write a rough draft of your final essay on Hypertrophy Cardiomyopathy Prevalence and Treatment

write a rough draft of your final essay on Hypertrophy Cardiomyopathy Prevalence and Treatment
Research topic
There has been reports of a lot of sudden deaths related to hypertrophy cardiomyopathy in athletes. Hypertrophy cardiomyopathy is a rare but catastrophic condition that is common within young athletes associated with sudden deaths in response to the stretch felt on cardiac muscles in athletics (Mailshot & Sharma, 2017). Therefore, in this analysis, the study would evaluate the cause and effects of hypertrophy cardiomyopathy in athletics.
Literature Review:
This section would analyze past studies related to the understanding of the condition. During the process, the study would evaluate the epidemiology of the condition and the basis data to evaluating its prevalence (Nadu, 2018).
Discussion:
Epidemiology:
In this section the study would evaluate the distribution of the condition, infection pattern and vulnerable populations in association with the condition.
Symptoms:
Provide basic information to the understanding of the signs and symptoms associated with the condition (Buchenwald & Marian, 2017). The section would also evaluate the progressiveness of the condition and what to consider during examination.
Disease Manifestation mechanisms
The section evaluates how the condition is presented and the patterns it takes in the affected population (Braunwald & Marian, 2017).
Prognosis
During the analysis, the study would evaluate varied chances of survival depending on the stage of infection and the likeliness of developing a solution to the condition (Malhotra & Sharma, 2017).
Diagnosis and Treatment:
This section would cover the laboratory testing procedure in determining the cause of the condition and deduce a desirable intervention measure (Braunwald & Marian, 2017). Both pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention measure would be applied for maximum healing effect (Braunwald & Marian, 2017).
Conclusion
Will provide an overview of the general research and provide recommendation based on the application of the research method and related parameter that were key in testing the hypothesis.
References
Braunwald, E., & Marian, A. J. (2017). Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy; Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy Circulation Research. Retrieved from https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circresaha.117.311059 (Links to an external site.)
Malhotra, A., & Sharma, S. (2017). Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Athletes. European cardiology, 12(2), 80–82. doi:10.15420/ecr.2017:12:1
Naidu, S. S. (Ed.). (2018). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Springer.

Write a two page minimum (not including cover page and reference page) APA formatted paper following the instructions below:

Assignment Instructions: Note: Late assignments are not accepted. See syllabus for late assignment policy.
This course uses ‘Turn it in’ to check for plagiarized or otherwise unoriginal papers and a high turn it in score may, at your professor’s discretion, result in a reduced score, a zero for the assignment and/or referral to the SoBT to recommend your removal from this course (and failing grade).
The Interface case study is located on page 361 in your textbook (or find the Interface case study if your version of the text has it on a different page). Read the case study and provide a case overview, answer the four questions on p. 366, and include a conclusion section. See below for more specific instructions:
Write a two page minimum (not including cover page and reference page) APA formatted paper following the instructions below:
Two textbook citations and one outside resource citation are required for this paper (and also included on the reference page).
Read the case study carefully and then do some outside research to learn more about this topic. Using proper APA formatting, write a two-page (minimum) paper (not including cover page and reference page) and begin with an introduction that briefly summarizes the ethical issues in the case. Then answer each of the questions at the end of the case. Provide a brief concluding paragraph that summarizes your key findings.
Within the paper, including at least some of the responses to the case study ending questions, the information and analysis you provide must be supported by at least 2 textbook citations and 1 reliable outside research source beyond the textbook, cited in proper APA format, then referenced properly at the end of your paper. At least two of the citations should relate to course concepts or applications, and not simply re-stating information provided in the case. (Minimum of 3 citations within the paper).
Paper format: No abstract is required for this paper. The first section begins on page 2 (after the cover page) and the paper begins with the introduction or case overview and should have a section heading (Introduction”, Case Overview” etc.). Next, include each question as presented in the case in bold, followed by your response not in bold. Finally, provide a brief conclusion and this section should also be designated with a ‘Conclusion’ header. The last page is the reference page.
The two-page minimum for content is just that–a minimum– and most likely you may need additional space to fully complete the assignment. Papers that are cut off before fully meeting the two-page minimum will be docked points.
The paper should be double spaced throughout and follow APA guidelines: 12 pt Times New Roman Font, page numbers upper right, section headings (and case questions) in bold, double spaced throughout, etc.
Note: For question # 1:
If you have trouble finding anything about the EnviroSense Consortium–try searching for ‘The Sustainability Consortium’ and write about that.

Write a paper on the Art pre history.

Write a paper on the Art pre history.
Visit a museum that houses artworks created between pre-history up to the mid-18th century
(Baroque).
• Kimble art museum
• DMA
Choose a specific piece of artwork (2 or 3 dimensional) and do a short formal analysis of the art
work. (800- 1000 words MAX)
• 4 RESEARCH SOURCES REQUIRED. (Google and Wikipedia are not allowed as sources)
• MLA format.

