Be sure to review the p value of the tests. Are there significant differences between these years? (*Note, run two separate t-tests) Be sure to label your output statistics on your worksheet so your instructor can identify the years you are comparing. Imagine you are speaking to the same individual that you explained the descriptive statistics to in M1.3, again, assuming they cannot see the data and know nothing about statistics. Their question to you is, “So there are differences between the years. How large are those differences really and what does that mean?” In a separate Word document, explain what t-tests are and how they work, and give the results of your two t-tests, explaining significance and what that means.
Best Writer
Discuss a health policy of a topic of interest and use the Bardiche’s eight steps of analysis.
Discuss a health policy of a topic of interest and use the Bardiche’s eight steps of analysis.
Discuss how the nurse leaders and managers would educate the unit within the organization.
Directions: Role of the Nurse Leader and Manager in Regulatory and Practice Standards As a nurse leader or manager, you will be required to support the nurses on the unit to understand their role with regulation, practice standards, and mandatory reporting. Describe one of the current issues identified by State Boards of Nursing in the state you will be applying for your nursing license. Discuss how the nurse leaders and managers would educate the unit within the organization. (STATE OF FLORIDA) RUBRIC Initial post includes comprehensive explanation with detailed examples and supporting evidence. Response to peers offers substantial contributions and detailed suggestions with supporting evidence. ***Please Do Not copy from Course Hero or Chegg***
Are there any movements or figures in Jazz or American History that that you find more interesting than others?”
Prompt: ” Are there any movements or figures in Jazz or American History that that you find more interesting than others?” —> you will write about the Jazz saxophonist Charlie Parker —> Try to related Charlie Parker to something else. May be how he was a Bebop icon, how he influenced Jazz at the time,… —> Do a JSTOR search to see if there are any articles that seem appropriate to your topic.You do not want to write a reduction of someone else’s article. However, being able to apply an idea from their article or discuss what they have written with your own spin is something that you can do. —> Begin to work out a rough draft thesis statement. This will help you focus in on what information you do not have. —> The whole paper should discuss on what was mentioned in the thesis. —> You can also add how Charlie Parker suffered from addiction, alcoholism, and mental health, and how that ended his career at the end.
What are the risks and rewards to consider in this case?
1. Consider the different suppliers – which one would you select? What type of agreement would you use?
2. What are the risks and rewards to consider in this case? How can the team balance these risks and rewards?
A large steel producer in Pennsylvania decided to open up its energy-spending contract to a number of existing and new energy providers that had entered the market as a result of deregulation. Up to this time, each of the steel plants had a separate contract with the local energy provider. The goal was to include existing local suppliers, but also identify potential new entrants. The strategy development team included managers from building and property maintenance, engineering, plant stakeholders, and purchasing. Initially, the team elected to consider just a single facility contract as a pilot for their energy sourcing strategy. Of their other facilities:
• Pennsylvania – one facility considered had contracts expiring; the other is not yet in an openly competitive market, but will be in a year
• Maryland – competition arrives in two years
• New York – currently being served by a low cost hydroelectric provider – it is unlikely that anyone can compete with this provider
• Indiana – status of deregulation still unsure.
For the facility in Pennsylvania new entrants were identified and researched by studying their websites, and were sent an RFP. As a result of this open RFP, four potential suppliers were identified and interviewed to identify their proposals for reducing the organizations’ energy cost. This included the current supplier (Company A) and three new suppliers. Next, each supplier was invited to visit and present their case to the team, emphasizing why they should be the provider for this block of energy to the facilities. The following descriiption of the utility evaluations illustrates how the team considered multiple criteria in evaluating each of the four suppliers:
Company A
Company A submitted the best response right from the start and continued to improve it as the selection process moved forward. All of the information requested was provided in a neat and organized fashion and was accompanied by additional facts about Company A. Some of the more interesting components of the offer included:
– A comprehensive Energy Analysis of the facility with recommendations on how to improve energy efficiency
– A pricing schedule which is dependant on the building’s load factor
– A “Net 30 days” payment term with a 0.3% discount if payment is made within 10 days
– Access to a diverse group of energy service companies
– The company’s extensive experience within the energy market and with the steel (buying) company energy requirements – especially at one of the steel company’s larger facilities
The contact person with Company A came in to answer any questions the steel company had and was very helpful throughout the process. During the meeting the prices for the steel company’s smaller accounts which were eligible for the customer choice program were also discussed; Company A was the first company to respond to this request.
Company B
Considering Company B called and asked if they could receive the distributed RFP, it seemed doubtful that they would be at all competitive; they were. Company B ended up being one of the final two competitors in the sourcing decision. Company B offered competitive pricing and a network that spans across the United States. They do not, however, possess any of their own generation. While this was obviously not a limiting factor, it did cause some concern. They do have some large accounts throughout the country and a positive track record but nothing that could really compete with the history the steel company had with Company A. In order to get the contract to service steel company’s main building, Company B would have had to beat Company A in all areas and they just were not able to do so.
