Sternsberg intelligence theory

The purpose of this week’s assignment is to give you an opportunity to explain Sternberg’s theory of intelligence and understand how each type is measured.

Sternberg is associated with the idea that successful intelligence involved incorporating the components of analytical, creative, and practical intelligences. His ideas were revolutionary because he insisted that there could be more than one kind of intelligence. Moreover, he theorized that there were varied ways of measuring intelligence and criticized standardized intelligence testing of his day. For any of us that have been characterized as “book smart” or “street smart”, learning about intelligence theory helps us understand how there might be different ways of seeing the world around us.

Create a three to five minute screencast that identifies Sternberg’s theory of the three different types of intelligence. Give an example of each type of intelligence and explain how they are measured.

Be sure to practice your presentation before hand! Often writing out a script will help keep you on track and ensure you stay within the time limits.
Creating a screencast is a multi-step process. After you write out a script, you will need to create a presentation using PowerPoint or Google Slides. You can use appropriate images or writing in your presentation. Next, you’ll record yourself reading the script over the slides. This is called screencasting. You may create this screencast using any available technology (such as Screencast-O-Matic, Active Presenter, Apowersoft). As an ACU student, you also have access to Adobe Creative Cloud products; you can use Adobe Spark if you prefer. You can find a tutorial from ACU’s Digital Learning Studio on using Adobe Spark HERE. Your final screencast should be in either .mp4 or .mpg format.
Here’s a short video one of ACU’s professors made on creating screencasts. This was initially used in a course called CORE 115, hence the title, but it is a great resource for us, too!
Screencasting: How to create a screencast <3:00 minutes>

Be sure to review the rubric to understand how your instructor will grade this submission.

Gordon Rule Paper 1: Mash-ups

Instructions:
Write an Argumentative Essay.
TOPIC: Is it OK for a pop artist to make a mash-up, a combination of two or more pre-recorded songs into a new recording, take another artist’s music, change it, and call it his/her own? What are the pros and cons of this type of music-making? Is it fair to everyone? Explain why or why not. This information must be contained in your thesis statement. Remember to begin with your thesis statement and purpose and end with a summary that restates your opening statement, using different words.
Your paper should be three (3) full pages in length (approximately 280 words per page), double-spaced, written in 12 pt font, and must conform to MLA guidelines. Do not use extra spaces between paragraphs.
Use at least three different sources. Cite them in the paper as endnotes and provide a fourth page that contains only the Works Cited (the sources you used for your paper).
Remember to use your own words–paraphrase all work and cite all sources. Your work will run through SafeAssign to check for plagiarism.
Type your paper into a Microsoft Word document, save the file and then upload the file.

Discussion psychology

In Reading #3 and the Lecture Notes, you learned about the different Theoretical Viewpoints on The Etiology of Mental Illness (e.g., Psychoanalytic, Behavioral, Cognitive, etc.). Which viewpoint do you think best explains the development of mental disorders? Post your response to the discussion board. Please make sure that you respond to at least one other classmate’s post. Always be polite and respectful when responding to another classmate’s post.

lecture

The history of mental illness can be traced as far back as 1500 BCE, when the ancient Egyptians noted cases of “distorted concentration” and “emotional distress in the heart or mind” (Nasser, 1987). Today, nearly half of all Americans will experience mental illness at some point in their lives, and mental health problems affect more than one-quarter of the population in any given year (Kessler et al., 2005). Fortunately, a range of psychotherapies exist to treat mental illnesses. This module provides an overview of some of the best-known schools of thought in psychotherapy. Currently, the most effective approach is called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT); however, other approaches, such as psychoanalytic therapy, person-centered therapy, and mindfulness-based therapies are also used—though the effectiveness of these treatments aren’t as clear as they are for CBT. Throughout this module, note the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, paying special attention to their support by empirical research.

A therapist sits across from a patient in a counseling session.
CBT is an approach to treating mental illness that involves work with a therapist as well as homework assignments between sessions. It has proven to be very effective for virtually all psychiatric illnesses. [Image: DFAT, https://goo.gl/bWmzaa, CC BY 2.0, https://goo.gl/BRvSA7]
Psychoanalysis and Psychodynamic Therapy

The earliest organized therapy for mental disorders was psychoanalysis. Made famous in the early 20th century by one of the best-known clinicians of all time, Sigmund Freud, this approach stresses that mental health problems are rooted in unconscious conflicts and desires. In order to resolve the mental illness, then, these unconscious struggles must be identified and addressed. Psychoanalysis often does this through exploring one’s early childhood experiences that may have continuing repercussions on one’s mental health in the present and later in life. Psychoanalysis is an intensive, long-term approach in which patients and therapists may meet multiple times per week, often for many years.

