Best Writer

dissertation proposal, Masters in project management
The two attachment is my dessertation project brief
My project topic is in the fif brief I just attached above

it is 2000 words
I would also like the expert to suggest if primary or secondary data is better
Is the topic suitable for primary or For secondary data?

Once you have watched this video:

Discuss how this speaker’s speech relates to persuasion? Do you think he was effective? Explain why or why not? Examples?
Comment on two of your classmates’ discussions and further their discussion using the Mind Your ABCs, as explained below.

Q:1 View the task learning guides (TLGs) below, which demonstrate how to find company information in the CSU Online Library and how to find competitor or industry information in the CSU Online Library. After reviewing the task learning guides (TLGs), describe how you might use these resources as a marketing manager within a company or as a student completing assignments in this and future graduate-level courses.

Q2: Companies need to understand their ability to compete and the environment in which they must compete. Of the strategy planning tools they have available, the PEST (political, economic, sociocultural, and technology) analysis has been shown to be very effective. Do you believe that companies who have a planning culture and use planning tools, such as the PEST analysis, can perform better in the long run than their industry competitors who may not use similar planning tools? Why, or why not?

For this week’s discussion, I want you to read through Proverbs chapters 10 to 22. Within these chapters I want you to find one proverb that in your view best suits the following prompts:
1) What proverb do you think YOU most need to hear, contemplate, and put into practice?
2) What proverb do you think the world around you most needs to hear and contemplate?
3) What proverb do you think would most benefit your community by putting its principle(s) into action?
For each choice, I want you to type out the proverb that you chose and then briefly explain why you selected it. Thus you should have three proverbs and three explanations for why you chose them. In your follow-ups with one-another I want you to try to make these reflections go deeper by adding your own experiences and suggesting further applications where possible.
Your initial discussion post should be at least 250 words and is due on Wednesday evening. Be sure and respond to at least two of your fellow students (at least 100 words each) by Sunday night.

– Discuss how our primate cousins are related to each other, and to us. Begin by briefly
discussing the evolution of primates, including when the common ancestors lived. Next,
discuss the similarities and differences that distinguish Prosimians, Anthropoids, Platyrrhines,
Catarrhines, and Hominoids. You must use all these words, with examples, or you are not
answering the question fully.
– Self-aware Habitat Diet Social Organization Communication
Monkey Ape Primate Locomotion Primatology
– You must UNDERLINE and DEFINE the term. Use the textbook and online resources I
provided, AND use correct in text citations and bibliographic methods.

Use these sources below:

https://ncc.sln.suny.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-3455445-dt-content-rid-22675337_1/courses/40861.202240/The-History-of-Our-Tribe-Hominini-1499359886.pdf

https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/tutorials/biological.htm

Home

Summary
Editing for readability and reliability
This is part two of a two-part assignment that provides practice editing an informal report. In this part (2.2), you are asked to improve the document you wrote for Written 2.1, especially its readability and reliability. This part is worth 5 points towards your final mark. We will use a rubric for assessment, shown in the attachment below.

Purpose of this assignment
Every piece of writing can become better with re-writing. Several steps are involved, from a document-level review to checking the correct punctuation and citation methods. Correcting and improving at each of these levels optimizes the final documents. The objective is to achieve greater readability (making the content easier to absorb) and maximize reliability (making you a trusted source of information). Keep in mind there may be many readers of the report, perhaps over long periods, and the material must be an accurate and trustworthy account that a wide range of people can understand.
Editing can involve re-phrasing, re-arranging, supplementing, or reducing the content. None-verbal aspects are also essential to consider, such as formatting or consistency in headings, citations, etc.
The assignment targets the following course objectives:
Organize and prepare workplace communications by the intended outcome.
Identify and eliminate sources of noise in workplace communications.
Distinguish the differences between facts, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations.
Apply design principles to various kinds of workplace documents.
Prepare summaries of workplace information.
Prepare reports for various purposes.

How to do this assignment
Written 2.2 is based on your work in Written 2.1.

