Best Writer

OUTLINE FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL
• Research proposal should have a good discussion flow.
• All abbreviated terms should be written in complete form upon first appearance in the text followed by its short-form. For example, World Health Organization (WHO).

ABSTRACT: (200 words)
• Please provide a short summary of the whole research proposal.

1. INTRODUCTION (<2 page) 1.1 Background of study (>4 in-text citations required)
• A comprehensive coverage of the proposed topic of study with few current issues provided.

1.2 Research Problem/ Problem statements (>2 in-text citations required)
• The content should reflect on the major issues (current/previous researches) that can be encountered by current study.
*DO NOT mention the research objectives here.

2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS (4-5 research questions in bullets form)
• Formulate the problem inquiry in structured format. All research questions formulated shall be able to match with the research title.

3. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES (4-5 research objectives in bullets form)
*This part very important, need to be concise
• This is the summary of the key issues being addressed in the research in statement format. The total number of research objectives should match with the research questions formulated.

4. SCOPE OF STUDY (in-text citation is not mandatory) (<1 page) • The relative coverage of the undertaken research should be identified. It should also highlight on the relative field of the study and mention the region/area that current study focus. *DO NOT mention/repeat the research objectives and the importance of study here. 5. SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY (<2 pages) • The relative contribution of the research to specific parties. Why is this research study important? This section should be able to tackle the problem statements mentioned above. * DO NOT repeat the research objectives here. 5.1 Theoretical contribution (1-2 in-text citations) • In what ways the undertaken research would augment the theory/model in the current academic literature. 5.2 Practical contribution (1-2 in-text citations) • Indicate the practical implications of the study and how it contributes to any given industry/organization. 6. LITERATURE REVIEW (5-8 in-text citations) (2-3 pages) • A brief outline of the past and recent studies being conducted with reference to the proposal. The content must refer to both the past and current body of knowledge. The candidate must be able to demonstrate a clear understanding of the theoretical background attributable to the undertaken study. * Do not repeat the content of introduction section here. 7. • What is the values of current proposed research compared to previous literatures? 8. METHODOLOGY（study design, study population, study variables, data collection, study area） (In-text citations required if the protocols used are following previous publications) • A brief presentation on research method and research design to be undertaken for the proposed study. Particular attention should be given to put it in a succinct manner. *Avoid to use “they” “we” “I” in this section, and remember to use present tense (will be) as this is proposal, except when author discuss on past protocol used with in-text citation provided. 9. DATA ANALYSIS (In-text citations required if the protocols used are following previous publications) • A brief overview of the type of analysis being undertaken for the research. The basic objective of this section is to gauge the suitability of the analytical process to be utilized with reference to the undertaken research. * NO NEED to include CONCLUSION, but can include EXPECTED OUTCOME 10. REFERENCES APA 7th edition, >15 bibliographies required, within recent 10 years.

Below three things required when place order

Research area:
Mechanical engineering （Tools and Dies）

Title of research proposal:
Research on Simulation of Sheet Metal Hot Stamping and Die Design Based on Damage Mechanism
KEYWORDS:
Tools and Dies， Sheet hot stamping，Damage Mechanism ，Finite Element Simulation，die design

Topic- Inclusion classrooms in public schools, and why are they necessary?
In this assignment, you will present and evaluate reasoning from scholarly sources on both sides of your topic.
Write a paper that includes:
Intro-100 words
Presentation of an argument-200 words-describe the source on both sides of the issue
then, present the main argument from that source in standard form with the premises listed above the conclusion.
Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source-200 words-how adequately does the article support the premises of the argument? How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion? What if any missing premises are justified or merely assumptions?
Presentation of an opposing argument-200 words-describe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue-present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion
Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source-200 words- How adequately does the article support the premises of the argument? How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion? What if any missing premises would be needed to complete the argument valid/strong? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?
Evaluations of arguments in Non-Scholarly Sources-100 words-discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support for premises in these scholarly sources contrasted with non-scholarly sources.
Conclusion-50 words-reflect on how this activity might influence how you conduct research in the future.

Write a research paper on social policy that support older adult centers.

