Best Writer

2-4 paragraphics long
What differences and similarities do you see with domestic and international crisis management? Do you think they should be a difference?
Proverbs 11:25 says” Generous persons will prosper; those who refresh others will themselves be refreshed.” The good news: Knowing that you’ve been able to help someone is its reward. But as this verse notes, being generous and open handed means God will also see to it that you are rewarded.
Who should be responsible for crisis on the international stage?(fema,private sector, nongovernmental organizations)
Does America have a responsibilty when a crisis occurs internationally?

Getting Started
You may have learned a great deal in your field placement agency about direct practice, including clinical services. At your field placement agency, you might have learned how to intervene effectively with individuals and families facing a number of psychosocial issues. As discussed throughout this advanced field placement and seminar course, one psychosocial issue that many families face is the issue of alcohol and other drug abuse. Because alcohol and other drug abuse occur in a social context, social workers must respond not only on the micro, individual, and family levels but also on the macro level. Social policy practice is also key for sustaining long-term change. In this workshop activity, you will discuss the drug policy and how it has impacted families with your classmates. Using online resources, you will identify at least one intervention that could be used to address social policy issues related to families and substance abuse.
Resources
Lloyd, M. H. (2015). The Forgotten Victims of the War on Drugs: An Analysis of US Drug Policy and Reform From a Child Well-Being Perspective. Journal of Policy Practice, 14(2), 114-138
Video: On the front lines of the opioid crisis across the US: Part 1
Background Information
As discussed in the article “The Forgotten Victims of the War on Drugs“, children have been disproportionately affected by the “war on drugs.” Your clinical practice at your field placement agency may provide you various opportunities to interact with families affected by alcohol and substance abuse and to engage families who are impacted negatively l enforcement of drug laws. In collaboration with your field supervisor, identify policies that could be useful for responding more effectively to drug use in your own community. Explore whether these actions could make a difference to improve the lives of families living in your region.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Read: The Forgotten Victims of the War on Drugs: An Analysis of US Drug Policy and Reform From a Child Well-Being Perspective. You may need to log in, using your MyIWU log in.
Watch: On the front lines of the opioid crisis across the US: Part 1.
Navigate to the threaded discussion and respond to the following:
Identify and describe two important ideas you learned from reading the article and ways you may agree or disagree with them.
Taking care to disguise the identities of families you have served in your field placement agency, provide one or two examples of how current drug policy in your state has impacted people in your field placement agency or in your community.
Describe a meaningful social policy intervention you could make in your field placement agency and/or community to address the use of drugs and its impact on families or how it is responded to. You can use one of the policy ideas from the article or another idea of your choice. Describe the proposed policy and provide a rationale and evidence-based argument for why it would be beneficial and how you might go about initiating it. Support your policy idea with references to the article or other professional sources or literature.
Identify 2 potential barriers that might stand in the way of your proposed social policy intervention. What could you do to respond to those barriers?

PLease make sure you use “I” statements in the order……. I am a social worker that work for an IOP agency with people addicted to substance abuse. I work in Kentucky, and make sure you find an articles that speaks on the policy in my state…………

Interventions…….. IOP groups, PEER SUPPORT, individual session, Natural support, etc….

listen to the video above …. cite and reference the article……….

I have attached the article you need to read, cite and refernce for the order

Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models. EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health Determining the Credibility of Evidence activity prior to developing the report. The activity is a media simulation that offers an opportunity to review a scenario and work on determining the credibility of presented evidence. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 2 successfully. This media simulation is one potential source of context on which to base your assessment submission. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

Scenario
For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing this assessment:

The specific diagnosis/health issue you identified in your previous assessment.
The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.
A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.
The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.

Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:

Evidence-Based Practice Models
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
Stetler Model
Ottawa Model
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode
John Hopkins Model
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model
For this assessment:

Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Review the literature below and choose the appropriate model for your diagnosis/health care issue.
Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF] and Evidence-Based Practice Models help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

Length of submission: 2-4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
Number of references: Cite 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
Identify an evidence-based practice model (such as Iowa, Stetler, John Hopkins, etc.) and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Write a reflection paper that focuses on your attitudes toward media. Tell me more about who you were, what made you pause, and what influenced what you thought at the start of the term compared to where you are today. What may have led to some of your changes in thinking, habits or consumption?
It should be approximately 1,500 words, double-spaced and submitted using the Canvas submission tool. In order to be eligible to receive full credit, you will need to cite examples, discussions, activities and readings from four different weeks/modules. Be sure to cite your source(s) using the format with which you are most familiar.

