Best Writer

So if necessary the textbook Polit and Beck should be referenced in some way. Also includeNeuman or Watson’s theory should be used relevant to the research. The proposal is narrative ( be specific fo which narrative) and each variable needs to be measured,It also has to be a vey specific population.Can be a case study or otherwise.

INSTRUCTIONS:

Please read/skim Chapter 8 I provided here before you write the paper. You MAY USE OUTSIDE RESOURCES/Online is required for creditiblity.
While writing this paper please answer questions 1-5 below while incorporating Chapter 8 readings into the paper and online recourses. Please pick any Business organization of your choosing and identify its business problem relating to (social, economic, technological, competitive, or regulatory forces). and using your critical thinking to solve its business problem using CHAPTER 8 reading I provide in your equation to solve this problem. please provide at least 2 sources from the book for evidence in solving this business problem or use 1 source online and 1 source from the book. for example, you may use Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon or whatever company to write this paper.

double-spaced, 12-point font, Times New
Roman/Arial/Calibri. Should be at least 2 pages in length.
For
your secondary information research:
a) Use any secondary research
methods (or sources) of your choice.
b) Be mindful about accuracy,
currency and dependability of your researched information or data.
c) List
all your sources of information and/or data in your report (exclusive of the
minimum 2-page write up).

In
this assignment, your task is to identify a business organization that has
a central business problem arising from any one of the 5 environmental forces
(social, economic, technological, competitive, or regulatory forces). Using the
on-line secondary research methods taught in Chapter 8 (Marketing Research),
your goal is to investigate and identify possible solutions that could resolve
the problems or challenges faced by the business organization.

1.
Perform
environmental scanning and identify a business organization that has a business
problem related to trends in any one of the 5 environmental forces. (Identification
of the central business problem and associated technological issues.)

2.List
all possible or likely factors that have caused this problem to arise in the
business organization. (Recognition of multiple causal factors involved in a
problem situation)

2.
Based
on the Secondary Research methodology (such as on-line databases and internet
resources) taught in class, investigate how this business problem could be
resolved from your research findings (Correct usage of theories, methods,
systems, and technologies to address the problem)

4.
Based on your research findings, generate alternative solutions to solve this
business problem and propose (or recommend) solutions that would solve the
business problem. (Generation of plausible alternative solutions to solve
the
problem)

5.
In your paper, provide and justify persuasive arguments or evidence in support
of your proposed solutions (or recommendations). (Provides persuasive arguments
and evidence in support of proposed solutions)

This course focuses on the nuclear age. we’re doing a simulation were every student has to research a different country, mine is Belarus. Below is my professors requirements for the paper.

Researching your country for the Simulation and Simulation Paper

1. First, learn some background information about the role you will be
playing. For states: Recommended source: CIA Factbook
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/
2. Pay attention to which actors yours is friendly with and hostile towards
3. Next, dig deeper into the nuclear history of your country (many countries
that do not have nuclear weapons have civilian nuclear facilities and may
have entertained the notion of building nuclear weapons). Recommended
sources:
a. Nuclear Threat Index: https://www.nti.org/countries/
b. Arms Control Association:
https://www.armscontrol.org/countryresources
c. Federation of American Scientists: https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-
weapons/
4. Next, dig into the current nuclear landscape. Recommended sources:
a. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty:
https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/
b. 2020 NPT Review Conference:
https://www.un.org/en/conferences/npt2020
c. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: https://thebulletin.org/nuclear-
notebook-multimedia/
d. Global Zero: https://www.globalzero.org/reaching-zero/
e. United Nations: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/
f. ICAN: http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/nuclear-arsenals/
g. Plowshares: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plowshares_movement
(wikipedia used here for background, main source is the Almighty
textbook.)
Clearly there is a lot of information out there. And, as you might suspect there is
much more information about the countries that have nuclear weapons. If you
are representing a country that has never had nuclear weapons, you need to
identify your country with respect to its relationship to nuclear disarmament.
The links posted above will provide a lot of information that you will find useful.
But, most of the material is factual and your paper must interpret the data. For
that you should draw upon the work done by nuclear scholars.
Each of the sites that are listed on this page are considered legitimate sources.
HOWEVER, your paper must also draw upon work done by academic scholars.
Other random websites you get via google, might or might not be considered
scholarly sources

