Create an annotated bibliography that aligns with the research topic/question presented to you.Describe the usefulness of the source as it relates to the topic/issue being addressed Annotations should not include first or second person narrative.

Assignment Question

To complete this assignment, you will create an annotated bibliography that aligns with the research topic/question presented to you. The topic/question can be viewed in Canvas.

Criteria for success To successfully complete this assignment, you will: Select a research topic from the ones provided on Canvas Find a minimum of 4 sources that align with the research topic/question provided Only 2 of these sources can be from websites. The remaining 2 should be from scholarly articles. You are welcome to have all 4 be from scholarly articles, but the limit is 2 for websites only These should be the best sources you identified—think if you were presenting your information to the CEO of a healthcare system related to the specific topic List all citations in APA format (remember the hanging indention) Annotate each citation which includes: Summarizing the content of the source—be descriptive and specific Evaluate the accuracy and validity of the source Describe the usefulness of the source as it relates to the topic/issue being addressed Annotations should not include first or second person narrative The assignment should be typed in Calibri, Arial, or Times New Roman 11pt. Or 12pt. Font When uploading your assignment to Canvas, only submit the following file types: Word document (.doc) PDF (.pdf) Checklist Selected research topic is listed at the top of the document before the annotations begin Annotated bibliography includes a total of at least 4 sources A maximum of 2 sources are from websites Citations are in APA format The assignment follows the annotated bibliography format—the citation is listed first then the annotation for that citation is underneath it Each annotation includes: A summary of the content of the source An evaluation of the accuracy and validity of the source A description of the usefulness of this source in the context of the topic/issue being addressed

Origins, Ramifications, and Policy Measures try to use the annotated bibi’s resources, but its ok to use other resources but cite correctly.

use the topic; Deciphering the Mechanisms of Currency Crises: Origins, Ramifications, and Policy Measures try to use the annotated bibi’s resources, but its ok to use other resources but cite correctly.

Write a Research Paper: YouTube for Mental Health Support.

Assignment Question

Write a Research Paper: YouTube for Mental Health Support.

For this assignment, you will take that beginning research and finalize your research paper. You should follow the writing process that you learned about earlier in the course to ensure a well-written research paper. Your final paper should include the following elements: A clear, concise, and well-written introduction to the paper that describes your social media strategy and how it addresses the health care issue you selected. Paragraphs that are well organized and flow logically from introduction to conclusion and include: information about the healthcare issue or problem; research available in the literature about the social media strategy and how it has been applied to the healthcare issue you chose; the pros and cons of using the social media strategy you selected; and legal and ethical implications that should be considered when using the social media strategy you selected. A comprehensive conclusion that summarizes your analysis and reflects the evidence you have gathered and presented in the body of the paper. Your paper should be 5-7 double-spaced pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages. There should be proper use of APA formatting and evidence of a thoroughly proofread paper.

Prepare a paper on these subjects Katsura imperial villa and gardens, Kyoto, Japan and the gamble house, Pasadena.Includes diagrams and images.

Assignment Question

Prepare a paper on these subjects

Subject: Katsura imperial villa and gardens, Kyoto, Japan and the gamble house, Pasadena 2000 words MLA format Includes diagrams and images as well: – exterior photograph – interior photograph – site context – site plan – plan – section – front elevation – organization-axis, symmetry, module – circulation-approach, threshold, program, and path – structure (Should be 10 images/diagrams).

What have you found out after exploring this topic?What is your topic about?

Assignment Question

Choose a grammatical point (or grammatical phenomenon) in the English language which you find interesting, difficult, puzzling, or “illogical”, conduct some investigation, and write a report about your findings. You are strongly suggested to support your findings or arguments with authentic examples. You can use the following questions to guide your writing:

1. What is your topic about?

2. Why do you want to work on this grammatical point or phenomenon?

3. What have you found out after exploring this topic?

4. What is your new understanding about this topic? What insights have you gained about the English grammar from exploring this topic?