Write a paper addressing the impact the media has on the cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during middle childhood. Include the following in your paper:
How the selected media can change brain functioning
How the selected media can disrupt physical development
How the selected media influences social development
How the selected media can positively influence a child
Briefly summarize how Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory would describe the impact of the selected media on the different systems that effect childhood development (refer to page 37 of the text as a guide).
Include at least three scholarly references, in addition to the text, in your paper.

(((PAGE 37)))
Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological TheoryConcentric circles show five levels of environmental influence on the individual, from the most intimate environment (the microsystem) to the broadest (the chronosytem)—all within the perpendicular dimension of time.The mesosystem is the interlocking of various microsystems. It may include linkages between home and school (such as parent-teacher conferences) or between the family and the peer group (such as relationships that develop among families of children in a neighborhood play group). For example, a parent’s bad day at work might affect interactions with a child later that evening in a negative way. Despite never having actually gone to the workplace, the child is still affected by it.mesosystemBronfenbrenner’s term for linkages between two or more microsystems.The mesosystem focuses on interactions between microsystems, but the exosystem consists of interactions between a microsystem and an outside system or institution. Though the effects are indirect, they can still have a profound impact on a child. For example, different countries have policies on what type, if any, of maternal or paternal leave accommodations are available for new parents. And, whether or not a parent has the option to stay home with a newborn is a substantial influence on development. Thus governmental policies trickle down and can affect a child’s’ day-to-day experiences.exosystemBronfenbrenner’s term for linkages between two or more settings, one of which does not contain the child.The macrosystem consists of overarching cultural patterns, such as dominant beliefs, ideologies, and economic and political systems. How is a child’s development affected by living in a capitalist or socialist society?macrosystemBronfenbrenner’s term for a society’s overall cultural patterns, including values, customs, and social systems.Finally, the chronosystem adds the dimension of time: change or constancy in the child and the environment. Time marches on, and as it does, changes occur. These can include changes in family composition, place of residence, or parents’ employment, as well as larger events such as wars, ideology, political system, and economic cycles.chronosystemBronfenbrenner’s term for effects of time on other developmental systems.According to Bronfenbrenner, a person is not merely an outcome of development but a shaper of it. People affect their own development through their biological and psychological characteristics, talents and skills, disabilities, and temperament.By looking at systems that affect individuals in and beyond the family, this bioecological approach helps us to see the variety of influences on development. The contextual perspective also reminds us that findings about the development of children in one culture or one group within a culture (such as white, middle-class Americans) may not apply equally to children in other societies or cultural groups.

1 What were the challenges of this virtual team?
2.
How did the Project Manager and the team
overcome those challenges
3.
Discuss the issues with quality control and
quality assurance. If you were the PM, how would you manage quality in
this project?

Discuss the role of anti-trust law in the formation of player’s unions.

-the impact of anti-trust law on the television rights for college sports

-what have been the negative and positive impacts of the Alston vs NCAA ruling

-what has been the most impactful court case on sports in your opinion. (Something in the past 50
Years)

1. Write up of project, 2‐4 written pages (typed).
2. Give a general description of child (age, sex, etc.) and the observation situation.
3. Describe behavior or patterns of behaviors that were interesting to you and analyze the significance to child development.
4. Do not just put a chronological list of what the child did during observation period, but do show evidence that you make careful observation.
5. Discuss significance of behaviors for the child and child development in general (use your text and notes). You must cite sources in APA format.

Select from the following disorders: bipolar disorder, dementia, Tourette’s Disorder, or schizophrenia. Prepare a PowerPoint for college seniors enrolled in an Abnormal Psychology course who are preparing for an exam on psychological disorders.

First, introduce and define the chosen disorder. Next, identify its symptoms & characteristics. Follow this up with information about its etiology, i.e., is it biologically based? Environmentally based?
Identify what brain regions and neurotransmitters are affected/involved in the disorder?
Next, address known risk factors including whether the disorder disproportionally affects certain populations such as a specific gender, age group, or ethnicity.
Finally, identify and discuss at least two current treatments and discuss how effective each is.

