Best Writer

1. Prepare a ONE PAGE OUTLINE of your legal memorandum based on the facts of the hypothetical problem below
2. Prepare a TWO PAGE legal memorandum based on the facts of the hypothetical problem below

Legal Memorandum Hypothetical Problem:

You are a paralegal working for Smith, a law partner in your law firm. Smith calls you in to talk to you about a client matter. Smith relates the following to you:

Smith’s client, J.B. Big Bucks, has a son, Honest Buck, who was arrested and charged with homicide after the police found him one block from the scene of a home invasion robbery that resulted in the gunshot murders of the home’s occupants. A 911 caller described screams coming from the home and described to the police dispatcher a fleeing male, approximately 6’0”, 190 lbs., aged 25-35, wearing blue jeans, a black baseball cap, sneakers, and a red t-shirt.

J.B.’s son, Honest, is 29 years old, 5’10” and 200 lbs. He lives two blocks down the street from the murder scene. Honest has no criminal history but is known in the neighborhood for singing loudly as he walks to and from his job at the local pizza parlor located about four blocks from his home. Honest generally must pass the house where the murders occurred as he walks to and from work.

Honest attended high school through 11th grade but dropped out after the teasing by other students became too much for him to bear. J.B. had Honest evaluated by a psychiatrist several years ago. The psychiatrist said that Honest may suffer from some type of autism but he could not be sure where Honest fell on the spectrum of autism without conducting further testing. J.B. decided not to pursue further testing, as he did not trust those “head doctors.”

When Honest was arrested by the police officers, he was wearing a light blue baseball cap, dress shoes, blue jeans, and a black t-shirt.

The police brought Honest to police headquarters for questioning at approximately 10:30 pm. Two homicide detectives were present for questioning. Prior to questioning one of the detectives read Honest the Miranda warnings. The detective then asked Honest if he understood his Miranda rights. Honest said that “yes,” he did understand them. The officers then asked if he wished to waive his Miranda rights and to speak with them without a lawyer being present to represent him. Honest replied, “I guess so, since you think I’m guilty anyway. What’s the use of having an attorney?”

The detectives questioned Honest until 4:00 am; however, Honest denied any involvement in any crimes. Finally, at 4:15 am, one of the detectives said to Honest, “Honest, if you just tell us the truth, we can all go home.” Honest said to the detective, “Really?” The detective nodded affirmatively. At that point, Honest gave the detectives a full confession.

Prosecutors then charged Honest with two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of armed robbery. (No gun was found on Honest and his hands tested negative for gunpowder residue.) During the interrogation (which was audio and videotaped), the detectives revealed to Honest that the victims were killed by gunshot. However, Honest otherwise related to police general details about the killing that could have arguably been surmised by most “real-crime” TV-show aficionados. Two of Honest’s favorite TV shows are The First 48 and Forensic Files.

When J.B. learns of his son’s arrest and the charges he’s facing, he retains Smith to represent him. Smith asks you to conduct the basic legal research into issues surrounding whether Honest’s confession was a truly voluntary one under existing case law.