History of Psychoanalytic Therapy

Freud initially suggested that mental health problems arise from efforts to push inappropriate sexual urges out of conscious awareness (Freud, 1895/1955). Later, Freud suggested more generally that psychiatric problems are the result of tension between different parts of the mind: the id, the superego, and the ego. In Freud’s structural model, the id represents pleasure-driven unconscious urges (e.g., our animalistic desires for sex and aggression), while the superego is the semi-conscious part of the mind where morals and societal judgment are internalized (e.g., the part of you that automatically knows how society expects you to behave). The ego—also partly conscious—mediates between the id and superego. Freud believed that bringing unconscious struggles like these (where the id demands one thing and the superego another) into conscious awareness would relieve the stress of the conflict (Freud, 1920/1955)—which became the goal of psychoanalytic therapy.

Although psychoanalysis is still practiced today, it has largely been replaced by the more broadly defined psychodynamic therapy. This latter approach has the same basic tenets as psychoanalysis, but is briefer, makes more of an effort to put clients in their social and interpersonal context, and focuses more on relieving psychological distress than on changing the person.

Techniques in Psychoanalysis

Sigmund Freud
Building on the work of Josef Breuer and others, Sigmund Freud developed psychotherapeutic theories and techniques that became widely known as psychoanalysis or psychoanalytic therapy. [Image: CC0 Public Domain, https://goo.gl/m25gce]
Psychoanalysts and psychodynamic therapists employ several techniques to explore patients’ unconscious mind. One common technique is called free association. Here, the patient shares any and all thoughts that come to mind, without attempting to organize or censor them in any way. For example, if you took a pen and paper and just wrote down whatever came into your head, letting one thought lead to the next without allowing conscious criticism to shape what you were writing, you would be doing free association. The analyst then uses his or her expertise to discern patterns or underlying meaning in the patient’s thoughts.

Sometimes, free association exercises are applied specifically to childhood recollections. That is, psychoanalysts believe a person’s childhood relationships with caregivers often determine the way that person relates to others, and predicts later psychiatric difficulties. Thus, exploring these childhood memories, through free association or otherwise, can provide therapists with insights into a patient’s psychological makeup.

Because we don’t always have the ability to consciously recall these deep memories, psychoanalysts also discuss their patients’ dreams. In Freudian theory, dreams contain not only manifest (or literal) content, but also latent (or symbolic) content (Freud, 1900; 1955). For example, someone may have a dream that his/her teeth are falling out—the manifest or actual content of the dream. However, dreaming that one’s teeth are falling out could be a reflection of the person’s unconscious concern about losing his or her physical attractiveness—the latent or metaphorical content of the dream. It is the therapist’s job to help discover the latent content underlying one’s manifest content through dream analysis.

In psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy, the therapist plays a receptive role—interpreting the patient’s thoughts and behavior based on clinical experience and psychoanalytic theory. For example, if during therapy a patient begins to express unjustified anger toward the therapist, the therapist may recognize this as an act of transference. That is, the patient may be displacing feelings for people in his or her life (e.g., anger toward a parent) onto the therapist. At the same time, though, the therapist has to be aware of his or her own thoughts and emotions, for, in a related process, called countertransference, the therapist may displace his/her own emotions onto the patient.

The key to psychoanalytic theory is to have patients uncover the buried, conflicting content of their mind, and therapists use various tactics—such as seating patients to face away from them—to promote a freer self-disclosure. And, as a therapist spends more time with a patient, the therapist can come to view his or her relationship with the patient as another reflection of the patient’s mind.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Psychoanalytic Therapy

Psychoanalysis was once the only type of psychotherapy available, but presently the number of therapists practicing this approach is decreasing around the world. Psychoanalysis is not appropriate for some types of patients, including those with severe psychopathology or intellectual disability. Further, psychoanalysis is often expensive because treatment usually lasts many years. Still, some patients and therapists find the prolonged and detailed analysis very rewarding.

Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of psychoanalysis and related approaches is the lack of empirical support for their effectiveness. The limited research that has been conducted on these treatments suggests that they do not reliably lead to better mental health outcomes (e.g., Driessen et al., 2010). And, although there are some reviews that seem to indicate that long-term psychodynamic therapies might be beneficial (e.g., Leichsenring & Rabung, 2008), other researchers have questioned the validity of these reviews. Nevertheless, psychoanalytic theory was history’s first attempt at formal treatment of mental illness, setting the stage for the more modern approaches used today.

