Best Writer

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the webpage for the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB), the Harvey, Luiselli, & Wong, (2009) article, and review the APAs Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
(Links to an external site.)
required for this week.
In your initial post:
Applied behavior analysis is a rapidly growing area of learning psychology. Based on the information in the required web page and article, describe what you think it would be like to be an applied behavior analyst is a school setting.
Analyze and describe how the APAs Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
(Links to an external site.)
might affect the implementation of behavior modification principles.
Examine the behavioral analysis approach to personality psychology and discuss whether personality shapes behavior or behavior shapes personality. Use evidence from the resources to support your statements.
Evaluate the cultural implications of addressing and treating mental health issues in standardized school settings.
Describe the benefits this type of approach might have for students.
https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index

Write about addiction using the article healthy people 2030.

Discuss the role of sickness in the novel. Victor often seems to fall ill after traumatic events. Is this a means of escape, and, if so, is it effective? What might be the psychological implications of this? Is there another explanation for his recurring illness?

Source: https://archive.org/details/Frankenstein1818Edition/Frankenstein/page/n35/mode/2up

example

Does anyone ever ask you about the way you speak? Have you ever heard any comments about your way of speaking or accent?

How would you characterize the way you speak? How is it related to where you grew up or where you are from? How is it related to your gender (If you want the topic to be gender, ask your interviewees whether they consider themselves a man or a woman, first)? How is it related to your

race/ethnicity/nationality? Do you like the way you sound most of the time, or are there situations where you wish you spoke differently from the way you do?

Do you have an accent? If yes, how would you characterize your accent? Have you ever wished you had a different accent? What was the situation? Have you ever wished someone else you knew had a different accent or dialect? when?

Have you ever found yourself changing the way in which you speak (your lexicon, accent, etc.) depending on the speech patterns of the person or people you are with (e.g. age, ethnicity, people here vs. people you know back at home)? If yes, elaborate and explain why. ii) About speech of people around the interviewees

Does your best friend or significant other have an accent, or speak a dialect? Is

it ever a topic of conversation, playful or otherwise?

Have you ever felt embarrassed by the accent or dialect of a friend or family member? Can you describe the situation?

Do your parents (brother, sister, grandparents, relatives, best friend, partner, etc.) have accents or dialects? If so, how would you characterize the way they sound? Can you describe? Do you like it or dislike it? Have you ever felt attracted or embarrassed because of that? Why?

How would you describe the way that English (Spanish, Vietnamese, Arabic, Zapoteco, etc.) is spoken/sounds in your home town/community? Do you like that variety of English (Spanish, Vietnamese, Arabic, Zapoteco, etc.)?

ii) About speech in the media

Are there any politicians, public figures, or entertainers who you think speak in an especially appealing or unappealing way? What is it about their speech that you find attractive? Or what is it about their speech that you abhor? Is it related to their gender or their race, ethnicity or nationality?

In animated films, characters (including those of the animal persuasion) have accents, dialects and particular ways of speaking. Do you have any favorites? Any that you abhor? How do you think Disney and others have used accents and dialects in the creation of social stereotypes (gender, race, ethnicity…), positively and negatively?

iii) Other ideas about speech

What varieties of English do you associate with high prestige? low prestige? any gender differences?

What varieties of another language (Spanish, French, Arabic, Hindi, etc) do you associate with high prestige? Low prestige? Are these associated with gender?

Does someones ways of speaking affect your attraction to that person? For example, is a girl or a guys ways of speaking or accent a bonus or a turn off?Would certain ways or speaking make you consider befriending them or possibly dating them or not doing so? (You can substitute any number of languages or accents here).

If you hear someone speaking with a British (Californian, Cockney, Latinx, Asian, New York, Boston, Southern, etc, etc.) accent, what are your thoughts on their social status or job?

When you hear friends speaking on the phone in their mother tongue (that you dont understand) to their parents, what do you think?

Do you find “foreign accents” to be attractive qualities of speech? If so, which ones, and why? Which foreign accent(s) would you like to have, and why?

What is the accent that you think sounds most uneducated or intelligent? Why?

Discuss about the guideline from the health history and medical information.

Immigration has always been a controversial topic in our country.
Using the link below, (1). Identify a policy proposal or initiative that addresses the issue you chose and provide a critical assessment.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx

Click on the link to read a brief article:
Believe in Atlantis? These Archaeologists Want to Win You Back to Science
(Links to an external site.)
Review the Tips for Assessing the Validity of Extraordinary Claims (below).
Select one of the following pseudoarchaeology case studies to debunk and conduct a bit of internet research to learn more about it:
Ancient Astronaut/Aliens “Theory”
Bosnian Pyramid
Crystal Skull
Kensington Runestone
Nazca Lines & Alien Spacecraft
Stonehenge Ley Lines
2012 Maya Doomsday Prophecy
Using what you have learned from this week’s readings & lesson, write a 2-page composition that debunks the pseudoarchaeology claim.
Provide an overview of the case study – what does the belief involve?
What “evidence” is used to support the claim?
Who is involved with promoting the idea – individuals, organizations, belief groups, etc?
What is the historical background and/or social context of the claim?
How have you determined the claim to be false? Build a solid case against the claim using concepts from this week’s unit, such as the archaeological inquiry model, characteristics of the scientific approach, the scientific method, validity tips (below), etc; in addition to any scientific evidence/interpretations you came across that counter the claim.
Format: The document must be typed in 11-pt Calibri font, with 1-inch margins, and double-spacing. A minimum of 2 pages is required.
Citations: Cite your sources both (1) within the text, and (2) in a separate References Cited page, using either MLA or APA format. More information is available here: https://libguides.pasadena.edu/citing
Tips for Assessing the Validity of Extraordinary Claims
So, how can you assess the validity of an extraordinary claim about the human past that appears in popular media?
Do some background research and ask yourself the following questions:
Where is the particular claim or discovery presented? Is it in an article in a peer-reviewed journal, where other scientists in the same field have had an opportunity to appraise its validity? Does the story appear in a widely respected magazine with science advisors on its staff, in a newspaper article written by an experienced science writer, or in a series produced by a science-based organization? These are all sources that we can feel confident in. Of course, they are not perfect, but they usually check their facts and apply the scientific method. On the other hand, is the report about the human past found on an anonymous website with no attributed source, in the informal discussions of social media, or in a presentation prepared by an individual affiliated with a political or religious organization with a particular axe to grind? In these cases, it is wise to be skeptical about the objectivity of the source and the accuracy of the claim.
Who is making the claim? Is it a trained scientist? Just as important, is it a researcher trained in archaeology, anthropology, or history? Remember, a scientist skilled in an unrelated field may be no better prepared than a nonscientist to assess an archaeological discovery or interpretation. Certainly, researchers with graduate degrees in archaeology or history make mistakes in their chosen fields, but they are less likely to make mistakes on issues related to the human past than are people with little experience or study in those fields.
In assessing the validity of any assertion about the human past that appears in popular media, you need to ask yourself this question: How does the person announcing the discovery, making the claim, or interpreting the results of a study “know”? Does the discussion or claim seem to follow standard scientific thinking as explained in your unit readings or other books that explain how science works? Are hypotheses based on observations? Are hypotheses tested with independent data? Among a series of explanations offered for some phenomenon, is the simplest one (with no other unsupported assumptions) presented as the most probable? Or does the claimant instead assert that their knowledge is simply the result of revelation or intuition and that no more proof is needed?
Are other experts consulted, and how do they respond to the claims being made? Are other scientists convinced? Are other scientists uncertain, skeptical, but intrigued? Are other scientists quite certain the claims are unfounded, and on what basis are they so skeptical? Are alternate points of view offered; are other interpretations presented? Accepting the authority of scientists just because they have diplomas is a mistake. When experienced researchers working in the same field are universally skeptical, it’s a pretty good idea for you to be skeptical too – unless and until supporting data are forthcoming.
Are confirming data present? Are the “mummified giant”, the “alien-like cranium”, the Hebrew tablet found in Ohio”, and other archaeological “mysteries” unique, one-of-a-kind objects, or are scientists able to confirm the validity of these by finding additional examples?
Is enough information presented for you to make an informed decision concerning the legitimacy of what is being asserted? Or, instead, are you left with important questions that the report simply does not address?

I have attached my windshield survey that I did, which is needed to complete this assignment. On that paper towards the end there was a question which i will put here ” What would be a need for a community health nurse to begin a health promotion project in this community? ” I spoke about areas being populated with trash, therefore this paper needs to focus on that. I will also attach the instructions and the rubric for this assignment and the questions that need to be answered. An introduction and conclusion need to be included in this paper and the headings should be “Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement and track”. Two peer reviewed articles need to be used which I will attach 3 articles that i found. You are more than welcome to use othere peer reviewed articles if you like. Please if you have any questions or concers let me know.

Write a bad news letter in indirect writing style in plain and concise language. please read the attached docs carefully.

n this module, we begin to look at how the democratic system of the United States functions: political parties, voting and the election system. It is important to remember that the US Constitution was not written with political parties in mind. George Washington even warned against them. Initially, the Vice President was not a political partner to the president but the runner-up in the election and continued this way until 1804. The system was built on compromise, but as time has passed compromise seems less routine. Currently, the American system is composed of two major political parties that voters can choose between, with many third party options that often can achieve success at the local level but often fail to achieve even 10% of the vote in national elections. This can create a voting for a lesser of two evils dynamic, as many voters mentioned in the last couple of presidential elections. It is then, not surprising, that voter turnout is generally low compared to the amount of people registered to vote when there is little excitement or support for a candidate. Why do you think more people do not vote in the United States? Can a democracy be maintained when leaders are only being chosen by a few?