Best Writer

Here is what the paper must address for full credit consideration
1. What is the background of the author/editor (Jensen)? How is this relevant to understanding the purpose of the book overall?
2. What is the thesis of the book? How successful is the author/editor (Jensen) at getting his points across to the reader clearly and does the author ultimately prove what the thesis claims
to show? Give factual examples of how and/or how not. Be sure to cite the Jensen text.
3. In the process of doing steps one and two above, choose three of the journalists in the book and use them as examples in the review itself. This implies a brief discussion about each of
the three journalists selected, their writings, the significance of the issue addressed, and what happened as a result of his/her reporting. Please choose an author from the first third, middle
third, and last third of the 20th century (spreading out your choices from across the book).
4. Do you think that investigative reporting and a free press are important to a democracy? Why or why not?
5. Finally, give an example of a contemporary muckraking journalist and the issue they address, one NOT included in the Jensen book, and one active writing in the past decade. In other words,
if the book continued, choose someone whom you think would be included in its ensuing chapters. What is socially/politically compelling about the topic and what possible solutions are
offered in the current example you chose? What role do these people play in the construction of our history? If you need ideas for finding contemporary muckrakers, see our work at
www.projectcensored.org a (including our top censored news stories a and independent news sources 2).
6. Closing remarks/conclusion. BE SURE the paper is properly cited in Chicago Style 2, endnotes or footnotes (note style, not bibliography style).

If an audience doesn’t trust you, they won’t listen to you. To establish credibility, speakers must earn the audience’s trust. What do you think a speaker can do to establish themselves as credibile and trustworthy? What are some things speakers may do that take away from their credibility? What can a speaker do to ensure that they are respectful of their audience, especially when speaking to a skeptical audience or an audience that has different values than their own? What considerations should a speaker take if they are presenting a topic that is new to the audience?

Only answer one and two question in the case study do enough research and also bridge the case in the book with the current company (provide the current company background (finance, market segment/share, SWOT analysis) and latest news events in the last 90 days).

1) The history, development, and growth of the company over time
2) The companies structure and control systems and how they match its strategy

The link to the book

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YwPyhHEPnt-K2LLTjpVOSGCBr_Q6ed6H/view?usp=sharing

Attaching example file take a look at it.

Purpose and Description
In Essay 1, we evaluated the purpose and relevance of a music video, noting different strategies and approaches used by authors to communicate with an intended audience. Building on our comfortability in regard to this kind of evaluative process, Essay 2 asks for an expansion of these skills and ideas: the aim of this paper is to explore a culturally, socially, or economically relevant issue of your choice and to examine it objectively, noting both voices contributing to its larger conversation and acknowledging their biases and perspectives.

Specific Requirements
Your paper should:
⦁ Identify and discuss an issue that affects you, along with some personal narrative regarding why you you’ve chosen to write about it, and what you might offer to its conversation;
⦁ Identify, summarize, and discuss the biases of at least six sources that contribute to the issue’s ongoing conversation (these can include songs, podcasts, videos, etc., though at least two must be from academic journals);
⦁ Be written in formal academic prose;
⦁ Be 1500 – 1800 words in length;
⦁ Be written in 12-point Times New Roman typeface;
⦁ Be uploaded to Blackboard by 4/17 at 11:59 pm.

The purpose of the informative speaking assignment is to share knowledge with your audience. You may want to teach us how to bake an apple pie, or you may wish to tell us about the history of the Apple iPhone. The topic you select is completely up to you. However, you must remain impartial and objective when presenting your speech. In other words, avoid using persuasive language (e.g., “This is the correct way to bake an apple pie,” “The iPhone is the bestdevice on the planet, so you should buy one”). You are simply sharing information with us, not trying to convince us to change our beliefs about your topic or to modify our behaviors.
Brainstorming potential topics:
§ Sport or athlete
§ Gendered communication
§ Food recipe
§ Psychological disorder
§ Famous musician
§ Historical event (e.g., protest, war, legislation)
§ Popular website or mobile application
§ Animal intelligence
§ Television series
§ Film or movie
§ Natural medicine
§ Planning a budget
§ Car maintenance
§ Graduate school
§ Job interviews
§ Celebrity or historical figure
§ Self-care guidance
§ Computer or mobile device brand
§ Social media
§ Financial aid
The following items will comprise your grade for this assignment:
1. Bibliography
a. You will need to cite at least six sources
b. Citations should follow the APA style guide
2. Outline
a. You should follow the sample outline found on Canvas
b. You should cite your sources in your outline as in-text citations
c. During your speech, you will be required to cite each of your sources out loud
3. Slides
a. You will be required to use a Google Slides, PowerPoint, or Prezi slideshow when presenting
b. Your slideshow should follow the six-by-six rule, which means there should be no more than six words per line, and no more than six lines of text per slide
2 / 2
c. Your slideshow should consist of 12 slides—one for the introduction, two for each main point, one for the conclusion, and four slides for any additional content you may present (e.g., pictures, embedded YouTube, or Vimeo video)
4. Presentation
a. You should sign up for a time slot; Mr. Mallary will send out a sign-up form later
b. Your presentation will be delivered live via Zoom during your scheduled time slot
c. Your speech should be six-to-eight minutes long. Speeches shorter than 5:30 or longer than 8:30 will be penalized per thirty seconds under or over.