Humanistic and Person-Centered Therapy

One of the next developments in therapy for mental illness, which arrived in the mid-20th century, is called humanistic or person-centered therapy (PCT). Here, the belief is that mental health problems result from an inconsistency between patients’ behavior and their true personal identity. Thus, the goal of PCT is to create conditions under which patients can discover their self-worth, feel comfortable exploring their own identity, and alter their behavior to better reflect this identity.

History of Person-Centered Therapy

A therapist and patient sit facing one another during a session.
The quality of the relationship between therapist and patient is of great importance in person-centered therapy. [Image: CC0 Public Domain, https://goo.gl/m25gce]
PCT was developed by a psychologist named Carl Rogers, during a time of significant growth in the movements of humanistic theory and human potential. These perspectives were based on the idea that humans have an inherent drive to realize and express their own capabilities and creativity. Rogers, in particular, believed that all people have the potential to change and improve, and that the role of therapists is to foster self-understanding in an environment where adaptive change is most likely to occur (Rogers, 1951). Rogers suggested that the therapist and patient must engage in a genuine, egalitarian relationship in which the therapist is nonjudgmental and empathetic. In PCT, the patient should experience both a vulnerability to anxiety, which motivates the desire to change, and an appreciation for the therapist’s support.

Techniques in Person-Centered Therapy

Humanistic and person-centered therapy, like psychoanalysis, involves a largely unstructured conversation between the therapist and the patient. Unlike psychoanalysis, though, a therapist using PCT takes a passive role, guiding the patient toward his or her own self-discovery. Rogers’s original name for PCT was non-directive therapy, and this notion is reflected in the flexibility found in PCT. Therapists do not try to change patients’ thoughts or behaviors directly. Rather, their role is to provide the therapeutic relationship as a platform for personal growth. In these kinds of sessions, the therapist tends only to ask questions and doesn’t provide any judgment or interpretation of what the patient says. Instead, the therapist is present to provide a safe and encouraging environment for the person to explore these issues for him- or herself.

An important aspect of the PCT relationship is the therapist’s unconditional positive regard for the patient’s feelings and behaviors. That is, the therapist is never to condemn or criticize the patient for what s/he has done or thought; the therapist is only to express warmth and empathy. This creates an environment free of approval or disapproval, where patients come to appreciate their value and to behave in ways that are congruent with their own identity.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Person-Centered Therapy

One key advantage of person-centered therapy is that it is highly acceptable to patients. In other words, people tend to find the supportive, flexible environment of this approach very rewarding. Furthermore, some of the themes of PCT translate well to other therapeutic approaches. For example, most therapists of any orientation find that clients respond well to being treated with nonjudgmental empathy. The main disadvantage to PCT, however, is that findings about its effectiveness are mixed. One possibility for this could be that the treatment is primarily based on unspecific treatment factors. That is, rather than using therapeutic techniques that are specific to the patient and the mental problem (i.e., specific treatment factors), the therapy focuses on techniques that can be applied to anyone (e.g., establishing a good relationship with the patient) (Cuijpers et al., 2012; Friedli, King, Lloyd, & Horder, 1997). Similar to how “one-size-fits-all” doesn’t really fit every person, PCT uses the same practices for everyone, which may work for some people but not others. Further research is necessary to evaluate its utility as a therapeutic approach.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Although both psychoanalysis and PCT are still used today, another therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), has gained more widespread support and practice. CBT refers to a family of therapeutic approaches whose goal is to alleviate psychological symptoms by changing their underlying cognitions and behaviors. The premise of CBT is that thoughts, behaviors, and emotions interact and contribute to various mental disorders. For example, let’s consider how a CBT therapist would view a patient who compulsively washes her hands for hours every day. First, the therapist would identify the patient’s maladaptive thought: “If I don’t wash my hands like this, I will get a disease and die.” The therapist then identifies how this maladaptive thought leads to a maladaptive emotion: the feeling of anxiety when her hands aren’t being washed. And finally, this maladaptive emotion leads to the maladaptive behavior: the patient washing her hands for hours every day.

