Best Writer

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌eight: 50% Due date: Monday 16 May, 11.59 pm Submission type: 2,000-word written reflection on collective negotiation simulation Estimated student workload: 30 hours Task Overview: You are required to submit a critical reflection piece based on the collective negotiation simulation carried out in Weeks 6 – 9. This simulation will be carried out in tutorials. You will be asked to reflect and evaluate the performance of your team members. Details of this assessment can be found below. MGMT 3000 – Negotiation simulation reflection task (Assessment 2) Word limit: 2,000 words maximum This is an individual assessment. Each student is to submit their response through Turnitin. Using the m‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌aterial and concepts discussed in lectures, you are required to evaluate the negotiation actions and tactics of the other members in your group. You may choose to focus on one individual or several members of your group.: Thinking about the steps in opening statements, how did your team member(s) apply the steps? (1,000 words) Discuss how your team members might be able to improve their use of the steps (600 words) Were you satisfied with the outcome of the negotiation? Why? What evaluation process or processes did you use? (400 words) Each of your answers should be supported by relevant academic sources. A MINIMUM of eight academic sources is required in total and should be in APA 7th Edition form‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌at.

i have the results, the instructor said it needed more improvment in making it more objective and answering the research questions in a way it may help my research.
also he wanted the results to be presented as percentage and in charts
for example: that 86% of employee wants a window in their office and 43% go out to places with a window.
and then a charts explaining the percentages of that.
ill upload the first chapter for reference and the results and the excel sheet.

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ attached the style sheet for this essay, as well as the article that is to be used for it as one of the sources, at least 2 sources need to be used but more can be used if needed. I also attached the topic instructions just focus on the first part where it says argumentative topics linguistics under pragmatics the second one: “In CLIL classrooms, the local in‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌teractional norms (i.e. the local culture) influence the way in which classroom interaction is conducted in English (Dalton-Puffer, 2005, p. 1291). Formulate an argument that responds to the statement: the argument should allow you to discuss the statement critically with support from at least two relevant studies.” if u have any more questions feel free to as‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌k

How can social media affect customer behavior

“See attachment as well”

High Performing Work Team Analysis
This assignment is worth 20% of your final grade. It gives you an opportunity to analyze a tool used to assess the performance of a team. You must complete this assignment individually, without contacting other students, and you may not use a paper or any part of a paper from a previous class or from another person. If you have any questions about this assignment, please post them in the Ask the Professor discussion forum so that everyone can benefit from the answers. The assignment addresses Course Objectives 3, 4 and 5.

Organizations often use surveys or questionnaires to obtain information regarding employee satisfaction, organizational issues impacting staff performance, and perceptions of pay and benefits, organizational culture, etc. Sometimes, questionnaires are used in classes for staff development and focus on behavioral styles, conflict styles, or team behaviors. Additionally, surveys may be used to help intact teams or departments focus on and resolve team differences or performance issues. Many times, the questions themselves provide people with insight into what the organization expects from its employees.

The Scenario

You are the leader of a cross-functional team that has not been performing well. You are not sure what’s causing the problems, but you know that the team cannot continue this way. You have contacted the Human Resources (HR) department for help, and they suggested using the High Performing Work Teams Survey as a tool to diagnose problems within the team. Every team member will complete the survey anonymously. The HR department will analyze the results and will work with you to develop a plan to address issues.

Your Task

Read the questions in the High Performing Work Teams Survey. The survey follows these instructions. You will analyze the questions, identify trends you see in the questions, and discuss what you and the members of your team could learn by taking this survey.

Write 4-7 pages (not counting the cover or reference pages), summarizing the trends you identified, describing what you and your team members could learn from taking the survey, and discussing your conclusions about what is required of team members in order to create a high performing work team. Support your opinions and statements with a minimum of five references from sources published within the last ten years.

You can cite scholarly and practitioner-oriented journals, newspaper articles, YouTube videos, (but not Wikipedia, vendor websites, or other non-academic sources.) Please use the UMUC library to search for appropriate sources rather than Google or other search engines. Librarians are available by phone, email, and chat; they are excellent at their jobs and they love to help students. See the Library link in the Resources section (on the ribbon at the top of our classroom) or go directly to for more information and to begin searching for sources. You can also consult a graduate writing tutor for help with organizing your ideas, presenting them clearly, and complying with APA style requirements. You can access tutors through the Writing Tutoring module in our classroom.

