Best Writer

This essay should be about the mental health of the movie shutter island

Formatting: 5-7 pages, 8th Edition MLA, including in-text citations and a Works Cited Page

Sources: The original text, as well as at least five outside sources

Justification: In this class, we are attempting to explore the representation of mental illness in narrative form. It is important to explore how accurately the state of mental healthcare is being represented, in order to understand the greater narrative being conveyed to the general public. If you are living with one of these mental health conditions, what are the popular books and movies saying about you as a person or about treatment options?

Argument: For this paper, you should establish an argumentative thesis about the text. This thesis should present itself at the end of your introduction and identify the overriding argument which will guide the rest of your paper. This overriding argument should be supported by evidence from the text, as well as at least five outside sources (although feel free to provide more).

Structure: Your paper should not merely be a presentation of quotes from the text and outside sources; it should not be a pointing paper. Your analytical voice should come through strongest. Always return to the question: why does this information matter?

Your Essay should have as follow…
Introduction (Purpose: It should provide the reader with background knowledge on the text, as well as provide context for the rest of the analysis)

Provide a very basic summary of the story– Imagine your reader hasn’t read or viewed the text. What information would they need in order to understand the overall concept? Avoid summarizing the entire story. Considering providing a concise 3-4 sentence overview.

Transition into the thesis– Identify the conversation about the book into which you are entering. Basically, what is the reason you are telling us about this book? (Hint, hint: it relates to the assignment descriiption)

Thesis– At the end of your introduction, identify where you stand on the text’s ability to accurately represent mental illness. What is the larger argument under which all sub-arguments within the essay fall? You can either provide a closed thesis (one wherein you identify the reasons to defend the larger claim) or an open thesis (one wherein you simply present the claim and don’t identify the reasons to support the claim). Both have their benefits and drawbacks. Keep in mind that your thesis does not have to be an all-or-nothing argument. You might come to the assertion that, based upon your research, the representation in the text is accurate in certain areas but flawed in others.

Body paragraphs (Purpose: Usually, but not always, a paragraph focuses on one argumentative reason at a time. Always ask yourself this question: what am I trying to say in this paragraph that I haven’t said in previous paragraphs)

Topic Sentence(s)– Identify the argumentative purpose of this paragraph. What does everything in the paragraph help to support?

Elaboration Sentence(s)–Tell us what that sentence means. Avoid jumping right into evidence. Unpack that topic sentence a little in your own words. What does that topic sentence mean?

Outside Evidence Sentence(s)–Insert evidence from an outside source that provides support for the argument in this paragraph. Make sure to set up the quote/summary/paraphrase appropriately (ex: According to psychologist Tom Wells…) and to provide an appropriate in-text citation when you are done with the source (ex: first name we see on the Works Cited Page and the page number- if applicable (Wells 95)).

Evidence Context Sentence(s)–Tell us what this evidence implies. Avoid allowing the source to speak for itself. What does the information provided mean? How does it assist your argument in this paragraph?

Textual Evidence(s)–Identify specific sections from the text that support your assertions. How can you show your audience that this argument is supported? Once again, make sure to set up the quote/summary/paraphrase appropriately (ex: This is not the case, as displayed when Charlie talks with Sam after the fight….) and to provide an appropriate in-text citation when you are done with the text (Chbosky 99).

Evidence Context Sentence(s)–Once again, tell us what this evidence implies. How is this connected to the information presented in the outside source? Why does this evidence support your assertions?

Conclusion (Purpose: This should provide a takeaway message. What do you want your audience to leave your analysis knowing? What do you want them to do with this information? Why is all this information important?)

please read the chapter I have attached you.The topic is “Punishment and Alternatives to Punishment”Some things to consider discussing in your papero Discuss the topic from a traditional perspectiveo Discuss the topic from a behavioral perspectiveo What is at issue here (e.g., the issue of control, autonomous man, operating undernegative reinforcement contingencies, etc.)o How might the science of behavior inform and guide practices related to this issue/topic(e.g., on an individual level, on a cultural level, etc.)o What has prevented a behavioral approach from being utilized?format:1. It should include an introduction where you outline what your paper is going to be about,2. including a thesis statement about the point of your paper o Then, bring up the issue/topic and discuss it3. Discuss the relative implications of each of your pointso Conclusion where you summarize/reiterate the points you wanted to make.paper should flow well, and you should use effective transitions across your paragraphsThank you!Comments from CustomerHi, the title should be “Cultural Analysis Paper”, not “see the instructions”, sorry for the confusion.Thank yo.https://we.tl/t-X5XKLEntMM chapterrevision instructions: https://media.us1.twilio.com/ME2c27a1e36a6b66abf42898c9aa1052e4?Expires=1652055439&Signature=grACE2RIfOfbC~wn5zRMoFm~X~RyOvHNYTxvIBI0jscEh8-GhNaLFvmLmQxfXLPDEpHsQbC8gmMoHTl4KIkKcgPNwdHCgW~WLuFpB7UGs2Nor-GYcgnEq~CN-1qhPh0D9c-7it-lU0YAyuaJfRDtfd1-FHb5XR3rcyVZeiXWYu7rYARDC9GTXAJfNzWO2uYFVvsbPuWQM5Qo9wO5hm9C85mkp2P1J1HwIaNupAO1VvhjLNNmL3Lb9F5b9PDgwRecCl-5kbq-~tEpqq~u6cWi2~ePlTrSb8FkIxRv407vgLFILlzzUl8IcrSy4dTRAVE3OtQilQXYw7hHU1k7utaYSg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJWF6YVTMIIYOF3AA