CBT is a present-focused therapy (i.e., focused on the “now” rather than causes from the past, such as childhood relationships) that uses behavioral goals to improve one’s mental illness. Often, these behavioral goals involve between-session homework assignments. For example, the therapist may give the hand-washing patient a worksheet to take home; on this worksheet, the woman is to write down every time she feels the urge to wash her hands, how she deals with the urge, and what behavior she replaces that urge with. When the patient has her next therapy session, she and the therapist review her “homework” together. CBT is a relatively brief intervention of 12 to 16 weekly sessions, closely tailored to the nature of the psychopathology and treatment of the specific mental disorder. And, as the empirical data shows, CBT has proven to be highly efficacious for virtually all psychiatric illnesses (Hofmann, Asnaani, Vonk, Sawyer, & Fang, 2012).

Thoughts create feelings; feelings create behaviors; behaviors reinforce thoughts.
Pattern of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors addressed through cognitive-behavioral therapy.
History of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

CBT developed from clinical work conducted in the mid-20th century by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, a psychiatrist, and Albert Ellis, a psychologist. Beck used the term automatic thoughts to refer to the thoughts depressed patients report experiencing spontaneously. He observed that these thoughts arise from three belief systems, or schemas: beliefs about the self, beliefs about the world, and beliefs about the future. In treatment, therapy initially focuses on identifying automatic thoughts (e.g., “If I don’t wash my hands constantly, I’ll get a disease”), testing their validity, and replacing maladaptive thoughts with more adaptive thoughts (e.g., “Washing my hands three times a day is sufficient to prevent a disease”). In later stages of treatment, the patient’s maladaptive schemas are examined and modified. Ellis (1957) took a comparable approach, in what he called rational-emotive-behavioral therapy (REBT), which also encourages patients to evaluate their own thoughts about situations.

Techniques in CBT

Beck and Ellis strove to help patients identify maladaptive appraisals, or the untrue judgments and evaluations of certain thoughts. For example, if it’s your first time meeting new people, you may have the automatic thought, “These people won’t like me because I have nothing interesting to share.” That thought itself is not what’s troublesome; the appraisal (or evaluation) that it might have merit is what’s troublesome. The goal of CBT is to help people make adaptive, instead of maladaptive, appraisals (e.g., “I do know interesting things!”). This technique of reappraisal, or cognitive restructuring, is a fundamental aspect of CBT. With cognitive restructuring, it is the therapist’s job to help point out when a person has an inaccurate or maladaptive thought, so that the patient can either eliminate it or modify it to be more adaptive.

In addition to thoughts, though, another important treatment target of CBT is maladaptive behavior. Every time a person engages in maladaptive behavior (e.g., never speaking to someone in new situations), he or she reinforces the validity of the maladaptive thought, thus maintaining or perpetuating the psychological illness. In treatment, the therapist and patient work together to develop healthy behavioral habits (often tracked with worksheet-like homework), so that the patient can break this cycle of maladaptive thoughts and behaviors.

For many mental health problems, especially anxiety disorders, CBT incorporates what is known as exposure therapy. During exposure therapy, a patient confronts a problematic situation and fully engages in the experience instead of avoiding it. For example, imagine a man who is terrified of spiders. Whenever he encounters one, he immediately screams and panics. In exposure therapy, the man would be forced to confront and interact with spiders, rather than simply avoiding them as he usually does. The goal is to reduce the fear associated with the situation through extinction learning, a neurobiological and cognitive process by which the patient “unlearns” the irrational fear. For example, exposure therapy for someone terrified of spiders might begin with him looking at a cartoon of a spider, followed by him looking at pictures of real spiders, and later, him handling a plastic spider. After weeks of this incremental exposure, the patient may even be able to hold a live spider. After repeated exposure (starting small and building one’s way up), the patient experiences less physiological fear and maladaptive thoughts about spiders, breaking his tendency for anxiety and subsequent avoidance.

Advantages and Disadvantages of CBT

CBT interventions tend to be relatively brief, making them cost-effective for the average consumer. In addition, CBT is an intuitive treatment that makes logical sense to patients. It can also be adapted to suit the needs of many different populations. One disadvantage, however, is that CBT does involve significant effort on the patient’s part, because the patient is an active participant in treatment. Therapists often assign “homework” (e.g., worksheets for recording one’s thoughts and behaviors) between sessions to maintain the cognitive and behavioral habits the patient is working on. The greatest strength of CBT is the abundance of empirical support for its effectiveness. Studies have consistently found CBT to be equally or more effective than other forms of treatment, including medication and other therapies (Butler, Chapman, Forman, & Beck, 2006; Hofmann et al., 2012). For this reason, CBT is considered a first-line treatment for many mental disorders.

