Best Writer

For this discussion forum, you will analyze poems that discuss the legacy of St. Francis. To begin, I would like you to read this essay by Lynn White, Jr ” I attached it down” .This essay was original a lecture given by White in 1966, in which he argued that many environmental issues were the product of Western views of nature. The essay is a little difficult in places, but if you read this introduction (https://ecoevocommunity.nature.com/posts/14041-the-long-reach-of-lynn-white-jr-s-the-historical-roots-of-our-ecologic-crisis ), it should give you solid footing as you read the essay itself.
In his essay, Lynn White, Jr. writes of St. Francis: “He tried to substitute the idea of the equality of all creatures, including man, for the idea of man’s limitless rule of creation.” In ways, the following poems connect with this idea of “equality.”
It’s worth pointing out that White’s essay was controversial when it was first published, and that many others since then have pointed to other interpretations of Western traditions and nature, such as Calvin Dewitt, who in this interview states (https://grist.org/article/dewitt/), “The Bible is an ecological handbook.”
For this assignment, there are four poems that you can potentially write about:
Yusef Komunyakaa, “Blessing the Animals” (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/browse?contentId=39953)
Gerald Stern, “Cow Worship” (https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-feb-14-bk-7887-story.html)
Ellen Bryant Voigt, “Cow” (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/06/cow)
Galway Kinnell, “Saint Francis and the Sow” (https://poets.org/poem/saint-francis-and-sow)
Once you have read through these poems, try to observe your initial thoughts and reactions to them. Then you will write 2-3 paragraphs where you connect one or two of these poems to our class discussions of humans and nature: The human and natural discussions are about how humans affect nature. There are many environmental issues are happening in our time because of the humanities and what they’re doing.

Calculate an expected return of your firm and its competitor, using CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model). Then evaluate its stock price with Dividend models. If the firm does not have dividend information, you may need to set up your own reasonable assumptions for dividend payments. 1 page – ROMAN

How did the early Welsh poets represent and respond to warfare?

Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Refer to the “Proposal Essay Assignment” resource for instructions on completing this assignment.

For this assignment, you will be read, analyze, and critique an academic research article written about applied ethics, which is a work of contemporary philosophy. In the summary component of the paper, you will discuss how a contemporary philosopher applies those same concepts and principles that we discussed in class to address moral concerns. In the critical analysis component of the paper, you will discuss how someone might reasonably disagree with what they say, as well as how someone might apply what they say to various aspects of life.

This is a 1000-to-1250-word paper (approximately 4-5 pages) that half summarizes (approximately 500 words) and half critically analyzes (approximately 500 words) a recent academic article (published in 2018 or later) of your choice on applied ethics. This review of an academic article will be written as a professor might write a critical review of an academic book. The word length is important, because 1000 words is the length of a standard academic book review. You will find that minimizing word length and offering restrained criticism of academic work will be increasingly important as you take advanced undergraduate and graduate classes.
Success on the paper will largely depend on how well the paper conforms to the formatting and content guidelines included in this document. It must be exactly eight paragraphs, in the same order and with the same content as specified in the guidelines. The review will be graded “like an English paper” in terms of the quality of the writing itself and “like a philosophy paper” in terms of the precision of its ethical content, such as how appropriately it defines and uses philosophical terminology.
The paper must be written about a single academic article published in 2018 or later, on a topic applied ethics, or it will receive a zero. Applied ethics refers to the application of the ethical theories to moral issues: the “ethics of” a given topic (for example, the “ethics of” zoos), a given topic’s “ethics” (for example, “zoo ethics”), or specific applications of ethics (for example, ethics of keeping elephants in zoos). This major assignment is 20% of the final grade.
You cannot review any of the articles which are reviewed in the samples following this guide. You also cannot review any of the articles reviewed in the sample papers following this prompt.

