge equal justified true belief? Yes? Why? No? Why not? What requirements can you offer so that you can know what you believe and not fall prey to Gettier?

Part 1) 200 words (What is the argument, problem, or what will I argue)
Problem: Does knowledge equal justified true belief? Yes? Why? No? Why
not? What requirements can you offer so that you can know what you
believe and not fall prey to Gettier?

Part 2) 200 words
(Analysis of the argument. 2-3 scholars interacted with here) (what
have other scholars written about the argument?) Write down and
summarize what 2 – 3 scholars say.
What do scholars say about the problem (2-3 scholars attempting to answer Gettier)? https://iep.utm.edu/gettier/

Part 3) 200 words (My conclusion to the argument)
What do you say about the problem?

600 words max.

We agree with Gettier!

Sources for the paper:
1) https://iep.utm.edu/gettier/ (Links to an external site.) This is the second best encyclopedia for philosophy in print. It is easy to read and has great information.
2) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/ (Links to an external site.) This is the best encyclopedia for philosophy in print. It is more in-depth than IEP, and it is written at a professional level.

Identify a international trade policy problem. This should clearly relate to international relations, which means that at least two countries are involved and affected by the Problem

Identify a international trade policy problem. This should clearly relate to international relations, which means that at least two countries are involved and affected by the Problem

Discuss some of the root causes of the identified problem

Propose at least one potential solution to the problem, discussing how this solution addresses the problem and its root causes

Draw upon some external references to offer evidence in support of the problem identification and potential
solution.

Be between 800 and 900 words in length

You can find details on the style and structure of writing an op-ed here: https://journalistsresource.org/tip-sheets/writing/how-to-write-an-op-ed-or-column

Using what you have learned about the key elements of branding and brand management, such as purpose, positioning, promise, personality and values, and brand expression, construct a one-page resume and a one-page cover letter that capitalize on you as a unique brand you want to sell to potential employers.

The purpose of this assignment is to create a resume and a cover letter that can be used to effectively present yourself to potential employers.
Self-promotion is an integral part of career success, and the first and most important product you need to learn how to market is yourself. You are a brand, and your ability to communicate your brand effectively to potential employers for internships and entry-level jobs in your field of study is an essential workplace skill.
Review the topic materials, paying special attention to “Career Options Discussion,” “Student Interviews,” and “Brands and Branding” videos, and the articles “How to Write an Effective Resume” and “Cover Letter Examples by Industry.”
Using what you have learned about the key elements of branding and brand management, such as purpose, positioning, promise, personality and values, and brand expression, construct a one-page resume and a one-page cover letter that capitalize on you as a unique brand you want to sell to potential employers. You need to ensure that the resume and cover letter accomplish the following:
Highlight your skills, abilities, qualifications, and experience relevant to the position you are seeking.
Utilize appropriate keywords relevant to the position you are seeking.
Utilize a clear, easy to read font, and provide an appropriate photo if you elect to include one.
Are free of spelling and grammatical errors.
Demonstrate key elements of branding.
Submit your resume and cover letter.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Assess Elements of Structure

For this assignment, prepare a PowerPoint presentation to accompany a formal proposal. Assume the board of directors of a higher education organization has asked you to create a plan to reform and revise the institutions governing structure. As you present a plan to the board, be sure to review the current structure and identify the related problems.
In formulating a plan, respond to the following:
Describe the elements of this structure that are found evident in higher educational surroundings, based on Bolman and Deals (2013) description of a classic bureaucracy.
Indicate how the higher education organization has modified the hierarchy to fit its particular needs.
Describe the resulting structures level of effectiveness or ineffectiveness. Then determine if there are any evident disconnections as the structure strives to accomplish its mission.
Identify the advantages/disadvantages of a bureaucratic organization. Then describe the changes that the organization should make to improve the organization.
Given all of the changes, determine if the organization works.
Incorporate speaker notes for each slide. The speaker notes are where you will provide the depth of the narrative and support of ideas, assertions, and claims.
Length: 10-15 slides, with a separate reference slide
Notes: 150-200 words per slide
References: Include a minimum of five scholarly resources.
Your presentation should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

Organizational Ethic Dilemmas

Choose one business or corporate scandal that took place in the last 10 years from
These are the worst scandals of the past decade (fastcompany.com)
In your paper,
Explain whether the organization acted socially and ethically responsible regarding the incident.
Describe what the organization should or could have done differently.
Describe who or what was responsible for the incident.
Explain the best way to ensure that such incidents do not recur, if possible.
Recommend the best way for society, and stakeholders, to prevent future incidents of this type.

How are the women in both Trifles and Streetcar mistreated by the men in their lives?