Focus Topic: Pioneers of CBT
The central notion of CBT is the idea that a person’s behavioral and emotional responses are causally influenced by one’s thinking. The stoic Greek philosopher Epictetus is quoted as saying, “men are not moved by things, but by the view they take of them.” Meaning, it is not the event per se, but rather one’s assumptions (including interpretations and perceptions) of the event that are responsible for one’s emotional response to it. Beck calls these assumptions about events and situations automatic thoughts (Beck, 1979), whereas Ellis (1962) refers to these assumptions as self-statements. The cognitive model assumes that these cognitive processes cause the emotional and behavioral responses to events or stimuli. This causal chain is illustrated in Ellis’s ABC model, in which A stands for the antecedent event, B stands for belief, and C stands for consequence. During CBT, the person is encouraged to carefully observe the sequence of events and the response to them, and then explore the validity of the underlying beliefs through behavioral experiments and reasoning, much like a detective or scientist.
Acceptance and Mindfulness-Based Approaches

Unlike the preceding therapies, which were developed in the 20th century, this next one was born out of age-old Buddhist and yoga practices. Mindfulness, or a process that tries to cultivate a nonjudgmental, yet attentive, mental state, is a therapy that focuses on one’s awareness of bodily sensations, thoughts, and the outside environment. Whereas other therapies work to modify or eliminate these sensations and thoughts, mindfulness focuses on nonjudgmentally accepting them (Kabat-Zinn, 2003; Baer, 2003). For example, whereas CBT may actively confront and work to change a maladaptive thought, mindfulness therapy works to acknowledge and accept the thought, understanding that the thought is spontaneous and not what the person truly believes. There are two important components of mindfulness: (1) self-regulation of attention, and (2) orientation toward the present moment (Bishop et al., 2004). Mindfulness is thought to improve mental health because it draws attention away from past and future stressors, encourages acceptance of troubling thoughts and feelings, and promotes physical relaxation.

Techniques in Mindfulness-Based Therapy

Psychologists have adapted the practice of mindfulness as a form of psychotherapy, generally called mindfulness-based therapy (MBT). Several types of MBT have become popular in recent years, including mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) (e.g., Kabat-Zinn, 1982) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (e.g., Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2002).

A young man meditates on a bench in a train station.
One of the most important advantages of mindfulness based therapy is its level of accessibility to patients. [Image: Wayne MacPhail, https://goo.gl/aSZanf, CC BY-NC SA 2.0, https://goo.gl/Toc0ZF]
MBSR uses meditation, yoga, and attention to physical experiences to reduce stress. The hope is that reducing a person’s overall stress will allow that person to more objectively evaluate his or her thoughts. In MBCT, rather than reducing one’s general stress to address a specific problem, attention is focused on one’s thoughts and their associated emotions. For example, MBCT helps prevent relapses in depression by encouraging patients to evaluate their own thoughts objectively and without value judgment (Baer, 2003). Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may seem similar to this, it focuses on “pushing out” the maladaptive thought, whereas mindfulness-based cognitive therapy focuses on “not getting caught up” in it. The treatments used in MBCT have been used to address a wide range of illnesses, including depression, anxiety, chronic pain, coronary artery disease, and fibromyalgia (Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt & Oh, 2010).

Mindfulness and acceptance—in addition to being therapies in their own right—have also been used as “tools” in other cognitive-behavioral therapies, particularly in dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) (e.g., Linehan, Amstrong, Suarez, Allmon, & Heard, 1991). DBT, often used in the treatment of borderline personality disorder, focuses on skills training. That is, it often employs mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy practices, but it also works to teach its patients “skills” they can use to correct maladaptive tendencies. For example, one skill DBT teaches patients is called distress tolerance—or, ways to cope with maladaptive thoughts and emotions in the moment. For example, people who feel an urge to cut themselves may be taught to snap their arm with a rubber band instead. The primary difference between DBT and CBT is that DBT employs techniques that address the symptoms of the problem (e.g., cutting oneself) rather than the problem itself (e.g., understanding the psychological motivation to cut oneself). CBT does not teach such skills training because of the concern that the skills—even though they may help in the short-term—may be harmful in the long-term, by maintaining maladaptive thoughts and behaviors.

DBT is founded on the perspective of a dialectical worldview. That is, rather than thinking of the world as “black and white,” or “only good and only bad,” it focuses on accepting that some things can have characteristics of both “good” and “bad.” So, in a case involving maladaptive thoughts, instead of teaching that a thought is entirely bad, DBT tries to help patients be less judgmental of their thoughts (as with mindfulness-based therapy) and encourages change through therapeutic progress, using cognitive-behavioral techniques as well as mindfulness exercises.

