Best Writer

How will your clinical practice improve with the integration of course content?
Course-Advanced pathophysiology. Scholarly peer reviewed refernces.

Your job is to find an article that highlights a plant and provide a reaction to that article. In your first paragraph you will briefly summarize the article, and 2nd paragraph you will provide a reaction to it. Are there things they missed in the article? Are they assuming something that might not necessarily be true? Etc.
Include a link to or a pdf of the article.
3/4-1 page, 12pt new times font, 1 inch margins.

Week 13 – Threaded Discussion: Post (Apr 8), Response (Apr 10)
No unread replies.
No replies.
You have until April 8 to respond to discussion questions.
Your response to the topic posted in the threaded discussion is part of the required coursework (32 points). Your answer should be thoughtful and specific to the information asked (provided) in the discussion. To prepare your answers, carefully read the reference article(s) provided in the discussion topic first.
You are also required to respond to at least THREE classmates’ posting (18 points). Your response should go beyond simply saying “I agree” or “I disagree.” It should reflect the amount of thought you put into responding.
To respond to the discussion question below, click on “Respond” and enter your reply in the box provided. Click the “Post” button when you are ready to share your response with your classmates.
To respond to a classmate’s posting, click on the classmate’s posting to open it first. Click on “Respond” in that posting and enter your response in the box provided.
Your response to the topic is due on Friday, Apr 8 and your response to a classmate is due on Sunday, Apr 10 when all the unit coursework is due.
_______________________________________________________________________
In Doubt: The Future of Globalization
In Chapter 1, we identified globalization as one of the key factors that shape marketing in the 21st century. We asserted that the world has become a level-playing field and geographic and political barriers have been eroded. Consumers and businesses have become multicultural –thanks to global communication and circumnavigation — and products and services developed in one part of the world are finding wide acceptance globally (Chapter 20). In his 2005 book, The World ls Flat (2005), Thomas Friedman used the metaphor to emphasize that the global market is becoming competitive, and historical and geographic divisions are increasingly less relevant. Recent world’s experience about the pandemic and the current war in Ukraine has cast doubt about the disappearance of geographic and political divisions in the world and the very essence of globalization.
The US-led effort to expel Russia from international commerce marks another fracture in the free-trade vision that guided the global strategy of American firms for nearly 30 years. US firms are moving quickly to decouple from Russia and will probably continue to distance themselves from China, while the U.S. is pressing for Russia’s suspension from the World Trade Organization. “The trading system as we’ve known it, with the WTO at its core and with a basic set of rules that everyone traded under, is coming apart,” as one trade lawyer said.
Discussion Questions:
1. Discuss the unraveling of globalization in the 21st century per the WSJ article. Why has the world heading toward constraining global trade and investment?
2. In a nutshell, how is the global trading system regulated? What role does the World Trade Organization play? For how long has this system been coming apart? When did the first fissures appear?
3. Looking forward, how will US firms likely adjust their global strategy in the future? What would be the fate of globalization as the world’s most powerful democracies and autocracies are turning away from each other?
Source:
Economic Blacklist of Russia Marks New Blow for Globalization
(Links to an external site.)
By Josh Zumbrun | March 10, 2022
The Wall Street Journal
Globalization and autocracy are locked together. For how much longer?
Download Globalization and autocracy are locked together. For how much longer?
The Economist | March 19th, 2022 edition
Ukraine War and Pandemic Force Nations to Retreat From Globalization
(Links to an external site.)
By Edward Wong and Ana Swanson | March 22, 2022
The New York Times
Ukraine Is the First Real World War
(Links to an external site.)
Thomas L. Friedman
April 3, 2022
The New York Times
Putin and Xi Exposed the Great Illusion of Capitalism
(Links to an external site.)
By John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge
March 24, 2022
Bloomberg Opinion
Why Global Supply Chains May Never Be the Same
(Links to an external site.)
March 23, 2022
The Wall Street Journal

Hi you will need my personal info & login on my ebook to do this assignment, and here is the link:
https://connected.mcgraw-hill.com/connected/login.do
My email address is: baessajussara@gmail.com
my password is: L1feisHard