Journal Recording Template
NU Student Name: ______________________________________
Date of Meeting/Activity/Event/Etc.: _____________________
Title of Meeting/Activity/Event/Etc.: ______________________________________________
Part A: Describe the reason, purpose, and/or goals of the interaction/meeting; Provide general background information including previous related meetings, and presenting problem(s)/concern(s); List the ways in which you prepared for the meeting, and what your expectations were for the outcome.
Part B: Describe, in detail, the meeting/activity/event/etc. Include location, participants, etc.
Part C: Describe the dynamics of the meeting/activity/event/etc. Describe the group interactions and processes. Include some verbatim dialogue. Were the goals addressed? Were they accomplished? What was the outcome of the meeting? What, if any, are the intended follow up actions?
Part D: Self-Assessment – what was your participation in the meeting/activity/event/etc.? Evaluate the experience and describe your observations about what was successful and what could have been done differently. What do you think the next steps/future activities should include?
Neumann University
SW 460 & 461
Process Recording Template
NU Student Name: _________________________________________Date of Interview/Meeting: _____________________
Client’s Name(s) (use code): ______________________________________________________________________________________
Part A: Describe the reason, purpose, and/or goals of the client interaction/meeting; Provide general information about the client (make sure to keep all information non-identifying); Describe presenting problem(s)/concern(s); List the ways in which you prepared for the meeting, and what your expectations were for the outcome.
Part B: Fill in the columns in the chart.
Column I: Write, verbatim, the dialogue that occurred during your interaction with the client(s).
Column II: Your feelings.
Column III: Your assessment or analysis of what happened during the interaction.
Column IV: Leave blank for Instructor comments and feedback.
Content and Dialogue
Feelings
Assessment/Analysis
Instructor/Supervisor Comments
Part C: Summary – Summarize the experience, your feelings, and your assessment. Examine how you handled the interaction and how the client(s) responded to you. Were the objectives of the interaction (purpose, goals, etc.) achieved? Will you be meeting with the client again in the future? What may be the focus of future meetings? Write down any questions you may have for your Instructor/Supervisor.

Explain and explore an issue that a school has been struggling with regarding the social, emotional, cognitive, or physical development of adolescents.
This
paper should be at least seven pages (double spaced with one-inch margins) and
should include the following:

A one-page discussion of the
issue – what the issue is as well as an explanation of why you chose this
particular issue

A four-page discussion of how
this issue relates to the four areas of adolescent development (physical,
social, emotional, and cognitive)

A two-page
discussion of how you believe this issue can best be addressed using
information/content that you learned from (Steinberg,
L. (2017) Adolescence (11th). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9781259822889) book.

How are photographs associated with the idea of surveillance? How has this technology been used and formatted historically in the Canadian context? Consider how photography has intersected with policies of exploration, expansion, and even colonialism.

It can be point form

Evaluate J&J’s organizational design and structure, what are some benefits from the structure and why have recent CEOs tried to make some changes to it? Are the firms design and structure responsible for its recent quality issues in any way and how can these be addressed in the future?

Discuss the aspects of religious symbolism with religious ritual describe how the form of symbolism is utilized in the ladder ritual with a distinct emphasis on the outcome as to how they relate to peoples individual and or corporate religious experiences.

Write a summary and response to my dialogue with Lewis Gordon.

In your response, explain what you learned and how it connects to the topics covered in our course:
Dr. Lewis Gordon in Dialogue with Dr. LaRose Parris

– Please watch the documentary ( https://watchdocumentaries.com/man-on-wire/ )

1. Provide the title, filmmaker, and a brief summary of the film.
2. Give a brief evaluative response to the film. This is your opportunity to express personal reactions and ideas that were sparked by the work. How did you feel when you watched the film? What questions did it raise for you? Remember, though – personal feeling is only one element of these critical responses. Liking or disliking the work is only the starting point for an interrogation of why.
Please put most effort on this: (should be the biggest chunk of the essay)
3. Analyze the relationship between the film and the course material under consideration as presented in the lecture, readings, and in our class discussions. In other words, situate your film in relation to the topics, histories, and debates you’re learning about in class. How does this film relate to the weekly topic under discussion? What parallels do you see between this film and any of the films we watched in class? To what extent does this film illustrate and/or challenge the ideas contained in your readings? This section should constitute the bulk of your response. (please look at the powerpoint attached, slides 2 and 3 should be helpful and used)
Key word to include and topic to talk about is the reenactment
4. All responses should be between 600-800 words in length and should be typed in 12-point font. Responses should be well-written, well-reasoned, and organized.