Best Writer

B‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ased on the Research Methods to date where the literature was reviewed, a specific research question/hypothesis identified, and ethical concerns considered, you are now required to design a research proposal based on this work. The research proposal should include a critical review of the current literature relevant to your topic, clearly stating your aims and objectives. Your proposal should include an Abstract, Introduction, Method section (including details on study design, selection criteria, recruitment , participants, interventions, measures, and proposed method of analysis‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌) and Discussion, where you will discuss the implications of your anticipated finding in relation to the practice of counselling and psychotherapy. You should also consider any limitations of your study and its implications for future research. You should evidence your awareness of the complex ethical and professional issues relevant to research and good practice in psychotherapy. Examples of Required Appendices to be included DASS and DASS21 scoring, Semi-structured interview questions, Consent form, Debriefing for study, Timeline and Budget, Ethical considerations. Thank yo‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌u

Write a paper on anti immigration rhetoric in the media.

You helped me before with 2 Primary Sources you can use them on this paper as well

Paper

• 10 – 11 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman is preferred.
o Name and title of paper on first page
o number pages
o include footnotes to cite your sources.
• Includes an introduction to your research question and argument. Explains how you will defend your research question and why this questions is important to explore
• Includes a section on the historiography of your theme: what have other historians argued about your topic and how does your argument expand upon, refine, challenge, present a new approach, etc.?
• Includes an organized and logical approach to defending your argument including (but not limited to)
o background information – what does the reader need to know to understand the theme, language, historical context, place, etc.?
o case – study: a focus on a specific example to show how your argument connects with this evidence
o multiple perspectives: incorporating different voices, views, or ways of analyzing your research question.
o multiple points that defend your argument and why they are important
• specific evidence (quoted material) from your sources
• footnote citations for all paraphrased and quoted text
o use the Chicago Manual of Style – notes and bibliography format
o consult the Chicago Style database –
• bibliography of all sources consulted, and sources cited, divided into primary and secondary sources.

You can use my old paper and just add on to it to save time, YOU DO NEED MORE SOURCES though

Discuss about Career plan as chemical engineering, you have to put the answer down below to related question. In other words, you have to put the answers down below to their questions in the document. and for more info for this section check the document in order to understand more.

based on the topic question, discuss about the HK case.Discuss about ‘what is the differences between Big market, Small government and positive non-intervention?’ and ‘what is the nature of positive non-intervention?’. There are three references you may use. The topic question is also on the picture. This work is only part of the whole essay, there is no need to do too much summary. 4 hundred words would be fine.

Write an analytical essay that explores why King Louis XVI’s wife Marie-Antoinette was so despised by the people of 18th century France. The essay is to be in Chicago style format with footnotes and bibliography, a minimum of 3000 words excluding the footnotes and bibliography.

PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE THE TWO DOCUMENTS FOR SUBMISSION.

The Situation
A smiling woman with her arms folded.

Sally calls, sounding pretty upset. You ask her what happened, “Did you lose a ‘Soufflé’ today or something?” Not laughing, she starts to tell you she read that a franchise business discriminated against a disabled person because the company’s official website did not have an accessibility policy.

A disabled person sued based on denying access to the company’s website and won! You state, “I guess that’s possible. Denial of accessibility is an established legal ground to sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (Links to an external site.). But, how in the world could a webpage not be accessible to a disabled person? Or, for that matter, how would it be accessible? How does that happen?” Sally replies, “I forgot one thing; the person suing was blind!” “It still doesn’t make sense to me,” you state.

Review the following:

Dennis Haynes v. Dunkin’ Donuts LLC, et al., No. 18-10373 (11th Cir. 2018) (Justia) (Links to an external site.)
W3 Web Accessibility (Web Accessibility Initiative) (Links to an external site.)
Your Response
You and Sally must investigate the Dunkin’ Donuts® case because your company intends to integrate its webpage into the core of the business operations. You need to get ahead of the issues raised in the Dunkin’ Donuts® case.

Using the IRAC format, analyze the facts and issues of the Dunkin’ Donuts® case.
Identify the statutory provisions of the ADA (if any) that were violated by Dunkin’ Donuts®.
Analyze your device intended functions and applications that potentially violate the ADA. Include the ADA statutory sections that impact its use in the business.
Compare the applicability of the ADA to your device what changes would you implement to reduce any potential liability claims.
Are there steps that your company can implement to guarantee that your website is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act? If so, what are they? List them and identify whether they ADA statutory provisions or some other source.
Please note that “yes” or “no” answers, keywords without explanation, one-sentence, or incomplete sentences are not acceptable as a response. Responses should be fully developed incorporating the question in the response and analyzed based on the statutory requirements. Entries are required to be single-spaced.

Submission Instructions
Upload the following documents:

IRAC analyses form for the Dunkin Donuts case
IRAC analysis form for the direct payment system

The textbook includes the following critical thinking question:

“Imagine that you want to interview police officers who shot and killed someone in the line of duty for a research project. What type of sampling approach would be best for this type of study? What are the advantages of going with the approach you selected? Are there other approaches that would work as well as the one you prefer? Remember to identify the purpose of your research, to identify your population and its nature, and the resources you may count on.”

