Best Writer

Write a paper on the Jet Blue Analytical Report.

Explain how to prevent bullying in the school system.

Write a discussion paper on Group Dynamics.Kozlowski, S.W., Chao, G.T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M.T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational research methods, 16(4), 581-615.
The authors and researchers from these individuals from different institutes helped in writing this. They sought to use direct quantitative research on the emergence that is contrary to the common quantitative research that has been done in the past decades. This research was done so that the results could be discussed with groups and organizations. They illustrated how direct and indirect these approaches can be complementary and appropriately integrated that could help advance theory and research. The conclusion to all this is that multilevel research across multiple organizational levels is limited in what it can reveal and that there is a need to enlarge the research design and the approaches to groups.
Dornyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The modern language journal, 81(4), 482-493.
This is the examining and research of the psychological foundations of the success of cooperatively structured learning. The author and research brought together two interrelated processes in the group dynamics of cooperative learning (CL) classes and the motivational system generated by peer collaboration. This journal entry was more focused on cooperatively structured learning, but the processes are not restricted to CL but are characteristics of any group work, teamwork, and student cohesion. Basically, any work in general. The method for all this breaks down to the educational role that is used from the CL. This journal was broken down to how we learn as a group and teaches how the dynamics of certain groups work to learn.
Cronin, M.A., Weingart, L.R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in Groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571-612.
This is a review of the theoretical developments, and they also examined their impact on the understanding of group dynamics. The research of this has shown progress in many areas such as effectiveness, learning, and diversity. With this type of research, we can learn how to bring together many groups and be helpful to everyone. The practices of group research and group practices can learn from this study and move forward. Highlighting group dynamics are a way to demonstrate how the complicated issues might be tackled. These groups and think tanks help bring together problems and then have solutions to these problems. This is the ley to moving forward, group studies, and group research.
Farnsworth, J., & Boon, B. (2010). Analyzing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 605-624.
The data studied and written in this journal of focus groups was conducted over a 7-year period. This study was done primarily to show the area that was most excluded was group dynamics. They thought that attending to group dynamics will make a better sense of the quality of research and focus group experiences to show that the findings will bring more detailed information on the group. They came up with that an orientation to group relations is so very important to expounding the sensitivity of the method as an effective research procedure. Focus groups are great to help distinguish the importance of group dynamics.
Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270-299.
This study or research was down to examine three ways or titles as to why team mechanisms are way understudied. The study showed what were the problems and why they caused differences. The rate and trajectory of these groups showed the underlining effects and the problems that come from the lack of study or research. There were three ways that were given to advance these groups. Advancing new research, measuring and creating new research to the existing research, and adapting and also advancing the research methods now. The research that has already been done and the new research can get a bit confusing. Mixing the new and the old can hurt more than help.
Kozlowski, S.W., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: cognition and cohesion in work teams, Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5-6), 335-354.
This research was done because of a lack of attention to micro-meso disciplines of organizational science. This was done by researchers from Michigan State University and was done as a multilevel research tool. They intended to explain the conceptual undertones that would advance a more process-oriented and dynamic understanding. They found that the dynamic processes have been little researched and because of that it has failed to show that the emergence of groups is extremely useful and powerful. This research shows and proves the importance of groups and what they bring to the table as in growth. The emergence of groups and working as teams is key to getting better.
Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443-503.
Studying and researching multilevel teams and understanding on how to enhance the groups or teams needs more data to have a better collection of information. Having a member of the group study one person at a time and then have the other members study the other members of the group will help define and gather crucial information about the group and the attendees. There needs to be a list of questions that need to be asked but the bigger the group gets the more questions to need to be asked. This journal was written to help pave the way for future studies of groups.
McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Bredahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and social psychology review, 4(1), 95-105.
This group studied and researched theory development. They used a 3-prong research strategy that was based on theory development, computational modeling, and empirical research. They studied this to show the constant changes in groups and also brought out the structures of continuity and also the complexity of the groups. They showed how it can go from easy to hard just by the group diversity and the group as a whole when it grows or gets smaller. With this type of research, we see how groups change from one day to another depending on emotions and where the groups differ from time to time.
Smith, K.K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). A paradoxical conception of group dynamics. Human Relations, 40(10), 633-657.
This group expounded on the theory of several group experiences. They did a seven-group dynamic study that was examined using paradoxical epistemology. The things they looked at were the paradoxes of identity, disclosure, creativity, authority, and regression. All this information that was sought after helps individuals learn more about themselves in groups. It teaches more of how each individual thinks about themselves. Small groups are better at this than big groups. Human relations consist of communication and getting to know each other but also getting to themselves better. Once the small group knows each other then they can proceed to make more progress in what they set out to do.
Griffin, R. W., Phillips, J., & Gully, S. M. (2020). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Cengage.
This group studied and researched people and groups and learned how to organize and better manage people. Having been able to learn the strengths and skills of each member in the group can help facilitate people to get the maximized work ethic out of them. They also researched and brought out how to understand employees’ behavior and better organize their employees. This gave ideas on how to balance the older ways with the newer generations. This group also brought out how to assess the weaknesses of the group or employees to help get their employees to better themselves in areas they are weak in.
941751
38 minutes ago
I have the 10 annotated bibliography sources already, just need to us those that I have sent. Thank you so much.

