Best Writer

EDUC 671 The article is attached
Page 1 of 2
ARTICLE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Follow the instructions outlined below for each assigned Article Review. The following assigned
Article Reviews should be completed for the corresponding module: week. The article can be
found on the submission pages for Article Review: Assessments and Assignments
Assignment, Article Review: Validity and Reliability Assignment, or Article Review:
Culturally Responsive Teaching Assignment under Article Review Resources.
Review must:
 Be typed using Microsoft Word (no other computer program is acceptable).
 Include an APA Professional Title Page. Do not include an abstract.
 Follow all APA guidelines, including style and grammar rules.
 Be two pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. You should not write
an introduction and conclusion.
 Include three sections with the following headings:
Article Analysis
This section should:
o Be written in third person, as this is your analysis of the article’s approach and
conclusions.
o Demonstrate an understanding and analysis of the author’s thesis.
o Articulate your reaction to the article, explaining why you agree or disagree with
the article’s findings. This is an analysis of the article’s assertions, not a topical
analysis.
o Include detailed reasons to support your expressed opinion.
o Be one page in length (between 200 and 250 words).
o Not include information taken directly from the article but should express your
own thoughts and feelings about how the article is crafted. (No quotations.)
o Include appropriate in-text citations following APA format. Paraphrase the
information from the article; do NOT directly quote any of the material.
Topic Analysis
This section should:
o Be written in first person, as this is your opinion and analysis of the topic.
o Not include personal experiences or anecdotes.
o Convey your perspective on the subject of the article.
o Be one paragraph in length (100-125 words).
o Not include information taken directly from the article but should express your
own thoughts and feelings about the topic. (No quotations)
EDUC 671
Page 2 of 2
Personal Reflection
This section should:
o Be written in first person and reflect on applying article content to your students
and professional practice within your own present or future practice.
o Be one paragraph in length (about a half page).
o Not include information taken directly from the article, but your own thoughts
should be on applying that information. (No quotations)
Include a separate references page with a single source for the original article in current APA
format. Do not use any other sources except the original article.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

This assignment has free reign when picking a thesis to base the whole research paper around. I would just need a confirmation of what it shall be prior to starting the essay.

Below you will find the following:

Instructions, Class Notes, Articles in regards to class notes, as well as writting tips for this paper.

Professor is really looking for in detail of the course content in this paper as well as no fluff.

Thank you

• Pick three films from three different eras (for example, silent era, Classical Hollywood, and contemporary)
• All three films should have a common element.
Examples include:
• The same subgenre (slapstick, parody, satire, dark comedy, etc.)
• The same approach to comedy, based on the major theories of comedy
• All three address issues of gender, sexuality, and/or race
o The same character type (unruly woman,
anarchistic comic, etc.)
• Your thesis should make an argument for how the comedic element has evolved in relation to film industry trends (technology, censorship, etc.), as well as shifts in American culture and values.
• You will need to do some outside research about the films, as well as the historical context. The Library can help you with research if you’re not sure how to start.

Before going into details about the assignment, I want to point out three conditions you must agree to:

1. The assignment must be free from plagiarism. The work will be checked for plagiarism through a third-party site; if any plagiarism is found, it will not be accepted.

2. References should be full including page numbers. You must ensure that you use the resources correctly, as I will check each one separately. If you fail to do that, I will not accept your work.

3. There will be four phases in the assignment, each with its own deadline, and once you complete a phase, you will receive information on the next one.
– Chapter one: due on 24 April 2023 (5500 words)
– Chapter Two: due on 15 May 2023 (6375 words)
– Chapter Three: due on 18 June 2023 (8300 words)
– Introduction & Conclusion: due on 25 June 2023 (1000 words)

Citations and references: Chicago Style
References: 50+ sources

————————-

The assignment isn′t to debate or argue whether climate change is happening or not. Despite this, the research will argue that climate change policies face many challenges (for example, most countries have agreed to achieve carbon neutrality in a specific year, but no one has discussed the cost and who will pay? In another example, carbon neutrality has become more of an accounting process.

This assignment does not aim to provide a scientific answer, but rather to discuss the challenges associated with climate change policies and how they are not realistic to some extent. The research will examine the following question:

How will political, economic, and technological factors affect the methods/policies used to achieve carbon neutrality?