Please follow the requirements listed below in writing and formatting your report: Font: Times New Roman or Calibri Font size: 12 points Line spacing: 1.5 Reference style: APA 7 preferred Word limit: 1500 – 2000 words (excluding cover, references, and appendices if any)

Submit your project data after you have cleaned, organized, transformed your raw data into meaningful total scores and have conducted the appropriate statistical analyses in either MS Excel, JASP, or the free website.

Assignment Question

This is the link that you need submit your project data after you have cleaned, organized, transformed your raw data into meaningful total scores and have conducted the appropriate statistical analyses in either MS Excel, JASP, or the free website.

First download your data from your Google Forms link when you have 30+ responses. You can include as many participants into your final sample size but it must be at least 30. Remember, you can find your project data under the RESPONSES tab at the very top of your form page.

Second, clean your data. This means removing any duplicate or invalid cases.

Third, organize your data set (in a new sheet or file). You need to have columns clearly labeled as age, gender, SES (income or eduction), and other demographic variables you measured (think 3rd variable) along with the actual data you collected. You should also label columns with the names of your psychological constructs and the scores that represent them (again, with the data you collected). These should be the total scores of your participants responses that their “score” on the variable. Remember that you already found your scoring instructions in a previous assignment. So, this is the data set that should show your ability to transform the raw data responses into meaningful data.

Once you have cleaned, organized, and transformed your raw data into meaningful total scores–you can run your statistical analyses.

Fourth, you will run most of the same functions as you did in the running statistics assignment. It will include any/all descriptive statistics you conduct on your project variables and anything else that is important (like age), any inferential statistics you conduct, create at least one figure. One sheet should show your variables transformed in their total scores and have all your variables clearly labeled.

You need to have a column that is clearly labeled as age, gender, SES (income or eduction), and another other demographic variables you measured (think 3rd variable). You should also label columns with the names of your psychological constructs and the scores that represent them. These should be the total scores of your participants responses that their “score” on the variable. Look at my example data set for the Running Statistics assignment. This is the data set that should show your ability to transform the raw data responses into meaningful data. You earn 5 points for just organizing the variables into one sheet that shows you have scored your constructs and have these columns as well: age, gender, SES (income or eduction), and another other demographic variables you measured (think 3rd variable).

In this file, you will also include any descriptive statistics you conduct on your age and any variables related to project (5 points). You need to run a correlation using your two main variables to test your hypothesis and a scatterplot based on this correlation (5 points). To examine how your third variable relates to your other two variables, you can either run another correlations, run a t-tests, or an ANOVA. You must determine what test would be appropriate (5 points).

This crisis of belonging is caused by many factors, particularly those having to do with her status as a racialized diasporic subject in a dominant French Orientalist culture.

In Leila Sebbar’s Sherazade, the eponymous heroine finds herself constantly grappling with a crisis of belonging—belonging is to be understood here in a variety of ways, referring to a sense of home, appurtenance to a particular culture or community, or, more generally, a sense of being accepted by and in harmony with one’s environment. This crisis of belonging is caused by many factors, particularly those having to do with her status as a racialized diasporic subject in a dominant French Orientalist culture. In a well-supported and well-organized essay, and while paying close attention to the specific historical context of the novel, discuss the extent to which Sherazade’s sense of belonging is undermined by the enduring legacies of French Orientalism.

Write a solicited or unsolicited Formal Recommendation Report, to your specified recipient within your topic’s context.

Assignment Question

This paper already has 7 pages, 1745 words. It just need to be completed.

OVERVIEW Write a solicited or unsolicited Formal Recommendation Report, to your specified recipient within your topic’s context, with the following purposes: 1. document your applied engineering problem or opportunity project 2. communicate pertinent aspects of your project to your audience 3. establish an engineering problem using engineering terms 4. provide transparency of method for analysis, research, evaluation, and solution 5. account for and provide research and materials necessary for readers to independently validate your reasoning 6. contribute to the body of literature and knowledge in your engineering field

LENGTH The body portion of your report must run at least 5 full pages of verbal text, single spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font for body content, default margins. Length excludes graphics and white space. Most of the detailed, technical, cited content will be in the Results/Findings section. Reports not meeting the content minimums will be greatly reduced in quality and therefore grade. The rough draft for peer reviews should have at least 4 full pages of text; graphic(s) incorporated, referenced, labeled, titled, and cited; all headings in place and each section at least partially completed; at least half of references list correctly formatted and citations in place. The Self-Assessment Rubric should also be pasted and filled out (see syllabus and Standards module).