Analytical report for company Jetblue
This report should be produced for professional investors from the perspective of
an independent professional Wall Street analyst.

Attached find requirements for the report,
Sample of an “A” Report,
Discuss about prof comments on what has been done and what adjustments are needed for improvement ( File Early review JBLU).

Responses should be both personal AND analytical and focused on developing ways to apply
the ideas from the reading to your academic writing. For your personal exploration, you might
explore answers to a question such as: What do you think of the ideas presented about writing?
For your analytical exploration, you might answer questions such as: What ideas are useful
to you as a writer? How can you apply these ideas to your writing?

Write and incorporate explanations of key concepts, specific examples, and quotes from the reading to support and illustrate your ideas. Providing explanations of key concepts allows the reader to
understand the source you are writing about and its connection to your ideas and analysis.
Including examples from the text you are writing about gives your work academic authority and
allows the reader to compare your ideas and analysis with the source you are writing about.

Kozlowski, S.W., Chao, G.T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M.T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational research methods, 16(4), 581-615.
The authors and researchers from these individuals from different institutes helped in writing this. They sought to use direct quantitative research on the emergence that is contrary to the common quantitative research that has been done in the past decades. This research was done so that the results could be discussed with groups and organizations. They illustrated how direct and indirect these approaches can be complementary and appropriately integrated that could help advance theory and research. The conclusion to all this is that multilevel research across multiple organizational levels is limited in what it can reveal and that there is a need to enlarge the research design and the approaches to groups.
Dornyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The modern language journal, 81(4), 482-493.
This is the examining and research of the psychological foundations of the success of cooperatively structured learning. The author and research brought together two interrelated processes in the group dynamics of cooperative learning (CL) classes and the motivational system generated by peer collaboration. This journal entry was more focused on cooperatively structured learning, but the processes are not restricted to CL but are characteristics of any group work, teamwork, and student cohesion. Basically, any work in general. The method for all this breaks down to the educational role that is used from the CL. This journal was broken down to how we learn as a group and teaches how the dynamics of certain groups work to learn.
Cronin, M.A., Weingart, L.R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in Groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571-612.
This is a review of the theoretical developments, and they also examined their impact on the understanding of group dynamics. The research of this has shown progress in many areas such as effectiveness, learning, and diversity. With this type of research, we can learn how to bring together many groups and be helpful to everyone. The practices of group research and group practices can learn from this study and move forward. Highlighting group dynamics are a way to demonstrate how the complicated issues might be tackled. These groups and think tanks help bring together problems and then have solutions to these problems. This is the ley to moving forward, group studies, and group research.
Farnsworth, J., & Boon, B. (2010). Analyzing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 605-624.
The data studied and written in this journal of focus groups was conducted over a 7-year period. This study was done primarily to show the area that was most excluded was group dynamics. They thought that attending to group dynamics will make a better sense of the quality of research and focus group experiences to show that the findings will bring more detailed information on the group. They came up with that an orientation to group relations is so very important to expounding the sensitivity of the method as an effective research procedure. Focus groups are great to help distinguish the importance of group dynamics.
Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270-299.
This study or research was down to examine three ways or titles as to why team mechanisms are way understudied. The study showed what were the problems and why they caused differences. The rate and trajectory of these groups showed the underlining effects and the problems that come from the lack of study or research. There were three ways that were given to advance these groups. Advancing new research, measuring and creating new research to the existing research, and adapting and also advancing the research methods now. The research that has already been done and the new research can get a bit confusing. Mixing the new and the old can hurt more than help.
Kozlowski, S.W., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: cognition and cohesion in work teams, Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5-6), 335-354.
This research was done because of a lack of attention to micro-meso disciplines of organizational science. This was done by researchers from Michigan State University and was done as a multilevel research tool. They intended to explain the conceptual undertones that would advance a more process-oriented and dynamic understanding. They found that the dynamic processes have been little researched and because of that it has failed to show that the emergence of groups is extremely useful and powerful. This research shows and proves the importance of groups and what they bring to the table as in growth. The emergence of groups and working as teams is key to getting better.
Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443-503.
Studying and researching multilevel teams and understanding on how to enhance the groups or teams needs more data to have a better collection of information. Having a member of the group study one person at a time and then have the other members study the other members of the group will help define and gather crucial information about the group and the attendees. There needs to be a list of questions that need to be asked but the bigger the group gets the more questions to need to be asked. This journal was written to help pave the way for future studies of groups.
McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Bredahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and social psychology review, 4(1), 95-105.
This group studied and researched theory development. They used a 3-prong research strategy that was based on theory development, computational modeling, and empirical research. They studied this to show the constant changes in groups and also brought out the structures of continuity and also the complexity of the groups. They showed how it can go from easy to hard just by the group diversity and the group as a whole when it grows or gets smaller. With this type of research, we see how groups change from one day to another depending on emotions and where the groups differ from time to time.
Smith, K.K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). A paradoxical conception of group dynamics. Human Relations, 40(10), 633-657.
This group expounded on the theory of several group experiences. They did a seven-group dynamic study that was examined using paradoxical epistemology. The things they looked at were the paradoxes of identity, disclosure, creativity, authority, and regression. All this information that was sought after helps individuals learn more about themselves in groups. It teaches more of how each individual thinks about themselves. Small groups are better at this than big groups. Human relations consist of communication and getting to know each other but also getting to themselves better. Once the small group knows each other then they can proceed to make more progress in what they set out to do.
Griffin, R. W., Phillips, J., & Gully, S. M. (2020). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Cengage.
This group studied and researched people and groups and learned how to organize and better manage people. Having been able to learn the strengths and skills of each member in the group can help facilitate people to get the maximized work ethic out of them. They also researched and brought out how to understand employees’ behavior and better organize their employees. This gave ideas on how to balance the older ways with the newer generations. This group also brought out how to assess the weaknesses of the group or employees to help get their employees to better themselves in areas they are weak in.
941751
38 minutes ago
I have the 10 annotated bibliography sources already, just need to us those that I have sent. Thank you so much.

You have been with ABC Company for over 5 years. As a successful Social Media Manager at the company’s headquarters, you have proved to be a valuable asset and have been asked to relocate from the company’s Las Vegas office to support the Gainesville office start-up process. As a Social Media Manager, you are tasked with working with the company’s corporate headquarters Human Resources Department to recruit and select new Social Media Specialists for the Gainesville office. You are excited for the Social Media Specialists to join your dynamic ABC Company in Gainesville.
Your Charge (The Project)
As a Social Media Manager and a recent completer of a management and supervision course, you know that it is critical that the onboarding process is structured and facilitated well. You are charged with developing an onboard process for the Social Media Specialists for the new staff at the new office.
After researching onboarding and reading Ashley Bell’s 7 Steps to a Perfect Employee Onboarding Process for New Hires you have outlined 7 key elements of the onboarding process that you will want to address: recruitment, office visit, offer letter, early onboarding, day 1 welcoming, orientation the first few weeks, and ongoing engagement.
Deliverable
The deliverable for the project is to address each of the 7 key elements above, as described below, using an APA formatted paper.
Recruitment. For the recruitment element,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the recruitment process
Office Visit. For the office visit,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the office visit process
Offer Letter. For the offer letter,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in developing the offer letter
Early Onboarding. For early onboarding,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the early onboarding process
Day 1 Welcoming. For Day 1,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the welcoming on Day 1
First Few Weeks. For the first week’s orientation,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the first few week’s orientation process
Ongoing Engagement. For ongoing engagement,
identify and discuss at least 2 sub-tasks that need to be completed, and
identify the other personnel that will be involved in the ongoing engagement process
When writing your 3 – 5 page double spaced paper, you are required to use 3 sources (2 sources in addition to your course eBook). Please do not go over 5 pages or less than 3 pages (see rubric: 5 point reduction for short or long papers). The intent is to write the paper clearly and concisely for your department to use.
In summary, you will have 6 to 8 pages (maximum):
Cover Page (page 1)
Abstract Page (page 2)
Content Pages (pages 3 – 5, 6 or 7)
Reference Page (page 6, 7, or 8; depends on the number of Content Pages)