Use APA format for citations, references, and quotations. This means your list of references should start on a separate page, and should be double spaced, with a hanging indent and no spaces between entries. Your analysis should be 4-7 pages (not counting the cover or reference pages), double spaced with one-inch margins and a font size of at least 11 points. The rubric for Grading High Performing Work Team Analysis is provided along with this document (it follows the High Performing Work Teams Survey). The rubric gives details on how your analysis will be graded. Keep in mind that most organizations value efficient communication; busy managers don’t have time – and most don’t have the desire – to read long reports. Keep your writing clear and concise.

Please add the following statement to the cover of your paper:

This paper is my own work that I created specifically for this course and this section. All research or material I used in preparing this paper has been properly acknowledged within the assignment in accordance with academic standards for complete and accurate citation of sources.
Submit your assignment electronically via the Assignment folder.
Name your file this way: LastNameFirstInitial_WorkTeamAnalysis
(Example: StudentJ_WorkTeamAnalysis)

Due date: See Course Schedule

High Performing Work Team Survey

The High Performing Work Team Survey appears below. The criteria for grading this assignment follow the survey.

Mission: 5 Items
1. I understand what contributions I am expected to make to the organization
2. I understand how this team’s performance will affect the business results of the company.
3. I can describe the mission or why this team exists.
4. I understand the team’s primary purpose.
5. Team members agree on the major work functions that our team is to perform.

Goals: 5 Items
6. I understand the team’s goals.
7. I am highly motivated to achieve the goals.
8. I understand the team’s long term goals.
9. I understand the standards for team quality and effectiveness.
10. This team has goals that are closely linked to the company’s goals.

Roles: 5 Items
11. I understand the role I am expected to perform for team success.
12. Team members are handling all job functions that the team is required to perform.
13. I understand what is expected of other team members.
14. Team members maintain a clear focus on the high priority tasks that are to be completed.
15. At least one member of this team attempts to maintain positive/harmonious relationships.

Procedures: 5 Items
16. We have procedures that encourage members to participate equally.
17. We have procedures for providing feedback directly to team members.
18. We have procedures for handling the common problems or unexpected events.
19. Agendas are distributed before each team meeting.
20. Follow-up dates are set when actions are agreed upon.

Relationships: 5 Items
21. I am encouraged to express my ideas even when my ideas disagree with the majority.
22. Team members live up to their promises.
23. Team members listen to me even when they disagree with me.
24. Team members have given me positive feedback and recognition.
25. Team members solicit ideas and help from me.

Effectiveness: 5 Items
26. This team usually completes tasks and meets its deadlines.
27. The team is fulfilling its purpose or mission.
28. Team meetings are efficient.
29. Team meeting end up with all topics and work completed.
30. This team is effective compared to other teams.
Satisfaction: 5 Items
31. I am satisfied with my job and responsibilities on this team.
32. I get a sense of personal enjoyment being a member of this team.
33. Morale is high on this team.
34. The team pulls together as a unit.
35. My skills and knowledge are fully used on this team.

Conflict Resolution: 5 Items
36. Differences in style and opinion are encouraged.
37. Team members are allowed to be different.
38. Problems and conflicts are resolved with solutions that meet the needs of everyone involved.
39. Problems and conflicts are confronted until they are resolved.
40. When team members disagree, they listen openly to each other.

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a health care professional or a health care colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will then create a 2-3 page report on this interview. Identify how the issue you identified from the interview, could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach and review best practices and evidence that could be used to address this issue. In other words, you will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
• (I interviewed a Registered Nurse. The issue I identified from the interview was “Frequent reports of patients falling at home after being discharged from our hospital.” I included some articles for this assignment but you could also use your own references as long as they are all scholarly or professional and NO more than 5 years old.
I choose Interdisciplinary collaboration/approaches from the following departments:
1. Nursing department—Should reach out to all the necessary departments requesting their participation in reducing or eliminating falls from patients after discharge from the facility.
2. Physical therapy Department — Should extend their services to patients after discharge by calling via phone or video calls and check in with patients at a mutually agreed times.
3. Social Workers Department: — They should check and verify that family members and or Home Health Aide involved in the care of patients with impaired mobility, be trained in the specific use of certain mobile equipment that helps with ambulation and transfer from one point in the home to another, such as from a bed to a chair.
4. Admission and Discharge Department: — Should ensure that all protocols decided on after the interprofessional/Interdisciplinary Collaboration are checked off before any patient file is closed.
As a health care professional, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will NOT be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 1, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 2.

Demonstration of Proficiency

 This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 1); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 2); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 3). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace. Consult the Interview Guide (Attached) for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.
 Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assessment by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template (Attached) which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
• Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
o Discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information.
• Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
• Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
• Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
• Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
(Competency 1: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Competency 2: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Competency 3: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Competency 4: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.)
Additional Requirements
• Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 3 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3-4 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be NO more than 5 years old.
• APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA
style.

