Best Writer

Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsPmJdlrBiI

1. Did Volkswagen respond to the crisis well enough? Discuss the model of crisis management.
2. Discuss the differences between German and Anglo-American Corporate Governance Structures. Comment on the corporate governance structures of Volkswagen Group.
3. What were the causes of corporate misbehavior at VW? What should it do to prevent similar crises in the future?
4. What should Corporate Social Responsibility truly mean? How can the VW Group integrate CSR throughout the company?
5. Why woulda leading corporation which was awarded several social responsibility recognition engage in such a scam?

Minimum of 6 pages (app. 350 words per page in an APA format apart from the title and reference pages)

1. The paper should have a title, which relates to your paper, do not title it as”Paper 1″, be creative. The title should be between 10-12 words.
2. The paper should have an abstract of not more than 150 words, which provides a high-level summary of the paper (write this in the end).
3. The paper should have an introduction section on about half a page in which you will provide a general overview of the issues. You may start by saying “I have described, in this paper, the circumstances involving….
4. The paper will have a discussion section, where you will address the questions posed above. Have at three-quarters of a page for each question. Typically, this section will be about four pages.
5. The paper will have a recommendations section. You need to build your recommendation from the discussion section and provide recommendations to mitigate future crises. A page will be fine for a recommendation. End the paper with a conclusion paragraph that needs to tie back to your introduction, discussion, and recommendations. Essentially, this part should be what you have learned from the readings, and write this paper.
6. The last section is the references. List the reference alphabetically and following APA.

Note: Follow APA 7th edition for the cover page, citation, organization, and references to the paper.

Discussion Question: Which company do you believe performed the best over the past five-year period and which company do you believe will do the best in the future? Again, justify your answer with evidence.
Before your class is scheduled to meet, read the attached materials and use information for your answer from those attached materials. You can add another source as long as you cite it.

Question to answer: What were the key results of the Perry Preschool, Abecedarian Project and Chicago Child Parent Centers research studies?

Write a paper (not including cover page, abstract, bibliography, and other elements) in which you apply your analysis of the pericope to a leadership theory/practice.

Write a thorough Psychiatric evaluation (Psychiatric History and Physical). Psychiatric evaluation is done for patient seen for the first time (initial visit) in a doctor’s office/clinic. Please read the 2 attached files to get a good understanding of the work at hand so no mistakes will be done. The assignment will be submitted via TURNITIN.com for plagiarsim check. The accepted percentage score by the instructor must be < 24%. The first attached file has the instructions for the assignment and the rubric as well.

Interview Project: You will be required to conduct one personal interview of a Vietnam
War-era person (anyone who was alive and aware during the war is fine). You can choose to
interview anyone who has memories of the Vietnam War. In addition to providing the
person’s name, age, and occupation, have them answer questions and summarize their
responses in 4-5 pages (please include the questions that you used). BE SURE TO INCLUDE
YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND WHAT YOU LEARNED. You can design your own interview
questions, but I have provided the following questions for you that you can use (YOU WILL
HAVE TO MODIFY THESE IF YOUR PERSON IS NOT A VETERAN):
Segment 1: For the Record: Record on tape (or notebook) the date, place of the interview,
the name of the person being interviewed, and the names of the people attending the
interview, including the interviewer and his or her affiliation or relationship to the
interviewee. Ask the veteran what branch of the service he or she served in, what war, rank,
and where he or she served.
Segment 2: Jogging Memory: Were you drafted, or did you enlist? Where were you living at
the time? Why did you join? Why did you pick the service branch you joined? Do you recall
your first days in service? What did it feel like? Tell me about your boot camp/training
experience(s). Do you remember your instructors? How did you get through it?
Segment 3: Experiences: Which war(s) did you serve in (WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the
Persian Gulf)? Where exactly did you go? Do you remember arriving and what it was like?
What was your job/assignment? Did you see combat? Were there many casualties in your
unit? Tell me about a couple of your most memorable experiences. Were you a prisoner of
war? Tell me about your experiences in captivity and when freed. Were you awarded any
medals or citations? How did you get them? Higher ranks may be asked about battle
planning. Those who sustained injuries may be asked about the circumstances.
Segment 4: Life: Ask questions about life in the service and/or at the front or under fire. How
did you stay in touch with your family? What was the food like? Did you have plenty of
supplies? Did you feel pressure or stress? Was there something special you did for “good
luck”? How did folks entertain themselves? Were there entertainers? What did you do when
on leave? Where did you travel while in the service? Do you recall any particularly humorous
or unusual event? What were some of the pranks that you or others would pull? Do you have
photographs? Who are the people in the photographs? What did you think of officers or
fellow soldiers? Did you keep a personal diary?
Segment 5: After Service: Appropriateness of questions will vary if the veteran had a military
career. Do you recall the day your service ended? Where were you? What did you do in the
days and weeks afterward? Did you work or go back to school? Was it supported by the G.I.
Bill? Did you make any close friendships while in the service? Did you continue any of those
relationships? For how long? Did you join a veterans organization?
Segment 6: Later Years and Closing: What did you go on to do as a career after the war? Did
your military experience influence your thinking about war or about the military in general?
If in a veterans organization, what kinds of activities does your post or association have? Do
you attend reunions? How did your service and experiences affect your life? Is there
anything you’d like to add that we haven’t covered in this interview?
Thank the veteran for sharing his or her recollections.

Assume your organization has experienced a few ethical violations over the past six months. Some were considered quite severe. You have been tasked by senior leadership to prepare a proposal for an ethical initiative for your organization. For purposes of this assignment, you may include hypothetical ethical violations or ones you have experienced; be sure to omit any identifying information.

