Best Writer

List two to three different types of tools you can implement with your mentee. Discuss the pros and cons of each approach as you decide which tool to use for your mentee.

In preparation for your Topic 7 assignment, develop a mentor experience evaluation tool for your mentee to complete. You can develop a survey, a questionnaire, or short-answer response document or electronic tool. At a minimum, your evaluation should include at least six prompting questions and feedback comment areas. Though not exhaustive, the following is a list of suggested prompts you may incorporate into your tool:

Mentor availability and frequency of meetings
Mentor communication (frequency and clarity)
Mentor demonstration of interest
Mentor knowledge, competency, and guidance toward goal achievement
Mentor attitude of advocacy and demonstration of integrity
Value, efficacy, and clarity of mentorship activities (e.g., goals, guidelines, timeframe, personal development, feedback)
Most/least beneficial activities
Completion of goals planned
Mentor guidance with networking
Most beneficial personal development or change and overall personal growth
Recommendations for mentoring partnership efficacy and improvement
Overall value of the mentoring program.
Prior to having your mentee complete the evaluation, submit your evaluation document or tool to your instructor for feedback.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Please write three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style. Please add title and reference page. Must use at least three scholarly sources.***I chose Tom’s case study and my disability focus is Emotional Disturbance.Instructions: In order to properly write positive behavior goals and create intervention plans, teachers and educators must be able to conduct observations of students and accurately define the behavior in observable terms. Read through the following case studies (TomDownload Tomand choose one student that you will focus on for this assignment. As you read through the case studies, think about how the student fits the disability focus you have chosen for this course and the Week Six assignment.After reading the case study, create a classroom incident that is aligned to the students’ characteristics. * Explain the antecedent (what happened before the behavior happened).* Describe the behavior in concrete, observable, and objective terms.* Use a functional assessment tool (e.g., FAST,* Download FAST, MAS* Download MAS , A-B-C Analysis Form* Download A-B-C Analysis Form , etc.) to assess the function.Provide a document that includes the following:* Identify the student by name and age, and describe the learning situation.* Explain the antecedent (what happened before the behavior happened).* Describe the behavior in concrete, observable, and objective terms.* Function of behavior (attention, escape, access/control, sensory/stimulation) and rationale for choice

The purpose of this assignment is to collect feedback from the mentee on the effectiveness of your “Individual Development Plan” as well as their perspective regarding your application of coaching or mentoring techniques. To collect feedback on your mentee’s experiences, you are required to ask your mentee to complete the evaluation you developed in Topic 6 that was approved by your instructor.

Provide your mentee with access to the evaluation tool along with instructions for them to complete it and return it to you in time for you to submit it by the due date. You will turn in the document, provide screenshots, or whatever information the mentee provides that shows their original responses.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Assessment Descriiption
Complete the prompts for Topic 8 in your “T5-T8 Self-Reflection Log.” Use your experiences during this course drive your responses. Review and make sure all sections of your log are complete and reflect your mentoring experience, ensuring modifications are made prior to submitting the templated document for this topic.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌n Essay on a Business Ethical Issue MAN1090 Assessment 2 You will write an essay on an ethical issue of your own choosing. You must apply ethical theories taught in the module to investigate a contemporary ethical issue that impacts organisations. · Maximum 1200 words (All inclusive excluding the list of references; no cover page is needed, but you must include the title of your essay, your full name, URN and the word count in the beginning of your essay) · 60% of your Final Grade for this Course · Due: 4pm, May 16 Monday; submitted to SurreyLearn ONLY The objective of this coursework is to demonstrate your learning from the module and your competence in applying this learning to real-world problems. It is also important you write in a concise, logical and professional manner. The topic: You must choose an issue that concerns organisations (i.e., companies or nonprofit organisations). Ethical problems of governments should be avoided. You MUST organise your essay with the PEAS framework and use these subheadings (refer to the sample essay for illustration): Problems, Evidence, Analysis, and Solution 1. Problem: What is the ethical issue? What kind of ethical dilemma it presents (to organisations and to societies)? (suggested words: 100) 2. Evidence: What organisations are implicated in this issue and in what ways? (you should present evidence that the issue has implicated multiple organisations instead of just one big-name company; you are encouraged to use descriptive theories to explain why the ethical problem occurs and persists) (suggested words: 150-200) 3. Analysis: You MUST conduct the following analysis to demonstrate your learning from the module. You are encouraged to underscore (as in the sample essay) the theories/concepts you have applied (. utilitarianism, stakeholders): a. Apply TWO normative theories to explore the moral implications of the ethical issue, preferably from both ways. Establish a moral position following the arguments. (suggested words: 400) b. Conduct a stakeholder analysis from the perspective of the organisations implicated in the ethical issue. You MUST apply stakeholder theories taught in the module to identify important/salient stakeholders, explain why they are important and how they are impacted by the issue (suggested words: 300) 4. Solution: What might be the solution to the is‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌sue? Please provide a plausible plan for action. (suggested words: 150) 5. References: at the end of your essay, list 5-10 references you have cited in the essay (with proper in-text citations) with the Harvard Style. For example, these could include newspaper articles or company websites you have gathered evidence from, and academic papers or books you have used to make arguments (No need to cite the textbook or lecture slides) When writing the essay, we suggest you focus on the following, which will be used to inform the marking: 1. Clarity: Do you demonstrate a clear understanding of theories and concepts? 2. Logic: Are you consistent (., does your solution follow from your analysis)? Are you coherent (., do your arguments add to each other)? 3. Problem solving: Can you come up with a practical solution to address the issue? 4. Writing: Do you present your material with clear and concise arguments? Do you use references properly? 5. Depth*: Do you present compelling evidence that help the reader see the essence of the issue? 6. Creativity: Do you demonstrate originality (., in your arguments, in your proposed solution)? *While criteria 1-4 are basic requirements, criteria 5-6 are more advanced requirements indicating a higher degree of your achievement. Formatting: Times New Roman 12-point; line spacing. Leave top and side margins of 1-inch (“normal” margin in word layout). Use your last name followed by your URN as the file title. References (Harvard Style): Below are a few examples. For details, please refer to the Harvard-referencing-guide. online article BBC (2009) Young resent ‘negative images’. Available at: (Accessed: 10 July 2009). book Cameron, S. (2009) The business student’s handbook: skills for study and employment. 5th edn. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall. academic paper Mavrommati, G., Bithas, K. and Panayiotidis, P. (2013) ‘Operationalizing sustainability in urban coastal systems: a system dynamics analysis’, Water Research, 47 (20) pp. 7235-7250. government or NGO report Department of Health (2008) Health inequalities: progress and next steps. Available at: (Accessed: 18 June 2010) important notes: pls read instruct‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ions carefully

