Best Writer

Needing a report on this company https://healthleadsusa.org .
Report must include:
Who they are?
What do they do/offer?
What are their missions/goals as an organization?
Who do they help and how do they help them? (targeted audience)
What partnerships is this comapny involved with?
Is this a for profit or non profit organization?

What are the most common reasons for depression amongst teenagers and what can be done to minimise or prevent this problem?

Week Three- Essay Project #2 – “Twelve Angry Men”
We’ll start our exploration of what is meant by critical thinking by watching a movie! The 1957 film “Twelve Angry Men” is used by many professors in this context. The movie begins at the end of trial in which an 18-year old man is accused of killing his father. We quickly move into the Juror’s Room, where jurors go to deliberate cases. One juror stands out as an example of a critical thinker, Juror Number Eight (the man in the white suit…you should have no trouble identifying him once the movie gets going!). As you watch it, take note on how his mind works, the way he questions and reasons with the others, the influence he begins to exert on them. In contrast to Juror number Eight is Juror number Three (the one who yells half the time). He is controlled too much by his emotions. He says he has no personal stake in voting guilty against the young man on trial, but something happened in this juror’s life which has biased him against young people-what is it? When studying critical thinking, we need to look at our own biases and see how they affect our decision making (note about biases: keep in mind that not all biases are bad; we too often use the word “bias” only in negative ways, how it occurs in racism and sexism, for instance. Essentially it just means what we are drawn to, what we favor over something else. Anyone who has studied electronics would know that we bias equipment, adjust how and to where the electricity flows. With me, I have a bias toward sweet snacks over salty ones. I have a bias for bourbon rather than Scotch. Do these biases make me a “bad/flawed” person? No. But if I had a bias where I favor one person over another because of skin color, then yes, that bias is wrong.)

Be sure to read the link “10 Characteristics of a Critical Thinker” on the Menu either before or after watching the movie; it will greatly help you in writing a one-paragraph response on why you think that we consider that character as a critical thinker. Try to identify specific characteristics he displays in doing so and cite specific examples from the film. I provide a link to the movie on the Menu; it also is available on Amazon Prime:

Here is a rather general reading on Critical Thinking that you might find helpful:
Profile of the Critical Thinker
From Teaching Critical Thinking in the Arts and Humanities, edited by Lucy Cromwell
The critical thinker:
Asks significant and pertinent questions and states problems with specificity. Arrives at solutions through hypothesis, inquiry, analysis, and interpretation.
Assesses statements,insights, and arguments according to the knowledge and skills provided by formal and informal logic.
Formulates propositions or judgments in terms of clearly defined sets of criteria.
Strives to acquire knowledge of the various disciplines, knowing that such knowledge is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for critical thinking.
Understands the different modes of thought appropriate to the various disciplines. Can apply these modes of thought to other disciplines and life.
Is aware of the context or setting in which judgments are made, and of the practical consequences and values involved.
Thinks about the world theories, assessing these theories and their contexts to determine the validity of their claims.
Seeks and expects to find different meanings simultaneously present in a work or event.
Recognizes and accepts contradiction and ambiguity, understanding that they are an integral part of thought and creativity.
Constructs and interprets reality with a holistic and dialectical perspective. Sees the interconnectedness within a system and between systems.
Tolerates ambiguity, yet can assume a committed position.
Is aware of the limitations of knowledge and exhibits epistemological humility.
Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful manipulation of ideas in service to one’s own, or one’s groups’, vested interest. As such, it is typically intellectually flawed however pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fair-mindedness and intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually, though subject to the charge of “idealism” by those habituated to its selfish use.
Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality is therefore usually a matter of degree and dependent on, among other things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.

The paper could obviously utilize your Discussion board post for that film, but you would have to expand on it and make a coherent argument about the film with a clear thesis statement and supported by evidence from the film and utilizing the articles. You will also submit a bibliography and can cite the lectures as well.

one of the sources
Natsu Taylor Saito: Colonial Presumptions: The War on Terror and the Roots of American Exceptionalism

Please only use sources provided. Traditional typologies of sexual offenders have classically been developed to provide a comprehensive understanding the deviant sexual behaviors associated with these offenders and assist with designing treatment interventions and/or supervision plans. However, a “one size fits all” model is incredibly problematic with sex offenders as there is no “sex offender profile” with which to base certain categorizations. Once viewed as simply “the dirty old man,” sexual offenders come from a wide variety of characteristics and heterogeneous population. Keeping this in mind, draft a response which addresses the following:
How have typologies of sex offenders evolved over the last 20 years?
Given the diversity among these offenders, what are some common characteristics that may be found?
What are some of the variables in these characteristics?
Do you think that sex offenders have more similarities with the rest of their community than they do differences? Why or why not?
*In addition to fully responding to the above prompts/questions, please point to one aspect of the additional lecture material that you found to be of interest, as well as reference one of the videos included in the lecture material.