International relations is sometimes abstract. We talk about our assumptions regarding generic “actors” and simplify their interests and interactions. We traffic in large datasets that can dull the complexities of individual situations. These are all fair charges.

The goal of this exercise is to demonstrate that (a) the abstract models that we’ve studied can be applied to ongoing, real-world current events and (b) applying those models can contribute to our assessment of those events.

The deadline is May 9th 12pm (noon) EST. I strongly recommend typing your answer somewhere stable, like a notes or word file, then pasting it into the box below. Some people have lost their answers if they lose internet connection while writing.

Also, if the links don’t work, or it links you to your non-preferred podcast player, ***just google it*** and find the right player or link.

Your task is to:

(1) Listen to (at least) one episode of the following podcasts:

Make sure to identify which podcast and episode title you listened to, and copy the link to the episode in your answer.

(2) Identify arguments made during their topic of discussion and apply what we’ve learned to that topic.

Your answer should be 2-3 paragraphs. The most emphasis should be on question (2).

Another helpful tip is to be “positive” in your argument. The best answers will not just link the podcast to a concept from class by saying “This is a war. That’s kind of like the bargaining model thing we did.” The best answers will demonstrate how including our study would enhance the podcast discussion. For example, “The participants really focused on whether the rebels were crazy, but that might distract from some deeper problems in the civil war, like how this is an audience cost problem in the following ways…”

You will be evaluated on 1) whether you identify a podcast clearly, 2) summarize it in a few sentences, and 3) make at least 2-3 points that link clearly to a concept or idea from the semester.

Book review of the Text, Nomadland, should be sociological in nature. Do not just tell me what the book is about as I already know what the book is about. My intention is to see how well you can think sociologically about the author’s case study. The case study is a work in journalism and is a set of stories about the subjects in the narrative and how they have adapted to a nomadic way of life. There is no sociological theory in the book. Your paper will be an essay on the book. It will be four to five pages typed and double spaced. Place the title of the book at the top of the page in bold and at the left margin. Give the author’s name. When quoting directly from the text give the page number like (p. 5) at the end of the quote. You are to write the review with concepts from the class in mind. For example, the Sociological Imagination can be used to discuss the lives of the people she wrote about in the book. How have larger social forces impacted the lives and choices of the people studied? Social Inequality is a big one. Age is an issue and also the loss of income and homes due to the downturn in the economy. Conflict theory would be interested in how the subjects’ labor has been exploited due to their hard luck during the economic downturn in 2008. Functionalist would be interested in how the subjects play a positive role for the economy as part time, seasonal workers, and Symbolic Interactionism is the main focus of the study (from a sociological point of view, not that of the author of the book) in that the narrative is mainly about the individuals in the study and their stories of survival as nomads in the RV subculture. You also have a lot of examples in terms of Gender issues! Also race, though most of the subculture is made up of white Americans. But why so? Finally there are many examples of institutional discrimination. Also look for examples of prejudice and ideologies about gender and age. End your paper with a self reflection on the significance of the book for the sociological study of part time work and life style and how the book affected your outlook on the future of labor (working people) in the United States. NOTE: Do not try to copy from some other review that is online of the book as I have an app that I use to check for this and students will get a zero on the paper for not writing their paper in their on words. If you have not started reading this text know that many of my earlier students stated that it was the best textbook to read while they have been in university! Students love this book! Enjoy! Book Review will not be due until the last week of regular classes.