The term autohistoria comes from the writing of Gloria Anzaldúa and describes the ways one’s personal or collective history helps to deconstruct the past/present through non-dominant interpretations of reality. In this style of writing, personal and creative narratives become a way to analyze and theorize. For this assignment students will reflect on their own experiences and relationship with identity and race.
Writing Prompt: Students will write a 600-900-word personal narrative about their evolving understanding of race and identity. This does not need to be in traditional academic writing form, and students can be as creative or as straight forward as they wish. Three overarching questions must be answered through your personal narrative. They are:
Where does your personal knowledge of race and identity come from?
What life experiences and/or world events have contributed to how you understand race and identity? In answering this question, demonstrate your knowledge of the term racial project.
How have these experiences shaped your understanding of racial justice?
While there is no one way to answer these questions, I suggest that students write from the first-person perspective and use this assignment as chance to reflect on their life experiences/struggles/choices with identity, as well as their evolving knowledge of race and racism, and their personal beliefs about racial justice.
Student are encouraged to be creative with this assignment. However, if you are having trouble getting started, the following questions may be helpful. Where is home for you, and how was race and identity understood in your house? In your community? What identities or labels were salient to your understanding of self as a child? As an adult? Have these identities changed? When and how? As you narrate your journey, I also suggest reflecting on important events. This may mean an experience that was uniquely important to you, or a global movement, such as Black Lives Matter, that may have exposed you to new or different discourse surrounding racial justice.

New study sheds light on how age and cognitive factors influence listening-related fatigue.
Sensory and Cognitive changes associated with aging can both increase listening-related fatigue and protect against such fatigue. People who experience listening-related fatigue feel worn out from everyday communications and feel the need to expend a lot of energy to listen and understand others.

New study sheds light on how age and cognitive factors influence listening-related fatigue

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09567976211016410

********************For this short paper, you will identify a relevant, recently reported result that interests you,
track down the original paper that the result appears to be based on, and critically comment on the
way the result is being presented to the public. Remember to also be clear in your essay about which cognition topics (like the topics we covered in class) is relevant. I will attach a document with the class topics.***********************
————————————————————————————————————————
Introduce your topic: What is the headline of the story? When and where (what source –
TV show, radio program, web site, blog, advertising claim) did you first find or notice the story and
when did it hit the news? Why did it catch your interest? Do you normally trust that news source
(why or why not)? What topic in cognition or perception is it related to? (Hint: Look up the topic in
the text.) Write a few lines answering these 5 questions, briefly summarize the story’s claims,
Compare the public story and the scientific research article. In your paper, add the
following information to your (approved) topic description:
A. First impression: Describe the tone the news story uses to present the findings and claims.
That is, does the story seem straightforward and reasonable, or perhaps ground-breaking and novel,
or else counter-intuitive, sensational, or even shocking? (Give examples of how the story is reported
to back this up). Is the story missing any information that could make the claims or conclusions
more convincing (such as a control group, comparison condition, details, or evidence)? When you
first found the story, were you convinced that it was accurate, or were you skeptical? Why?
B. Next, track down the original scientific article behind the story. The news story may not
completely cite the article, so you may need to do some detective work here. Use the Internet to find
the name of the journal or conference, the name of the authors, and the title of the article. You can
probably just google the last names of the scientist/authors and date associated with the finding, get
the full citation and then look it up in the library’s electronic journal collection (or it may work to
google the article’s title). If you need help tracking down the scientific report from a journal, see the
handout “how to find your peer-reviewed article.” If all else fails, ask a TA for help.
C. Then, read the scientific article. You may be unfamiliar with some of the jargon or statistics, but
do the best you can (you don’t need to read every word). Summarize what was varied within the
Psy 260: Survey in Cognition & Perception / Brennan Revised 1/27/22
experiment and what things were compared. Try to find the part of the article that the news story seems
to be based on, then say how the scientist reported the finding, then identify and describe any differences
between that and how the news story reported the finding.
In your opinion, does the news story simplify the scientific article appropriately, without being
misleading? Or do the claims in the story go beyond those in the article, and if so, how? Are there
important limitations discussed in the scientific article that didn’t make it into the news story?
D. Briefly comment on how much you trust the scientific article (how good the original study is).
1. Is the scientific journal or conference where it was presented a good one? Journals are rated by
how much impact their articles have within a scientific field. This is called an “impact factor.” If
your source is a journal, report the journal’s impact factor (just google the journal’s name and
“impact factor”). If it’s a scientific conference, try to estimate whether it’s selective (= uses peer
review) or else has loose or no standards (some conferences allow anyone to publish who can
pay a fee; others allow members of a society to publish without going through peer-review).
2. Does the research finding seem to be completely novel—is this the only study that found this
result—or is it consistent with other studies? (We’re not asking you to do a lit search here, but to
use your best judgment of based on how the article is presented.)
3. Yes or no: Can you identify any missing controls or weaknesses, or do you see any confounds in
the scientific study? A confound as something unintended that the experimenter failed to take
account of, that may actually be causing the result. For some examples of confounds, see
https://www.psychologyinaction.org/psychology-in-action-1/2011/10/30/what-is-a-confounding-variable
4. Optional: Just for fun, see if the paper (or one on a similar topic) is listed on the website
Psychological File Drawer (http://psychfiledrawer.org/), a web site that psychologists use to discuss
results that don’t replicate (this website and its links are interesting reading!!).
E. Finally, provide a brief conclusion about what you’ve learned from this assignment.
Format: You will do very well on the paper if you address all of these questions and points in an
organized fashion (Hint: Before turning in your paper, check off each part on this handout to make sure
you’ve covered it, or else structure your paper like points A-D, above). Try to do all this in 2 well-written
pages (we suggest using 1.5-spacing and 11-12 point font). Beware if your paper goes to 3 pages
(we will take off points for padding). Be sure to cite your sources using APA style (there are many
online guides for this, or you can follow the examples in https://library.flcc.edu/APA_FLCC.pdf).
Do not count the references in your page limit. Make sure you’ve proofread your paper for typos.
If you’re a non-native speaker of English and you want us to take that into account, add a note about
your first language next to your name

