Best Writer

Discuss your experience with lobbying or being involved in a political campaign which represented a healthcare issue. Please deidentify and do not provide specific names of the campaign. If you have not been involved in political activism describe an area of interest to you and how you would proceed in becoming involved at some level.

Explain why ethics is important in entrepreneurship and everyday life?

Do you think the GDP growth rate is sustainable going forward? Why or why not? What do you think the US needs to do to continue to grow? Does our current President’s plan make sense?

Final Essay Assignment
Assignment Aim
This paper is assigned as an exercise in developing an original philosophical response to a problem from our readings. You should maintain a high level of expository rigor (the emphasis of the first paper) as well a clear critical comparison of all relevant views. This paper differs from the first essay, in that you are required to construct an original argument for your own view.
Prompt
Provide a clear and concise response to one of the following topic prompts in a 3-6 page paper (750-1500
words):
1. At the end of Gone Baby Gone, Patrick decides to call the police and return Amanda to her biological mother. Evaluate this decision using at least one theory from each of the following two groups: [GROUP A: Virtue Ethics/ The Ethics of Care] [GROUP B: Kantianism/Utilitarianism.] Explain whether (and why) you think that Patrick’s decision is morally legitimate, anticipating and addressing at least one significant potential objection to your view.
2. In “Consider the Lobster”, David Foster Wallace writes, “I believe animals are less morally important than human beings, and when it comes to defending such a belief, even to myself, I have to acknowledge that… I have not succeeded in working out any sort of personal ethical system in which the belief is truly defensible instead of just selfishly convenient.” Evaluate this remark via the respective views of Tom Regan and Carl Cohen. Then explain whether (and why) you think that it is possible to defend the moral legitimacy of eating boiled lobster, anticipating and addressing at least one significant potential objection to your view.
Due Date and Turnaround Time
• In order to receive comments on your paper, the final version of your paper must be submitted in the Blackboard system no later than 11:59 PM on the date indicated in the course schedule. Late papers will not be accepted for comments.
• Late papers will be accepted up to one full week past the due date indicated above. These papers will not receive comments of any kind, but they will be thoroughly read and graded. I WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY PAPERS AFTER THIS TIME. There will be no exceptions to this policy.
Submission Requirements
• Please submit your essay as a file upload in one of the following formats: DOCX, DOC, PPT, PPTX, PDF, TXT, ODT, RTF
• You are not required to use textual citations for this assignment, and given its nature, I strongly encourage you to rely less on quotes than on your own expository prose. If you do choose to use quotes or paraphrases, it is imperative that cite them explicitly. Failure to do so will be considered plagiarism.
• No particular writing format (MLA, Chicago Manual, etc.) is required.
• Please do not include your name anywhere on the paper–this will allow me to grade your work
blindly.
Evaluation
Your paper will be evaluated according to the following criteria: Organization, Clarity, Concision, Substantive Accuracy, Critical Comparison, Originality of Argument, Coherence of Argument, and Successfully Anticipated/Addressed Objection. A detailed rubric elaborating on these criteria is attached to this assignment prompt.

Assessment Description

1. If you were caring for a child who could be cured if given blood transfusions, but whose parents refused permission to give the transfusions due to religious beliefs, what would you do?

2. Some parents are refraining from giving certain immunizations to their children. How will this affect diseases in the United States in the future? How as medical professionals can we embrace these nontraditional practices?

please use a referance for both questions?

5-7 pages; min. 5 academic/professional sources published in the last 5 yrs.

You work at a small community-based hospital as a manager in the quality assurance department. One function of your job is to analyze internal data such as medical records, patient surveys, and incident reports to track trends and help improve patient care delivery. Your supervisor just came back from a seminar on quality benchmarking and has asked about your thoughts on analyzing secondary data from the health care industry as a way to benchmark and measure the organization’s quality performance against its peers. You have been asked to prepare a report on the use of both secondary data and internal data as way to improve quality in your organization. Complete the following:

Write a paper comparing and contrasting the collection of secondary data and their uses versus the analysis of current health care records and internal data such as incident reports and patient surveys.
Explain how health care organizations use secondary data as a comparison to internal data.
Assess the validity and reliability of primary and secondary data in conducting health care research.

HIST 135 – Module 5 Assessment

5 – The Lawrence Mill Textile Strike of 1912

*DO NOT USE any othe sources other than “Bread & Rose” & “Supplementary Primary Source Evidence Sources” (I provided in attached file)!!

*Please refer to the “What is a Primary Source?” explanation I’ve provided in ATTACHED FILE “What is A Primary Source”!
*For all answers, to receive credit it will be necessary to indicate where each example can be found in Bread and Roses. Also, only use file “Primary Sources” when indicated.

*Be sure to provide a page number for each reference. (If you have an e-book that does not permit you to cite a page number, then cite the chapter number and provide first three words of the paragraph so I can locate the example.)