(An argument based paper with ZERO opinions. Times New Roman font size:12)
The emphasis of this assignment is on demonstrating good academic research, persuasive
or informative writing, and correct MLA formatting. Your paper must be argument-based paper. This paper
should not be an introduction to a topic. Instead, you want to focus on a particular issue and delve deeply into it.
Your grade will largely depend on your level of focus, though, naturally, formatting and applying the standard
rules of formal writing are also important. Papers full of broad statements or basic historical details will receive
very low grades.
Requirements:
– Minimum of four sources.
– 1000-1250 words in addition to your Works Cited page!!!!!
– If you use an auto-citation you will receive a zero for this assignment.

Unit 4 – Individual Project
View Assignment Details for Unit 4 –
Assignment Overview
Type: Individual Project Part 3
Unit: HLS Response and Resilience, Cross-Domain Strategies & International Factors
Deliverable Length: 2 pages
Assignment Details
Assignment Descriiption
Key Assignment Draft

Section 9: Interagency Process

This week, you will outline the potential for improved whole-of-government, interagency coordination among domestic and international partners. In this section of your Key Assignment, you will identify the framework for a possible policy planning effort that would serve as a catalyst for improved multiagency, cross-governmental cooperation and collaboration at the SWB.

Draft a 2-page road map, similar to the plan of action and milestones (POA&M) or concept of operations (CONOPS). Be sure to include the following:

Propose steps to significantly raise the level of coordination among the constellation of interagency players at the SWB.
Draw from your case study, NSWBCN Strategy, and the Patriot Act to formulate a plan of action that leverages existing capabilities and introduces new ideas.
Identify at least 3 specific examples of potential for improvement versus transformation. For example, there are several coordination centers with overlapping missions that are colocated at the SWB that appear redundant.
Include useful and appropriate bibliographic references.
Review the Key Assignment descriiption in the Week 1 Individual Project.

Key Assignment Draft Requirements

Update your assignment formats to create a cohesive case study analysis and include all appropriate bibliographic references.

Your Key Assignment Draft and case study analysis should include the following:

You should have an introduction to the project that highlights the strategic purpose for the NSWBCN Strategy and outlines your case study on the threat of WMD being smuggled across the Southwest Border.
You should highlight the all-threat environment that exists on the SWB for the key stakeholders of the Interagency Police Committee (ICP) within the interagency.
You should include a graphic diagram of the rules and policies that apply to the region, along with a list of overarching themes that summarize the challenges.
You should write a point paper that emphasizes the need for better multiagency coordination on the SWB.
You must include an executive outline of the specific chapters of the NSWBCN Strategy, and describe how they might support the state-level objectives of governors of the border states with homeland security equities on the SWB.
You should write a policy proposal, explaining how SWB-related critical infrastructure protection (CIP), response, and resilience imperatives should be fully integrated into future versions of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) strategies and policies, with general recommendations that would be appropriate for DHS planners to consider.
You should include a quad chart with supporting information that explains the planning variables associated with cross-domain strategies.
You should write a thought piece on improving cooperation with Mexico.
You will create a road map with proposed steps to significantly raise the level of coordination among the constellation of interagency players

Please submit your assignment.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

question 1
Using the GCU Library, locate a journal article about capital budgeting. In the subject line of your post, include the name of the article that you read. Then, in your initial post, provide a link to the article and a summary followed by your reaction to the article. The summary should be approximately 250 words and the reaction should be approximately 150 words. The summary should describe the major points of the article, and the reaction should demonstrate your interpretation of the article and how you can apply that knowledge. Do not choose an article that one of your classmates has already posted. To participate in follow-up discussion, choose one of the articles that a classmate has posted and provide your own reaction to it. Note: It will be challenging to find a relevant article if you do not use the library.

Please include proper citations in your discussion post. Points will be deducted if proper citations are not used.
question 2
Review Case 9.32 in your textbook. Using the questions provided as a guide, explain what you would do if you were Amy in this situation.

Participate in follow-up discussion by debating whether Amy should report Tony as indicated in part D of the case. Ask questions and post comments regarding classmates’ posts, or respond to follow-up questions posted by the instructor.

Please include proper citations in your discussion post. Points will be deducted if proper citations are not used.

Net present value, ethics (adapted from Roland L. Madison, “Should Finance Make the Numbers ’Come Out’,” Strategic Finance, 86, no. 10 (April 2005): 17–18.) Amy Kimbell, CPA, CMA, and a member of the Institute of Management Accountants, recently joined Magee Metals and Moldings as a senior financial analyst. One of her major responsibilities is to prepare data to support capital equipment purchases.

Magee is trying to expand its international operations. The company is currently spending $275,000 each year on international travel, an amount that is expected to increase by 20% each year for the next four years and then level off. Since none of Magee’s current fleet of corporate jets has the range to fly internationally, Magee’s CFO, Tony Smith, recently asked Amy to run some numbers on the purchase of a new corporate jet with an international range.

