Best Writer

Use Canva.com (Links to an external site.) or another infographic development to design a patient teaching aid about OTC treatments for colds and cough. Use PO drugs only.
Include the following required six sections. You do not have to use these exact words for headings, but they should be labeled to identify the intended topic.
What OTC drugs (active ingredients) are available to treat the following common cold and cough symptoms?
Nasal decongestants
Cough suppressants
Expectorants
Antihistamines
Pain relievers
What is the recommended dose and frequency for each generic drug (active ingredient)?
How do I know which one to take?
How do I know which OTC medications are safe to take with others?
When should I stop taking the OTC medication selected?
When should I see my healthcare provider?

Short Essay Questions (4 short essays worth 20 pts. each; 80% of total score).
Choose four of the following questions to answer in a well-developed
paragraph (try and limit your word length to a single healthy paragraph). Please include
the corresponding letter of the question you choose with your answer. Then submit your answers to the
dropbox in this module:

A) Differentiate between the four spatial (proxemic) distances (with their suggested
lengths), giving a specific example of how each can be used appropriately to
communicate effectively. (135-36)

B) Define self-disclosure and contrast the rewards and dangers involved. (180-84)

C) What general stages do relationships follow? Give an example of the kind of
communication that takes place at each stage. (198-204)

D) For each of the five steps in listening (receiving, understanding, remembering, evaluating,
responding) [80-85], give examples of verbal and/or nonverbal messages that you have personally
observed. Explain how both denotative and connotative meanings [102-03] were conveyed
verbally and nonverbally.

E) Keeping well within expectations of propriety, evaluate your experience and level of success
in computer-mediated communication as far as both creating and maintaining relationships. How
has the advance of technology affected your interpersonal relationships or changed the way you
communicate with others?

F) Discuss either your friendships, love relationships, or family relationships (choose one of
these three relationship types) by identifying their type or types (and characteristics, if helpful)
and by noting any influence of culture, gender, and/or technology (if applicable). If you choose
to discuss multiple relationships within the chosen category, you might discuss one in detail and
summarize the rest, noting interesting comparisons/contrasts [217-27].

G) Describe a conflict you had with another person that ended in a positive outcome, giving
specific examples of how the conflict followed the five steps of conflict management to its
successful conclusion (define the conflict, examine possible solutions, test the solution, evaluate
the solution, accept or reject the solution) [Ch. 11].
H) Analyze and evaluate your own non-verbal communication processes. In what situations do
you (by propriety or choice) communicate more non-verbally than verbally? How effective are
these non-verbal communications in achieving your goals? [Ch. 6].

Topic: You will further develop your Argument Essay 2 into a research paper by adding support from additional secondary sources, and by revising and editing errors. Just to be clear, you will be literally using your Argument Essay 2 as the foundation of this essay and adding research to expand it with additional support for your argument. Therefore, all the rules about title, formatting, style, etc. that apply to Argument Essay 2 also apply to Research Essay 2.

Word Count: 1,500 words.

Some notes about the sources: Remember that the purpose of these sources is not merely informative; the research should support your thesis. In addition to the one required source from PCI, and the one required source from the LSC-Tomball Library database, you should have at least 4 non-PCI secondary sources. That is a minimum of 6 sources. All sources included must be reputable academic sources from either the LSC-Tomball Library database or Google Scholar.

Each source must be used at least once throughout the text.

Use at least one block quote and three “regular quotes.”

Instructions from SUNY Oswego: In 500–1000 words, describe your unique personal achievements relating to your academic interests, and include any experiences you feel have contributed to your educational and professional objectives, such as supervisory activities, program development, leadership activities, and special assignments. Explain what these achievements and experiences have meant to your professional growth, what you hope to achieve professionally in the next five years, what you expect out of your business degree, and how you will contribute to the classroom experiences. This essay should detail your reasoning for applying to SUNY Oswego and it will help the review team better understand your background and evaluate your application.

Describe culture from a behavioral perspective.
Discuss the importance of incorporating culture as a part of a client’s/participant’s context in applied practice and research.
Describe cultural humility and discuss the potential benefits of adopting culturally humble approaches to applied practice and research.
Discuss specific skills needed to adopt culturally humble approaches and specific ways we can develop and maintain those skills.
Provide at least two supporting examples of a culturally humble approach in action within the context of two groups of people in frequent conflict: (1) behavior analyst researchers and practitioners and (2) anti-ABA autistics and advocates.
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for more information on how to cite your sources.
Resources: 2–4 recent scholarly resources.
Length: 3–5 double-spaced pages, in addition to a title page and a references page.

assignment expects participants to select one of the risk strategies and apply it to a security issue of your choice. You can choose any national or international security issue. In week 8 the expectation is very specific — one of the risk strategies (PRA, MBRA, etc.). These are the strategies that are mainly discussed in the second chapter of our textbook.

The Textbook Used needs to be a source, the textbook is Critical Infranstructure protection in homeland security, defending a networked nation by Ted G Lewis

The following two items also need to be sources:
https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/cip/Documents/2016-hph-ssp.pdf

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2021-Unclassified-Report.pdf

The PowerPoint needs to be displayed like a research paper with proper citations (APA format). 12 slides total (15 at most)

The focus needs to be how the privacy is within the cyber security world and what the US federal governments involvement is. Must be in third person. The stance is that the government infringes on citizens rights to privacy. Stance is also that we must secure cyber security to protectthe American citizens.

Below is the rubric, guidelines, and points to discus:

Key Elements:
Learner fully correlates and integrates key elements to substantiate thesis statement.

Analysis:
Learner presented and substantiated a clear debatable claim.

Writing Conventions:
Learner fully included and transitioned between a clear beginning, middle, and ending. No significant errors in grammar were evident.