* If using one of the supplementary primary sources, provide the name of the evidence and web link, like this:
Frances Thompson and Lucy Smith, 1866: http://www.americanyawp.com/reader/reconstruction/a-case-of-sexual-violence-during-reconstruction-1866/

QUESTIONS:
1. Drawing from Bread & Roses, explain a factor that prompted textile workers in Lawrence, Massachusetts to participate in the strike of 1912.

2. Drawing from Bread & Roses, explain an example of the nonviolent strategies (such as the “Children’s Exodus”) that strikers used during the Lawrence, Massachusetts, textile mill strike of 1912.

3. Explain an example of the challenges strikers faced during the Lawrence, Massachusetts, textile mill strike of 1912.

4. Drawing from Bread & Roses, explain an example of how the Congressional hearings on the Lawrence strike contributed to public pressure that compelled mill owners in Lawrence to meet the strikers’ demands.

Please note: Answer each of the questions. Each answer is worth an equal fraction of 100 points. (For example, when there are four prompts each answer is worth 25 points; when there are five prompts each answer is worth 20 points.) To receive credit, answers must provide full and coherent explanations. Before submitting your assessment, also be certain that your responses are free from spelling and grammatical errors. Submissions that are filled with such errors will not receive full credit. Finally, answers that do not explain examples from the assigned primary sources when required will not receive credit.

*Please refer to the “What is a Primary Source?” explanation I’ve provided in ATTACHED FILE “What is A Primary Source”!

Answers receiving 25 points:
Completely and coherently utilize examples from the required evidence to directly demonstrate support for the answer.
Effectively integrate quoted evidence into the answer; do not rely merely on long quotations.
Are free from spelling and grammatical errors.
Clearly and correctly identify the assigned evidence utilized in the answers.

Answers receiving 5-20 points:
Partially or indirectly utilize examples from the required evidence.
Rely on long, undigested quotations; do not adequately explain how the quoted evidence supports the answer.
Contain multiple spelling and grammatical errors.
Fail to clearly or correctly identify the assigned evidence utilized in the answers.
Answers receiving 0 points:
Do not utilize the required evidence to directly demonstrate support for the answer.
Two examples of such answers are: Answers based on secondary source evidence (such as The American Promise or a documentary film) rather than utilizing assigned primary source evidence; answers that utilize assigned primary source evidence, but in a manner that does not directly support an answer to that prompt.

Summary: Identify and summarize the key argument(s) or main point(s) of the readings. Ask yourself what the author is trying to convince you of and how. Pick three or four of the more important key arguments or points of the reading, and briefly map them, i.e., elaborate their supporting claims; detail how the argument(s) “work.” You are not expected to summarize the entire chapter / video / reading. You must summarize 3-4 key points from each of the readings (or videos) provided.
The summary section should be given the most space – approximately 2/3 of the paper. Do not include your own thoughts or reactions to the readings in the Summary.

Integration: Use this section to present your own analysis of one or two ideas / issues from your summary. Strive to analyze how and why this condition exists. In this section you must strive to integrate course concepts (i.e. concepts such as patriarchy, power, privilege, gender, feminism, etc..) into your analysis. This section is used to demonstrate your own understanding of the social condition / issue. You should provide support for your analysis as necessary (by citing sources and / or personal experience).

Questions/Reactions: Share your reaction to the readings. You can identify questions the readings raise for you. This can also be the place to put your specific questions about the topic. You should discuss your reaction to the content, not the style of the reading. For example, stating that the reading was long / short / complicated / un-interesting etc.. does not provide an understanding of your grasp of the material.

Do not focus on items that were not discussed in this reading. No one course reading will ever cover all aspects of one topic. For example, pointing out that a reading on women in China did not discuss the situation for women in India, is not a valid point. Stay focused and on topic.

Write a short reflection paper (minimum of 400 words) explaining what the engineering disaster was, how did it happen, and what was the aftermath of the disaster.

Your primary audience for this paper should be executives (those who understand the business of engineering, but not necessarily engineering itself).
Based on your understanding of the reading done in Technical Writing (Chapter 2 – “Audience Analysis”), our class lessons, and your own notes, you will decide how to organize the paper, how to title and label it, and how to incorporate graphics.

Make sure to properly quote, cite, analyze throughout your paper. Make sure to include a full reference page as well.

As the HR manager for a large health care organization, you have been asked to design a new position for an individual contributor in a non-clinical department such as Billing, Admitting, HR. The job should be entry to mid-level and one appropriate for someone with a bachelor’s degree in health care administration.

Write a 6 page paper in which you:

Develop the job title and essential duties for the new position.
Write a detailed job description suitable for listing on the organization’s website.
Identify the desired KSAs (Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities).
Explain the required minimum qualifications.
Describe the steps involved in hiring for this new position.
Develop salary recommendations.
Identify a process to identify the most qualified applicants for the position.
Be sure to justify each decision and recommendation you make.