Address the aspects of this critical thinking question that is about sampling, with an argument that is logically organized, in a one page, single spaced but elegantly written short essay. Remember to not write solid blocks of text.

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌tudents are to include data, trends, research into their paper. Historical information showing progression of diagnosis, treatment and prevention efforts. Also, speak about prior and current challenges as well. Use credible sources/site ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌sources (6-8 references). Double spaced Use 12 pt font Use section transitional titles (Title for change in topics) Include a title page (not considered part of the paper length) Site sources (not considered part of the paper length‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌)

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌lass Project Guidelines Policy and Management of the Health Effects of Climate (40% of the course credit) For this class, you will complete a project addressing mitigation and/or management of a disease/disability or a health risk (that interest you the most) associated with climate, climate change, weather patterns and extreme weather (C2W2) and/or environmental exposures mediated or modified by C2W2. The project will have the following parts: 1. Select a disease/disability/health risk(s) and describe how this risk is directly or indirectly linked with and/or exacerbated by C2W2 2. Identify and describe all potential direct and indirect risk factors associated with the disease/disability/health outcome, including C2W2. Develop a conceptual framework showing the association between these risk factors and disease/disability/health outcome you selected for your project 3. Conduct a comprehensive literature review and document the existing policies, interventions and/or strategies that are being used and/or have been used to mitigate and manage the selected disease/disability/health risk. Identify gaps in the strategies. 4. Select target areas of interventions based on the gaps you identified in the risk mitigation and/or management strategies, and justify this selection, . explain why do you think that the selected target(s) are important to manage the disease/disability/health risk you selected. 5. Develop your intervention/management strategy 6. Develop a systematic plan to implement your strategy 7. Provide a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of your strategy NOTE: The focus of your intervention strategies should be on prevention of the disease risks due to C2W2, such risks can be addressed at multiple levels by engaging multiple stakeholders. You do not need to include all levels and/or all stakeholders for this project. An example: climate mediated risk of pollen allergies. We already know that there are many risk factors that are responsible for the onset, persistence and severity of allergies. We also know that changing climate and weather patterns are resulting in prolonged blooming seasons and hence increasing the duration and intensity of (outdoor) pollen exposure. Very high concentration of pollen exposure at an early stage can also sensitize children to pollens and prolonged pollen exposure can increase the severity of allergy (and associated co-morbidities). This is a complex health problem and can be addressed at multiple levels by multiple stakeholders keeping in mind the present and (anticipated) future health risks. All strategies fall under the following four categories: • Eliminate sources of exposure. This is a long-term strategy and requires higher level interventions, such as involvement of local, regional, national and international agencies that can aim to target factors which can reduce pollen levels and/or eliminate their sources. • Avoid or pre‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌vent exposure by taking actions to protect from exposure. This requires action by those at risk to completely avoid exposure, . staying indoor when exposure is high or migrating to a place with less pollens, such as Arizona. This can engage other stakeholders including primary healthcare providers who can provide the timely- and important information to those at risk, so that they can take actions to avoid exposure. • Mitigate exposure by taking actions. This requires engaging individuals at risks to take measures that reduce exposure duration and levels, and it may also engage local agencies that facilitate mitigation measures. • Counteract adverse effects of exposure. This requires interventions at an individual level by engaging individuals and healthcare providers in preparing those at risks to take actions, such immunotherapy or medicinal therapies so that exposure does not trigger adverse health effects, meaning does not worsen allergies Written project report (30 points) Report. The final report MUST NOT exceed 8 pages single space including figures/tables but excluding references and/or any instrument. The report must include the following: Introduction ( to 3 pages). This section must include1-3 parts of the project (as on the first page), including a problem statement, its importance and significance, a critique of the literature, gaps in the literature and project aim(s). This section should also include a concept map and its description embedded in the introduction. Material and methods (2-3 pages). This section must describe 4-7 parts of the project (as on the first page), including description of your intervention strategy, its justification supported by the literature, identification of the targeted areas and stakeholders, anticipated present and future impacts and your methodology for the evaluation of your strategies. Make sure to include supporting documents that you develop to implement and/or evaluate your strategy. Results (1-2 pages). This is a semester long-course. Thus, you should have enough time to develop, implement and evaluate a pilot of your strategy. Discussion (1-2 pages). A descriptive summary of your results (if any available). Novel contribution(s) if any, description of the relevant literature and policy and/or health implications of the proposed intervention strategy, limitations of your strategy and future directions. Report evaluation criteria. Report substance (25 points), including introduction, significance of the problem, (anticipated) effectiveness of the proposed strategy, its implementation and evaluation methods and discussion. Writing and presentation (5 points). Report organization, coherent writing and figure/graphic design etc. Oral presentation A power point with 5-8 slides (6 points). Oral communication (2 points) Slide graphic design (2 points) Both a written report and PPT must be uploaded on Blackboard by the‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ due date