Another form of treatment that also uses mindfulness techniques is acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). In this treatment, patients are taught to observe their thoughts from a detached perspective (Hayes et al., 1999). ACT encourages patients not to attempt to change or avoid thoughts and emotions they observe in themselves, but to recognize which are beneficial and which are harmful. However, the differences among ACT, CBT, and other mindfulness-based treatments are a topic of controversy in the current literature.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mindfulness-Based Therapy

Two key advantages of mindfulness-based therapies are their acceptability and accessibility to patients. Because yoga and meditation are already widely known in popular culture, consumers of mental healthcare are often interested in trying related psychological therapies. Currently, psychologists have not come to a consensus on the efficacy of MBT, though growing evidence supports its effectiveness for treating mood and anxiety disorders. For example, one review of MBT studies for anxiety and depression found that mindfulness-based interventions generally led to moderate symptom improvement (Hofmann et al., 2010).

Emerging Treatment Strategies

A therapist conducting an online session with a patient using video software.
Recent improvements in video chat technology along with the proliferation of mobile devices like smartphones and tablets has made online delivery of therapy more commonplace. [Image: Noba, CC BY 2.0, https://goo.gl/BRvSA7]
With growth in research and technology, psychologists have been able to develop new treatment strategies in recent years. Often, these approaches focus on enhancing existing treatments, such as cognitive-behavioral therapies, through the use of technological advances. For example, internet- and mobile-delivered therapies make psychological treatments more available, through smartphones and online access. Clinician-supervised online CBT modules allow patients to access treatment from home on their own schedule—an opportunity particularly important for patients with less geographic or socioeconomic access to traditional treatments. Furthermore, smartphones help extend therapy to patients’ daily lives, allowing for symptom tracking, homework reminders, and more frequent therapist contact.

Another benefit of technology is cognitive bias modification. Here, patients are given exercises, often through the use of video games, aimed at changing their problematic thought processes. For example, researchers might use a mobile app to train alcohol abusers to avoid stimuli related to alcohol. One version of this game flashes four pictures on the screen—three alcohol cues (e.g., a can of beer, the front of a bar) and one health-related image (e.g., someone drinking water). The goal is for the patient to tap the healthy picture as fast as s/he can. Games like these aim to target patients’ automatic, subconscious thoughts that may be difficult to direct through conscious effort. That is, by repeatedly tapping the healthy image, the patient learns to “ignore” the alcohol cues, so when those cues are encountered in the environment, they will be less likely to trigger the urge to drink. Approaches like these are promising because of their accessibility, however they require further research to establish their effectiveness.

Yet another emerging treatment employs CBT-enhancing pharmaceutical agents. These are drugs used to improve the effects of therapeutic interventions. Based on research from animal experiments, researchers have found that certain drugs influence the biological processes known to be involved in learning. Thus, if people take these drugs while going through psychotherapy, they are better able to “learn” the techniques for improvement. For example, the antibiotic d-cycloserine improves treatment for anxiety disorders by facilitating the learning processes that occur during exposure therapy. Ongoing research in this exciting area may prove to be quite fruitful.

Pharmacological Treatments

Up until this point, all the therapies we have discussed have been talk-based or meditative practices. However, psychiatric medications are also frequently used to treat mental disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and anxiety disorders. Psychiatric drugs are commonly used, in part, because they can be prescribed by general medical practitioners, whereas only trained psychologists are qualified to deliver effective psychotherapy. While drugs and CBT therapies tend to be almost equally effective, choosing the best intervention depends on the disorder and individual being treated, as well as other factors—such as treatment availability and comorbidity (i.e., having multiple mental or physical disorders at once). Although many new drugs have been introduced in recent decades, there is still much we do not understand about their mechanism in the brain. Further research is needed to refine our understanding of both pharmacological and behavioral treatments before we can make firm claims about their effectiveness.

Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy

In discussing therapeutic orientations, it is important to note that some clinicians incorporate techniques from multiple approaches, a practice known as integrative or eclectic psychotherapy. For example, a therapist may employ distress tolerance skills from DBT (to resolve short-term problems), cognitive reappraisal from CBT (to address long-standing issues), and mindfulness-based meditation from MBCT (to reduce overall stress). And, in fact, between 13% and 42% of therapists have identified their own approaches as integrative or eclectic (Norcross & Goldfried, 2005).

