Best Writer

Informatics Use in
Your Practice Setting
Create a 5-10 minute video narrative that
focuses on the technology used at a relevant health care practice setting.
Introduction
As a DNP-prepared nurse, you will lead
initiatives to maximize the power of informatics now and in the future. It is
incumbent upon you to be aware of and be able to articulate and explain the
role of technology and informatics within the context of personal, team, and
organizational practices, as well as patient outcomes. Important concepts,
tools, and policies that you will need to be familiar with include:
The Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act.
The genesis, implementation,
and use of the electronic health records (EHRs).
Meaningful Use Standards.
The current Cures Act.
This assessment will provide you with the
opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of how the above, and other
considerations, impact decisions and practices within the context of a health
care environment or organization which you are familiar. By examining how an
organization is currently using health care informatics and technology, you
will better be able to understand its benefits and areas for potential
improvement. This will, in turn, equip you to be a more effective practitioner
in the future.
Note: The assessments in this course build on one another; keep
this in mind as you select a health care organization or practice environment
to focus on. This assessment will prepare you for selecting a topic that you
will use throughout the other assessments in this course.
Preparation
In preparation for this assessment, you may
wish to look at the following for some ideas about workflows, settings, and/or
technology/informatics. These sites provide information about how informatics/technologies
are employed to positively impact patient safety, process optimization, and
quality. They present step-by-step guidance and offer case studies in a variety
of practice types.
HealthIT.gov. (n.d.). Health IT playbook. https://www.healthit.gov/playbook/
HealthIT.gov. (n.d.). Implementation resources. https://www.healthit.gov/healthit-resources/implementation-resources
In this first assessment, create a 5–10 minute
narrative for a future video using Kaltura or similar software, exploring the
overall technology usage in your current institution, an institution you
have previously worked, or an institution that you hope to work with in the
future. The context of the technology usage you are reporting on should
specifically relate to your practice setting (for example, acute care facility,
primary care office, or academic setting) within the institution as a whole.
Submit a written APA-formatted transcript for
the video, as well as a diagram of your workflow redesign. Think of this as an
opportunity to script out what you want to say ahead of time. This is good
practice for the future when you may be making presentations or speeches via
video call and where presenting yourself as knowledgeable, professional, and
polished will be important.
Overall, your assessment will be assessed on
the following criteria:
Analyze the benefits of the
chosen technology that has been implemented within the context of a specific
practice setting.

What are the benefits of
the specific technologies/informatics implemented in your practice
setting?

Explain what are perceived
to be the obstacles to utilizing the chosen technology within a specific
practice setting, noting generalized examples from a single viewpoint or
stakeholder.

What do you perceive are
current obstacles to use of these technologies/informatics within your
setting?

Create a workflow for the
usage of the chosen technology within a specific practice setting.

How would you redesign the
workflow (execution of a series of tasks) because of the
technology/informatics usage within the context of your chosen practice
setting?

Convey purpose in a
well-organized video presentation, incorporating appropriate evidence and
tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Apply APA style and
formatting to scholarly writing.
You may use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help guide your structuring and
formatting of this assessment.
Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or
alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please
contact Disability Services at DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following
requirements:
Length: 2-3
page narrative and workflow diagram.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment,
you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and
scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Defend the
selection of a technology to meet the needs of a health care organization.

Analyze the benefits of the
chosen technology that has been implemented within the context of a specific
practice setting.
Create a workflow for the
usage of the chosen technology within a specific practice setting.

Competency 2: Evaluate
technology and its effect within a health care organization.

Explain what are perceived
to be the obstacles to utilizing the chosen technology within a specific
practice setting, noting generalized examples from a single viewpoint or
stakeholder.

Competency 4: Address
assessment purpose in a well organized text, incorporating appropriate
evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.

Convey purpose in a
well-organized video presentation, incorporating appropriate evidence and
tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Apply APA style and
formatting to scholarly writing.

Health care organizations that adhere to or seek Magnet designation (Magnet hospitals) are exemplars in serving patients. They are recognized as organizations that have high nurse satisfaction and lower rates of nurse shortages. These organizations tend to have higher degrees of nurse involvement at all levels of decision making. Magnet hospitals also have improved patient outcomes.
For this Discussion, you explore how Magnet status contributes to health care change within an institution and the personal contribution nurses make to this process.
To prepare
Review the Discussion Rubric for Week 3, provided in the Course Information area or accessible through the link below.
Review the ANCC informational webpages and the articles related to Magnet from this week’s Resources.
By Day 3
Post a 2-paragraph response (of at least 350 words) to the following question.
ANCC Magnet-recognized institutions globally are considered the gold standard of nursing expertise, discovery, and innovation. They are leaders in improving patient, family, and community care. As you have explored this week, there are five Magnet Model Components:
Transformational Leadership.
Structural Empowerment.
Exemplary Professional Practice.
New Knowledge, Innovation, Improvements.
Empirical Quality Results.
Briefly describe the intent of one of the five Magnet components. Explain what your personal contribution would be concerning that component if your workplace was seeking or maintaining Magnet designation.
As you compose your initial Discussion, consider how Magnet goes beyond solving issues and challenges in organizations to transforming those organizations!
Develop and post cohesive paragraphs and use evidence to support your ideas. The practice of writing cohesive paragraphs is essential to good writing. Focus each paragraph on one main idea or goal.

what aee the methods a nurse can use to gather cultural information from patients?

how does cultural competence relate to better patient care?

discuss the ways in which a nurse demonstrates cultural competency in nursing practice

details
This week, you will write the final draft of your implementation plan section.