Which is why for this lab, you will be illustrating the steps and factors involved with creating and running a lemonade stand. Some suggested formats that you may choose to do this are: a slideshow, a digital or hand-drawn poster, or maybe even a video. Feel free to get creative and select a format and method that best expresses your vision for this project and allows you to meet the given requirements.

Whatever format you select, you will need to clearly identify and explain each step and/or factor involved in the lemonade stand process. For each step/factor that you discuss, you will also need to identify how that step/factor relates to entrepreneurship or starting a business.

You will need to address each of the following items (though you are not limited to these items if there are additional steps/factors that you want to address):

Location
Startup Costs
Pricing Plan
Marketing
Production/Products
For each step/factor listed above, you will need to make sure that you do the following:

Explain the step/factor in relation to starting and running a lemonade stand
Provide a minimum of one image or graphic that is pertinent to the step/factor (if making a video, hold up an image, use a prop, etc.)
Evaluate how this step/factor relates to entrepreneurship and/or helps prepare someone for one day starting a business
The information that you include in your project will be a combination of content from the unit, information that you discover through online research, and a bit of your own creative knowledge and input.

Submit your project in the most appropriate and accessible format possible (i.e. a digital PPT or Word file, a video file, image files that contain photographs of whatever hand-drawn project you made, etc.). Please also include a list of websites and/or resources used in your research. Refer to the rubric below for more information on how you will be graded.

HRT4760-04 Individual Project will involve an in-depth assessment and analysis of service quality in hospitality operation. You will 1) choose a target hospitality entity, such as hotel/resort/casino (at least full-service upscale hotel), restaurant (at least fine-dining restaurant), private club, convention/exhibition/conference center, airline, zoo/theme park, etc., 2) visit the chosen target property, 3) observe its service operation carefully, 4) if necessary, conduct multiples interviews with managers and/or frontline employees, 5) conduct secondary (data) research, 6) analyze online word-of-mouth (WOM), and 7) submit your findings (final paper). Your analysis of service operation must focus on five dimensions of service quality (reliability, tangibles, assurance, responsiveness, and empathy). Detailed information about the five dimensions of service quality will be discussed in Chapter 3 Service Quality Part II. You must submit your final paper to the instructor via Canvas by May 15. Grades (maximum 100 pts) will be based on 1) clarity of writing or professional editing, 2) in-depth observation and analysis, and 3) creative insights/recommendations. Copying other’s works will be considered “Plagiarism,” resulting in F grade in this course and further consequences from the university side. Please remember that the similarity check will be conducted to check the originality of your paper. Similarity percent (%) of your project should be below 15% for the consideration of full credits. If it exceeds 30%, you will receive “0” credit and be required to provide explanation of your case to the instructor. There will be no presentation of your work.
Paper Format: Your final paper should be no less than 15 pages and no more than 20 pages including cover page and references, double spaced with 12 font size (Follow APA style.). It is expected that you write a senior-level research paper. Spelling and/or grammatical mistakes in your paper will result in significant penalty. Your final paper must follow the research paper format below:
1. Title Page: Project title, the list of group members, and the date of submission etc.
2. Table of Contents
3. Introduction of Your Target Property: A brief history and the general facts about your target property. For example, founding year, number of rooms/seats and employees, type of ownership, target market, Average Daily Rate (ADR)/average check, etc.
4. Overall Observation: Followings are some suggestions for your analysis:
o • What makes the property’s overall operation different?
o • What were your observations regarding each operational area?
o • What were the unique practice(s) in each operational area?
o • Were you surprised or impressed at any particular aspect of service operation?
o • Were you disappointed at any particular aspect of service operation?
o • What were the operational strengths or weaknesses of the property?
o • Others

HTR4760 Course Syllabus – Page 3
1. Assessment of Service Quality: It should be based on your observation, secondary research, and online Word-Of-Mouth (WOM), using five dimensions of service quality: Reliability, Tangibles, Assurance, Responsiveness, and Empathy
2. Recommendations and Conclusion: Provide your own recommendations on how to improve overall service quality.
3. References: Cite all printed or on-line resources used (APA style).

Essay question: The primary responsibility for environmental issues lies with governments not individuals. To what extent to do you agree with this?Document saved as: s&s final essay, is the document I want written the essay on. I started on it so you can get an idea of the layout and information but I want it more professional pls.Other documents are just to give you a better understanding of what is required. I put a few sources you can add more, all references in Harvard format pls.Comments from CustomerDiscipline: Science and society

Develop a short business plan for a nurse/midwife-led Family Planning clinic, including postpartum family planning (PPFP), in your country of origin, with an emphasis on the most effective methods, whilst promoting choice of method and decision making.