Company B did propose some interesting pricing alternatives that caused the steel company to thoroughly consider what Company B had to offer. There were discussions concerning short term fixed pricing (3 or 6 months) that could then be adjusted to reflect the market for the remainder of the term of the contract or until the next adjustment point. There were discussions concerning longer-term contracts such as 22 or 24 months but none of those prices could beat what Company A offered.. There were also discussions concerning a savings sharing plan which would split the savings a drop in the market would cause even if the steel company had agreed to a fixed price over the life of the contract.
Company B seems to be the wave of the future in electricity sales. They understand the market, and will definitely be considered when the steel company begins future projects. Company B’s representative visited the building and was very knowledgeable and helpful during the meeting and throughout the entire sourcing process.
Company C
Company C chose not to complete the RFP but instead submitted the information they thought the steel company would like. They typed a few answers onto the RFP that was originally sent and gave the steel company a standardized packet of information to supplement it. In addition, the steel company was erroneously given the pricing information for a different company located in the Lehigh Valley . Company C was competitive on pricing originally, but was absolutely unwilling to budge from this offer. A lower price offer put them out of the running. Although the affiliation with their parent offered a strong name and history, there was just too much of a price difference in the end. This affiliation should have given them the capacity needed to be price competitive since they were one of the few companies that did not have to buy extra capacity from someone else.
Two representatives from Company C came to steel company’s facility to explain the benefits of choosing Company C. While both seemed knowledgeable, they appeared more interested in putting on a show than in answering any questions the steel company may have had.
Company D
Expected to be a top contender, Company D was a definite disappointment. While able to offer almost everything the steel company would have liked to have seen from an electric company, Company D was not able to come anywhere close to the desired pricing. The pricing submitted by Company D was based purely on the market. Market prices for next summer have been bid up much higher than what the steel company would be willing to pay.
Company D also felt that they should not bid for the steel company’s smaller accounts due to Company D’s market based pricing. They felt that the pricing they could provide would not be competitive and was therefore not worth submitting. They do understand that the steel company would like to do business with them in the future and they would like to work with steel company as well. A good relationship could develop from this even if the steel company is offering no business to Company D at this time.
Discuss and analyze the potential economic opportunities and risks associated with your proposed initiative.
This essay involves 2 parts. 1st part is writing an essay, 2nd part is using the provided excel workbook to develop a business case plan. You must use this workbook as part of the assignment to complete this essay completely. You will submit 1- essay with resources meeting the criteria for a resource stated in the instructions, and 2-the completed workbook. Please read through all attachments, examples, resources, and instructions when completing this project. The 1st assessment is attached with the business case initiative already proposed. You do not need to recreate any of that, it has already been done.
Assessment 2 Instructions: Developing a Business Case
Develop a 4-7-page business case for the initiative you proposed in Assessment 1. Examine feasibility and cost-benefit considerations over a 5-year period, analyze ways to mitigate risks, and complete a cost-benefit analysis.
Introduction
As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you are expected to consider a number of factors when analyzing the feasibility of a new initiative. For example, you must consider the various types of risk (such as patient safety, physical plant, financial, or reputation), as well as the present and future value of the service line or economic opportunity in which you are investing. You must also balance your ethical and moral responsibility to provide quality care to patients and populations with your responsibility to protect your organization’s assets and economic viability in the near and long terms.
Instructions
Develop a business case for the economic initiative you proposed in Assessment 1. Examine the feasibility and cost-benefit considerations of implementing your proposed initiative over the next five years. Analyze ways to mitigate risks and complete a cost-benefit analysis.
The requirements for your business case, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriiptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
• Discuss and analyze the potential economic opportunities and risks associated with your proposed initiative.
• How do the potential opportunities benefit your organization or care setting?
• How could potential risks pose a threat to the financial security of your organization or care setting?
• How do the potential economic opportunities compare to the potential economic risks?
• Propose ethical and culturally sensitive solutions that address the risks associated with your initiative to the future economic security of your organization or care setting.
• Which risks are potentially the most significant for your organization or care setting?
• How could you modify your proposed initiative to mitigate those risks?
• How have other organizations and experts in the field dealt with similar risks?
• How do ethics and equality factor into your proposed solutions?
• Are your solutions unfairly burdening or disadvantaging any specific groups?
• How will this proposal affect community health care delivery outcomes?
• What makes this a great opportunity for economic growth?
• What potential issues should be considered?
• Analyze the economic costs and benefits of your proposed initiative over a five-year period.
• Use the Cost-Benefit Analysis Template [XLSX] for your calculations. Add the worksheet to your business case as an appendix. (attached) Required to use. See example assessment for incorporation into essay.
• Does your analysis warn against specific aspects of your proposed initiative?
• How would you recommend that your findings be incorporated into decisions about the feasibility of your proposed initiative?