Citations/References:
Learner fully integrated and cited source material within evaluation.

Key elements to address include as it pertains to the topic:

• The role of public opinion, interest groups, and political parties;
• The state and local election process;
• Rights and responsibilities of citizens; and
Key issues and policies and political culture.

• This powerpoint will be 9-12 slides in length.
• Information should be in the slide itself AND NOT THE NOTES SECTION.
• Use APA format for in-text citations and cover slide.
• This is a professional paper so you will not use 1st or 2nd person.
• Utilize the OWL Purdue website that is mentioned in previous assignment sheets. Click on their APA format link. That has a ton of links that explain what is expected.
• Proper grammar and punctuation are expected as this is a professional project. 10 points is the usual deduction on my projects for grammar and punctuation but I reserve the right to take off more in cases where the mistakes are enough to inhibit my ability to understand the message.
• Projects cannot be recycled from previous or current classes or semesters. Any recycled papers will result in an automatic “0” and may be subject to further disciplinary action.
• Make sure to use in-text citations like the sample APA paper on OWL Purdue. Any powerpoint that does not have in-text citations will result in an automatic 0 for the powerpoint. These in-text citations will be used for anything that is not an original thought.

For Module 3 we examined race and racisms by focusing on underlying assumptions, practices, and models of genetic and social science research. For the discussion board assignment, we will combine different examples to analyze different (often unintentional or implicit) ways that scientific research might reinforce existing racial hierarchies as well as explore concrete proposals to challenge them through changing research practices, transforming institutional and legal guidelines for research, and following alternative research paradigms.

INSTRUCTIONS

Step 1 (40 points). Respond to the following prompt by discussing main arguments and specific examples from the assigned media from Module 3. Word count for your post is open-ended but should aim for 250-400 words (think creatively and try to connect ideas!) but should meet basic criteria. Please review additional instructions and tips below to ensure you receive full points.

PROMPT: A research institute on campus has asked you to contribute to a new initiative that aims to identify implicit biases or racial inequities of research involving historically underrepresented groups and to propose alternatives. Discuss specific examples analyzed by researchers in other contexts that might help identify some potential “blind spots” in the assumptions or practices of their own institute and consider its broader implications (in shaping social relations, education, public policy, etc.). Then, draw from proposals or initiatives others have put for forth to outline some concrete steps the institute could take in efforts to avoid them.

BASIC CRITERIA

To receive full points, you must fully incorporate at least one of the assigned readings and at least one of the assigned media from Module 3.

Note: the podcast interview with Angela Saini and the website and resource list about the “Model Minority” are considered assigned media. You are also more than welcome to substitute assigned media with any of the news stories or links provided in the supplement materials from modules tab or lecture slides and/or outside examples of your own).
Your response should address two key elements of the prompt:

1) Identify potential “blind spots” (i.e. assumptions, practices, dominant models) in research by discussing specific argument(s) scholars have made in other contexts (in other words, summarizing Reardon and Tallbear’s argument about genetic scientists at ASU or Mirandé’s argument about Immigrant Group Models in sociology to explain how this could also occur – if even unintentionally occur in the institute).

2) Outline some concrete steps that could be taken to avoid such “blind spots” (in other words, discuss any of the alternatives we discussed in the readings or supplementary materials) and then generalize to think about how the institute might incorporate a similar protocol, paradigm, initiative, etc. to transform research practices. What are some different objectives driving the research? What, by extension, are some different outputs/outcomes of the research project? Who benefits (and who decides)?

TIP: Keep your imagined audience in mind! The “research institute” is interested in learning about new approaches to research but has never heard of ideas such as “Anti-Racist Racism” “Whiteness as Property” or “Chicano Sociology.” So, fully incorporating the materials implies: Introducing the scholar(s)/speakers and summarizing their work as well as discussing specific examples to show specifically how assumptions, practices, models of other researchers might produce or maintain racial inequalities. Similarly, be detailed and specific when discussing alternative proposals. In sum, be creative and connect ideas, but do so in a way that also demonstrates your thoughtful engagement with the assigned materials.

1. As a tourism specialist with the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), describe three (3) ways in which your agency could assist an emerging country wishing to expand its quite meager (at present) tourist industry. How could resident responsive tourism play into this?
2. As the food and beverage manager of your resort hotel, make a few suggestions as to how you might employ Hi-Tech/Hi Touch. In what other areas of tourism can or will technology change the tourism industry?
3. How has tourism changed over the past few years and what changes or trends do you see happening in the future? Think in terms of existing markets and emerging markets. Hotels vs AirBNB. Ecotourism. Consider future travel needs and how the industry can better manager future unknowns like pandemics.

A four-page presentation in which you synthesize how social construction, working with culture, and the role of street level bureaucrats together form the basis for a people-focused bottom-up approach to creating a more effective public sector for the greater society. In what ways do the three perspectives flow together? Finally, how do the ideas expressed in the course suggest the potential for leadership willing to challenge status quo thinking and put new systems and processes in place? 1. Includes specific concepts from reading2. Provides personal analysis and evaluation 3. Synthesizes the themes/concepts of the three texts4. Indicates relevance of material to leadership in public admin. 5. Writing is well organized, flows well with minimal errors/typos

An Invitation to Social Construction, 3rd ed.
Kenneth J. Gergen
ISBN – 978-1-4462-9647-9
Sage, 2015
Working with Culture; The Way the Job Gets
Done in Public Programs
Anne M. Khademian
ISBN – 1-56802-687-0
CQ Press, 2002
Street-Level Bureaucracy, Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, Updated Ed., 2010
Michael Lipsky
ISBN – 978-0-87154-544-2
Russell Sage Foundation