For this assignment you will summarize one applied ethics argument covered in our weekly readings or videos, raise a critical
objection to that argument, and then reply to your critical objection. A satisfactory paper will demonstrate an understanding of the topic and that you care are capable of discussing moral issues on “both sides” of the debate. Write for a non-academic
audience unfamiliar with our readings or the topic at hand.
Your Term Paper assignment will consist of three sections – an Argument Summary, an Objection, and a Reply Section. Use
bolded Section Headings to label each section. (Make sure you have an Objection and Reply in mind before you begin your
paper; if you can’t think of an objection and reply for the argument you wish to summarize, you may need to pick a different
argument!)
There is no minimum or maximum page count or word count for this assignment. A typical Term Paper will likely be 2-6 pages, double spaced, but this varies depending upon the topic and arguments being discussed.
Follow the instructions below for each section.
Section 1: Argument Summary
Begin your Term Paper by choosing an applied ethics topic from this semester’s assigned readings or videos (Duties to the
Poor, Voting Rights, Drugs, Gun Rights, Abortion, Animal Rights, Euthanasia, or Affirmative Action). Then, choose one applied
ethics argument from one of those readings and videos. (An applied ethics argument is an argument concerning how we
should act when confronted with a moral question, and will give reasons in support of a moral prescription.)
Summarize your chosen argument in your own words. Discuss the reading or video your argument came from, and refer to
authors by name. Explain what the author thinks the argument shows and what the implications of the argument are. (You may need to discuss implications not found in the original work. For example, an abortion argument might end up having moral
implications for our duties to the poor, the scope of medicine, whether euthanasia is morally acceptable, etc.)
Make sure to cite your sources and refer to authors by name. Be specific. Give details. Discuss examples or thought
experiments that you think will help explain the argument, it’s conclusion, and it’s implications. An applied ethics argument will end with a moral prescription. Make sure you explain whether argument’s moral implications are personal (individuals should
do such and such) or policy related (we ought to pass a law that does such and such).
Section 2: Objection
Section 2 will consist of an original objection to the applied ethics argument you summarized in the previous section. In
philosophy, an objection is an argument against a theory, position, or argument. Objections can take many forms. Note that
you can play “devil’s advocate” here and present an argument you don’t believe in.
You can construct a counter-example that demonstrates the argument has a false conclusion and explain it.
You can argue that the argument has one or more false premises. (You might argue that a moral premise is false, or
provide evidence that suggests an empirical claim is false.)
You can argue that the argument is invalid. (An invalid argument is an argument where the conclusion does not follow
from the premises. There are many ways an argument can be invalid. Some arguments have hidden premises that
assume things the author forgot to argue for. Sometimes an author confuses two different terms or ideas, for example one premise might refer to legal rights, and another moral rights.)
Sometimes an argument is invalid because the author is confused about a concept or idea. If so, it might help to write a definition or give examples to better explain the concept or idea at the heart of the argument, and then show how the author’s argument turns on confusion about these concepts or ideas. (For example, I suspect a lot of disagreement in the abortion debate stems from confusion over the term “person.”)
A satisfactory objection section will give your reader good reasons to doubt the conclusion of the argument summarized in
section 1. (Do not write a strawman argument – a purposely bad argument that easy to knock down.) Keep in mind that a
philosophical objection is a response to an argument, not a criticism of an author’s writing talents! Do not say that author’s
paper was poorly written, that it was boring, or that you had trouble reading it.
Note: Your objection can build on the work of others. For example, if you choose to summarize an anti-abortion argument, you might base your objection on one of the pro-choice arguments we’ve discussed in class, or referenced in the reading you’re
summarizing. If your objection is based on someone else’s work, cite the source and reference the author by name. Make sure that your objection includes something original; this can be thought experiment, example, definition of one or more terms being discussed, etc.
Section 3: Reply
Section 3 will consist of an original reply to your objection. Generally a reply will take one of two forms:
(1) A satisfactory reply can argue that your Section 2 Objection fails. This can be written from the perspective of the author
you summarized in Section 1, from your own perspective, or you can play “devil’s advocate” here an argument for a position you don’t hold.
(2) Alternatively, a satisfactory reply can concede that the Section 2 Objection gives us good reason to doubt your summarized argument, and try to discuss how one might progress. You might offer a different argument in favor of the position discussed
in section 1, or discuss how the author in section 1 might try to revise their theory to keep as much of their original conclusion as they can. Again, feel free to play “devil’s advocate” here, but try not to write a strawman.
In either case, a satisfactory reply will demonstrate that you understand both sides of the moral debate in question, as well as
the practical implications of the arguments you’ve made throughout the paper. This does not have to be the “final word” on the debate; though if there are some concepts or ideas that you think will need to be explained or defined to resolve the debate,
you can go into some detail here.