Conclusion

Throughout human history we have had to deal with mental illness in one form or another. Over time, several schools of thought have emerged for treating these problems. Although various therapies have been shown to work for specific individuals, cognitive behavioral therapy is currently the treatment most widely supported by empirical research. Still, practices like psychodynamic therapies, person-centered therapy, mindfulness-based treatments, and acceptance and commitment therapy have also shown success. And, with recent advances in research and technology, clinicians are able to enhance these and other therapies to treat more patients more effectively than ever before. However, what is important in the end is that people actually seek out mental health specialists to help them with their problems. One of the biggest deterrents to doing so is that people don’t understand what psychotherapy really entails. Through understanding how current practices work, not only can we better educate people about how to get the help they need, but we can continue to advance our treatments to be more effective in the future.

Outside Resources

After completing the reading and watching the documentary, what are your overall thoughts about policing in America? Have they changed, or remained the same? Explain

You have viewed a number of materials that demonstrate some of the problems in policing in America, and that argue the police also have a difficult job. For this discussion, please respond to the following questions, and use the materials to support your argument.

1) After completing the reading and watching the documentary, what are your overall thoughts about policing in America? Have they changed, or remained the same? Explain
2) What do we need to do to make policing an institution that can be trusted in the eyes of all Americans? Policies? Practices?

Lively Discussion

You are responsible for participating in Lively Conversation before midnight on the due dates. Your first posts will each respond to the readings and should be at least 250 words apiece (that’s 2 substantial paragraphs; more is fine, less is not). Please write your post in paragraph form, using at least two separate paragraphs. You have some options for what to post each time:
Analyze the key ideas of the day’s readings, then respond to them with your own thoughts. If there is only one reading or video, then obviously you’ll respond to that one. If there are two or more readings/videos, please respond to at least two.
Analyze the key ideas of at least two of the day’s readings, and connect them to examples from popular culture, an example from another class, and/or a personal experience of your own.
Compare two or more of the day’s readings with each other. What cuts across them? Where do they differ?
No matter which option you choose, please be sure to use 3 to 5 direct quotes from the reading(s) in each post, and be sure to cite all direct quotes by putting the author’s name and page number in parentheses, like this: (Smith 24). You might also consider ending each post with a question for your classmates (this will help get you talking to each other).
In your second post, instead of writing about readings, you will respond thoughtfully to at least three of your classmates’ posts; your replies should be at least 100 words apiece (that’s about 1 substantial paragraph). In your responses to classmates, you may agree, disagree, take their argument further, share a related quote, and/or say what you might add to their ideas. Please say something more than “good job!” Responses to classmates are key to your score each week, so don’t forget them!
You may post Lively Conversations anytime during the week before each due date, but late posts will not be accepted unless you get an extension from me in advance.
Lively Conversation will be graded based on completion (did you complete the assignment goals, fulfill the minimum word limit, use 3 to 5 direct quotes from the readings, cite all sources, and post on time?), thoughtfulness of your posts, understanding of the readings, thoughtfulness of your responses to classmates, and the clarity of your writing. They will not be graded based on whether I personally agree with your opinion.
I encourage you to use these conversations to explore ideas, seek to understand something about the readings, make connections to your own experiences, and extend the authors’ argument to different contexts. Your posts should avoid plain-old “ranting” (e.g., going off on a tangent about the issue without engaging with the reading’s argument and perspective, or angrily rejecting a reading’s ideas out of hand without logical support).

https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/786655684809274/

Side Panel Expand side panel Week 5 – Assignment: Critique Situational, Path-Goal, Transformational, and Adaptive Leadership Approaches

This week, you will prepare a narrated presentation using the audio/video capturing tool located in NCUOne. To access the capture tool, follow the tutorial found in this week’s resources.

Analyzing situational, path-goal, transformational, and adaptive leadership approaches can help you understand how to improve your leadership style. Assume you have completed relevant professional development and must report your findings to your leader and colleagues. Prepare a narrated presentation to address the following:

*Briefly explain each of these four leadership approaches in the context of PSEL standards reviewed earlier in this course.
*Assess the strengths or benefits and potential weaknesses or limitations of each of these four leadership approaches. Use examples from your experiences to highlight your thoughts.
*Describe the characteristics of a successful transformational leader you have experienced.
*Predict how you will effectively apply these four leadership approaches within an educational setting of interest.

Length: 5 to 7-minute narrated presentation with a minimum of 12 slides, not including title and reference slides. You may include your transcript in the Notes section of each slide or submit it as a separate Word file.

