The impact of the united state of America sanction on the republic of Cuba. dISCUSS
Best Writer
Risk
Imagine that you are the newly hired CFO for a start-up company that is just beginning to grow. In your role, you must help educate the original leadership staff on the importance of good financial practices because they are from a different industry (software).
As a part of your new role, you are examining several new software products that the company may choose to begin development on to hopefully launch. The rest of the leadership group is focused on product specifications, but you are also examining the risk of new product launches. The company was successful with its first product, so they are unsure about why you are evaluating risk. Create a short presentation for the rest of the group that discusses why risk should be evaluated as a part of overall financial planning.
Requirements
Between 5-7 slides
Professional appearance including theme and at least two images/graphics
Non-technical explanation of how risk is evaluated, quantified, and integrated into a financial plan
Include at least two references
does religion affect reality
there need to be this 5 sources in my paper.
“The Fine Art of Baloney Detection” by Carl Sagan
“The Fine Art of Baloney Detection”
“The New York Magazine Environmental Teach-In”
“On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs”
“Radicalized”
“Reality is Broken”
Should nurses advocate for quality and equal access to healthcare for undocumented immigrants?
Your scholarly Issue paper will consist of an introduction, an outline and current status, pros and cons and a conclusion.
Need no fewer than 8 references, 4 must be current (less than 2 years old).
Be sure and use APA 7th edition format.
It must be typewritten, double spaced, and 5-10 pages in length.
Be sure and use proper sentence structure, punctuation, word usage & correct spelling.
Be sure and utilize the resources under the Library tab in the course content.
the funeral scene in Julius Caesar and the dispute over the piano in The Piano Lesson.
Using “The Classical Model of Argument,” as your guide, write an essay that closely analyzes one of four propositions taken from the two scenes we have been studying, the funeral scene in Julius Caesar and the dispute over the piano in The Piano Lesson. For this essay, you must use the text of either play to make an argument and counterargument in response to one of the four following proposition: 1) leaders of a political community have a right to protect themselves and their people against the threat of tyranny, even through the use of preventive violence if they deem it necessary (Brutus’ point of view in Julius Caesar); 2) there is no such thing as violent prevention of tyranny (a possible conclusion from the result of what happens in Julius Caesar); 3) selling an object that tells a family’s story is like trying to sell the family (Berniece’s point of view in The Piano Lesson); 4) there is no way for children to honor the legacy their families have left them except by making the best use they can of what they are left (Boy Willie’s point of view in The Piano Lesson). You must make detailed reference to the play you are working with; the words and lines of the play are your evidence.
The perfect woman
You must quote from and cite at least 2 erudite sources to support your ideas (Erudite = scholarly).
Gallimard has a vision in his mind of “the perfect woman.” Explain what his vision is and discuss how Song fulfills that vision for Gallimard.
Problem solving in philadelphia
*Must include essay outline and essay.
Essay 4 is a “problem and solution” essay that will be written in three parts: an introduction that presents an overview of the problem, a middle section consisting of summaries of and responses to your two sources, and a conclusion. The sources that you summarize and respond to will discuss the problem (and perhaps offer solutions), and your conclusion will explain your thoughts on the best course of action for addressing the problem. Consider this essay a “bridge” essay in that it will begin to prepare you for the type of research writing you will take on in English 102.
You will be choosing your own topic for this essay within the following parameters:
The problem you investigate must be contemporary and based in the Philadelphia area
The articles you use as sources must be reputable, focus on the Philadelphia region, and must have been written within the last 5 years (Please see this page for more info on choosing your sources: How to Find Sources for Essay 4.)
You will want to choose a problem to discuss that is narrow enough in scope so that you can address it in an engaging, interesting, and in-depth way in an essay of at least 4 pages. Thoroughly reviewing the page called How to Choose a Focused Topic for Essay 4 on Canvas will help you to choose an appropriately narrowed-down topic.
Audience: You are writing for your peers—intelligent and curious college students who are unfamiliar with the readings and topics discussed in this class.
Structure
Introduction (1-2 paragraphs):
Get our attention with a clear and captivating hook.
Then, in the background information section, you should then introduce the problem. Describe the problem, why it is a problem, and perhaps how it became a problem. You will likely want to use information from one or both of your two sources here, making sure to appropriately introduce and cite any sources you use.
