Best Writer

Explain how food branding and marketing use rhetoric to influence consumer health, lifestyle, and ethical decisions?

Describe the health care administration issue or barrier you are addressing. “Cost of Health Care Rising”
Discuss resources needed, including key stakeholders and the role they play in your plan.
Identify the characteristics of an effective health care leader and the role they will play in your plan.
Identify any external or internal regulation that must be considered to ensure compliance with any legislative, institutional, or agency policy or expectation.
Describe the organizational and strategical development structures/processes that address the problem.
Present strategies for communicating your proposed plan.
Use the research gathered in your literature review to provide support for your paper.

11.1: How can teachers and students use digital portfolios as tools for learning and as tools to assess to what degree learning has taken place?

11.2: What rules and procedures might you institute or design with students to make student participation systems (i.e. clickers) a positive and cooperative learning experience rather than competitive or negative?

11.3: How might technology-assisted performance-based learning experiences better measure skills and knowledge of the student learner? Of you as teacher?

Write a paper examining the sociological theories regarding the role of organized sports participation for strong social integration. This will include a schloraly lit review as well as an anaylsis of the implications for better sports team organization.

Write a persuasive easy on how IT workers should work in an office and not remote.

Write a research paper on the Grape Zinfandel?

From past to present, the controversy over the legalization of marijuana still exists. California legalized medical marijuana in 1996; in 2012, Colorado and Washington were the first states to legalize the recreational use of the drug. Today, numerous states have legalized marijuana in any use, but it is still illegal under federal law. Explain how the conflict perspective would discuss this issue. Be sure to discuss Marx and issues of social class (Mills) in your response. Peer comments should reflect on the viability of the conflict perspective to understand marijuana legalization issues.

Identify and describe the person’s most significant contribution to the field and assess their impact on the emerging field of human services (or social work). Eligible topical areas include services for at-risk and vulnerable populations, including the poor, the disabled, the elderly, children, the homeless, immigrants, and those in need of health and mental health services.

Describe the geographic region and work setting in which the work took place. Work settings might include hospitals, reservations, universities, state, or federal legislatures, or direct service agencies.

Discuss the pioneer’s legacy by explaining how and in what ways the pioneer’s work is relevant today.

If the pioneer sets up an organization, does it still exist?

Are there modern counterparts that can trace their existence to the pioneer’s work?

If the pioneer wrote an important policy or law, is it or some newer version of the policy or law still in effect?

Your essay should include a well-developed introduction with a statement of purpose, sub-sections with (centered) first-order headings, and a conclusion. Include a SMOG readability analysis of your essay. Refer to Chapter 4 in Writing Clearly for Clients and Colleagues by Ames and Fitzgerald for more information on a SMOG readability analysis. Be aware that the SMOG analysis does not count towards the 1200-word count.Write a 1,200-word, APA style essay in which you:

Note: You must cite and give a complete reference for at least three sources for this paper. You must use and cite at least one book on the pioneer.

Create a descriptive title that mentions the pioneer by name.

• Write a brief description of the assessment.
• Describe the type of assessment tool that will be used to assess the learning objectives.
•
•

