What did the grandparent (or elder person), as a 12-year-old child, find so astonishing that years later can be described in perfect detail?

Life was different 1200 years ago in Romanesque times. Some of you might have been knights but most of us would have lived as serfs, toiling the land, giving a portion of harvested crops to the Lord of the Estate. Unlike peasants, we would not own the land, but together with peasants, we would form the lowest level of the feudal system, as those who came before us.

Most of us would have lived in one-story wood and mud dwellings with thatched roofs near the Lord of the Estate’s stone manor house, the largest structure most of us would see. Many would make a pilgrimage and see the establishment of towns. Imagine taking a pilgrimage and coming upon a church as large as Saint-Sernin in Toulouse. Imagine seeing the sculpture on the outside of the church or the opulent reliquaries in the radiating chapels.
Imagine yourself as a 12-year-old child, listening to grandparent’s (or elder person’s) tales of making a pilgrimage, at the same age, during Romanesque times. Imagine the powerful reaction the grandparent had to one specific item covered in the list of works of this time. What did the grandparent (or elder person), as a 12-year-old child, find so astonishing that years later can be described in perfect detail?

Now, imagine yourself as a grandparent (or great aunt or uncle) of a 12-year-old child, living in Gothic times. What piece of art or architecture, covered in the list of works of this chapter, would you think your grandparent (or elder person from your childhood) would be amazed to see? Even though your grandparent may have passed, how would you imagine describing the art or architecture?
In your initial post, pick one specific piece from the Romanesque period AND one from the Gothic period, covered this week. Imagine hearing the stories of an elder’s pilgrimage and relating the modern wonder of Gothic times to the same elder when you are the elder’s age.

Write a Case Brief of the U.S. Supreme Court case, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project following the IRAC format.

Write a Case Brief of the U.S. Supreme Court case, Holder v.
Humanitarian Law Project following the IRAC format. This Case Brief:
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Assignment will help further develop
your analytical skills as well as familiarize you with important Supreme Court
cases.
With every right
should come an equal responsibility. The
First Amendment to our Constitution holds rights that we hold sacred, to include
the rights to freedom of speech and the rights to freedom of association. But, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes has
been quoted for almost 100 years: “The most stringent protection of free speech
would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a
panic.” Your Case Brief: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Assignment for
this module is to brief – Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1
(2010). At the end of your brief, detail if you agree with the Court’s holding
or not and why.
The Case Brief: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Assignment will
be 500–1,000 words. There are no outside sources; only brief the case as
reported by the U.S. Supreme Court, and use the citation provided in the correlating
module assignment.
When
“briefing” a case, grasp the problem the court faced (the issue), identify the
relevant law the court used to solve it (the rule), analyze how the court applied
the rule to the facts, and write out the outcome (the conclusion). This
prepares you to both discuss the case and to compare and contrast it to other
cases involving a similar issue.
Before
attempting to “brief” a case, read the case at least once.
Follow
the “IRAC” method in briefing cases:
Facts:
Write
a brief summary of the facts as the court found them. Eliminate facts that are not
relevant to the court’s analysis.
Procedural
History: What
court authored the opinion? The United States Supreme Court? The Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals? If an appellate court issued the decision, how did the lower
courts decide the case?
Issue:
What
is the question to be decided on by the court? Usually, only 1 issue will be
discussed, but sometimes there will be more. What are the parties fighting
about, and what are they asking the court to decide?
Rule(s):
Determine
what the relevant rules of law are that the court uses to make its decision. These
rules will be identified and discussed by the court. What rule must the court
apply to the facts to determine the outcome?
Application/Analysis:
This
may be the most important portion of the brief. The court will have examined
the facts in light of the rule, and should consider all “sides” and arguments
presented to it. How courts apply the rule to the facts and analyze the case
must be understood in order to properly predict outcomes in future cases
involving the same issue.

Describe the change to technology or personnel that requires your team’s buy-in.

Scenario: Your company is introducing a change to technology or personnel that will affect your team’s working environment. You are tasked with gaining buy-in from your team, as well as learning if they have any objections to this change.You already know that certain team members have strong opinions about the change and are not going to agree with each other. You call the team together for a meeting.
Considering the course materials for this week, answer the following:
Describe the change to technology or personnel that requires your team’s buy-in.
How will you account for differences in your team’s personality types? In your answer, refer to your results from the DiSC assessment you took in Week 1 of JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century.
What will you do to assure your team members that they have a voice and are free to challenge each other’s input?
How will you align your team around the final decision, even if some members disagree with it?

Describe the process the way it should work or how the movie could portray it more realistically.

A couple of examples of movies: Deep Impact, Armageddon, Volcano, Geostorm, Twister, etc.

Rules!!

1) Needs to be a mainstream science or disaster Hollywood-ish movie – no “B movies” – can’t use Godzilla or Sharknado or anything like that.

2) Needs to be natural science movie and not a science fiction or fantasy movie – can’t use twilight or Matrix or anything like that.