BAD 2070
Course Project
Part II
For this project, you will read a scenario and then determine what legal concepts will apply. The concepts will come from Chapters 8 and 9 of your textbook.
INSTRUCTIONS
Read the following format and submission instructions, followed by the mostly fictionalized hypothetical scenario. There are 3 clear points of law that you need to identify and discuss.
Find the issues that are being raised; that is, what legal questions are presented by the facts?
Identify the legal principles that are being discussed. Here is a hint. We discussed various torts, negligence, strict liability, and product liability. More than one of these will apply.
Make sure that you identify the elements or definition of each legal principle.
For example, if this was about an assault (it’s not), you would need to give the elements of it-intentional touching of another that is harmful or offensive. Then, you would give facts that shows how each element has or has not been met. Be able to explain the elements-not simply restate them.
Once you have identified the legal concepts and the elements, make certain you discuss the elements. Apply fact to law to show why the elements were or were not met.
Give your opinion of the outcome of each Part of the scenario. Who would win? Explain why. Make sure your analysis is a law-fact basis.
FORMAT
This will be a written document and not a PowerPoint. You must use 12 pt font and either Verdana or Times New Roman. For ease of completion, each Part that requires discussion has been labeled. Note that each scenario will have a different concept of law discussed. Be certain you label each Part correctly in the submission box. Each scenario should be discussed in such a fashion:
Part A: Legal concept (what is it); elements (what are they); Discussion (show how the elements were or were not met); and Opinion (who will win and why).
Part B: Legal concept (what is it); elements (what are they); Discussion (show how the elements were or were not met); and Opinion (who will win and why).
Part C: Legal concept (what is it); elements (what are they); Discussion (show how the elements were or were not met); and Opinion (who will win and why).
SUBMISSION
You are to enter you answers via the Assignment Tool, “Course Project Part II.” You may click on the link above. You may also go to the “Assessments” tab at the top of your screen and select, “Assignments.” Once in the Assignment tab, select Course Project Part II. You may enter your answers for the project. You can either copy/paste your answers or you may include an attachment.
Your assignment will be graded by a rubric, which you may view.
SCENARIO
Background. The Bladensburg Cross, called the Peace Cross, was built between 1919 and 1925. Originally, the 40 foot cross was built on private lands-that of the Washington Cathedral. In 1961 the lands were donated to and is maintained by Maryland-National Capital Planning Commission (MNCPC). It was listed in 2015 on the National Register of Historic Places. In 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the publicly funded maintenance of the Peace Cross was unconstitutional per the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. In February, 2019, the United States Supreme Court head the case. On June 20, 2019, the Court ruled there was no constitutional violation. (This part is all true)
As with all things, age, wear and tear require that repairs and upkeep be made on the Peace Cross. The Peace Cross needed some restoration work done to it. Being that it needed experts in restoring a structure this old, the MNCPC hired Old Time Restorations, an LLC owned by Brady Thomas and Roger Aaron. Brady and Roger agreed to bring their crew to restore the Peace Cross to all its shining glory. The work began on March 1st and was to be completed on September 1st. (More on the contractual agreement on a later date.) The project started off smoothly and proceeded as expected mostly.
Part A. On May 15th, Jordy and Clay, two employees of New Creation Builders (NCB), Old Time’s competitors, posted an article in The Baltimore Sun about Brady and Roger’s business. (NCB was outbid by Brady and Roger, which means they lost thousands of dollars they could have earned in one job.) Because they didn’t get the job, Jordy and Clay routinely snuck by the job site to see how the Peace Cross project was doing. They took pictures of the workers (Peyton and Eli) on break, playing football during the lunch hour, texting on their phones, and the mess of the job site. They stated that Old Time’s employees were lazy; didn’t have the skill, knowledge or training and that they weren’t properly licensed and insured through the state of Maryland. They also said that the guys were reckless with their tools and tossed their trash in the busy street. Based on what they saw, a few of Old Time’s current clients wanted to get out of their contracts. Old Time had a decrease in calls for new work for a few weeks. In addition, two clients told Old Time customer service representatives that because of the newspaper article, they were canceling their contracts. Upon investigating the claims made by NCB, the claims were found to be false. Sure, the workers played around, but it was always on their own time and not when they were “on the clock.” Even so, their work was always of the highest caliber.
Part B. On June 1st, after having to move Peyton and Eli to a different job, Brady was on site at the Peace Cross doing some power washing. He was on the scaffold properly (which means he followed all safety precautions and requirements) when one of the poles holding it in place snapped. This caused Brady to fall 15 feet, landing on his right arm. Though he wasn’t badly hurt, it would sideline him for several weeks. He wouldn’t be able to assist with finishing the Peace Cross project; participating in the local charity football game in August; and, possibly, prevent him from taking on additional work for the company. It turns out that the company who owned and who installed the scaffolding did not properly fasten the poles together. This wasn’t a case of improper design; the errors came from the company who set up the scaffolding for Brady.
Part C. On August 25th, despite the mishaps in May and June, the restoration is almost complete. The crew was busy doing final cleaning, polishing, and decorating. The MNCPC decided it wanted to do a ceremony to commemorate the 95 year dedication of the cross over Labor Day weekend. This meant the crew had to not only complete the restoration, but also beautify the area for the ceremony. The crew decided that it needed to replace some of the sidewalk near the cross. Two crew members, Crosby Mason and Griffin Roberts, set to work. Old Time Restoration had recently purchased a new jack hammer called the Jack Extreme. This would be the company’s first time using the new tool. As Griffin began jack hammering the concrete, things seemed to go smoothly. However, as he increased the intensity of the tool, he noticed that it seemed to accelerate and apply more pressure than he intended. When he tried to reduce pressure, he could not. Crosby saw Griffin had a problem and came to help. However, the jack hammer jumped and went onto Crosby’s foot. Thankfully, Crosby was wearing steel toe boots. The pressure from the tool did break Crosby’s foot, requiring several surgeries to repair the damage. A few days after the event, Brady received a safety notice regarding the tool. That notice indicated that users were experiencing the problems that Griffin did when using it. Brady believes the Jack Extreme is unsafe.
883057
a minute ago
I’ve attached screenshots of the textbook (e book) for citing the paper
Textbook name:
Essentials of Business Law
Authors: Beatty, Samuelson, Abril
Publisher: Cengage
Publication Date: 2019
Edition: 6th

