Best Writer

2000 words Modelling Growth & Diffusion Dynamics
and Testing Alternative Strategies assignment, need to run stimulation on VENSIM.

Standard Essay Format: The faculty will be evaluating your work to see that you have used the proper format. This includes standard essay format: introduction/body/conclusion. You will find additional information and sample writing assignments on the Student Portal, including helpful videos that will walk you through the steps for creating a proper essay.

• Understanding the Course Content: The faculty will be evaluating your work to see that you demonstrate an understanding of course content and that you are covering key concepts discussed in the textbook. While you may certainly provide additional information from outside sources, you must use the course textbook as your primary source of information.

• A Clear and Well-Developed Response: The faculty will be evaluating you on your ability to present a well-organized and developed response that is clear in its presentation of the course material.

• The Ability to Understand the Course Content: The faculty will be evaluating you on your ability to examine, assess, evaluate, and/or analyze course content and key concepts. You will need to demonstrate you can look at the course material in various ways and present your review in your writing assignment.

• Good Presentation: The faculty will be evaluating your work to ensure you have the proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, citation style, etc.

To help you earn the maximum number of points (25 points) for your writing assignments, we have developed some strategies for you to use:

• Be sure to organize your writing assignment to meet the standard essay format. Students will often have the answer, but their work is poorly formatted. This is one of the most common critiques made by faculty members students do not present their work in a standard essay format. The maximum points are given for work that is clearly developed with effective transitions from point to point.

• Read the question/prompt carefully and be sure you are covering key concepts outlined in the textbook. Students will sometimes find information only through an Internet source or personal/ professional experience, discuss that information, and not cover key concepts outlined in the textbook. Be sure you understand what the question/prompt is asking for and discuss the textbook material first. After that, you may feel free to add additional information as it provides support or contrast to the textbook material. The maximum points are given for work that demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the ideas in the assigned readings.

• Be sure to present your work in a clear and organized fashion that is easy to follow. The maximum points are given for well organized writing submissions that respond to the assignment clearly and directly.

•Depending on the question/prompt, you need to demonstrate your ability to evaluate, assess, and analyze the concepts related to the question/prompt. With this, you are showing the faculty you have a solid understanding of the material and are capable of looking at it from different perspectives. The maximum points are awarded for writing assignments that demonstrate both a solid understanding of the material and make connections between varying points.

•Your writing assignment should use proper grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and provide references/citations. The maximum points are awarded for writing submissions that include all of these features. Proofreading your work before submitting it to the university will help ensure that all of these expectations have been met.

References/Citations:
• Students must use APA style citations in their writing assignments. The majority of your response should be your own original writing based on what you have learned from the textbook. Be sure to provide a citation and a reference for any materials used, including the required textbook. The following points are designed to help you understand how to provide proper citations and references for your work:
Sources are listed in two places.
The first, a citation, is briefly listed within your answer. This includes identifying information that directs the reader to your list of references at the end of your writing assignment.
The second, a reference, is at the end of your work in the list of references section.
All sources cited should follow APA style and provide enough identifying information so that the reader can access the original material.
Textbook for the order:
The Humanities Through the Arts: (Chapter 5-8)
Lee A. Jacobus & F. David Martin, 2018
McGraw-Hill Education
ISBN.13: 978-1-260-15418-4

Please choose a question from the list below:
Compare Michelangelo’s “David” (Figure 5-8) with Rodin’s “Danaïde” (Figure 5-9). How does each sculptor establish the gender of his figure? Does Rodin achieve more in terms of gender identity by leaving some of the original marble unfinished?
Analyze the “spatial” and “revelatory” functions of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum. Give specific details and incorporate relevant terminology.
Compare and contrast Old Comedy and New Comedy. Describe characteristics of each. Give examples.

Objective:
Develop a paragraph using either inductive or deductive reasoning, depending on your preference.
Instructions:
In your previous discussion and this week’s text reading assignment, you have learned more about inductive and deductive reasoning. You have also been introduced to varying perspectives on the free speech debate, and it’s time to consider your own perspective.
Using an inductive or deductive argument strategy, compose a paragraph or two in which you argue a unique point about free speech as it relates to a social media platform of your choice (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, or other relevant platform). More specifically, in this paragraph (or paragraphs), you should state an arguable claim, defend it with support (evidence: facts, observations, or expert opinion), and end on a conclusive note.
If you are struggling to identify a topic, you could use the following for inspiration: online hate speech, dark comedy, threats of violence, political agenda, fake news, cyberbullying, or anonymity (among others). This story about a famous “social media fail” might inspire your ideas too. Kendall Jones became headlines news when she posted photos of her hunts on Facebook for the public to see, and she received some serious backlash as a result.
As always, if you use an outside source to support your claim, please cite it in a Works Cited page.
Your paragraph(s) should be at least 300 words long.