3) Needs to have something we talked about in class – like an earthquake, volcano, landslide, tsunami, or solar system objects

Acceptable comments about movies:

Watching Armageddon and they fly to space in 2 shuttles. When they get near the space station, the 2 shuttles arc toward the station like airplanes. There is little atmosphere up there and the wings on the shuttle are for show, so really they would need some kind of compressed air to change direction or speed.
Watching Twister and the 2 heroes near the end tie themselves to a water pipe as a tornado splinters the shed they are in and somehow they end up with very minor scratches. This injury seems small compared to the debris in the air. Also, there are scenes of slow moving cows in the air? The air speed needed to lift a cow would need to be very high.

Watching Volcano and they turn water hoses on the lava to stop it? The amount of water needed to cool lava would be tremendous! Lava flows into the sea and keeps going. Also, not aware of how lava would be able to make a turn through the lobby of a building and the steel building withstanding the heat. Steel melts at 2500 degree F and lava flows at about 2100 degrees F. While it technically may not turn the steel into liquid quickly, it would definitely cause strain and compromise the building.

Unacceptable comments about movies:

Watching twilight and i don’t get that vampires would be sparkly. (issue – not the right topic)

Watching Geostorm and holy cow is anything accurate in this movie? (issue – not specific enough)

Watching the Martian and I don’t get why Matt Damon needs to be rescued so often in movies. (issue – this is true, but does not deal directly with a physical process we covered in class)

Watching Resident Evil and the virus wouldn’t spread like that. (issue – sci-fi and difficulty to prove or dispute concepts or fictionalized plots)

How to write 1000 words: Describe the movie and general plot of the film. Tell me what is going on when the event happens. Describe the event and what is right or wrong about it. Describe the process the way it should work or how the movie could portray it more realistically.

Does mainstream success prevent meaningful dissent or radical social change?

The exam will be posted until Saturday (July 30) at 11:59pm PST.
The exam will be time-constrained: you will have 3 hours to complete it from the time you start. You will not be able to start and stop and re-start or continue, so be sure to give yourself 3 full uninterrupted hours to complete it. If you did not finish before the end of 3 hours, the exam will be submitted ‘as is’ at the 3-hour mark.
The very latest you can start the exam: Saturday (July 30) at 9pm PST.
Avoid problems related to technical irregularities:
When you start the exam, copy or screenshot the questions.
Write your answers in a Word doc, *not directly into WebCampus. Then upload your answers into WebCampus.
If you lose connection, let me know as soon as possible (bw_stew@fdu.edu) *and then continue answering the questions within the 3 hours. If you had lost internet connection, email me your answers by the end of the 3 hours. I will be able to see in WebCampus when you began the exam.
The exam will consist of 2 essay questions. Do not refer to outside sources, only course material. Be prepared to discuss the creative texts:
The Mummer’s Tale
The Night of the Living Dead
Looking for Jake and Other Stories
The Dispossessed
V for Vendetta
I will be submitting your essays through SafeAssign, so please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE! If you need help understanding plagiarism, please see our syllabus, or email me. Plagiarism will result in a 0 (zero) for your exam grade and will be reported to the school.
There is no specific length for your essay answers – just answer as best and as completely as you can within the given time. You do not need to worry about proper citation format, but be sure you write your essay as a proper essay – intro/thesis, body paragraphs, conclusion.
Not everyone will have the same questions for their exam.

QUESTION 1

What is psychoanalysis? What is postmodernism? What is Marxism? Considered as forms of dissent, what are they dissenting? Use creative 3 creative texts from the course (listed in the instructions for this exam) to explain.

QUESTION 2

Across the course, we have considered the possibility of “dissent” in popular culture products. Is it possible for “pulp” or mainstream culture to actively and meaningfully dissent from the social norm? Does mainstream success prevent meaningful dissent or radical social change? Consider this in relation to at least 3 (THREE) course readings across the course as a whole.

Write a paper based on the importance of transparency, your organization (you can represent any organization, McDonalds, Starbucks, ESPN, etc.) has asked you to create a training presentation on ethics and compliance to be presented next week.

Write a paper based on the importance of transparency, your organization (you can represent any organization, McDonalds, Starbucks, ESPN, etc.) has asked you to create a training presentation on ethics and compliance to be presented next week. Referencing the Hagel article, the Gonzales-Padron textbook, and at least two other journal articles, present an outline for your training as a response to this thread.

Create an outline describing the information that you would include in your training presentation.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center.

Which of the particular arrangements or ‘covers’ of either work stands out to you?

Based on your understanding of the individual stories and your own response to this music, do these two works, built around the same word, have anything in common, or inspire similar responses?
If you had to listen to one or the other of them (Hallelujah or the Hallelujah Chorus) right now, which would you pick? Any particular version? Why?
Have you ever had (or have you known someone who had) an experience like any of the commentators in either podcast to any piece of music? What was the music and what was transformative about the experience of it?
Which of the particular arrangements or ‘covers’ of either work stands out to you? How so?
-Professor Terricciano