Best Writer

Write a comparative essay including the works cited.

Discuss about designing a mobile app that connects family and friends.

Write a research paper on sustainability, climate and environmental issues.

Every program has risks associated with it. This week, I want you to review your idea(IDEA FROM WEEK 2 IS PROVIDED) and provide a risk analysis. What are the potential risks involved with this program, and what processes can be put in place to manage these risks? One specific risk that I want you to discuss is related to cultural differences. Please assume that your company is a multinational corporation…will this program work in all areas of the business? If not, how can it be adapted for the other country/countries involved?

This does not need to be written as a formal research paper, but all research provided does need to be cited in APA format. You may write in the first person because you are presenting your own ideas. You do not need to provide an abstract, but you do need an APA formatted title page and reference page. Your paper should be a minimum of 2 pages (approx. 700 words) not including the title and reference.

Use the GCU library to locate an article on one of the following developmental stages: Prenatal, Infancy, Childhood, Adolescence, Early Adulthood, Adulthood, or Aging Adulthood. Address the components below within your assignment. Use the resources below to support this activity.

Choose an online or onsite education program at any museum to experience as a
participant. What are the goals of the program? Did the program meet its goals?
What was the experience like as a participant? What role did the art or artifacts
play in the program? Did the program represent the mission of the museum?
Write about the program and your experience in a 3-page paper.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CaVOAjdFQVA/?hl=en

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper examining the process of gene expression. Include the following:

Explain the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotic cells.
Discuss mechanisms by which gene expression may be altered. How do these alterations induce cancer-causing mutations in cell DNA?
Explain how cancer is formed.
Describe genetic changes found in cancer cells and how these changes lead to alterations in cell behavior.
Determine whether proteome data can be utilized in genetic disorder diagnosis.
Relate the Human Genome Project data to the analysis of cancer genes.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Examine the key test measurement constructs of reliability and validity for the assessment. You will want to describe the methods used to acquire reliability and validity for the assessment.
Describe how results of the assessment are interpreted. For example, describe how scores are interpreted in comparison to group means and norms (for a standardized or norm-referenced test) or to cutoff scores (for criterion-referenced test). How are scores on this assessment correlated with other tests that measure the same construct?
Analyze the effectiveness of the selected assessment tool in your specialization area incorporating a minimum of six scholarly research studies.
Based on the review of the literature, evaluate if the assessment is clear in its application of measurement concepts.

The Specialization area is Clinical Mental Health Counseling

For this week’s Project component, you will examine how to evaluate an employee’s performance and describe effective communication strategies with the employee around problem behaviors. Think about three potential problem behaviors an employee for your selected job role might exhibit (e.g., customer relations, job performance, interactions with other co-workers or supervisors, job quality, etc.)

Respond to the following:

Describe how you would evaluate the employee’s performance.
Explain what factors must be considered when selecting an appraisal method.
Explain what common rating errors can occur and how they can be avoided.
Explain how you would communicate to the employee about his or her performance.
Describe how and when you would communicate performance expectations.
Assess what plan you would put in place for performance improvement, re-evaluation, considerations about termination, etc.
In general, briefly discuss the legal concerns around termination.

Must use reference:
Aamodt, M. G. (2016). Industrial/organizational psychology: An applied approach (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.

In Mark 8:29, Jesus discussed with his disciples what people were saying about him. Jesus asked his disciples directly, “But who do you say that I am?” In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of who Christians claim Jesus is and to share your own belief about who Jesus is.

Based on Mark 8:29, you will summarize and analyze the claims made about Jesus’s identity and purpose.

Follow the directions in the “Who Do You Say Jesus Is” document.

In addition to the Bible, use a commentary from the topic Resources.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Who Do You Say Jesus Is? – Rubric

Part 1: Teaching of Jesus
18 points
Criteria Descriiption
Part 1: Teaching of Jesus

5. Excellent
18 points
(1) Responses are insightful and address the prompts about the teachings of Jesus with a deep understanding. (2) Responses include supporting explanation utilizing a commentary from topic Resources.

4. Good
15.3 points
(1) Responses clearly address the prompts about the teachings of Jesus with an above-average understanding. (2) Responses include supporting explanation utilizing a commentary from topic Resources.

3. Satisfactory
13.5 points
(1) Responses address the prompts about the teachings of Jesus with a basic understanding. (2) Responses include minimal supporting explanation or utilizes a commentary from topic Resources.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.7 points
(1) Responses attempted to address the prompts about the teachings of Jesus but do not demonstrate an understanding of the teachings of Jesus. (2) Responses do not include supporting explanation.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Responses do not address the prompts about the teachings of Jesus.

Part 2: Claim That Jesus Made About His Nature
18 points
Criteria Descriiption
Part 2: Claim That Jesus Made About His Nature

5. Excellent
18 points
(1) Responses are insightful and address the prompts about the claim that Jesus made about his nature with a deep understanding. (2) Responses include supporting explanation utilizing a commentary from topic Resources.

4. Good
15.3 points
(1) Responses clearly address the prompts about the claim that Jesus made about his nature with an above-average understanding. (2) Responses include supporting explanation utilizing a commentary from topic Resources.

3. Satisfactory
13.5 points
(1) Responses address the prompts about the claim that Jesus made about his nature with a basic understanding. (2) Responses include minimal supporting explanation or utilizes a commentary from topic Resources.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.7 points
(1) Responses address the prompts about the claim that Jesus made about his nature but do not demonstrate an understanding of the claim that Jesus made about his nature. (2) Responses do not include supporting explanation.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Responses do not address the prompts about the claim that Jesus made about his nature.

Part 3: Personal Answer to Question From Jesus
18 points
Criteria Descriiption
Part 3: Personal Answer to Question From Jesus

5. Excellent
18 points
(1) Response clearly describes personal beliefs about Jesus with a thoughtful and detailed understanding. (2) Response includes supporting explanation with relevant details.

4. Good
15.3 points
(1) Response clearly describes personal beliefs about Jesus with an above-average understanding.(2) Response includes supporting explanation with relevant details.

3. Satisfactory
13.5 points
(1) Response describes personal beliefs about Jesus with a basic understanding.(2) Response includes minimal supporting explanation or relevant details.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
11.7 points
(1) Response describes personal beliefs about Jesus.(2) Response does not include supporting explanation. (3) Response does not demonstrate an understanding of personal beliefs about Jesus.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Response does not describe personal beliefs about Jesus.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
3 points
Criteria Descriiption
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent
3 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

4. Good
2.55 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory
2.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.95 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources
3 points
Criteria Descriiption
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent
3 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good
2.55 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory
2.25 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
1.95 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.

Total: 60 points