Criteria for Content
Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected nurse practitioner specialty.
Select a theory or theoretical model which is relevant to your nurse practitioner specialty and would offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.
Introduction to the presentation
Identify and describe a theory or theoretical model, and explain its relevance to your nurse practitioner specialty.
Describe an issue or concern that is related to your nurse practitioner specialty, and explain its impact on health care outcomes
Explain how the theory or theoretical model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or theoretical model.
Conclusion to the presentation
References
Preparing the presentation
Submission Requirements
Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.
Length: The PowerPoint presentation must be 6-8 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).
Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes in the file.
A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature sources must be used.
Submission: Submit your PowerPoint file to the Week 7 Dropbox.
Best Practices in Preparing the Presentation
The following are best practices in preparing this presentation:
Review directions thoroughly.
Follow submission requirements.
Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Review the Creating a Professional Presentation located in Course Resources.
Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature sources must be used. A minimum of 3 scholarly references are used. References should be published within the past 5 years. A primary source (original theory or writings from theorist) may be used, and primary sources may be older than 5 years. Textbooks are not considered scholarly resources.
Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.
Best Writer
risk management strategies
discuss and explain how as a Chief Executive Officer you would identify key indicators affecting the privacy disclosure of the data in the health management department and how would you resolve them.
Peer-reviewed sources only no older than 6 years. APA 7th edition formatting.
What do these findings tell us about the importance of forming secure attachments with human infants? Do you agree with Harlow’s explanation of love at the end of the video? Do the monkeys “love” the cloth mother or is their sense of security and comfort different from love?
1- What do these findings tell us about the importance of forming secure attachments with human infants? Do you agree with Harlow’s explanation of love at the end of the video? Do the monkeys “love” the cloth mother or is their sense of security and comfort different from love?
2- What is the stimulus control? What is the motivation operations? What is establishing operations? What is abolishing operations ?
World Civilization Research Paper
Research a civilization and focus on two aspects of the civilization. Aspects of civilization include political,
economic, religion/beliefs, social, or a person from your civilization. Make sure to focus on a time frame as well. Greece will be the civilization that is researched in this paper.
Discussion – Design Prototypes Inc Project Management (A) Selection of the project team
Design Prototypes Inc Project Management (A) Selection of the project team
Submission Instructions:
Introduction.
Question
a.
The case study presents knowledge in two related
areas: Project Leadership and Project Practices. Before the case presents what
was learned by the player or players, there was a process of unlearning; a
breaking down of traditional knowledge practices that were required in order to
eventually be successful. Describe the case in detail with a problem statement
and references to the unlearning process. Explain how the principal character
or characters were able to gain from their experiences.
maximum of 1.5 pages double-spaced (excluding title page and
reference page) and should follow APA referencing style.
Governing the Commons – Do you think Ostrom’s common pool resource management strategies are applicable to big common resources such as the global climate? Explain why or why not. (250 words)
Governing the Commons – Do you think Ostrom’s common pool resource management strategies are applicable to big common resources such as the global climate? Explain why or why not. (250 words)
Wealthy people typically marry each other and have conscientious, capable children who inherit generational wealth. Their families tend to be more stable and give their children many advantages. Does this mean rising wealth inequality is inevitable, and if so, does it imply anything for the stability of liberalism? Explain why or why not. (250 words)
Organizational Behaviour
As a business consultant do whatever analysis you deem appropriate and consider what criteria should be used to measure alternatives. Recommendations and validate a comprehensive Organizational Behaviour Plan.
The Federal Road through Georgia, Alabama, and the Creek Nation, 1806-1836″
Respond to the following questions:
1. What is the thesis of The Federal Road?
2. Why was the Federal Road opened, & how did it exacerbate tensions between the Upper Creek Indians & white settlers?
3. How did the Federal Road change the character of the countryside?
4. How was the history of the Federal Road inextricably linked to the Creek Indians & their fate?
Search
From the book Southerland and Brown, The Federal Road through Georgia, the Creek Nation, and Alabama, 1806-1836 (ISBN: 0-8173-0518-1).
The Crime Scene
Scenario*: You are a detective for the local police. You have some training in computer forensics.
The primary suspect in a murder investigation works at a large local firm. He is reported to have two computers at work in addition to one at home. His company has issued him a cell phone for business use, but you do not know if this is the only cell phone he has or uses.
You will be the first responder to both scenes.
So, what do you do? To get the discussion started:
Can Locard’s Exchange Principle be applied to a digital crime scene, in general? -to these digital crime scenes? Why or why not?
What do you need to do? What do you base the preliminary assessment on? -the platform? -the software? -the user’s Internet browsing history? -other?
Would the sniper forensics
perspective be useful?
What are the potential traps and pitfalls for you as the investigator?
What’s happening in the news right now to support your viewpoint?
Be prepared to both defend your position and challenge the position of others.
Your first post is due in Week 4 and all replies need to be submitted by the end of week 5.
* This scenario used Case Project 4-1 (Nelson and others, 2015, p. 180) as its starting point.
Required Readings
Text: Nelson, Phillips, and Steuart. Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations
Chapter 2: The Investigator’s Office and Laboratory
Chapter 3: Data Acquisition
https://www-sciencedirect-com.library.esc.edu/science/article/abs/pii/S1742287605000940
https://dl-acm-org.library.esc.edu/doi/10.1145/1655737.1655740
societal issue of concern today
You will select a societal question from a list I will provide and read one fiction and nonfiction story that goes with the question (provided in the list). There needs to be an introduction paragraph with a hook to grab the reader’s attention (1-2 sentences), background information offering a brief summary of the fiction story and anything the readers need to know about the history of the topic (2-3 sentences), and thesis statement answering the question. There also needs to be one body paragraph using a quote from the fiction story that supports your thesis with an explanation of how the quote supports your thesis (2-3 sentences). Then do the same with a second quote from the same fictional story. Then end that first body paragraph with a summary/transition (what is the big takeaway message about your supporting point? What do you want the reader to remeber most about this paragraph?) Then you need to do a second body paragraph doing the same exact thing but with 2 quotes from the nonfiction story. Lastly, there needs to be a conclusion paragraph restating your thesis statement, summarzing your argument by recapping your main points without mentioning any new ideas (1-2 sentences), and a “so what?” statement explaining why this debate/topic is important. The files I uploaded are the playlist with the options of questions and story links that go along with each question, as well as the outline. In the playlist, you pick which question you want to write about then use the fiction story that goes with it (on the left side) and the nonfiction story right next to the question (on the right side)