Ethics and Diversity in Family Practice
Assignment Overview
This assignment focuses on a case study, The Case of Marie, which you completed as a part of this unit’s studies. This case involves an ethical dilemma with a diverse family, and the dilemma itself, like most ethical issues in group work, is potentially two-fold:
The dilemma among the group members, as well as the content and manner of their communication with you.
The ethical dilemma within yourself, as you examine your own natural preferences and biases in the context of the group and its needs.
At all levels of social work practice (micro, mezzo, and macro), the diversity of personal preferences and biases always presents the possibility of ethical compromise. Combined with potential ethical issues within the diverse situations, beliefs, and actions of the group members themselves, any given situation can quickly become ethically clouded.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:
Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
C1.GP.B: Use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations.
Related Assignment Criterion:
5. Describe personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
6. Identify data collection methods necessary to conduct an ethical decision.
Competency 2: Engage diversity and difference in practice.
C2.GP.C: Apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
5. Describe personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
Competency 7: Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C7.GP.C: Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
2. Describe how to manage ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts.
Competency 8: Intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C8.GP.E: Facilitate effective transitions and endings that advance mutually agreed-on goals.
Related Assignment Criterion:
2. Describe how to manage ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts.
Competency 7: Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C7.GP.A: Collect and organize data, and apply critical thinking to interpret information from clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
6. Identify data collection methods necessary to conduct an ethical decision.
Assignment Description
Your task for this assignment is to identify the ethical issues at play, describe their potential consequences, and, finally, using the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) code of ethics and other researched resources, apply a principled framework for resolving the dilemma. Use the link located in the Resources to visit NASW’s Web site; you may search the site to find information regarding NASW’s code of ethics and essential steps for ethical problem-solving.
Note: You may find it beneficial to complete the discussion activity for this unit before beginning work on this assignment.
Assignment Using this unit’s readings, case study, NASW resources, and scholarly literature, complete the following for this assignment:
Identify NASW essential steps for ethical problem solving to apply to the case study.
Identify what type of data you would need to collect in order to make ethical decisions.
Describe the ethical dilemma presented in the case study, and identify areas of ambiguity, including the possible consequences that could result if different steps were chosen.
Based on your research, apply best practices related to ethical decision-making models.
Explain the areas of NASW code of ethics in question as you apply the strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions.
Describe where your personal values come into play as you apply the strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at the principled decision and how you will manage these personal values.
Submit your completed assignment by the end of the week.
You will be working with Marie and her family again in Unit 4, moving from getting a handle on potential ethical dilemmas to planning an approach to group work that will benefit all involved.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
Number of resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: Minimum of three double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.Ethics and Diversity in Family Practice
Assignment Overview
This assignment focuses on a case study, The Case of Marie, which you completed as a part of this unit’s studies. This case involves an ethical dilemma with a diverse family, and the dilemma itself, like most ethical issues in group work, is potentially two-fold:
The dilemma among the group members, as well as the content and manner of their communication with you.
The ethical dilemma within yourself, as you examine your own natural preferences and biases in the context of the group and its needs.
At all levels of social work practice (micro, mezzo, and macro), the diversity of personal preferences and biases always presents the possibility of ethical compromise. Combined with potential ethical issues within the diverse situations, beliefs, and actions of the group members themselves, any given situation can quickly become ethically clouded.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:
Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
C1.GP.B: Use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations.
Related Assignment Criterion:
5. Describe personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
6. Identify data collection methods necessary to conduct an ethical decision.
Competency 2: Engage diversity and difference in practice.
C2.GP.C: Apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
5. Describe personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
Competency 7: Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C7.GP.C: Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
2. Describe how to manage ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts.
Competency 8: Intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C8.GP.E: Facilitate effective transitions and endings that advance mutually agreed-on goals.
Related Assignment Criterion:
2. Describe how to manage ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts.
Competency 7: Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
C7.GP.A: Collect and organize data, and apply critical thinking to interpret information from clients and constituencies.
Related Assignment Criterion:
6. Identify data collection methods necessary to conduct an ethical decision.
Assignment Description
Your task for this assignment is to identify the ethical issues at play, describe their potential consequences, and, finally, using the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) code of ethics and other researched resources, apply a principled framework for resolving the dilemma. Use the link located in the Resources to visit NASW’s Web site; you may search the site to find information regarding NASW’s code of ethics and essential steps for ethical problem-solving.
Note: You may find it beneficial to complete the discussion activity for this unit before beginning work on this assignment.
Assignment Using this unit’s readings, case study, NASW resources, and scholarly literature, complete the following for this assignment:
Identify NASW essential steps for ethical problem solving to apply to the case study.
Identify what type of data you would need to collect in order to make ethical decisions.
Describe the ethical dilemma presented in the case study, and identify areas of ambiguity, including the possible consequences that could result if different steps were chosen.
Based on your research, apply best practices related to ethical decision-making models.
Explain the areas of NASW code of ethics in question as you apply the strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions.
Describe where your personal values come into play as you apply the strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at the principled decision and how you will manage these personal values.
Submit your completed assignment by the end of the week.
You will be working with Marie and her family again in Unit 4, moving from getting a handle on potential ethical dilemmas to planning an approach to group work that will benefit all involved.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
Number of resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: Minimum of three double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.