I require assistance with a paper I am having difficulty with. I have over half of the paper written but am having difficulty with flow and organization. I have all required references and an approved thesis (this thesis MUST be used). I would like someone to review what i have written already and then continue with the rest of the paper as per the theories I have already suggested. Essentially the framework of the paper is done,I just need it all put together.

The paper must be written in APA 7th edition, 12 point Times New Roman font, double spaced. Minimum of 10 pages and maximum of 15 not including title page or references.

Marking scheme includes:
Introduction/definition of key terms
Issue review
Literature review/theoretical frameworks
analysis of discussion and theories including responses to questions 1-8 (can be found below)
Synthesis and Conclusion
Format. style, composition, and grammar.

Questions as per marking scheme:
1. describe why the behvior being considered deviant conforms or fails to conform to societal norms.
2. What is the societal norm or legitimate authority for regarding thsi person or group and their behavior as deviant.
3. Why do these peopel or groups engage in deviant behavior? Be sure to prodie a detailed analysis. If possible, provide alternative perspectives.
4. How do there deviatns view their behaviour? For example, do they regard their deviane as one-time aberration, or do they see it as a deviantcareer? Justify your answer.
5. Should the behaviur or the group under discussion even be defined as “deviant according to current norms and values in contemporary western society?
6. What impacts (both positive and negative does the deviant behavior have on society.
7. in what ways has society responded or reacted to deviant behavior?
8. What do thekey scholars in the subject area have to say about the topic? Tow hat extent do they agree? Provide an analysis of the deviant behavior from teh perspective of two of the sociological theories on deviance set out in the Study Guide and course readings.

In a well-written, concise paper, trace the process of CREATION, MAINTENANCE, and DECAY in ONE (1) of the following systems:

1) The US supported governments in Afghanistan.
2) The Byzantine Empire.
3) The Arbenz regime in Guatemala.
4) The French in Indochina (Vietnam).
5) The Mugabe regime in Zimbabwe.

It is important to note that I am not looking for an historical account of these systems, i.e., what happened and when. I am looking for an analysis of why. Of course it will be necessary to include historical facts in your analysis, but the focus should be on the process of creation, maintenance, and decay. The following questions can be used as a guide:

CREATION:
1) What were the old social facts that no longer worked?
2) Analyze and explain the human needs and why they weren’t being satisfied by the social facts.

MAINTENANCE:
1) What were the institutions (new social facts) that maintained the system?
2) Who controlled them?
3) How were they enforced?

DECAY:
1) Why did the regime decay? Analyze the institutions of maintenance and explain what led to their failure?
2) Analyze and explain the new human needs and why they weren’t being satisfied by the “new” social facts.
The paper should be typed, double spaced, and between 5-7 pages in length. There must be notes where appropriate, a bibliography, and a title page. Try not to fill your bibliography with the same type of source. For example, newspaper articles, weekly magazines such as Time, on-line encyclopedias, and the Internet are good for obtaining general background information, but should not be relied upon exclusively. Your main sources should be scholarly, in-depth analytic works.

Specific instructions are in the downloaded document
*Chose a project you would like to implement in healthcare delivery environment*.
Strict 7th edition APA style inside out .
APA 7th edition style writing
Double spaced
Word count 2500-2700.
Incite citation in 7th edition APA format
References and Title pages are not part of the word count.
Refereced journal articles must be 3-4 and cited in the discussion boby of the paper.
Plagiarism free-use trunit in to check it.

Discuss the similarities between your library’s online journal and database search engines and public search engines like Google™ Scholar or Web of Science™. Are there some journals or databases that you cannot find? What other resources are available? Would you consider the sources that you find through Google Scholar credible? Why and how can you tell?

Instructions:
For this assignment, you need to
craft an essay (2,000 words) on the relations between managerial control and
worker autonomy. The purpose of this paper is to explain why managers claim
control of the labour process, why workers may engage in collective action to
improve their incomes and working conditions, and how such collective action
might impact management strategies. To do this, you need a thesis statement
that allows you to decide which arguments from the readings you will use to
develop your own line of argument. You also need to ensure that your arguments
are in line with empirical findings presented in the readings. You are not
expected to do further research. But you can, if you like. If you do, make sure
to use scholarly sources and properly cite them. Also, use theories as a
conceptual framework around which you can organize empirical evidence. Theories
of bureaucracies, organizations, and managerial control and conflict. Look at
them first, see which ones suit the arguments you want to advance, and
construct your conceptual framework out of them before looking for the piece of
evidence you need to support your arguments.

The essay should answer the
following questions:
Why do managers claim control over the labour process?
Which forms of collective action might workers pursue
to improve their incomes and working conditions?
Does workers’ collective action challenge managerial
control? What can managers do to regain control?