Formatting
The review should be written as a continuous narrative: There are no separate sections.
Please observe standard writing conventions of 2-3 paragraphs per page (double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman, 1” margins).
Language
The review should be written in academic style.
The article should be written in the historical present tense (that is, we know the author “wrote” the article in the past, but you’re presenting it as if the author “writes” now).
The author is doing the action, not “the article.”
Since you are reviewing an ethics paper, you must incorporate technical philosophical words where appropriate, taking into consideration that different authors may understand those same terms differently and defining those words accordingly.
References and Citations
Do not use any outside sources in the review, other than the article under review. Cite page numbers only if you quote the article directly, e.g. (p. 29). Cite section numbers, e.g. (sec. 3), if no pages are available or when you reference the sections of the article in the first paragraph.
Quotes should be used sparingly, if at all. Citations are needed for direct quotes or to point out specific information to the reader. Citations for section numbers are required in the first paragraph.
Title
The citation of the academic article under review also functions as the title of the paper. This is a citation style that is often used in ethics papers written by professors.
The citation is created using a hanging indent.
Everything, including your name line, is bolded
DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier. This functions as the article’s unique serial number. You must use the direct link to the DOI. If no DOI is available, you will need to link to the article’s digital “home” on the journal’s website. Do not use links to library databases.
Title Format
Author Last Name First Initial (year in parentheses) Title of article in all lowercase. Title of Journal in Uppercase volume number of the journal:page range of article. DOI link
Reviewed by Your First Name and Last Name, undergraduate at Blinn College (or Texas A&M)
Title Example
White TI (2017) Dolphins, captivity, and SeaWorld: the misuse of science. Business and Society Review 122:119–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12112
Reviewed by Steve Dezort, instructor at Blinn College

Paragraph 1: Structure and Scope
The first three sentences need to 1) Indicate the issue that the paper is addressing, 2) Indicate the author’s research question, in the form of a statement (E.g., “In this article, Thomas White seeks to answer . . .”), 3) Indicate the author’s answer to the research question, the thesis (E.g., “He argues that . . .”).
The remainder of the paragraph should describe article’s structure, organization, and sections, referencing those sections in parentheses. For example, “Section 1” of the article would be referenced as (sec. 1).
The content should be specific, not what the author is doing, but what the author is questioning, describing, explaining, arguing, etc.
All the sections must be accounted for in parentheses. Subsections should not be referenced.
Refer to the author by both their first and last names at first mention, and by last name only at subsequent mentions.
Do not reference the title of the article or the titles of the author. For example, do not refer to the author as Doctor (Dr.), Professor (Prof.), or Mister (Mr.).
Paragraph 2: People, Perspective, and Point
Describe the perspective from which the author writes the article by mentioning the author’s discipline, and the author’s research specialization within that discipline. For example, the author’s discipline might be philosophy, and their specialization within that discipline might be business ethics.
You will have to do an “academic background check” to find out the author’s discipline and area of specialization. This “academic background check” will typically lead to a university’s website. You should not reference this as an outside source. It is not plagiarism.
You should use the same pronouns that the author uses in their self-description.
The author’s place of employment, job title, and degrees are irrelevant and should not be mentioned.
Describe the contribution that the author is seeking to make to their research specialization. This is what the author claims they are seeking to contribute.
Paragraphs 3 and 4: Thesis and Argument
These paragraphs elaborate on the first 3 sentences of paragraph 1 and therefore must match that content.
Describe the author’s argument in the article.
Summarize their main point (thesis) and sketch their arguments in support of that main point.
Paragraphs 5 and 6: Points of Limitation
Limit each paragraph to only 1 point of limitation. Examples include:
Evaluate the breadth, depth, scope, and limitations of the article.
Discuss what the author covers and what the author leaves out.
Evaluate whether the author’s claimed contribution is indeed what they make
Evaluate how convincing the author’s arguments are.
Including an example or two would be helpful to the reader.
Use language such as “Someone might be interested to know more about …” or “One aspect of the issue that readers would like to know more about is …”
Paragraphs 7 and 8: Points of Usefulness
Limit each paragraph to only 1 point of strength. Examples include:
Evaluate the strengths of the article.
Discuss the interesting insights the author offers.
Comment on the ways the article is useful and who might find the article useful. Specifically discuss how someone might apply what they say to various aspects of life.
Including an example or two would be helpful to the reader
Paragraph 8 is not a conclusion. The conclusion is the last sentence, so end on a positive note with a sentence on why the article is worth reading and recommended for reading.

Here are the following 5 topics for your final essay. Choose one and think about what you will write about tomorrow.

1. Who is the most successful human being you can think of (living or dead)? Tell me why.

2. If you won 1 million dollars, how would you spend it?

3. Love or Money? Which is more important, and why?

4. What is the worst decision you ever made, and how would you change it if you could?

5. What is the most important character trait a person could possess, and why? (You might consider traits
like honesty, loyalty, intelligence, generosity, sense of humor, etc.)

