Best Writer

VOCABULARY
Apply poetic devices creating an original poem
Rhyme: using words with the same or similar sound, often at the end of a line of poetry.
Imagery: figurative or descriptive language in literature.
Musical effects: sound devices that create meter such as assonance, consonance, or alliteration.
Lyric poem: a type of poem that expresses personal emotions.
Figurative: nonliteral words or phrases, often expressed with devices like metaphor or personification.
Literal: understanding words in their most common sense; opposite of figurative.
Symbolic: serving to represent another thing (ex: flag → country).
POEM INSTRUCTIONS
1. Write a lyric poem using a minimum of 12-20 lines (1st person, includes personal emotions
Use any meter and any rhyme schemeUse imagery that can be visualized by the reader.
Use at least one metaphor or simile.
Use at least two musical effects (alliteration, assonance, consonance).
List the techniques you used immediately after they occur within your composition. The listed technique should be specific.
2. Write a brief paragraph (50-100 words) describing the meaning and/or significance of your poem, and the techniques you used and
how these influence your poem’s meaning.

SUMMARY OF ASSIGMENT DETAILS
Heading, header, title, and 12pt Times New Roman or Arial font
A lyric poem of at least 12-20 lines including:
Any meter and rhyme scheme
Imagery
At least one metaphor or simile
At least two musical effects
List the techniques used immediately after they occur
Include your poetic reflection paragraph.

Write an essay of your own that, without explicitly mentioning any of the six nonfiction pieces, responds to a central claim of one of the pieces (Choose from Alice Walker’s “Am I Blue,” Judith Ortiz Cofer’s “The Story of My Body,” Bernard Cooper’s “Burl’s,” “Talking to Boys the Way We Talk to Girls” by Andrew Reiner, “If You Are What You Eat, Then What Am I?” by Geeta Kothari, or “Common Scents” by Lynda Barry).
To effectively respond with an essay of your own, you will need to marshal evidence that supports your point. Your evidence will come from your own personal experience as well as any research you would like to undertake to help prove your thesis.
Write your essay in the rhetorical style and format of one of the six nonfiction pieces you’ve read. You may use your rhetorical analysis of the original piece to help you with this aspect of your essay. You do NOT need to choose the same rhetorical strategy of the nonfiction piece you’re responding to– you could choose the claims from one piece and the rhetorical style of another.
For example: If you choose to respond to a claim in “Am I Blue?” and write your own essay about your own claim that modifies that in Walker’s piece, you might still choose to write your response in the style and format of a graphic memoir (like “Common Scents”).
Part 2:
Write an analysis of your own nonfiction piece (i.e. Part 1), using the terminology and questions from pp. 42-49 in Legacies (section on Arguments about Literature) to describe what form of argument you’re using, as well as the how well your essay in Part I responds to the Checklist for Argumentative Writing (p. 47). Be sure to tell your reader how you analyzed the nonfiction piece you’re responding to as well as what conclusions you drew as a result of that analysis (this is work you already did in the first paragraph of your proposal. Don’t forget to reference the rhetorical angle you took in your own essay (did you use pathos, logos, and/or ethos to persuade? How? Your analysis of your own essay as well as the essays you’re responding to should amount to at least 2 typewritten pages, and it should be attached to the end of Part 1.

Identify and discuss about the Christian worldview on effective leader.