ASSIGNMENT;
Understand the application of journalists’ professional codes of ethics.5 points
Sissela Bok’s Box.
Loyalties arising from shared humanity, professional practice, employment, and media’s role in public life.
Journalists’ codes of ethics, Ch. 4, Loyalty, Patterson and Wilkins.
-Ch. 11 Free Press-Fair Trial in Calvert, Kozlowski, and Silver
Discuss Cases 4-A, 4-B, 4-C and 4-D. in Patterson and Wilkinpp. 91-99. Due Tuesday, 4/5 at 11:59pm.
Apply Ethical News Values on the syllabus pp. 10-12.

Feedback Reply to at least one other colleague’s post. Due Friday, 4/8 at 11:59pm.
MLA Style, must acknowledge sources including Textbooks.

Practice E-x-a-m Time: 19/4/2022 1pm – 3pm (Sydney Time)
Duration: 2 hrs
Question structure: 2 Section (Section A: One compulsory question; Section B: Answer TWO from the three possible questions)
Topic covered: Weeks 1 to 12 Notes

Conclusion and Abstract
Follow the directions below for the completion of the conclusion and abstract assignment for Unit VIII. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance.
Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to complete your academic argumentative research paper.
Description: In this assignment, you will first write your conclusion; then, you will write your abstract. The following components are requirements of the assignment:
Conclusion (150-200 words):
Revisit the controversy.
Emphasize the seriousness of the controversy.
Answer the “So what?” question.
Suggest a general solution (optional).
Call for awareness/action.
Leave the reader with a final thought.
Abstract (200 words or less): For this assignment, you may not exceed 200 words.
Restatement of the controversy (one to two sentences)
Your thesis (one sentence)
Reasons (three to four sentences)
Conclusion sentence (one sentence)
Add the conclusion and abstract to the rest of your paper so that you are turning in a complete research paper. The paper should include all of the following components (in order):
Title page
Abstract
Introduction
Literature review
Body paragraphs
Conclusion
References page
Full version of the partial paper shared in the assignment instructions in Units VI and VII

Many health care providers hold negative attitudes and stereotypes about people in larger bodies. In this discussion forum, we will explore the impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and patient outcomes, as well as reflect on the presence of weight discrimination in everyday life.

Read Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity

Read Fatphobia In Medicine Is A Serious Issue — Here Are 22 Stories From Plus-Size People About How It Affected The Care They Received

Reflection prompts you can use include, but are not limited to:
The pandemic has caused many medical clinics to transition to virtual care. Predict how this has altered care for those in larger bodies.
Just like everyone else, health care providers are influenced by the media. Think back to a movie or TV show you’ve watched that featured a character in a larger body. How was this character portrayed? Were they in a leading or supporting role? Was their size the target of jokes and/or a problem that needed to be fixed?
Health care providers may over-attribute symptoms to obesity, resulting in patients not receiving the necessary diagnostic testing and/or treatment. Do you know of another instance where negative attitudes (explicit and/or implicit) toward a stigmatized group lead to harm?
Can those in smaller bodies experience weight discrimination? If not, why not? If so, how is it similar/different than weight discrimination experienced by those in larger bodies?

In the proposal attached, you can see the overview of the Essay that I would like to include. The Outline has to include

The Working Draft is an 8-10-page (2550 – 3200 word) draft which should include:
Working title
Introduction (~1 page)
The introduction provides an appropriate and compelling entry to the paper by developing relevant background information on the topic and states the research question(s) and/or research thesis.
Body (~7-8 pages)
This is the organized body of the paper, using APA headings and incorporating appropriate sources. It should contain a discussion of at least one fully developed main point/argument. It should synthesize information from several scholarly and credible sources to support the developed point/argument.
Conclusion (~½ page)
At this stage, the conclusion needs only to be a paragraph that summarizes the main points.
References
This is an APA-style reference list, containing all and only the sources cited in the working draft.

Refer to the instructions and rubric.

ALL sources have to be credible, and 10 HAVE to be scholarly ( peer-reviewed journals ).

The sources i have included in the discussion of sources don’t have to be all used, but use most if possible, and add sources that seem relevant but they have to be credible and scholarly.