After reviewing the learning content on argument writing, receiving feedback on the Argument Essay Outline, and participating in the Argument Essay Peer Review, students will submit their revised draft for a final grade.
For this essay, students may select any topic to form an opinion on and defend except the following topics:
Abortion
Gun Control
Global Warming
Capital Punishment
COVID-19
Legalizing Marijuana
Students who select one of the topics above will NOT receive credit. Once students select a topic they want to develop, they need to form an opinion on that topic that can be debated and ultimately stated in a thesis that sets an expectation for a persuasive development. Consider adding the word “should” or “should not” to your thesis to make it clear the essay is argument based.
There is not a required number of reasons students must include to answer WHY or WHY NOT to defend their argument. However, the development of the essay must be at least five pages long. The development should include specific examples that illustrate a target audience and significant details related to the argument and its purpose.
The organization of the essay must demonstrate a clear order to the points – consider least to most important. There must be transitions between the points to indicate their relationship to each other and maintain unity in the essay. Each paragraph must have a strong topic sentence that identifies the reason controlling the content that follows.
The essay must demonstrate effective language and style appropriate to the audience and purpose of the argument. Consider the tone you want this argument to take based on who you are trying to appeal to and what style this audience would expect given your selected topic.
Students must integrate at least THREE (3) sources into the essay – but not more than FIVE (5). Additionally, at least ONE (1) must be from a CPCC library online research database. The sources must be specific, purposeful, credible, and relevant. They should be integrated effectively and cited accurately.
The essay content must be five pages long – this does not include the Works Cited page. The document must be formatted according to MLA 8th edition standards. The content must be written in complete sentences with appropriate grammar and mechanics and must be written in third person.

Read Chapter 10 of the course text. Complete any two of the three activities below.
Use a chapter from a middle or high school textbook and develop an advance organizer for the chapter. Attach a PDF (not a link) of the organizer. Describe how you will use the advance organizer prior to students’ reading of the chapter. Use an APA citation to reference the textbook and chapter.
Choose a concept from a lesson you have taught or plan to teach and develop a concept diagram.Indicate the (a) subject and (b) grade level. You may use your in-depth lesson plan if you wish. Follow the procedures presented in chapter 10 of your textbook. Attach the concept diagram.
Using a chapter from a content-area textbook, create a vocabulary list and create a semantic map to visually represent the relationships among these terms. See Figure 10-7 in your textbook. Attach the vocabulary list and semantic map. Use an APA citation to reference the name of the textbook and chapter.