Identify and focus potential topics, form an appropriate research question and hypothesis, and propose a research plan.
Use current academic research methods to retrieve college-level research information from a variety of sources.
Read and critically evaluate sources in terms of bias, accuracy, authority, currency, purpose, relevance, audience, and other factors.
DESCRIPTION:
You will choose one of the topics from an IAP (or a new topic) and conduct preliminary research. You will find a minimum of five Peer-Reviewed Sources. One of your sources should be a book (print or electronic). Once you have conducted your preliminary research you will write a research proposal that follows the template provided. The final Research Proposal will consist of two parts: The Research Proposal and an Annotated Bibliography. These will be turned in as one file via Canvas.
The Research Proposal: Addresses the current research and why the topic you have chosen merits further investigation.
The Annotated Bibliography: Consists of the correct MLA8 citation for each of your sources. Each citation is followed by a 100-150 word evaluation of the source itself and how it might be of further use to you in a Research Essay.
*As with all of your assignments the Research Project will be typed, double-spaced in Times New Roman (or similar), 12 point font, with the correct MLA8 header and page numbers. Since you are included an annotated bibliography the work cited page is unnecessary.
AUDIENCE:
The audience for this assignment is an academic audience of your peers. This should be a formal assignment and should avoid slang and cliches. Since your proposal is based on your interests and perspectives, you may use first-person pronouns. Please avoid the second person (“you”).
PART ONE: THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
POINTS: 30 out of 60 total
The Research Proposal will take into account all of the research that you have completed and provide the overall strategy you will use as you approach the first draft of the essay. The proposal will be written in a formal academic style and will be subdivided into five specific sections:
Introduction: Provides general background and context. This should help ground a reader in the current perspectives on the topic you intend to research.
Reason for Further Investigation: Explain why this topic needs further investigation. What information is lacking from the current research?
Objectives: Summarizes the intended objectives of the essay. What, exactly, will the essay attempt to accomplish. What is the primary objective (main goal), and what are two or three sub-objectives (sub-goals).
The Literature Review: Summarizes and evaluates initial research on the topic, taking into account themes and trends. This is the section where you are summarizing the current discussions on the topic.
Plan: Provides a framework for future research into the topic. This section provides a clear indication of what your next steps (as a researcher) will be.
PART TWO: THE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
POINTS: 30 out of 60 total
For the Annotated Bibliography, you will need to find at least five peer-reviewed (or academic) sources. You only need to annotated the first five academic sources. I highly recommend that you complete the Annotated Bibliography first. Completing this part of the assignment first will inform your work in the Research Proposal (in particular the “literature review” portion of the proposal). For each, source you will write an evaluation of no less than 100 words. These evaluations should address (in formal academic language):
The overall reliability of the source, taking into account the author and publication as well as how the information relates to other sources.
Any potential bias of the author.
Significant findings in the research (statistics, quotes, claims).
How the information in the article might be of use to you in a formal essay.
*Note: This should not simply be a bullet-pointed list or a formulaic list answering the questions above. Your analysis of the document should be thorough and consist of fluid prose. Additionally: if a source does not appear to be useful it should not be included in your Annotated Bibliography.
EXAMPLE AND TEMPLATE:
ResearchProject.Example.2020.pdf
Actions
Minimize File Preview
ResearchProject.pdf
Actions
PREPARATION:
In order to prepare for the successful completion of this assignment I would suggest that you do the following:
1) Review your Research Question and Rationale assignment and my comments on the assignment.
2) Find five peer-reviewed/academic/scholarly sources that look promising.
3) Read and annotate the five sources prior to starting your Research Project.
4) Make sure to consider the two sides of the issue.
5) Pay close attention to why this is a question that needs to be addressed now.

Write a research paper on how the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women crisis is directly influenced by American federal laws and policies.

Write a research paper on drugs that are affecting the urinary tract and bladder.

PICO QUESTION: In hospitalized patients, does removing urinary
catheters less than 48 hours after placement reduces the risk of developing Catheters-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) compared to having urinary catheters in longer than 72 hours?

*Be sure you include “compared to” in your clinical question using PICO.

STEP TWO: Conduct a literature search. Be sure to include also systematic reviews (e.g., the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and evidence-based practice guidelines (www.guideline.gov) in your search strategy.

STEP THREE: Review and Critically Appraise the evidence. Describe the problem and purpose of each research study. Describe the research methods, including process of data collection, sampling, and data analysis, for each research study What were the results of the study? Summarize the major findings and conclusions of each research study Critique the strengths and weaknesses of the research methods. The expectation is that you also cite your textbook, when describing research methods or criteria for evaluating research. Are the results valid? To answer this question, you need to critique the studies for validity-based on your critical appraisal of the literature, are the results valid? Are the findings clinically relevant to patient(s) identified? Do you believe this will work in practice?

STEP FOUR: Integrate evidence to implement a decision.

STEP FIVE: Evaluate the outcome. Students will not be evaluating the outcome in this assignment. This occurs in clinical practice.

The final research paper must be 5-7 pages in length, double-spaced, not counting the cover page and the reference pages. You must use at least 5 scholarly sources (current in the last 5 years) for your paper beyond the course textbook. Professional journal articles found in the Virtual Library will be key sources in researching your topic. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced and paraphrased; any quoted material must be placed in quotes, and must have accompanying APA style in-text citations.