For this course, I am required to compose a reflective paper on the module readings from my class. It shouldn’t be a SUMMARY of what I’ve read, but more so an indepth analaysi of the issues discussed within the readings. Please see the directions from my professor below:

Directions: Your reflective papers are evaluated according to the effectiveness, insights, and in-depth analysis used to discuss the issues covered during the week in the readings and course discussions. Students are expected to make connections to educational leadership and/or role of educational leaders in addressing the educational issues discussed in the weekly topic. In fact, making connections to educational leadership is a common expectation for all assignments in this class.

To ensure each area is addressed, students would want to organize their papers at least for the following areas. While a required a full paper may also include an Abstract and finish with a Conclusions section, the reflections should be must address the following questions/areas:
What is/are the central issue-s/problem-s addressed in the readings and online discussions?
What is the specific value (or lack thereof) of addressing this issue in comparative literature to the field of education?
I have attached the course textbook below. This week’s readings were focused on Chapters 1-4 (you do not have to discuss all). I would highlight some important things learned from the chapters and reflect on how it connects to educational leadership. Use the two discussion questions to help the guide the paper as well. You may use other outside sources to support your thinking.

Here is a link to a Youtube video we were required to watch as well if you want to use it as a source, too: https://youtu.be/ERvh0hZ6uP8

Ethical and Strategic LeadershipEthical and Strategic Leadership

A. Discuss ethics and ethical decision making within the context of sport.
B. Establish a framework for becoming an ethical leader.
C. Discuss chronic and emerging ethical issues in sport at various levels.
D. Differentiate the four levels of strategy.
E. Explain the main characteristics that strategic leaders possess.
A. Discuss ethics and ethical decision making within the context of sport.
B. Establish a framework for becoming an ethical leader.
C. Discuss chronic and emerging ethical issues in sport at various levels.
D. Differentiate the four levels of strategy.
E. Explain the main characteristics that strategic leaders possess.

Research a topic from the book (see individual chapters) that interests you. Gather at least 5 recent articles from external sources in addition to the book and write a paper on your topic. Choose current events to discuss your points. There may be a current issue that you would like to research and tie to what was learned this semester, that is what I want. All statements should be grounded in theory – not your opinion unless it can be justified with theory. The due date is on Friday of that week (not the usual Sunday). Use APA guidelines and the grading rubric found in the Start Here folder. There is not a minimum word or page requirement, but with 5 sources, it should be around 7-10 content pages with a reference section.

Use article Long walk to freedom by Nelson melandela AND the dark side of resilience by Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic and Derek Lusk for 2 of the 10 required sources

RM, a 62 year old Hispanic widow, recently underwent radiation and chemotherapy following surgery for breast cancer. On a follow-up visit to the clinic, the nurse notes that RM appears thinner and more tired than usual.

Subjective data:

She has not had an appetite since the treatment for cancer started
Feels “weak” and “worn out”
Thinks the treatment for cancer has not been effective
Lives alone in an apartment in the inner city
Is a nationalized citizen from Honduras
Speaks English but does not read English very well

Objective Data:

Height 62 in; weight 92 lbs
BP 98/60, HR 60, RR 12
Ulcerations of her buccal mucosal membranes and tongue
Serum albumin: 2.9 g/dL
Hb: 10g/dL; Hct: 32%

You will need to make a simple, understandable brochure to leave with RM. The brochure must address your assessment findings above and help RM to improve her nutritional health. Consider the given factors of the client, RM, when creating the brochure for her to use.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to apply the principles of pharmacology to support evidence-based prescribing practices for the management of common diseases of the endocrine system. This assignment allows students to use clinical practice guidelines to guide treatment decisions for common patient scenarios in the clinical setting.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Identify the most commonly prescribed agents in the major drug classes. (POs 1, 2)
CO 2: Make appropriate evidence-based therapeutic treatment decisions for individual patients utilizing drugs from the major drug classes.(POs 1, 2)
CO 3: Apply knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics in prescribing patient treatment. (POs 1, 2)
CO 4: Distinguish internal and external environment factors affecting drug action, reaction, efficacy, and interaction. (POs 1, 2)
CO 5: Identify client indicators of therapeutic, ineffective, adverse responses and side effects to drug therapy. (POs 1, 2)
Due Date

The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
The assignment title is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 120

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
There are three patient cases presented in this assignment. You are to use the following to answer the questions.
When you click on the resource links, the links will open in a new window so you will be able to navigate between the resources and the quiz.  
American Diabetes Association. (2020). Figure 9.1 [Graph]. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. https://clinical.diabetesjournals.org/content/38/1/10 Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)
Rosenthal, L., Burchum, J. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurses and Physician Assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
You will be presented with a patient case and then a series of questions. This assignment is completed in a quiz format; however, it is not an exam and you are encouraged to use your textbook and course materials. There are 12 questions worth 10 points each and an attestation question worth 0 points for a total of 120 points.

