Best Writer

not an actual paper. just describing 2 articles. one evidence based and
the other non-evidence-based levels
1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose)
of the research article.
2. Describe the research methodology.
3. Identify the level of evidence using the Johns Hopkins
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) mode
4. Identify the quality rating of the non-research-based article
according to the JHNEBP model

Discrimination Theories

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides the basic requirements for equal employment opportunity and established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer and enforce legislation that prohibits two forms of discrimination: disparate treatment and disparate impact.
What are the main ideas of each of the two forms of discrimination? List and summarize at least two landmark court cases and research for current examples to support the definition of each of the two forms of discrimination.

Note:
• Key terms to consider in your answers – “prima facie,” “burden of proof.” “Bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ), Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures.
• Key landmark cases – Griggs v. Duke Power Co.; Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody; and McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green.

Required Reading: you may also do your own research
• Antidiscrimination in the Workplace. (2013). Congressional Digest, 92(10), 9-11. Retrieved from EBSCO multi-search database in the Touro library.
• Corrigall E, Cirka C. A Case of Ability and Disability: What Managers Must Know About the ADA. Organization Management Journal (Routledge) [serial online]. January 2014;11(1):31-39. Retrieved from EBSCO multi-search database in the Touro library.
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved May 31, 2019, from

Internal Analysis
In the Katavic and Butkovic (2016) reading, assess if the authors identified the internal strengths and weaknesses.
Properly cite within the body of your work.

Reading
Katavic, M., & Butkovic, L. L. (2016). MBA knowledge transfer in construction. In 15th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – Human Resources Development (pp. 263-271). Varazdin, Coratia: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency (VADEA).

External Analysis
According to Stakic, Zakic, and Jurcic (2015), how can the John Naisbitt University convert their (a) weaknesses into strengths, and (b) threats into opportunities?
Please cite within the body of your work.
Reading:
Stakic, A. J., Zakic, K., & Jurcic, A. (2015). The process of internalization in higher education and its impact on efficiency of working force. In 11th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – Building Resilient Society (pp. 186-194). Varazdin, Croatia: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency (VADEA).

Hi, You will be creating a Educational video based on the information I provide. (Instructions will also be attached.)
The video will be Khan Academy style.
For the voice recording you will use a online voice generator for example ( https://www.ibm.com/demos/live/tts-demo/self-service/home ) [ Language: English, Dialect: American, Enhanced neural voice: Michael ]

**Using Part 1 & Part 2 Mythbusters you will complete Part 3 Mythbusters

Submit a comprehensive analytical paper that researches a health care issue of your choosing that is relevant to your region of travel. Give a detailed explanation of the issue, it’s history, causes, and the population it most effects. Summarize your findings from the three interviews you conducted. What are some of the solutions to the issue on a local and global level?

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌he paper has to be written one of the questions below: 1. Has the return of Great Power competition heralded the end of Fourth Generation Warfare? 2. Why have proxy wars proved so appealing to states? 3. Is ISIS still a threat? 4. What impact do private military companies have on a state’s “monopoly of force”? 5. What impac‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌t does bad DDR policy have on future conflict? 6. Does conflict in cyberspace meet the threshold of being called ‘warfare’? 7. Can a state achieve its strategic objectives through the ambiguous use of force only Maximum word count: 2000 words I have attached the reading list for the module, in which I would like 5 sources to be ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌referenced.

1‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌500-word critical evaluation report. specifically, in your critical evaluation report your need to: 1. accurately identify and explain the different elements of the research process that are evident in the article 2. critically evaluate the research elements using the appraisal guide with reference to recent, relevant and scholarly literature 3. discuss the significant implications of the research for contemporary nursing practice and standards of care. please note, the suggested word count for each section is only approximate. – PICO, journal quality and authors credentials (100 words) – title abstrac‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌t and literature review (150 words) – research design (250 words) – the sample (150 words) – data collection (200 words) – data analysis (150 words) – results (250 words) – relevance to clinical nursing practice (250 words) — ensure that you use scholarly literature (digitised readings, reading articles, relevant Government reports and textbooks) that has been published within the last 5 years (2015-2020) — including minimum of 10 references in support of your critical evaluation — you may use heading to organise your essay. — I attach the sample file of example in critical evaluation (please check‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌)

Prompt: To what extent can it be said that Julio Cortázar’s “Axolotl” is about Europe and Latin America? If so, what is the story saying about the difference between these places, and/or about what it means for subjects from these places to communicate with—and understand—each other?

Your paper must contain a clear interpretative argument and be grounded in close readings of the text. Make sure to explain clearly and in your own words how every phrase or passage you quote from the text: (a) works or means what you say it does; and (b) supports your argument. Papers should consist of at least 1,250 words. No outside research or references to
secondary works is required or expected. Please do not use a thesaurus—just say what you want to say as clearly and precisely as you can in your own words.

The case study doc is pretty much what the PowerPoint needs to be about, and with that, it needs to have info from 2 systematic reviews (which I have provided), 1 lay article, and 1 original research article (that is peer reviewed). Below I will provide more information that is needed,Systematic Reviews-Choose the systematic review(s) that you think will guide you the best in finding the appropriate literature to make recommendations to your client for the end project. (these I provided)Lay Article- This article will be used in the presentation to compare and contrast what is said in popular literature, to peer-reviewed literature, as you make your recommendations and provide background information to your client.Original Research Article (Peer Reviewed)- Find a paper of original research, meaning they actually performed an experiment. It needs to be closely related to your topic and recommendations, as you WILL be talking about it in your group presentation. Make sure it is a good one, so you don’t end up talking about something silly or irrelevant!The following components of the slides:-Description of your topic/case study/client-Background information and scientific foundation for recommendations*Slides on systematic reviews, as well as individual research papers-Compare and contrast peer-reviewed literature to lay literature-Final recommendations to client based on scientific literature-Anything else you wish to include to make it an awesome presentation