IN TEXT CITATION (2018 and UP)
I also attached the rubic for the paper.

ACCT – 486
QUESTION #1 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Review the “Financial Analysis – A Study.” https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jef/papers/vol2-issue3/B0231022.pdf
The authors discuss eight reasons financial analysis is significant. Choose one of those eight items and discuss how the authors supported the case for the purpose for performing financial analysis. Offer your personal perspective regarding whether you agree or disagree with the authors’ position.
QUESTION #2 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Review the topic material, “Analyzing the Financial Statement Using Horizontal-Vertical Analysis to Evaluate the Company’s Financial Performance Period 2012-2016.” https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/viewFile/18270/18194
The authors provide four charts to visually summarize their findings. Using Figure 2, 3, 4, or 5, add at least two points the authors did not address regarding the performance of the company based on the data presented in the chart.
QUESTION #3 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Identify the accounts receivable section for the company you are investigating for your Financial Statement Analysis Report. After reviewing this information, explain how accounts receivable can impact liquidity and solvency ratios. Additionally, you may notice some companies use total receivables instead of net receivables. Discuss how this distinction might impact the calculation and liquidity analysis. Provide an example and describe how bad debt affects liquidity and solvency ratios.
COMPANY: KROGER
QUESTION #4 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Typically, there are signs to indicate a business is failing, forcing the business to claim bankruptcy, seek financial help from the courts to pay debts, or go out of business. Using your knowledge of liquidity and solvency, find an annual report of a company that went out of business and analyze the financial statements to determine if you could tell the business was going to fail. In your response, discuss your findings and why you think those items lead to the demise of the organization and include any indications to management that changes needed to be made. Examples of high-profile companies that went out of business include Toys-R-Us, Blockbuster, Tower Records, Pan Am, Borders, Pets.com, and Compaq.
QUESTION #5 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Before investors, lenders, and prospective customers associate with a company they will consider the company’s financial reports and try to project the future profitability of a company. Current and prospective employees are also incentivized by potential profit sharing of a successful company. These and other factors serve as reasons for a company to manipulate financial reports to project unrealistic or even false earnings. Provide an example of a company that has previously committed financial fraud. Answer the following questions when considering the surrounding circumstances of the company:
1. Is it ever ethical or necessary for a company to manipulate their profitability? Why or why not?
2. What might have caused this company to have to manipulate financial information?
3. What was the ultimate outcome for this company?
QUESTION #6 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Management of a company’s inventory can influence the overall profitability of a business. Provide an example of company that has mismanaged inventory and discuss how these mistakes inevitably affected their profitability. Assume you work for this company and the CEO approached you and asked for advice on how to improve the inventory management from an accounting/financial perspective. Provide at least two recommendations you would offer the CEO.
QUESTION #7 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Locate the financial statements for a publicly traded company that provides segmented financial information. Prepare an overview of what is revealed about the company through its segmented data. Discuss the benefits of reporting financial information this way. Provide a link to the financial statements with your initial post and include the company name in the subject line.
QUESTION #8 – 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE
Locate the income statement of three companies in different industries, such as an airline, discount retailer, restaurant, auto manufacturer, etc. Calculate at least three profitability ratios for each company, such as gross profit margin, net profit margin, return on assets, or operating profit margin. Discuss the differences you find between industries and why you think those differences exist.
***NO PLAGIARISM ***
*** 100 WORDS AND 1 SOURCE EACH QUESTION ***

Describe an important person in history and how their work benefits the world today

In a 5 paragraph essay, compare and contrast World War I (1914-1918) to World War II (1939-1945). The first 4 paragraphs will be comparing a different aspect of war. The last paragraph you will explain if you think they have more similarities or more differences. You must use at least 3 pieces of specific evidence in each paragraph.

Examples of paragraph topics to compare and contrast:
Compare the causes
Compare the role of the US
Compare the effect of the US homefront
Compare warfare methods
Compare the technology used
Compare the fronts/territories involved

Essay Format
Paragraph 1: Comparing and contrasting a topic, 3+ pieces of specific evidence
Paragraph 2: Comparing and contrasting a topic, 3+ pieces of specific evidence
Paragraph 3: Comparing and contrasting a topic, 3+ pieces of specific evidence
Paragraph 4: Comparing and contrasting a topic, 3+ pieces of specific evidence
Paragraph 5: Conclusion–were they more similar or different (provide 3+ reasons for your stance)