Qualitative Article Analysis Assignment Instructions
Choose 1 qualitative article and
compose a 3-page review (not including the reference page in the count). Your
review must include 2 sections (using Level I headings in current APA): (1) a summary of the article, and (2) a critical analysis of the article. All articles must be of studies
conducted and published in the United States or Canada within the past 5 years.
Your summary must
include:
The purpose of the study;
A description
of participants/sample;
The
research design/data analysis (narrative, grounded theory, case study,
phenomenology, ethnography, etc.);
The method
of data collection (questionnaire, document analysis, observation,
open-ended or structured interview, etc.);
Analysis
(Inductive/deductive approach, point of focus, summaries, memoing,
indexing, coding, grouping, themes, order of analysis, type of analysis
(content, narrative, discourse, framework, grounded theory), and
The results.
Your analysis
must include:
Opportunities for further research not already stated
in the article,
Threats
to validity or undocumented bias (credibility, transferability,
dependability, confirmability) on the part of the researcher(s),
Other
original insight or criticism, and
Implications
of the findings.
See your textbook if you need more help evaluating your
article. Remember to include a reference page. All citations and references
must be in current APA format.

United States of America was by far the worlds most powerful state in the 1960s, yet despite this power it found that it could not defeat a far weaker and less technologically advanced opponent in the Vietnam War. Why?

Section 1: Description of (insert
persons name you have chosen)
In this section, objectively describe
the person you have chosen. Overall, the goal of this section is to explain the
key life experiences that contributed to his or her psychological development.
Because this paper is a psychological
investigation (and not a biographical sketch), start Section I with your
decisions about the person. Then, back your decisions with the relevant life
experiences and information that influenced your decision.
Opening paragraph: Begin Section 1 with the patterns your research
uncovered about the person you investigated. To assist your process of
formulating patterns about the person, thoroughly think through the significant
life experiences (about five) that affected his or her development. Think about
how he/she coped with the experiences, and ponder the lasting impact of each
experience. Then, identify similar themes related to how the person coped and
the lasting impact of those significant life experiences. You have read at
least eight hours about his/her life, and you most likely have drawn some
conclusions about their tendencies.
Remaining paragraphs: Capture his/her formative life experiences that
affected his/her development. Integrate relevant information about the person,
such as: Where was he/she born and raised? What is his/her cultural background?
How is he/she diverse (for example: race, ethnicity, socio-economic status,
etc.)? How old is he/she? Describe his/her family dynamics. Describe his/her
career. What is his/her personality? How did other people describe him/her?
This section should be written in 3rd
person. This section should be at least three-to-five paragraphs. The
word count guideline for this section is about 600 words.
Section II: Analysis of (insert
person’s name you have chosen)
In this section, discuss your impressions,
thoughts, and feelings about the person you have chosen. Did he/she meet your
expectations and preconceived notions? Self-analysis is part of psychology;
therefore, include in this section what you have learned about his/her life.
Analyze your thoughts, feelings, and attitudes about him/her and why you
were affected in that way. What personal assumptions, values, and perspectives
did you have regarding the person you chose that were challenged during this
investigation? Also, provide some insights into your own analysis of how the
person you chose may have changed for the better or improved his/her life.
This section should be written in 1st
person. This section should be at least three-to-five paragraphs. The
word count guideline for this section is about 600 words.
Section III: Integration of the
Psychological Investigation of (insert persons name you have chosen) with
Psychological Theory and Concepts
Choose *three* psychological
concepts or theories presented in your text or presented during this course and
apply them to analyze the results of your psychological investigation. The
theory/concept for each integration should be specific.
For example, if you selected Marilyn
Monroe as your subject, you may want to integrate Eriksons theory (Chapter 9)
by synthesizing Eriksons psychosocial stage of Intimacy versus Isolation to
explain her intimate relationships. In this discussion, you would also likely
recycle back to Eriksons psychosocial stage of Trust versus Mistrust to
capture the consequences of her relationship with her mother.
Also for example, if you selected
Eminem as your subject, you may choose to synthesize Eriksons psychosocial
stage of Identity versus Role Confusion to capture the characteristics of
Eminem, Marshall Mathers, and Slim Shady.
Avoid selecting concepts or theories
that are too general, such as the psychodynamic approach.
Also, please avoid
describing the theory or defining the concept. Please see the instructor for
assistance with this section if you need help.
This section should be written in 3rd
person. This section should be at least three paragraphs. The word count
guideline for this section is about 600 words.
Section IV: Reflection
Discuss any conclusions you may have
about your experience conducting a psychological investigation. Was your
experience worthwhile? What did you learn from this process? What would you do
differently next time to improve the depth of your investigation? What (if any)
missing information were you not able to uncover through your research? How did
this experience change your perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and attitudes about
not only the person you investigated, but also yourself?
This section should
be written in 1st person. This section should be at least two paragraphs.
The word count guideline for this section is about 200 words.