Review the case information and then answer each required question with a succinct, informative answer.
Answers should be one to five sentences in length.
Some questions may require a short one-sentence answer, whereas others require a five-sentence answer for a complete explanation.
Consider the most common and obvious answer.
A scholarly reference is required for answers where a source such as textbook or clinical practice guideline is used to develop your response.
Feedback is provided immediately after completing this assignment only. The feedback provided is general and non-specific to protect the integrity of this assignment due to the unfortunate nature of answer sharing among many students.
There is no time limit for this assignment.
This assignment will need to be completed in one sitting, meaning you will not be able to save your answers and come back to it later. Once you open the quiz, you will need to finish it at that time.
When you are ready to begin this assignment, click the “Take the Quiz” button near the bottom of this page.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to apply the principles of pharmacology to support evidence-based prescribing practices for the management of common diseases of the endocrine system. This assignment allows students to use clinical practice guidelines to guide treatment decisions for common patient scenarios in the clinical setting.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Identify the most commonly prescribed agents in the major drug classes. (POs 1, 2)
CO 2: Make appropriate evidence-based therapeutic treatment decisions for individual patients utilizing drugs from the major drug classes.(POs 1, 2)
CO 3: Apply knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics in prescribing patient treatment. (POs 1, 2)
CO 4: Distinguish internal and external environment factors affecting drug action, reaction, efficacy, and interaction. (POs 1, 2)
CO 5: Identify client indicators of therapeutic, ineffective, adverse responses and side effects to drug therapy. (POs 1, 2)
Due Date

The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
The assignment title is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 120

Preparing the Assignment-
USE THE QUESTIONS AS SUBHEADINGS
USE THE ATTACHED CASE STUDIES TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT
ANSWER this question:
Use the Helen Smith case study to answer the following question.

Which DM drug class is contraindicated in patients with heart failure and why?

The why portion of this question will require some independent web or article searching to understand why this contraindication exists. Be sure to cite your sources. ANSWER this question:
Use the Helen Smith case study to answer the following question.

Which DM drug class is contraindicated in patients with heart failure and why?

Paper Criteria- use a minumum of 3 sentences

The why portion of this question will require some independent web or article searching to understand why this contraindication exists. Be sure to cite your sources.

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
There are three patient cases presented in this assignment. You are to use the following to answer the questions.
When you click on the resource links, the links will open in a new window so you will be able to navigate between the resources and the quiz.  
American Diabetes Association. (2020). Figure 9.1 [Graph]. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. https://clinical.diabetesjournals.org/content/38/1/10 Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)
Rosenthal, L., Burchum, J. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurses and Physician Assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
You will be presented with a patient case and then a series of questions. This assignment is completed in a quiz format; however, it is not an exam and you are encouraged to use your textbook and course materials. There are 12 questions worth 10 points each and an attestation question worth 0 points for a total of 120 points.

Review the case information and then answer each required question with a succinct, informative answer.
Answers should be one to five sentences in length.
Some questions may require a short one-sentence answer, whereas others require a five-sentence answer for a complete explanation.
Consider the most common and obvious answer.
A scholarly reference is required for answers where a source such as textbook or clinical practice guideline is used to develop your response.
Feedback is provided immediately after completing this assignment only. The feedback provided is general and non-specific to protect the integrity of this assignment due to the unfortunate nature of answer sharing among many students.
There is no time limit for this assignment.
This assignment will need to be completed in one sitting, meaning you will not be able to save your answers and come back to it later. Once you open the quiz, you will need to finish it at that time.
When you are ready to begin this assignment, click the “Take the Quiz” button near the bottom of this page.

ANSWER this question:
Use the Helen Smith case study to answer the following question.

Which DM drug class is contraindicated in patients with heart failure and why?

The why portion of this question will require some independent web or article searching to understand why this contraindication exists. Be sure to cite your sources.

Complete the following

Using process mapping and reviewing the information here, present the new processes for check-in and checkout to management.
Pick 1 hotel offering and write a new process map for it. Along with charts, give a detailed explanation of the new process and where such improvement will benefit the hotel and increase customer satisfaction. Be sure to include all costs, resources, and management functions.
Using the data gathered for check-in and checkout under your new process, present control charts that demonstrate the new process performance to management.