Guidelines for Analysis of Art
Knowing how to write a formal analysis of a work of art is a fundamental skill learned in an art appreciation-
level class. Students in art history survey and upper-level classes further develop this skill. Use this sheet as a
guide when writing a formal analysis paper. Consider the following when analyzing a work of art. Not
everything applies to every work of art, nor is it always useful to consider things in the order given. In any
analysis, keep in mind the following: HOW and WHY is this a significant work of art?
Part I – General Information
In many cases, this information can be found on a label or in a gallery guidebook. There may be an artist’s
statement available in the gallery. If so, cite (MLA style) in your text where you got the information. (One
paragraph)
1. Subject Matter (Who or What is Represented?)
2. Artist (What person or group made it? Often this is not known. If there is a name, refer to this person
as the artist, not “author.” Refer to this person by their last name, not familiarly by their first name.)
3. Date (When was it made? Is it a copy of something older? Was it made before or after other similar
works?)
4. Provenance (Where was it made? For whom? Is it typical of the art of a geographical

5. Location (Where is the work of art now? Where was it originally located? Does the viewer look up at it,
or down at it? If it is not in its original location, does the viewer see it as the artist intended? Can it be
seen on all sides, or just on one?)
6. Technique and Medium (What materials is it made of? How was it executed? How big or small is it?)
Part II – Brief Description
In a few sentences describe the work. What does it look like? Is it a representation of something? Tell what is
shown. Is it an abstraction of something? Tell what the subject is and what aspects are emphasized. Is it a
non-objective work? Tell what elements are dominant. This section is not an analysis of the work yet, though
some terms used in Part III might be used here. This section is primarily a few sentences to give the reader a
sense of what the work looks like. (One paragraph)
Part III – Form
This is the key part of your paper. It should be the longest section of the paper. Be sure and think about
whether the work of art selected a two-dimensional or three-dimensional work is. Only discuss the things
that apply to the artwork. (Two + paragraphs)
Art Elements
1. Line (straight, curved, angular, flowing, horizontal, vertical, diagonal, contour, thick, thin, implied etc.)
2. Shape (what shapes are created and how)
3. Light and Value (source, flat, strong, contrasting, even, values, emphasis, shadows)
4. Color (primary, secondary, mixed, complimentary, warm, cool, decorative, values)
5. Texture and Pattern (real, implied, repeating)
6. Space (depth, overlapping, kinds of perspective)
7. Time and Motion
Principles of Design
1. Unity and Variety
2. Balance (symmetry, asymmetry)
3. Emphasis and Subordination
4. Scale and Proportion (weight, how objects or figures relate to each other and the setting)
5. Mass/Volume (three-dimensional art)
6. Rhythm
7. Function/Setting (architecture)
8. Interior/Exterior Relationship (architecture)
Part IV – Opinions and Conclusions

Provide a synthesis of how your results tie into your industry research and your chosen major/concentration.

Note about papers: All papers should be written in 7th edition APA format, including: title page, page numbers, headings, and references (if applicable). However, you are not required to include an abstract. Papers should be on standard 8.5” x 11” paper, with one-inch margins, Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double-spaced.
Each student is required to submit a five- to seven-page essay (APA format) detailing their choice of major. Drawing on the discussion and research in, the essay should include your reasons for choosing the particular major as well as the role it plays in your longer-term career goals and vision of success.
Introduction
A summary of your chosen major/concentration and why it appeals to you.
Industry Research
Provide a research-based analysis of an industry that you are interested in. Include the types of jobs in the field (sample job titles, functions, example companies), what the job entails (duties and work environment), and education, experience, and skills needed.
Reflection
A reflection and analysis of your assessment results and what you learned.
Provide a synthesis of how your results tie into your industry research and your chosen major/concentration.

What is Literature?

Learning Goals
Synthesize the ideas you have considered in answering the question, “What is literature?”
Craft a thesis that clearly states your interpretation of the meaning (significance) of the story.
Support your thesis with evidence from the story and base it on the literary elements you have examined.
For this paper, you will develop an argument that you began exploring in the Week 2 discussion, which asked, “What is literature?” Your paper will answer that question using the following format:
“This story is an excellent example of literature because it provides meaning about X.”
Examples of how you might fill-in “X” include “children and parenting,” “the Black experience,” “gendered double standards,” or another aspect of the human condition that you can relate to and that has a significant presence in the story.
The answer statement above is only half of your thesis. Week 3 teaches you that the thesis governs your paper’s analysis and development. The thesis is constructed with two main parts:  a claim and warrants. For this paper, your thesis will have three warrants.
Example:
Flannery O’Connor’s short story “A Good Man Is Hard to Find” is an excellent example of a literary work because it provides insight into the hypocrisy of religious morality through character, setting, and theme.
Week 3 shows you how the outline is a straightforward way to list and organize your ideas to support your claim with three warrants. Your task in drafting this paper is to expand the levels of your outline in more detail. Next, you will convert the bulleted items from your outline into well-crafted sentences, and then combine the sentences into well-organized, logical paragraphs.
Your three warrants will use the literary elements you explored and applied in Week 2. You may choose any literary elements, and you do not have to use three different ones. However, the body of your paper needs to have three paragraphs. For instance, if you choose to only discuss plot, then you must have enough information to develop three paragraphs about how the plot elucidates your thesis claim.
In Week 4, you’ll learn more about the development of body paragraphs. In the example above, each of the warrants exemplifying the hypocrisy of religious morality—through the story’s character(s), setting, and theme—will have its own paragraph.
Hints: Remember that your reader has read the story and is familiar with it; extensive summary is not useful. Rather, explain and analyze how meaning is derived from the story by the author’s implementation of literary elements. Note that the focus should be on the story, not the author, so repeated references to the author are unnecessary.
Summary vs. analysis: Be aware that a paper analyzing a piece of literature is not a plot summary. Summary should be brief, with only the details necessary to identify the parts of the story required to develop your paper.
Length and Format:
750-1,000 words (approximately three pages, double-spaced)
MLA style for document format. See this MLA Style Demo video for how to set up your document.
See the Sample Paper for format and organization.