You will write a 3-5 page clear, coherent and unified analytical/argumentative essay which demonstrates your understanding of the plays we have read, Trifles and A Streetcar Named Desire and showcases your ability to analyze a work, based on the themes we have discussed. You need to make a connection between the two ideas, characters, plays, whatever you like. Keep in mind that you want to analyze the theme of the texts. Choose at topic or angle that you liked the most, one that spoke to you so you have plenty to say about it. Remember, this is an argumentative essay; therefore you must present a specific argument (thesis) and defend it using textual evidence and analysis. Your thesis needs to be focused; your paper should be tight and concise. Your thesis is the statement that connects the two ideas. I will be looking for a unique connection that shows your deep thinking and analysis of the works we have studied. (Note, if you would like to compare one of the plays to one of the short stories or poems we have read, that is ok, as long as one of the texts you are writing about is a play. For example, comparing the lonely Blanche to the lonely Eleanor Rigby; or comparing veteran Stanley to veteran Krebs; or comparing the lack of respect for women’s work in Trifles to “Boys and Girls”)
You are writing a compare and contrast essay, which means you are looking for similarities and differences between two things, (characters, works, themes, etc.) and your thesis is the statement that connects them.
Two topics: A & B
Thesis: A+B
Remember to have a strong thesis, something you are trying to prove. This is an example of a WEAK thesis, which does not say anything: “Blanche and Stella have similarities and differences.” This is vague and empty, and not an argument. A STRONG thesis would be this: “In Tennessee Williams’ play A Streetcar Named Desire sisters Blanche and Stella have different tastes in men, Blanche preferring a sensitive man while Stella loves a rough guy, but they both fall prey to illusions and lies regarding those men.”
Structure:
Keep in mind that compare and contrast essays look for similarities and differences amongst two or multiple works, but that does not mean that both similarities and differences get equal time: you might find the similarities more interesting to write about than the differences or vice versa. You just want to make sure you do both. Also the structure of the compare and contrast essay will vary depending on your specific topic and your style: you might use the ABABAB approach or AAABBB; choose the one that stylistically and organizationally works best for your topic.
Possible Topics:
Blanche and Stanley are very different, which is why they butt heads from the start. What are the major differences between them? How do those differences get in the way of mutual understanding? Do they have anything in common? Think of Old South vs. New South.
Mitch and Stanley have similar backgrounds and are good friends. Yet they are not alike. What are the differences between Mitch and Stanley? How does Blanche highlight their difference?
Stella and Blanche are sisters, with similar upbringing. How are they different from one another? How does Stanley highlight their differences? What do they have in common? (think of illusions, fantasy)
How are the women in both Trifles and Streetcar mistreated by the men in their lives?

Discuss how the religious-secular divide started in America and how it still affects us today.

One of the great culture wars that exists in America today is the one between the religious and the secular. Much of that started during the 1920s and continued into the 1930s. Discuss how the religious-secular divide started in America and how it still affects us today.

Your paper can be based on your class lesson notes and/or textbook readings. You may use outside sources but they are not required. Your papers must be in your own words with no quotations from your textbook or other sources unless they are cited correctly. If you use sources for the information in your papers other than your assigned lessons and/or textbooks, you must indicate the source by a citation and complete information on the source using the Modern Language Association (MLA) works cited format. You will write your papers offline and then submit online using the paper icon under the course section designated as dropbox. Each essay must be approximately 1000 words. No late papers will be accepted without assessing a 5 point penalty per late day.