Amy determined that the jet upper managers want to buy has a purchase price of $15 million and a useful life of 15 years. Variable operating costs are an estimated $220,000 per year, based on a projected usage of 400 hours per year. Fixed operating costs are estimated at $375,000 per year, not including depreciation. When Magee employees aren’t using the company’s jets, they are rented to other parties at a rate of $3,500 per hour. Based on existing rental requests, Amy estimated that the new jet would be rented for 500 hours each year.

Using Magee’s 12% discount rate, Amy calculated the net present value of the new jet purchase to be at most ($6,000,000). She knew there was no way the capital budget committee would approve a purchase with such a large negative net present value. When she presented her analysis to Tony, he responded. “Go back and check your work. When I ran the preliminary numbers, I found a positive net present value. You must have made a mistake.” Tony suggested that she increase the useful life of the jet to 25 years, raise the salvage value by 25%, and increase the rental usage by 50%.

Amy did some additional research and determined through discussions with the jet’s manufacturer that her original salvage value and estimated life were aggressive, but realistic. In fact, if the jet were used for 25 years, it would require a multimillion-dollar overhaul in year 15 to remain flightworthy. Beginning in year 11, operating costs would increase by 30%. With this new information, Amy reworked her analysis and obtained an even larger negative net present value.

When Tony saw the revised numbers, he blew up. “I told you what to do with the numbers and you did something else. Now go back and do what I said. And have the correct analysis back to me by the end of the day.”

Amy returned to her office slowly, thinking about what Tony was telling her to do. She had been at Magee for only a month and really liked her job. In fact, she was looking forward to a long career at Magee.

Required

Should Amy make the changes Tony has requested, noting in her analysis that the CFO provided the estimates? Why or why not?
If Amy makes the changes Tony has requested, but doesn’t want to list him as the source of the estimates, should she send an unsigned note to the chair of the capital budget committee, informing him of the problems with the analysis? Why or why not?
What actions should Amy take in response to Tony’s final request? Support your answer by referring to the IMA’s Statement of Ethical Professional Practice.
Tony Smith is a licensed CPA and a member of the IMA. Should Amy report his behavior to the state accounting board and the IMA? Why or why not?

Submit a fully developed essay in response to each of the following questions. Note that there is a suggested length for each question. Be sure to use MLA format for this and all of the written assignments in this course.

Select a manufacturer or service organization then, using the SWOT factors on page 79 of your textbook, identify the competitive advantages that your selected company exhibits. Be sure to support your conclusions. (Suggested length: 250-300 words)
Discuss the pros and cons of franchising. What are two examples of how a franchisor can negatively impact a franchisee? Do you think there are any ethical implications? (Suggested length: 100-200 words).
Read Situation 2 on page 120 (Chapter 4) of your textbook. What risks do you think you would face if you were a successful manager in a large organization who suddenly had an offer to go into business for yourself? Why do you think Treadwell decided to become a multi-brand franchisee instead of staying with KFC? (Suggested length: 150-250 words)
Give four reasons for buying an existing business rather than creating a brand new one. Describe the process of evaluating an existing business. How effective do you think these guidelines are? (Suggested length: 150-175 words)

SEE ATTACHED FOR SUPPORTING DOCS

Take a look at this report from the CATO Institute
https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/war-poverty-turns-50-are-we-winning-yet

Have the programs worked to reduce poverty?
What is the end goal of welfare—to give people money to help them live day-to-day or to help them become self-sufficient? How ethical is this end goal? Explain.
Where does the US stand in terms of poverty and welfare?
What federal social service programs need revision? Why?
Evaluate the welfare/social service issue using our policy framework.

Be sure to use three scholarly sources to balance analysis.

1. Compose three pitches. In each, propose one idea for a 2000-word feature story. 2. Use the template provided3. Address each pitch to the editor of an appropriate publication. The publication does not have to be realistic in terms of your experience, but it should be a good match for the feature you are proposing. You can address all three pitches to the same editor/publication or you can select 2-3 different editors/publications. (Please choose from the publication idea list-provided)4. See week 1 notes for which subgenres to avoid for assessment. 5. details the elements you need to include, such as:What’s the story? (what’s the topic? the angle? the human story?) Why this and why now? (why is this important? why is it newsworthy? why is it suitable for their readers?) Why you? (why are you the best person to write this? this may include what you already know and what you can access) a catchy subject line If relevant: mention high quality additions you can include such as specific photos or graphics 6. Please advise the grading rubric providedThanks!