This is the culmination of your work throughout the semester, shown in a Researched Position Paper that presents your academic and professional position focusing on a problem you want to explore in your field. It should reflect clear knowledge of the discourse community and academic audience, the current conversation on the topic in research, and the conventions and guidelines for documentation in your field. It is important to remember you are not writing down to uninformed people by informing them of simplistic concepts in your field. Instead, you are writing to the people in your field who have been teaching you or might be interviewing you. As such, defining simplistic terms and giving a history of your field are not good strategies for this assignment. This paper should be strongly argumentative instead of informative (70% argumentative, 30% informative). Furthermore, the paper should speak of your ability to choose, synthesize, and document sources correctly and in good rhetorical standing. You must incorporate a minimum of 12 academic articles but are encouraged to use other sources that do not meet the strict confines of being academic in addition to the required sources. This assignment also needs to reach a minimum of 5000 words to avoid deductions. It should include all items required by your documentation style (e.g. cover pages, abstracts, keywords, headings, headers, formatting, in-text citations, etc.). Also, it must be written in the expository mode. Worth 300 points. This assignment is not eligible for late submission. (Intellectual Skills: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; Broad and Integrative Knowledge: 4, 5)

You are required to use 12 academic articles in your Researched Position Paper. Each academic article you are short of the required 12 earns a deduction of 3%.

Remember that academic articles need to meet these parameters:
They must have a named author or authors. These need to be the names of people, not the name of an organization.
They must utilize and reference sources in some manner (e.g. parenthetical citations, footnotes, endnotes, etc.).
They must have been published in an academic journal.

Also, be mindful that you can use sources beyond the 12 academic articles and that those other sources can be something other than academic (e.g. professional, pop culture, etc.) as fits your career field and writing style. This is one of the ways to make sure you reach the required word count!

Instructions: Submit a word document defining the following key terms: sex, gender, chivalry, paternalism, andpatriarchy. Then, answer the following questions.
Discuss how gender affects the sanctions or punishments men and women receive. Do you think men receive harsher punishments than women? If so, why do you think men receive harsher punishments?
Discuss what role chivalry might play in the sanctions or punishment women might receive. Do you think chivalry still exists in our society or is it an outdated idea? Explain your answer.
Give an example of paternalism in American society. Do you think there are some groups of people (such as women) who need to be protected? If so, explain why you think this group needs to be protected. If not, explain why you feel this way.
Do you think Americans live in a patriarchal society? Give some examples to support your claim. Think about other countries. Can you give an example of another country that is patriarchal? Give some examples to support your claim.

you will need to provide an overview of the topic and then state the research question that
you want to investigate. Then, using the information that you learned about
research methods, design a study that would be useful for answering your question. Finally,
discuss what results you would expect to find. Please see attached Rubic.

12 pages (Numbered, not including cover page)
12 pt font, Times New Roman, 1-inch margin, double spaced.

Please be sure to address the following in order…

– What are the current laws on abortion itself?

– What are the current laws on partial-birth abortion?
*What is partial-birth abortion?*
*Explain different types of late-term abortions*

– Provide “Yes” argument
*Use a case to support why it is constitutional to ban partial-birth abortions for the sake of the mother’s health* (mentioned in issue summary on the first page of provided source)

– Provide “No” Argument
*Use a case to support why it is NOT constitutional to ban partial-birth abortions for the sake of the mother’s health* (mentioned in issue summary on the first page of provided source)

– Provide historical overview of laws and cases having to do with abortion

– Provide personal input

– Provide legal aspects and compare to ethical aspects.

Consider the ways in which the Tuskegee study violated the criteria for ethical research as articulated by Emmanuel, Wendler and
Grady. In your view, which violation was most egregious, and why? Brandt concludes the article about Tuskegee by stating “the
notion that science is a value-free discipline must be rejected.” What do you think he means by this?

The paper should be 300-500 words and should properly cite the text using MLA format for paraphrasing and for direct quotes.

After reading Jerry Bentley and Herbert Ziegler, Traditions & Encounters, Chapter 10 and the web enrichment below
Thucydides, c. 5th century BCE
(read the brief biography of Thucydides at this site and then click on the links to the “Funeral Oration of Pericles” and “The Melian Dialogue”.)
Please analyze this contemporary historical account by answering the following questions in the Discussion Forum:
According to Pericles, what precisely makes Athens great? How does this compare to other city-states? What problems do you see in Pericles’ description of Athens?
Does Thucydides seem to take sides in the Melian debate? Who has the strongest argument? How do the sentiments expressed by the Athenians here jive with the sentiments expressed in the Funeral Oration of Pericles?
Please limit your answers to both questions to around 500 words total to start.
Comment on at least two of your fellow students’ postings.
Thereafter, the professor will guide the discussion.
You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads

Behavior Modification class need to write about eating healthy (behavior ) the peer reviews and treatment used to change the behavior