Answer all questions given below

Length: 1200 Words
A Doll House was controversial in its time, in part because it showed a woman daring to leave her husband to pursue her own self-fulfillment, but also because its heroine was so unapologetic about her choice to abandon her children.
The play continues to provoke ambivalent feelings today, as audience members and readers are forced to reconcile their support for Nora’s belief in her own humanity with the extreme nature of her actions in leaving her family.
Write an essay in which you assess the morality of Nora’s decisions at the end of the play. Is she justified in actions? Why or why not? Whatever argument you choose, you should support it through analysis of specific textual examples from the play itself. Answering this question sufficiently requires thinking not only about the end of the play, but the world and the characters that Ibsen establishes for us in the first two acts as well.
You can use the text of the play provided below to help you locate specific examples.

It is December 2008, and you have just accepted an appointment as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) position at Midwest Healthcare System. Dr. Montana is the system’s President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Your peers on the Executive Team include Mr. Clark, the Chief Operating Officer (COO), Dr. Jordan, the Medical Director, and Ms. Palfrey, the Vice President of Nursing.
When Dr. Montana announced your appointment to the organization, he stated that your primary objective would be to reverse the ominous financial trend of operating losses that started early FY 2008; the trend is expected to continue into FY 2009.
During FY 2008, some of the operating losses were offset with emergency infusions of investment income from restricted net assets; however, in November, the Midwest Healthcare System Board of Trustees passed a resolution prohibiting that practice. Consequently, investment income is now restricted to capital expenditures only.
Midwest Healthcare System is a not-for-profit corporation that comprises a 120-bed acute care hospital, a skilled nursing facility, a rehabilitation center, a home healthcare agency, and some outpatient clinics. The hospital is the only major facility within 50 miles of the rural community of approximately 40,000 that it serves.
Based on the scenario in the Overview, you will need to meet with each member of the executive team to determine how best to address the various issues surrounding Midwest’s operating losses and the effect of the board’s resolution.
Write a 2-3 page paper
Develop a specific set of realistic questions (at least five per member) that you will ask each of the three executive team members based on their specific roles, responsibilities, and perspectives regarding the causes of the operating losses and the potential resolutions. Focus on questions related to the following topics. However, you may address other topics not included in this list:
Assets, liabilities, and net worth
Sources of revenue
Expenses
Direct and indirect costs
Inventory
Staffing
Operating budget
Capital expenditures
Trends
Develop a list of specific actions, which will form the foundation of an action plan, that you will take to begin addressing Midwest Healthcare System’s operating losses.

Please use examples
Provide abundant evidence of critical thought.

Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation. Consider your internal stakeholders, such as the facility, unit, or health care setting where the change proposal is being considered, and your external stakeholders, like an individual or group outside the health care setting. Why is their support necessary to the success of your change proposal, and how you will go about securing that support?

You have established the risk management context. Using the 2nd step in the risk management process is necessary to identify actual and potential risks, their consequences, mitigation strategies, barriers, and prevention. Then you can determine risks that must be managed. Select a specific risk from the following:
Accidents
Injuries
Falls
Medical error
Human error
Decide approaches for identifying risks such as brainstorming, brainwriting, interviews, reviewing reports (patient records, committee reports, incident reports etc.), and conducting root analysis.
Determine who should be involved in the process.
Decide the scope of the risk, consequences, mitigation strategies, prevention, and barriers.
Identify the type of information required.
Establish a risk register and document identified risks.
Identify 2-3 sources for your report.
Submit a 5-page report to management.
Submitting your assignment in APA format means, at a minimum, you will need the following:
Title page: Remember the running head. The title should be in all capitals.
Length: 5 pages minimum
Abstract: This is a summary of your paper, not an introduction. Begin writing in third person.
Body: This begins on the page following the title page and abstract page and must be double-spaced (be careful not to triple- or quadruple-space between paragraphs). The typeface should be 12-pt. Times Roman or 12-pt. Courier in regular black type. Do not use color, bold type, or italics, except as required for APA-level headings and references. The deliverable length of the body of your paper for this assignment is 5 pages. In-body academic citations to support your decisions and analysis are required. A variety of academic sources is encouraged.
Reference page: References that align with your in-body academic sources are listed on the final page of your paper. The references must be in APA format using appropriate spacing, hanging indent, italics, and uppercase and lowercase usage as appropriate for the type of resource used. Remember, the Reference page is not a bibliography but a further listing of the abbreviated in-body citations used in the paper. Every referenced item must have a corresponding in-body citation.