Douglass Rhetorical Choices I

Rhetorical Choice Assignment Instructions
Assignment
For each chapter selection given on the actual assignment page, create a brief rhetorical analysis for the reading selection that contains a thesis statement focused on Douglass purpose in writing these particular chapters.
Key to your writing will be to address all three appeals, but you must do so without using their Greek names of ethos, pathos, and logos. Instead, utilize other phrasing such as Douglass establishes his authority on the subject of… for ethos, Douglass elicits a visceral response from his readers by stating… for pathos, or Using classification and description, Douglass helps his readers understand that for logos.
You should include at least one piece of textual evidence for each of the three appeals and adequate commentary identifying Douglass tools of language, their effect on the audience, and why thats important to Douglass goal in writing this section, chapter, or book overall.
Example from page 1 of the text:
Over the course of the first four chapters of Frederick Douglass 1845 narrative text about his life as an enslaved person, Douglass masterfully employs the three rhetorical appeals in introducing his audience to his argument for the abolition of slavery. Although he is only telling the truthful tale of his early life, it is a story so vivid and moving that embellishment is not required for Douglass to establish credibility, evoke emotion in his audience, and help them understand the unmitigated horrors of slavery. In the very first paragraph, Douglass conjures a measure of sympathy in his audience for a young Frederick, who, deprived of the knowledge of his own date of birth or father, is left to fend for himself in the brutal game of slavery (Douglass 1). Describing this deprivation draws the audience closer to a youthful Douglass and at the same time introduce them to the ways in which the practice of slavery requires ignorance to survive. This feeling of sympathy not only creates a connection between writer and audience, but also bolsters the audiences emotional connection with the subject of slavery. When Douglass states slaves know as little of their ages as horses know of theirs, (Douglass 1) readers cant help but abhor a practice that dehumanizes people to the status of livestock, meant only for labor. Though this is only page one, the utter disregard for basic human rights, let alone the liberty and justice written into the founding documents of the nation less than a century earlier, is palpable. Douglass comparisons extend from horses to the white children with whom he encounters on the plantation, stating that the white children could tell their ages, but that for those enslaved, it illustrates evidence of a restless spirit (Douglass 1). By contrasting the different way the two races of people are treated even as children, Douglass clearly highlights the unfairness and injustice of slavery. Of course, not everything in life is fair, but the level of discrimination the author faces as a child – for the sole reason of his race and status as an enslaved person – powerfully reveals the troubling truth about the most unjust institution. It doesnt take Douglass long to establish a connection, instill feelings of contempt for slavery, and help the audience understand the cruel inequality resulting from it.
*Notice that I spoke about the rhetorical appeals, gave examples, and described their effects, all without using the terms ethos, pathos, and logos.
Guidance:
Ethos/credibility: (consider Douglass qualifying his suffering, appealing to religion/morality, explaining the lengths to which he goes to gain literacy/freedom, words of others, etc.)
Pathos/emotional: (think imagery, framing of cruelty, shocking scenarios, etc.)
Logos/reason: (consider comparisons/analogies, cause-effect examples, if-then reasoning/logic, identifying the fallacies of slaveholders, etc.)

After you have read Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave and read through the module, which includes detailed instructions for this assignment, upload a MLA formatted document that considers how Douglass utilizes each of the three rhetorical appeals – personal, emotional, and logical. For this assignment, develop a rhetorical analysis paragraph for Chapters 1-4 and Chapters 5-9. You should have a total of two paragraphs.

Summarize the key components of HIPAA, FERPA,and IDEA.

In order for schoolcounselors to make sound ethical decisions, they must understand the importance of
three different Acts: HIPAA, FERPA,and IDEA. Schoolcounselors must also understand the
importance these three Acts play in their everyday roles in the schools.
Use the following websites to assist you with your paper. These websites cannot count as any of your
3 references.
You must find professional textbooks or journalarticles. It is recommended that you find
resources written specifically for counselors/schoolcounselors:
IDEA: http://idea.ed.gov?
HIPAA: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/index.html
FERPA: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
Candidates will write a paper that covers the following:
I. Summarize the key components of HIPAA, FERPA,and IDEA. Include how eachAct relates to the
ethicaland legal rights of students and parents/guardians. (3 pages)
II. Compare and contrast HIPAA, FERPA,and IDEA. (1-2 pages)
III. Explain why schoolcounselors must understand HIPAA, FERPA,and IDEA. (1-2 pages)
The paper must be inAPA style and use at least 3 professional references.
No abstract is required, but a title page and reference page is mandatory. Use citations in the paper where
necessary.

Candidatesummarized the key
components ofHIPAA, FERPA,and
IDEA. Candidateexplained how
each relates to theethicaland legal
rights ofstudentsand parents/
guardians with regard to student
records. Candidatethoroughly and
clearly explained the key components.

Candidateclearly and thoroughly
compared and contrasted HIPAA,
FERPA,and IDEA. Criticalthinking
skills wereapparent in thecandidates
writing

Candidateexplained why school
counselors must understand HIPAA,
FERPA,and IDEA. Thisexplanation
was thorough and clear,and
considered multiple
angles/perspectives.

Candidateeffectively usedAPAstyle
and incorporated at least 3 professional
references. There were no grammatical
errors. The writingwasclear,concise,
and flowed well.

VRIO framework (analysis) (Global Strategy)

Using the VRIO framework, individually examine an international business rivalry (Sony VS Motorola (Mobile phones)) explain why one firm outperforms another (Sony outperforms Motorola).
Use your ability to analyze each firm’s resources and capabilities for strategic leveraging a sustainable competitive advantage.
The report is NOT A SUMMARY of your findings; rather, you should be applying the VRIO framework and supporting your ideas with research.
Use your analytical skills, critical thinking, and writing skills to perform a critical analysis of the business rivalry, after gathering information from your sources.
YOU ARE NOT required to spend time collecting data.
Your research should be incorporated into your writing to support your ideas. The analysis should be original.
ENSURE that you are properly citing your sources through the report.
Excessive quoting or CUT AND PASTING will result in lower marks.
Final Report Requirements:
4 pages, 1000 words (excluding cover page and appendices)
Minimum of 8 relevant and reputable sources Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, flow of thought, clarity of ideas and creativity APA Formatting (for citations and referencing as well as overall organization)