Best Writer

Write a paper comparing and contrasting Skocpol and Sewell’s methodologies in explaining revolutions.

Write a paper discussing a strategic approach to United States homeland security current state and/or how we can improve it from a proactive standpoint. what is a strategic approach to us homeland security?

Discussion Question: MODULE 8 DISCUSSION
Medicare and Medicade
You have a patient who
only has Medicare Part A and B. She has limited income most of which is
used to pay for Medicare Part B. She is in dire need of placement into a
nursing home as she can no longer care for herself at home. You leaned from
your reading that long-term care needed by low-income elderly people is paid by
Medicaid, and you feel your patient meets the criteria. What are the steps you would
take to advocate for your patient while she is still in the acute care setting?
Who are some of the other health care professionals you would collaborate with
to ensure your patient receives the additional healthcare coverage she needs?
Analyze the role Medicaid plays in supporting long-term care for the elderly
and disabled.

Write a Research paper about the civil war

In part, this discussion should interact with your data collection and other assignments. The goal is to present some ideas to the class and perhaps gain some suggestions, insights, or support. This is an opportunity to be collaborative with your work. Remember – research is a collaborative activity!
Part One
This portion has multiple things to address. Please address all of the points in at least 100 words. First, thinking about your final project, what is an especially interesting finding that you have so far? How do you think you might illustrate this to your reader (e.g., a visualization, a quote, an image – we will talk more about this in the next lecture set). Second, has anything been surprising in terms of what you expected to see in your data? What and why? If not, why are things going as expected? Finally, did the additional videos on using your data change your approach at all? If so, how?
Part Two
Based on our earlier discussions of methods, now that you have had some more time working with your data, respond to the following in at least 100 words. Given the opportunity to explore your topic in more depth, how do you think you would do things differently? How would this change the project, your results, and how applicable your findings would be?
Reminder
You will not be able to view anyone’s post until you submit your initial post.
The initial post (3 points) is due on Thursday, and you are expected to respond to at least one classmates’ posts (2 points) by the end of Friday.

Critically evaluate the effects of health policy including financial implications upon global, national, state, and local health care delivery in the community
Provide one example from your current or past nursing practice and demonstrate how policy/finances impact the health of the community served

MUST BE NURSING WRITER!! USE REFERENCE LINK ABOVE , ATTACHED REFERENCE and outside peer reviewed source. NO PLAGARISM

Choose two of the forensic psychology subspecialties and discuss their similarities and differences. Include at least two tasks performed by each specialty.Responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability.
Restatement of the question.
Student used standard essay format: Introduction/Body/Conclusion.
Student demonstrated an understanding of course content and key concepts, as discussed in the text.
Student was able to examine, assess, evaluate, and/or analyze course content and key concepts.
Student provided a clear and well-developed response to the question.
All work must be free of any form of plagiarism. Put written answers into your own words. Do not simply cut and paste your answers from the Internet and do not copy your answers from the textbook.
Please site the textbook if possible.
(S) Introduction to Forensic Psychology
Curt R. Bartol, Anne M. Bartol, 2020
Sage

ISBN.13: 978-1-506-38724-6

write a reccomendation letter:

a letter of recomendation: you are writing a letter from a dental clinic, where I volunteered. You are reccomending me to a dental university, praising me stating why I would be a good choice for the dental unviersity. how i was a great help, and attentive, and stating good qualities, that would make me look good in front of university i am applying too.

very sophisticated and no grammatical errors. you can look up sample reccomendation letters online, but no plagerism please.

1. Describe (in one paragraph) connections you identified between an element of leadership vision from Ndalamba et al. (2017) and conditions of empowerment in Covey (1991).
2. Identify and briefly discuss a current educational problem; share your vision for solving it; and describe the communication strategies you would use to garner support from your colleagues towards developing and fostering a shared vision.
3. For second and third responsive posts, provide your colleagues with ideas they can used to garner support from potential followers to move their vision forward to reality.
Leadership Vision as a Moral Duty.pdf

RUA: Analyzing Published Research, IF YOU HAVE NEVER DONE A RUA DO NOT ACCEPT JOB PLEASE!

TOPIC: The analysis of postpartum depression treatments
CLASS: EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE OF NURSING

Please include this book and these two references as listed below as referenced citations
SCHOLARLY SOURCES FROM THE LAST 5 YEARS.

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939973/

Abdollahi, F., Lye, M. S., Md Zain, A., Shariff Ghazali, S., & Zarghami, M. (2011). Postnatal depression and its associated factors in women from different cultures. Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, 5(2), 5–11.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35122433/
Safi-Keykaleh M, Aliakbari F, Safarpour H, Safari M, Tahernejad A, Sheikhbardsiri H, Sahebi A. Prevalence of postpartum depression in women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 May;157(2):240-247. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14129. Epub 2022 Feb 28. PMID: 35122433; PMCID: PMC9087783.

———————————————————————————————————————–

Paper should be 3 content pages in length.
Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4
page length.

Clinical Question
1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your
problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may
find support on websites for government or professional
organizations.
3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?

Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and
reference list entries for each article.
1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
4. Study Design
5. Sample Size and Selection
6. Data Collection Methods
7. Major Findings (Evidence)

Description of Findings
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations
and reference list entries for each article.
1. Compare and contrast variables within each study.
2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study;
qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence
in each study, etc.?
3. Participant demographics and information. 4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your
clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your
question?
6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s
work.

Conclusion
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
1. Evidence to address your clinical problem.
2. Make a connection back to all the included sections.
3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think
about.

Format
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
▪ Variables
▪ Methods
▪ Participants
▪ Instruments
▪ Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary
sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title and reference pages.

Evidence Matrix Table
Article
References
Purpose
Hypothesis
Study Question(s)
Variables
Independent(I)
Dependent(D)
Study Design
Sample
Size &
Selection
Data Collection
Methods
Major Finding(s)
1
(SAMPLE ARTICLE)
Smith, Lewis (2013),
What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education, 1 (4) 111-112.
How do educational support groups effect dietary modifications in patients with diabetes?
D-Dietary modifications
I-Education
Quantitative
N- 18
Convenience sample-selected from local support group in Pittsburgh, PA
Focus Groups
Support and education improved compliance with dietary modifications.
1
2
3
4
5

Purpose
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
this assignment.
Total points possible: 200 points
Preparing the assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
The paper will include the following:
Clinical Question (30 points/15%)
Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this
is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for improvement provided as feedback.
Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) – (60 points/30%)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
Study Design
Sample Size and Selection
Data Collection Methods
Major Findings (Evidence)
Description of Findings (60 points/30%)
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
Compare and contrast variables within each study.
What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method
study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?
Participant demographics and information.
Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence
is needed to answer your question?
Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion (20 points/10%)
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
Evidence to address your clinical problem.
Make a connection back to all the included sections.
4. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.
Format (30 points/15%)
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
· − Variables
· − Methods
· − Participants
· − Instruments
· − Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title and reference pages