1. Consult the checklist in the Coursepack, pp. 061-062. This provides a valuable list of things to consider as you review your work. A copy is attached below.
2. Consult the feedback for your Written 2.1 submission for areas to review. Note that this is not an inventory of every item that needs to be addressed but indicates certain things that you can improve with extra attention. We will publish feedback during the week of 21 March.
3. Read over your earlier draft and make a checklist of things you want to be sure to concentrate on in your re-write. This can be particularly valuable if you’re going to do the re-write in a minimum number of passes through the document, correcting multiple items simultaneously. An alternative can be to do multiple passes through the paper; for example, one for re-phrasing to improve clarity, another to reduce wordiness, another to check spelling, etc.
4. Turn on “track changes” in MS Word. Make sure to select “track changes while editing” (or equivalent) so the edits you make appear as they are being done.
5. Make all the changes you believe will improve your document to provide the final draft.
6. Save a version WITH track changes visible as a PDF file. This PDF will be known as the “redline version.”
7. Save the same version as a PDF file WITHOUT track changes visible. This PDF will be the final draft, known as the “clean version.” Note: In some versions of MS Word, you may need to select “accept all changes” to see the final draft with no changes visible.
8. Describe three changes you made to improve readability and reliability. Be specific. For example, provide more details than “corrected errors from feedback” and instead name the kind of errors you corrected and how, such as “corrected reference list formatting after checking the examples in the Coursepack.” Note: Make as many changes as necessary to provide the best final draft, but only three need to be listed.
9. Submit three items in a single PDF file:
The list of three changes you made to improve readability and reliability, as described in #8
The redline version (the final draft with changes visible from “track changes”)
The clean version (the final draft with no changes visible)
Deadline
Friday, 01 April 2022 at 2359 AT.
A two-hour grace period extends beyond the deadline to allow for connectivity/technical issues while uploading.
After the grace period (2359 + 2 hrs), submissions will be late and marked 0.
Accommodations are not possible after the deadline. Additional information about exemptions and accommodations is in the course syllabus.

Assessment
You will receive a letter grade.
The grading scale follows the Dalhousie system for undergraduate courses.
We will assess your submission using a rubric.
The rubric is attached below.

Further instructions
On templates & third-party tools
Many pre-formatted templates and writing tools exist online and in some apps. You are free to use any of these with one provision: you will be accountable for demonstrating your understanding of the principles presented in this Course. Put differently, because your format or wording uses a third-party application will not make it correct for purposes of this assignment. The reference for marking will be (a) the principles, language, and details we discuss in class, (b) the background provided in the Coursepack, and (c) the reference slides provided in Course Day-by-Day.
On academic standards
You must write in your own words. The material needs to be original. We may use plagiarism detection software and other means to analyze submissions. Any instances that suggest copying from others will be examined closely as a possible academic offense. We may withhold your mark while a closer examination of your work occurs. Additional information about academic standards is in the course syllabus.
On questions
We expect follow-up questions, and they are welcome. The quickest answers will be checking Course Questions and Answers on MS Teams (CSCI 2100 | W22). Your question may have earlier been asked and answered. If not, posting your question benefits your colleagues with the answer. If you feel your question is more complicated, contact your TA directly. They are there to respond to individual questions on any aspect of the course material.

Within the context of social determinants of population health discuss the values guiding political advocacy by nurses to mitigate environmental health vulnerability of affected population. Give an example.

The Thesis is written 80 pages. Field of papyrology. Specific Topic Daily life aspects of Greek papyri of Fayum and Oxyrinchus Area. Only proofreading and a small revision is needed. I will provide the exact parts that must be changed (less than 2 pages)

From a
Windows 10 command prompt, type eventvwr.msc and press Enter. This will
open the Windows 10 Event Viewer. Explore the different logs and write
a report summarizing your findings in two (2) content pages or less as
they relate to host intrusion detection and event logging/auditing (for
performance and security).

The Context
You are working for
a newspaper and are asked to write a 1,500 word, scientifically informed,
opinion piece on social networking sites.
The Assignment
You will write a piece using one of the following titles:
a) The media often represents social networking sites negatively, and
they are right to do so.
b)
The media often represents
social networking sites positively, and they are right to do so.
c)
The media often represents
social networking sites negatively, but they are wrong to do so.
d)
The media often represents
social networking sites positively, but they are wrong to do so.