• Propose ethical and culturally equitable ways of keeping costs under control, while maximizing the benefits of your initiative.
• What costs are you most likely to be able to control or reduce?
• How would you go about ensuring this?
• How could controlling or reducing these costs affect the benefits of your proposed initiative?
• What strategies could you employ to maintain or maximize these benefits, while controlling or reducing costs?
• How do you plan to ensure that any cost controls or benefit reductions are ethical and equitable?
Justify the relevance and significance of the quantitative and qualitative economic, financial, and scholarly evidence you used to support your business case.
This criterion applies to any evidence you cited throughout your business case. Your evidence should be persuasive, scholarly, and relevant (sources must be within the last 5 years) to your findings, proposals, and recommendations. Consider one or more of the following questions when citing support evidence:
1. How is the evidence relevant to your organization or care setting?
2. How is the evidence relevant to your proposed economic initiative?
3. How does the evidence illustrate a solution that has been successful in the past?
4. How does the evidence illustrate that an initiative or solution is likely to be a net benefit to the organization or care setting?
Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
Proofread your document before you submit it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your business case.
Apply current APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 2 Example [PDF]. attached
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Format: Format your business case using APA current style. Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your business case. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
Appropriate section headings. The headings should correlate to your grading criterion sections.
Length: Your business case should be 4–7 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting evidence: Cite 4–5 authoritative, scholarly, and relevant (sources must be within the last 5 years) resources to support your business case. Be sure that your sources include specific economic data.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply, and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.
Analyze the potential economic opportunities and risks associated with a proposed initiative.
Analyze the economic costs and benefits of a proposed initiative over a five-year period.
Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization to improve the quality of care and services offered.
Propose ethical and culturally equitable ways of keeping costs under control, while maximizing the benefits of an initiative.
Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.
Justify the relevance and significance of the quantitative and qualitative economic, financial, and scholarly evidence used to support a business case.
Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization’s resources and its ability to provide quality care.
Propose ethical and culturally sensitive solutions that address the risks associated with an initiative to the future economic security of the organization or care setting.
Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.
Write concisely and directly using active voice.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Write a film review (excluding Works Cited page) of an American feature film of your choosing.
Write a two to three page film review (excluding Works Cited page) of an American feature film of your choosing. Areas that must be covered: Storytelling Acting Cinematography Editing Sound Style and Directing Impact of society on the film and vice versa Genre Writing Tips: Students must establish a coherent thesis statement in the introduction of their paper with a claim that they intend to prove. The body of the essay serves to support the thesis through an analysis of the film and other relevant material. Avoid simply rehashing descriptive material from other source. Support your thesis through textual and formal analysis. Refer to specific shots, scenes, characters, stylistic devices, and themes in the film. As much as possible, use technical, literary and industry terms to make your points. If needed, you may use additional resources to support your claims. Suggested sources might include academic books and articles; film reviews; and personal opinions from reputable film critics and scholars. Information other than production details obtained from popular sources such as The Internet Movie Database and Wikipedia is not considered reputable. Only use plot information to support the thematic points of the paper. Include only one to two sentences of plot summary when explaining each of the required film elements. Also, students should not choose a film that the authors of the textbook have analyzed in detail. Writing the Film Review The Film Review: Must be two to three double-spaced pages (excluding the Works Cited page) in length and formatted according to MLA style. Must include an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph. Must include, on the final page, a Works Cited Submitted as MS Word document
What are the major methods used for waste management and how effective is each of them?
Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling. Assignment: -What is the scale of the waste dilemma? Is this a serious problem that requires a solution? Why or why not? What are the major methods used for waste management and how effective is each of them? -Of the various waste management approaches, which ones are your community pursuing, and which are they not pursuing? Would you suggest that your community start pursuing any new approaches? If so, which ones, and why? If not, why? -What are the causes and consequences of urban sprawl? What are some of the ways cities are attempting to slow or prevent urban sprawl? -What are the major issues that must be addressed for urban sustainability and what does role urban ecology have in urban sustainability?
What of Workteam might be needed to address the issue Can the challenges be solved by ethics training?
What of Workteam might be needed to address the issue Can the challenges be solved by ethics training? If so, how can the effectiveness of a training be maximized Be sure to include information you learned from your textbook and at least one citation from a scholarly journal from the National University Library. Remember You can cite sources in responses and bring in media. TEXTBOOK: Fried, B & Fottler, M. (2018). Fundamentals of Human Resources in Healthcare (2nd ed). Health Administration Press. Will attach an example of the original student question and the student response.
What is the purpose and objective of each proposed intervention?
Discussion 4- Program Interventions Program Interventions Identify at least three proposed interventions for your program. What is the purpose and objective of each proposed intervention? Include appropriate resources, including location and referrals, for your interventions. I will attach the last 2 discussions you did and the capstone paper assignment 1 you completed. Thank you!