This is a 3 page, double spaced critical assessment, not a summary (clarifying since it’s clarified in the assignment), of the book(?)
The Soviet-Yugoslav Dispute. The book is short, around 95 pages, but it’s a lot of technical government stuff that I can’t handle. So yeah, read the book, and then write 3 page critical assessment/analysis on it. If you need any further instruction, feel free to let me know.

Here’s the book:
https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-52889015/view?partId=nla.obj-111575808#page/n0/mode/1up

Structure of the Research Paper
1. Cover/Title Page
2. Abstract
3. Introduction
4. Literature Review
· Go over info related to the topic
· Number of works: at least 5 references
· Type of References: scientific studies (articles or books)
· Time of publication: articles/books published within the last 10 years
· Order: chronological/historical; relevance; alphabetical; influence
· Length: minimum 5 paragraphs (one paragraph should have at least 5 well-developed sentences)
· Use APA (7th Ed.) style:
** in-text
** end-list references: alphabetical=> author’s last name
5. Method
· Type: meta-analysis
· Identify min. 5 references; different from those presented in the Lit Review!
· Time of publication: published within the last 5 years
· Use Past Tense when writing the Method section
1. Presents the step-by-step process of the research
2. The tools that were used
a. Databases
b. Keywords: “antibiotics,” “respiratory diseases,” and “complications”
c. Limitators: full text; time of publication; language; age range; abstract available; availability of the source
d. Studies/articles/ books; numbers zero (0) to ten (10) are to be entered in letters
3. How the tools were handled
a. How many studies did the search provide: # of studies
b. Screen (skim and scan info) the studies: which will be used and which will not be incorporated into the study
c. Used: how many; and based on what
d. Discard: how many; and based on what you took that decision
· Length: 1-2 paragraphs
· Do not specify the studies themselves=> no references list
6. Results
· Presents findings: data/ information
· Do not: interpret/ analyze/ evaluate data
· Use Past Tense when writing the narrative
1. Narrative: help the audience read the visual
a. Length: 1-2 paras
2. Visual: table, figure, graph, image, chart
a. Created by you (the researcher); cannot be taken from outside sources
Source
Criterion 1: Low
Criterion 2: Medium
Criterion 3: High
Anderson (2021)
· short periods
X
· longer than 2 weeks
· other complications
Dodge (2019)
Johnson (2017)
Morrow (2020)
Richardson (2022)
Table 1: Impact of Antibiotics on Liver Functioning
7. Discussion
8. Limitations and Implications
9. Conclusion
10. References
Proofread before submitting the final draft!

I need to use references based on APA (7th Ed). Below you will find the introduction part that I had to submit.
I need to use at least 5 references that can’t be older than 10 years (from April 2012 and newer)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please, find below a sample that I wrote of the introduction:

Differences among the Various COVID-19 Vaccines

Hook: Given the public health emergency that the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the world, scientists got together and developed effective vaccines against the virus in a time record.

Background Information: Before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, scientists used to take years to develop new vaccines. Due to the global health issues that the COVID-19 virus caused, the need to promptly develop a vaccine against the virus arise and new methods to make effective vaccines were developed. Vaccines work in different ways to offer protection against pathogens. Presently, there are three vaccines that have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to use within the United States. Two of them, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna use a novel technology messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. The third one, Johnson & Johnson, is a viral vector vaccine.

Problem Statement: It has now been over two years since the start of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 6,123,461 global deaths attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic brought with it a significant impact in the health system, rising an emergent need to rapidly develop an effective vaccine against the deadly virus.

.Research Question: How do different types of FDA approved COVID-19 vaccines work with the human immune system to provide protection against the virus?

Hypothesis: New vaccines using the mRNA technology, have the potential to be more effective and are faster to develop than viral vector vaccines.

Thesis Statement: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how COVID-19 vaccines work in the immune system to offer protection against the virus.

References
1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, (2022). How Vaccines Work. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/how-they-work.html
2. Mayo Clinic, (2022). Different types of COVID-19 vaccines: How they work. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/different-types-of-covid-19-vaccines/art-20506465