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌n relation to your selected topic: • Consider the application of the bioethical principles that have been discussed in the unit. • Consider the application of ethical theories and other ethical concepts to the chosen topic. • Based on the evidence, construct a written discussion that clearly pres‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ents these ethical considerations and the ethical dilemma/s. You need to discuss both sides of the argument/s. • Based on the evidence determine and then specify your ethical stance. • Present your work in a formal academic essay using APA referencing that includes an introduction, discussion, and‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ conclusion

Assignment #13
3 points
Due Friday May 6th by 11:59pm
Task: Read the document attached here, “Film-analysis-checklist-and-chart.”

Based on the document, and the video lectures complete (in note form) the included film analysis worksheet for the following opening scene from Falling Down (1993) directed by Joel Schumacher.
Here is a link to the IMDB page for more basic information about the film: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106856/

Here is a list of the youtube/vimeo clips used in the lecture if you prefer to watch them this way:
Hot Fuzz – Montage – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBNnHlqO4cs
Joel and Ethan Cohen Shot Reverse Shot – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UE3jz_O_EM&feature=youtu.be
Breaking Bad Camera Pan Movement – https://vimeo.com/91688801
Batman And Joker Lighting in Dark Knight –
Billy Elliot Mise-en-scene,
Jaws and Sound –
I have also included my slides from 5/2 below.

1.

2.

3.

Annotated Bibliography

This Work must be 100% plagarism-free- no recycled work… This must be written from scratch.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapters 4 and 5 from the text. It is also recommended that you review the upcoming assignments in Weeks 2 and 3, along with your Capstone Paper in Week 5. An Annotated Bibliography is a great way to organize your research and prepare you for completing the Capstone Paper Outline in Week 2, the Capstone Paper Rough Draft in Week 3, and your Solution Proposal Capstone Paper in Week 5.

The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to find, summarize, and critique scholarly and/or credible sources that you will use to complete your Capstone Paper. You will also use the information gained from the required readings this week to complete this assignment.

The Capstone Paper requires you to address five specific areas of your program of study and the learning objectives for the social and criminal justice program. Like the Capstone Paper, your annotated bibliography will consist of five various topics, each aligning with the first five course learning outcomes for this class, which are also the areas for examination in the Capstone Paper.

In your Annotated Bibliography

Analyze criminal justice issues within the systems of law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections (CLO 1).

Evaluate the application of the social justice principles of equality, solidarity, and human rights toward building a just society (CLO 2).

Examine cultural sensitivity’s and diversity awareness’ impact on social and criminal justice (CLO 3).

Deconstruct the relationship between law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections (CLO 4).

Interpret the relationship between social justice and criminal justice (CLO 5).

****For each of your five separate critical analyses of your sources for the Course Learning Outcomes listed above, complete the following:

Summarize each source’s thesis and/or main points in one paragraph.

Evaluate the relevance of the data used to support the thesis of the source.

Provide the formal APA reference entry for each source. The APA References/ sources DOES NOT INCLUDE the 825 words.

Briefly critique (as defined in Chapter 5) the accuracy, acceptability, strengths and weaknesses, and overall soundness of the article.

Explain, in one to two sentences, how each source supports your thesis and/or resolution.

The paper must be 825 to 1250 words in length, excluding title and reference pages, and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly and/or credible sources, which includes the source you are reviewing, two sources that support or contradict the initial article, and any other sources that support your analysis. Visit the University’s Library to review the Criminal Justice Research Guide which may help in your research. You may also find the University’s Library Quick N’ Dirty tutorial, The Research Process tutorial, and the Advanced Search Techniques tip sheet helpful as you conduct your research. As you conduct your research, the University also provides the RefWorks tool that will help you organize your research, create APA reference entries and citations, and more. Creating a RefWorks Account will assist you in creating an account in order to start using the tool.

Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Use the Annotated Bibliography Template, available in the Writing Center to help you complete this assignment. For information regarding how to complete an Annotated Bibliography, visit the Writing Center. There you will find a video tutorial and sample Annotated Bibliography.

The Annotated Bibliography assignment,

Must be 825 to 1250 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style

Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).

Must use at least five scholarly and/or credible sources in addition to the course text.

The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Writing Center for specifications

Development of a roadmap for Voyager Therapeutics, focusing specifically on their monogenic ALS gene therapy. Papers, figures and source count is flexible.