Step 1: Read Marjane Satrapi’s graphic
novel, Persepolis.
Step 2: Choose one of the topics indicated and write
an analysis. The listed questions provide some ideas that you might address in
your critique. You don’t need to respond to all questions. 300 words minimum.

Topic : Gender
If you want to say that the veil is a symbol of something,
what do you think it could symbolize?
How are women oppressed in the novel? Cite three examples of
oppression. What is Marjis reaction to this oppression?
How are men oppressed in the novel? Cite three examples of
oppression. What is Marjis reaction?
France has outlawed the headscarf and hijab by parliamentary
law passed in 2010. This means that girls cannot wear headscarves to
school and females cannot wear burkinis at the beach, for example. What is
your opinion on this French policy? Provide reasons why you support or
dont support this idea.
Cite two important moments in the novel that feature the
veil. Why are these moments important.
Cite two important quotes in the novel that reflect on
gender. Why are these quotes important?
Cite two important images
in the novel that reflect on gender. Why are these images important?
Topic : Teachers/Education
List a specific example where you feel a teacher is behaving
inappropriately in the text. Why do you think the teacher behaves this
way? What is Marjis reaction? Why? How would you react in the same
situation?
Marjis parents seem to value her education above all else.
Why do you think they place such a high value on her education? How does
this dynamic compare to your own family relationship to education?
Name one moment where Marji decides to educate herself. What
topic does she research? Why? What is the result?
Name one idea or concept that Marji is taught by her
grandmother. Why do you think the grandmother wants to teach Marji that
idea? What is the result? Name one point that your grandmother or mother
has taught you. How does your grandmother/mothers lesson compare to the
one taught by Marjis grandmother?
What do you think is the most important idea taught to Marji
by her parents?
What life lesson does
Marji learn from experience?
Topic: Revolution
How would you define a revolution? Do you think revolutions
are good or bad?
Provide 2 reasons that revolutions can occur.
Is violent overthrow of the government ever acceptable? Why
or why not?
List the various revolutions in Persepolis.
What brings on these revolutions?
What do the characters in Persepolis do to try to make a
change in government? Do you think their strategies are effective?
Why or why not?
How does the theme of
revolution affect Marji when she is in Austria?

Read the instructions for research papers included as a supplement to this lesson. Then, select a topic from the following choices:
Consult resources other than the course textbook and your reading assignments. Examples of resources include other textbooks, journal articles, and reputable websites. Reputable online sources include encyclopedias and university or governmental websites. Never use Wikipedia as a source for a research paper. Prepare a detailed report on the topic you choose, including the following elements:
Describe the background and basic issue of your chosen topic.
Describe the basic argument of opposing viewpoints.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of both views.
Choose which view you agree with. (Only in the conclusion)
Explain why you agree with that view.
Incorporate the information you learned about your chosen topic from this course, but dont limit your discussion to the textbook and study guide. Take advantage of external resources to provide an in-depth, comprehensive report.
Goal
This assignment is designed to help you apply what youve learned from your lessons by researching and writing about a controversial topic youve studied and to give you an opportunity to demonstrate your written communication, research, and critical thinking skills.
Writing Guidelines
Type your submission, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman font, size 12. Use a standard document format with 1-inch margins. (Do not use any fancy or cursive fonts.)
Read the assignment carefully and address the topic suggested.
Be specific. Limit your submission to the topic suggested.
Use proper APA formatting. Include in-text citations and a reference page in APA style. On this page list websites, journals, and all other references used in preparing the submission. Also include a cover page and in-text citations. For assistance with this project and APA in-text citations and references, please see the Biology page in the Penn Foster Virtual Library.
Proofread your work carefully. Check for correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.