Please provide a 2-page critical analysis of this issue by a) listing 5 of the main points argued by the Pro side; b) 5 of the main points argued by the Con side; c) Which side is more persuasive to you and why (list and cite 5 supporting arguments from alternate, scholarly sources).

Question 1:
What role did the punched card play in the history of computing? Please refer to at least one of the week 3 readings in your response.

Question 2:
What role did the minimax algorithm play in the history of artificial intelligence research, according to Nathan Ensmenger?

Question3:
What do you think is the most important point made by Turing in his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”? Why?

Instructions:
Each answer should be between 400 and 500 words. Each answer should be direct, clear, and well-supported by evidence drawn from the attached readings. Please cite these readings using the APA format. While you are not expected to draw from outside sources, if your argument employs information or ideas from other sources, you should cite them properly as well. At the end of the writing, provide a references list which includes all the works you have cited within the exam, formatted in APA style.

Criteria:
1. Thesis: A clearly stated, direct answer to the question.
2. Argument: A logically organized and clearly presented argument which directly supports the thesis.
3. Evidence: Relevant information used to support the argument. This information should mostly be drawn from the attached readings and should be cited using the APA format. You may use secondary sources if you believe they will help your argument.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:
Style: Completely written in Third person (avoid “I”, “we”, “our”…) and past tense.
Word choice: use scientific terminology, be concise, and avoid repetition
DIRECTIONS FOR EACH SECTION:
The experiment report is based on the standard style of a scientific journal article.
Each section must be clearly labeled.
Title Page: On an individual sheet of paper, include the number and title of the lab exercise, the name of the course, your name, and the date on which you submitted your report.
Abstract: A single paragraph summary of the entire report.
 Must state the study’s purpose, a general approach, and the results/conclusion.
There should be no literature citations in an Abstract.
 Limit Abstract to a maximum of 250 words.
 This section should always be written last.
Introduction: 1-2 paragraphs introducing background information and the study’s goal.
 Include background information needed for a reader to understand the study.
 State the goal & hypothesis (in the form of a prediction statement) of your study.
Material and Methods: Concise description providing enough information to repeat experiments.
 Must be written in paragraph form. DO NOT LIST YOUR MATERIALS.
 Include times, volumes, etc; Omit what you used to measure with.
 Incorrect example: “Solution A, Solution B, a micropipette, and tips were collected.
Using the micropipette, 500uL of Solution A was transferred into 500uL of Solution B. The
tip was then disposed of”.
 Correct example: “500uL of Solution A was transferred into Solution B”.
Results: States and presents the data you collected. Include figure (s) and refer to the figures in the text.
 Example 1: “as seen in Figure 1, the bacteria grew faster on glucose…”
 Example 2: “…a significant increase was seen (Figure 1).”
 Each figure must have a title, and appropriate labels and axis legends should be included,
so that each figure may stand alone.
 Do not discuss what the data means.
Discussion: The discussion reiterates the hypothesis, the results, and what they mean.
 Briefly repeats the data and discusses what they mean in context of the hypothesis.
 States any mistakes/difficulties/future changes to the experiments.
References: This section is a list of all reference materials that you cited in the report in the order of appearance. Use CSE format. List the sources of information that you use to prepare the lab, perform the procedures, and prepare the report. You should cite any laboratory handouts, information sheets, or other material distributed to you that pertain to the experiments. Be sure to prepare complete references, containing all appropriate information about all information sources. See: http://www.njcu.edu/Guarini/Instructions/CitationGuide.htm
FIGURES: Note that each Figure has a number and is followed by a brief, descriptive caption.
TABLES: Note that each column and row are centered and labeled, with labels bolded and capitalized. Each Table is followed by a number and a brief, descriptive caption.
IMPORTANT: Please do not forget to enjoy the process and contact me if you have any questions.