RESEARCH use at least 10 substantive, published sources of at least 3 different types including at least 5 scholarly journal articles. A substantive source is one with depth of content, e.g., books, journal articles, government reports, industry specifications and standards, or professional reports. Top-quality reports will exceed this minimum research requirement. Newspaper articles, PowerPoints, encyclopedic entries, and website product/service specs all fail to meet this criterion for one of your 10 minimum quality sources. You may use those items, but they will not count toward the 10. Use of exactly ten substantive sources is at the standard of “meets.” I will not accept any reports lacking ample documented (cited) research in the Results/Findings section. Save a PDF and hyperlink for every source and be ready to provide it with your draft submissions.

REPORT SECTIONS Items in bold are required. Items capitalized are required verbatim. letter of transmittal title page executive summary (optional) Abstract – informative (vs. descriptive), summarizing the report including final recommendations Table of Contents Glossary — with footnote reference to glossary at the first appearance of a glossary term in report body: bold the term* with footnote at bottom of same page, once: *This and all bolded terms are defined in the Glossary. list of illustrations, list of symbols (optional) Introduction Purpose Literature Review (optional) Background Motivation Scope Research Methods with chronological subheadings as verb phrases featuring actions in present tense, similar to Proposal Tasks, with emphasis on transparency of critical thinking—your method of ensuring asking and answering (through research-based evidence) all relevant questions. Results with subheadings aligning with and expanding upon the Research Methods subheadings. The subheadings should be noun phrases to show, rhetorically, the shift from methodology of research to the results—the content—of that research. Example: Research Methods subhead 1: Acquire a basic understanding of tablet use by clinical staff at ABC Hospital Results subhead 1: Tablet use by clinical staff at ABC Hospital – no verb and no “Task” The Research Methods and Results subheads do not need to match fully. Include third-tier headings as needed. For some help beyond the textbook, consider including the following typical engineering or technical report content within the Results: • problem definition: Establishes the engineering problem in engineering terms • design description: Explains the potential design(s) selected to solve the problem (or address the opportunity). May be compared to alternatives. Described at a high (organizational or ethical), system, and component level as needed. • design evaluation: Assesses how well the design fulfills the requirements. Document any testing that can be fulfilled. Conclusions (a plural noun): Describes what you have concluded based on analyzing your Results, not a rhetorical essay “conclusion.” Recommendations: What you recommend your audience does based on your analysis of the Conclusions. Should be succinct yet detailed, concrete, and specific—a clear course of action. at least one informative graphic created by you and incorporated correctly into the body: You may include additional visuals. Follow the requirements for selection, design, introduction, label/title, and interpretation. appendices (optional) IEEE References list page

1) Is this a criminal or civil case? 2) Who is the defendant? 3) What is the main issue that the defendant appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court? 4) What is the rule regarding this issue? 5) What is the holding of this case? Provide a brief rationale.

Assignment Question

The focus of this chapter is: Analysis! Let’s examine how the US Supreme Court analyzed a case. Carefully read McDonnell v. US , 579 U.S. ____ (2016) (the entire opinion) and answer these questions. 1) Is this a criminal or civil case? 2) Who is the defendant? 3) What is the main issue that the defendant appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court? 4) What is the rule regarding this issue? 5) What is the holding of this case? Provide a brief rationale.

Project guidelines – Sustainability — Focus is on consumer engagement in the act of thrifting and recycling. For this assignment please analyze your data and write a report describing the sample and sample size.

Please review the Project Guidelines attached to understand the project topic that has been selected Project Topic — Option 2 in project guidelines – Sustainability — Focus is on consumer engagement in the act of thrifting and recycling. For this assignment please analyze your data and write a report describing the sample and sample size.