Utilize all your research from this course to prepare an ethical initiative for your organization. What will you implement, improve upon, or omit? Think of short-term goals and long-term goals to achieve later. Specifically, explain how you will ensure that you are an ethical leader and how you will help build and maintain an ethical organization and culture. Be sure to include the following:
Explain how your organization can improve socially responsible initiatives.
Assess current methods of communication to recommend improvements where necessary.
If your organization has a global presence, explain whether those practices have been conducted ethically. Indicate how these initiatives could be improved.
In addition to the written plans for your initiative, including charts, graphs, and any other visual aids to illustrate your ideas.

Length: 12-15 pages, not including title or reference pages

References: Include a minimum of 7 scholarly resources.

Your ethical initiative proposal should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Academic Integrity Policy.

Discuss in detail the points in the rubric with at least one
paragraph or more, be specific and explain the reasoning behind your talking
points.

What was your goal/learning objective for this unit’s clinical experience?
How does this new information combined with prior knowledge and beliefs carry forward
into your future practice?

Academic
Resources
In one paragraph or more explain what academic sources did
you read on this topic, and what were the notable findings? Include any pertinent data important to this
topic.

Cultural
Knowledge
Discuss one of the questions below in one paragraph :
1. Name one specific cultural consideration that could impact the
implementation of this knowledge, and explain how you would address it?
OR
2. For a specific patient seen in clinical, explain an aspect of the patient’s
culture that would need to be addressed during the implementation of this
knowledge. How would you address it?

Education
In one paragraph discuss how would you use the information
that you have learned to educate a patient/appropriate family member who is
uninformed on this topic?

Challenges
In one paragraph discuss what were the challenges you faced
in integrating this information into the care of a patient you saw during this
unit’s clinical experience?

What visual elements and principles of design did the creator use? Subjectively interpret what the content is, taking style into account. Finally, interpret and evaluate the work of art being studied; what do you think the artist’s intentions were? What is being communicated? Does it have value? Can you recognize the aesthetic quality in the work? Include biographical and/or historical information. Evaluation can be a very challenging part of art criticism and requires practice and careful seeing.
Requirements
Select a museum
First, select a major museum in your area. A listing of some approved museums may be found at the following site: Art Museums Worldwide opens in a new window. If you live in a more rural area or are military and stationed overseas where you cannot visit a museum, contact the instructor to discuss options. An online museum visit may be necessary. However, in-person museum experiences will be prioritized. If the museum you’d like to visit is not on the list, you must get instructor approval.
If a virtual museum is necessary, you may find listings at the following site: Arts and Culture opens in a new window.

I chose this piece of art from this virtual museum((((( https://artsandculture.google.com/story/kAXxBUOmk2IlKQ )))))

Select a work of art
The following outline is suggested, but not required:
Identification: Select a work of art. You may select a piece that you like or dislike. Get all the information provided: artist, title, medium, year, etc. Write down your initial responses. How do you respond to the work? Does it invoke an emotional response? What do you think the artist was trying to communicate? It is helpful to bring a notebook to record your responses.
Describe the piece and review it carefully. What do you see? Note all the details about the work. How would you describe it to someone you were talking to on the phone who can’t see it?
Analyze the visual elements and design principles, thinking about the relationship between form, content, and subject matter. This will be helpful in your ‘interpretation’ of the work. Consider context: does it fit into a movement or time period? Consider its place in the artist’s overall output.
Interpretation Follow your analysis with a subjective interpretation of the meaning of the work. How does the work make you feel? What do you think the content is? Go beyond “I like it” or “I don’t like it.”
Research the artist. Historical and biographical information on the artist often provides clues into a work’s intended meaning. Carefully consider the purpose and context of the piece. Did the piece you selected have any particular political or cultural message? Was the artist making a statement?
Evaluate What do you think the artist’s intentions were? Was this communicated? Does it have value? Can you recognize the aesthetic quality in the work?
Format Requirements
The paper must be 1500 words, double-spaced, 10- or 12-point type, with 1” margins. The title page, images, and reference/bibliography page do not count toward the required length of paper. The preferred format to complete the Final Paper is Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx). If these formats are not available, other acceptable formats are ASCII (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), and Open Office (.odt), and PDF. Make sure you proofread your papers for incorrect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other errors.
A minimum of four sources is required. Research can come from the Internet (reputable, academic sources only) scholarly articles (JSTOR, for example), books on art history, politics, etc.. Sources should be varied and academic and/or professional in nature. Your textbook cannot be one of the four minimum sources but can be included.
Anything that is not considered common knowledge (information that can be found in at least 4 sources) should be cited. This includes opinions, judgments, little-known facts, and direct quotes. In-text citations (APA) or footnotes and endnotes (CMS) are used to give credit to sources of any material or scholarship borrowed, summarized, or paraphrased. They are intended to refer readers to the exact pages of the works listed in the Reference or Bibliography section.
Citation Sources
Columbia College Writing Center opens in a new window
The OWL at Purdue provides excellent formatting and style guides for APA opens in a new window and Chicago Manual of Style opens in a new window.
Any paper that is plagiarized will receive a “0.” Please review the Columbia College policy on plagiarism included in the syllabus.
Make sure you proofread your papers for issues with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other errors. If you reference a source other than the text (not required), cite this reference according to the APA or Chicago Manual of Style. The use of any secondary reference without providing citation is plagiarism and will receive a score of 0.

Discuss what you have incorporated the information related to technology, corrections, and any theories or policies related to the issue you are researching?