Based on the Learner-Centered Design Model create an outline with the following information:

Components of the selected model
How the model would apply to curriculum design within your organization
Learning theories that would fit well within this model

Show how the seismic shift in art relates to Marcel Duchamp’s “ready-made’s.”

Describe the selected type of nonverbal communication and how it affects our interpersonal relationships. Some examples of questions you might think about to get started are: How does this type of nonverbal communication affect relationships between people of different cultures? How can this type of nonverbal communication help me as a nurse? How important is this aspect of nonverbal communication in making first impressions? Be specific and use examples from your personal and/or professional experiences.
Step Three:
Compose your submission using a word processing program (e.g. Word).
Structure your submission in a 5-paragraph essay. See example. Example of 5-Paragraph Essay
At least 2 citations/sources must be used this week; 1 may be your weekly reading, however the other should be from an outside source (independent research).
Include the citation for your source in APA format in the body of your text, and on its own page at the end. This link will help you format your citation into APA format.
Upload

Write a paper on the importance of Patient Confidentiality.

For your discussion post this week, consider your own nonverbal communication and respond to one of the following prompts.
Have you ever had your nonverbal cues misinterpreted? For example, someone thought you liked them because your proxemics suggested an intimate relationship. How did you correct the misinterpretation?
OR
Think about how we use nonverbal behaviors to announce our identities.
Are you projecting the image you desire?
Monitor your nonverbal actions and tell us how you think you can more wisely use nonverbal cues to your advantage.
Make sure you refer to specific nonverbal cues as described in the reading; provide specific examples.

In two of your countries of operation, one of your major competitors has made deals with officials that make your competitor’s phone the official phone of the government. You find out that one of your Director of Sales is a turncoat who set up these deals for your competitor and turned in his resignation to you today. How do you react to this threat? What negotiations could you use to turn this threat into an opportunity? This assignment calls for at least one full page of detailed information, double spaced.

Write a paper on the Health Informatics Systems

How is your peer’s choice of nursing theory different from yours, discuss the differences.
Share your thoughts on how they could apply their chosen nursing theory in the practice setting.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Please give each peer a half page response and place them on same document. please start each post with hello and the peers name. please use at least one sourse for each response.