Also in the background information section, you may want to discuss your prior knowledge of and/or interest in this problem. You can also discuss why this problem is important to you, and why it should be important to the reader, perhaps drawing on your own or others’ experiences.
Your thesis, which can be one or two sentences, should do the following:
sum up the problem
mention the two sources your essay will primarily use
briefly mention the solution
Body Paragraphs (3-4 paragraphs): Summary and response to your two sources
Be sure to use the materials provided in Canvas to help you select your sources.
Please organize your body paragraphs according to one of the following patterns:
Pattern A:
A paragraph summarizing source 1
A paragraph responding to source 1
A paragraph summarizing source 2
A paragraph responding to source 2
Pattern B:
A paragraph summarizing source 1
A paragraph summarizing source 2
A paragraph responding to both of your sources
Note that your response paragraph would need to be especially well-developed if you choose the three paragraph approach for your body paragraphs
Remember that a summary focuses primarily on main or key points and is always shorter than the original source. If one or both of your sources are long, you will have to work to focus on the overall main ideas in order to fit your summary into one paragraph per source. Since you are spending a full paragraph on each source, though, and since your readers definitely won’t have read your sources, you’ll want to develop a summary of at least ½ to ⅔ of a page double-spaced for each source.
After each summary, then respond to the source: What was your opinion about the source? What was helpful or convincing about it? What, if anything, did you feel was missing? Did it adequately explore both the problem and potential solutions? You do not have to use the rhetorical analysis terms of emotion, logic, and credibility, though you are welcome to.
Sandwich quotations from your sources within your summary and response paragraphs as needed to support your points.
Conclusion (1-2 paragraphs): Your Solution
Ok, you have stated the problem and reviewed some other sources that discuss the problem. Now, how would you propose addressing or “solving” this problem? Of course, addressing the problem isn’t always about “solving” it in a simple/straightforward way, and it’s okay, even important, to acknowledge that.
You aren’t required to use a new source in your conclusion, but if you would like to, you may consider citing more qualitative and/or informal evidence here: Do you know someone with a stake in this issue? Could you interview them?
Alternatively or additionally, you could call upon the sources you used previously in your essay to bring their perspectives together as you discuss possible solutions. You could use or modify this template: “X believes that _______ would solve this because _______ and Y believes that _______ would be better because _______. However, I suggest that we _______.”
Remember to include a Works Cited page. This is especially important since you chose your own sources, and I need to know how to find them.
Remember to write transitions between each section.
An introduction with a carefully chosen and interesting hook as well as any necessary background information.
A one to two sentence thesis statement that answers the prompt, makes a specific claim, and is correctly positioned in the final sentence(s) of the introduction.
Body paragraphs with clear topic sentences and thoughtfully developed supporting evidence/examples from the source. At least one body paragraph should summarize your first source, at least one body paragraph summarize your second source, and one to two body paragraphs should respond to their arguments.
A conclusion that discusses a solution to the problem and makes the stakes of the problem clear.
A well-organized and well-developed essay displaying the student’s critical thinking about the topic and thesis; the essay meets the assignment guidelines.
Appropriate in-text citations, Works Cited list, and ethical use of summary, paraphrase, and quotation (avoids plagiarism).
Correct punctuation and no pattern of grammar errors; the essay has been carefully proofread and uses MLA formatting. The essay has an original title.
Sentences that convey a clear message and meaning.
What is the difference between the nexus of politics and religion in Machiavelli and Luther?
He question is: What is the difference between the nexus of politics and religion in Machiavelli and Luther?
I attached all necessary documents.
Public Sculpture Analysis
Analyze a public sculpture or monument, providing extensive artwork analysis from a technical and conceptual standpoint. Provide contemporary criticism of the work.
Write an analysis of William Shakespeare’s Othello that is 2-3 pages in length and conform to current MLA standards (this information can be found below). You must cite examples from the text in order to support your thesis
Write an analysis of William Shakespeare’s Othello that is 2-3 pages in length and conform to current MLA standards (this information can be found below). You must cite examples from the text in order to support your thesis.
Write an essay exploring how Othello is a tragic hero. What are his positive characteristics? What are his tragic flaws? What is the nature of his downfall?