This assignment requires that you evaluate ONE of the following news articles. Since these
articles express a potentially controversial viewpoint, your grade will not be determined based on
your agreement, or disagreement with the philosophy, but rather on your evaluation of the article
using the 3, 2, 1 evaluation and your opinion on the article.
Your task is this:
• Write about 3 things that you learned, 2 things that you did not know, and 1 thing that you
would like to investigate further.
11 pts
• Is Is this a good idea or not? (your opinion)
7 pts
• C. Why? (your opinion based on reading)
Ipts
25 total points
• Type your response within the DB text box, along with correct grammar and spelling.
Your work is to be typed using 12 font, your name and title of the article at the top of the
page.
• Work is to be submitted under assignments in Black board by 11:59 pm on the assigned
due date. I will not accept any emailed submission.
Newly identified softshell turtle lived alongside T. rex and Triceratops
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220311095330.htm
Researchers produce fully functional pancreatic beta cells from stem cells
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220303120803.htm
How a touch-sensing protein could stop constipation
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220307113128.htm
Common houseplants can improve air quality indoors
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220307113115.htm
Forget handheld virtual reality controllers: a smile, frown or clench will suffice: Facial recognition
tech taken to the next level in virtual reality
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/02/220218100717.htm

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
You will need to identify ONE journal article in any area of psychology that interests you from one of
the scientific journals below. Click on the links to explore the available articles. You can select any
article, as long as it has a Method section within it. (Articles without the Method section are review
articles and would not be appropriate for this assignment).
UNC Charlotte Undergraduate Psychology Journal
The Journal of Undergraduate Ethnic Minority
Modern Psychological Studies
PSI CHI Journal of Psychological Research
Once you have identified the article you will need to summarize it, in particular the Introduction, the
Method, and the Discussion sections. You will also need to write the appropriate title page and reference
for the article.
The written assignment should contain the following sections, and you should write the name of each
section where it begins, except for the title page:
Title page, Introduction, Method, Discussion, References
The length should be a total of 4 pages, double spaced, written in 12 points font with 1” margins.
Page 1: Title page (with your own title, name, and school affiliation).
Page 2 and 3: Introduction, Method and Discussion.
Page 4: Reference (you should have only one reference, the article you are summarizing).
Use the Paper Checklist as a guide to complete the assignment.
I will be using the Psychology Paper Rubric to grade your assignment.
This paper must use APA (American Psychological Association) FORMAT. The following link
provides an example of a paper using the APA style format, as well as descriptions of what the different
sections of the paper should contain. Here is a link to an APA sample paper. Use the example as a guide
to write your paper. It is also a very good idea to visit the writing center to ensure that your summary is
properly formatted.
You may also visit: http://www.apastyle.org/. This website has many useful instructions, video tutorials,
etc.
To receive FULL CREDIT you must meet the following criteria:
a. The summary should be exactly 2 pages, excluding title page and reference page.
b. APA style (double space, times new roman 12-font, 1” margin, etc.)
c. Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, etc. must be perfect. (Have
someone, a few people, proofread your paper.)
d. The paper must contain the following sections: Title page, Introduction, Method,
Discussion, References. (You do not need the Abstract).
e. Clear and demonstrated understanding of the chosen article.

Please watch the first 20 minutes of the documentary, Calypso Dreams (we already watched the first 10 mins in class)
Calypso Dreams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHXpHRZALHw

Then, In 1-2 paragraphs, respond to the following prompts:
1.) What did you learn about calypso from the documentary? What did you find most interesting about Calypso as a musical form?
2.) What are ways you see Calypso as a musical form being incorporated into the literary form of the modernist novel in Lonely Londoners?