Please treat this as if you were really turning in these suggestions to an employer. Does this section provide a clear path forward in achieving the goals outlined in your proposal? Is it well-thought-out, including necessary budgets and priorities?

1. Convert your implementation plan rough draft into a final draft. This draft should be free from spelling and grammar errors.
2. Be sure to include in-text citations and adhere to APA formatting.
3. Update your references page as you go.

View this TED Talk on violence against women and then answer the following questions:
What is your understanding of the “bystander” approach?
Explain an incident you have witnessed or participated in that demonstrates the “bystander” approach mentioned in this video.

Nurses Make the Difference

Health care organizations that adhere to or seek Magnet designation (Magnet hospitals) are exemplars in serving patients. They are recognized as organizations that have high nurse satisfaction and lower rates of nurse shortages. These organizations tend to have higher degrees of nurse involvement at all levels of decision making. Magnet hospitals also have improved patient outcomes.

For this Discussion, you explore how Magnet status contributes to health care change within an institution and the personal contribution nurses make to this process.

To prepare

Review the Discussion Rubric for Week 3, provided in the Course Information area or accessible through the link below.
Review the ANCC informational webpages and the articles related to Magnet from this week’s Resources.
By Day 3

Post a 2-paragraph response (of at least 350 words) to the following question.

ANCC Magnet-recognized institutions globally are considered the gold standard of nursing expertise, discovery, and innovation. They are leaders in improving patient, family, and community care. As you have explored this week, there are five Magnet Model Components:

Transformational Leadership.
Structural Empowerment.
Exemplary Professional Practice.
New Knowledge, Innovation, Improvements.
Empirical Quality Results.
Briefly describe the intent of one of the five Magnet components. Explain what your personal contribution would be concerning that component if your workplace was seeking or maintaining Magnet designation.

As you compose your initial Discussion, consider how Magnet goes beyond solving issues and challenges in organizations to transforming those organizations!

Develop and post cohesive paragraphs and use evidence to support your ideas. The practice of writing cohesive paragraphs is essential to good writing. Focus each paragraph on one main idea or goal.

1.Discuss the angiotension renal system in relation to the management of hypertension.

2.Describe the effects of long term uncontrolled hypertension in relationship to chronic renal failure

For this journal assigment watch The Tuskegee Experiment (1990) YouTube Video (45 min) located in the module activity section. Then answer the following questions regarding the video.
What suprised you about these events?
Should the nurse or physicians have done anyting differently?
How does Ethics apply in this situation?
Explain how you think this event influences the interactions between African Americans and the Health Care System?

• Explain what methods of socialization and social control have affected your organization. (Include political and legal aspects)
• Outline how deviance plays a part in our personal and workplace lives.
• Identify what social factors contribute to the current social inequalities and how we can create social change within our own company and community.

Describe databases that are relevant to EBP around a diagnosis you chose and could be used to help a new hire nurse better engage in EBP.

Describe your role as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse supervising clinical staff nurses with regard to communication and collaboration in locating evidence for application to a nursing practice scenario.
Compile a list of five online databases or other online sources (that is, websites, journals, facility policies or guidelines, et cetera) that can be used to research evidence to apply to this scenario or clinical practice issue/diagnosis and describe to which of these you would direct a nurse colleague to search for evidence.
Describe where you might go in the work place to complete this research and how you would access the desired, relevant research within research databases or other online sources.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

Describe communication strategies to encourage nurses to research the diagnosis/practice issue, as well as strategies to collaborate with the nurses to access resources.
Describe the best places to complete research and what types of resources you would want to access to find pertinent information for the diagnosis/health care issue within the context of a specific health care setting.
Identify five sources of online information (medical journal databases, websites, hospital policy databases, et cetera) that could be used to locate evidence for a clinical diagnosis/practice issue.
Explain why the sources of online information selected should provide the best evidence for the chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Note: While you are not selecting and evaluating specific evidence to help with the clinical diagnosis/practice issue, you should still be citing the literature and best practices to support your description of your communication and collaboration approach. Additionally, it is appropriate to cite best practices related to EBP and evaluating databases to support your explanation as to why you selected the five sources of online information that you did.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 1 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

Length of submission: 2-4 pages (not including the title page or the reference page) description of communication, collaboration, and evidence location process, including a list of databases or other sources with description of why they are appropriate for clinical scenario diagnosis/health care issue (that is, something that would be useable in professional practice for other nurses). Be sure to include an APA-formatted reference page at the end of your submission.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
Explain why the sources selected should provide the best evidence for the chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision within the context of a specific health care setting.
Describe the best places to complete research within the workplace environment and what types of resources one would want to access to find pertinent information for the diagnosis/health care issue.
Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
Identify five sources of online information (medical journal databases, websites, hospital policy databases, et cetera) that could be used to locate evidence for a diagnosis/health care issue and three out of five should be specific to the diagnosis/health care issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
Describe communication strategies to encourage nurses to research a diagnosis/health care issue, as well as strategies to collaborate with the nurses to access resources.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.