References: Include a minimum of 5 scholarly resources.

The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

Art appreciation. Analyzing an artwork

I choose an artwork to analyze from the Nc state museum website and there are some instructions from the professor. I will attach the artwork and details about it .

INSTRUCATIONS
The components for this Paper are:
· Identification of Artwork
· Introduction
· Visual Analysis (the bulk of the paper)
· Concluding Paragraph stating why you dislike this work
· Include a picture of your artwork at the end of your paper with a caption (artist, title, date)
The paper should be approximately 2 – 3 full pages of text, without the heading or image.
Identification:
Begin by identifying the work using the following format*:
[artist] Vincent van Gogh
[italicized title, date] Starry Night, 1889
[medium] Oil on Canvas
Or
[culture for those without known artists] Egyptian
[basic description of the object for those without titles, date] Jar, black-topped ware, ca. 4000 – 3500 BCE
[medium] Nile silt clay
*Bracketed text is not to be included in the paper; it is only for your reference.
*Note that the identification is single-spaced. It should be placed above the text of your paper
EXAMPLE:
Vincent Van Gogh
Starry Night, 1889
Oil on Canvas
This painting stood out to me the moment I walked into the museum because of its bright colors and swirling lines. The painting depicts a nighttime scene in which large stars and a moon glow above a small village. There is a large cypress tree in the left foreground, and a mountain in the right background. In the valley between these two elements is a cluster of homes. Above everything is a night sky that is filled with blue, yellow, and white colors. Although the painting is quite beautiful, it also made me feel extremely depressed and anxious due to the disorienting motion of the stars, and the menacing darkness of the navy-blue sky.
Introduction:
Tell the reader why you chose the work of art that you selected. You also might want to give your reader a brief overview of the work. Again, see my simple example above.
Visual Analysis:
The body of your paper will be a thorough visual analysis of your chosen work of art. Keep this portion of the paper objective and without your personal opinion. Your feelings on the artwork will come through naturally as you analyze it and with your word choices but avoid explicitly discussing your reactions or feelings until the conclusion. One easy way to do this is to not use personal pronouns in this section (I, me, you, etc.)
As with the introductory paragraph, the body should be double-spaced, 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Always indent the first sentence of a new paragraph.
In your visual analysis, consider all the relevant elements and principles that apply to this work of art. Some things to think about:
· How are the elements arranged within the composition?
· Are there implied lines used to guide the eye?
· Are the lines, shapes, or forms primarily organic or inorganic?
· Is there symmetry or asymmetry?
· Is the work balanced? Why or why not?
· Is the work representational or nonrepresentational? Are there human figures, identifiable objects, or landscape?
· What is the iconography? Is it a narrative? A particular human figure or figures?
· What elements are naturalistic and what elements are abstract? If abstraction is used, it is expressive in its purpose?
· How is color used in this work? Are there warm or cool colors, analogous or complementary color schemes?
· If this is a two-dimensional object, has the artist attempted to create an illusion of three-dimensional space? What techniques has the artist used to achieve that goal?
· If this is a three-dimensional object, what is its volume and mass? Is there open or closed volume?
· What is the real or implied texture in this object?
· Can you identify one or more areas of emphasis? One or more focal points? What creates those?
· What is the medium / material of this object? How does that material influence its visual qualities?
Of course, you will not cover all these topics. If you are writing about a marble sculpture, for instance, there is little need to dwell on color. This list is not meant to be comprehensive, but rather to get your wheels turning. It’s better to cover an element or aspect in depth, supported with quality details and visual evidence than to cover lots briefly.
I suggest making the body of your paper (the visual analysis) into several paragraphs. Do not try to write the entire body as one paragraph, as this will leave your reader feeling overwhelmed and, likely, confused. I recommend writing separate paragraphs about each element or group of related elements (color and value, etc.). Make sure you support your points of analysis with specific visual evidence (details) from the artwork. You also want to be sure that you analyze the artwork, don’t just describe it. What about the color bothers or excites you, for example, what is the effect it has on you? Where does the line make you look, etc.
Conclusion:
At the end of your paper, please include a concluding paragraph that tells the reader specifically why you like or dislike this object.
*Note: This is not a research paper. You should be able to write all the paper based on your own visual observations. However, if you do use any exterior sources, those must be properly documented with in-text citations, and a works cited page at the end of the paper. Lifting any words or ideas from another author (even the wall label at the museum!) is plagiarism and will result in either a “0” grade for the paper, or in certain cases, a failing grade for the course.
Include a good picture of your artwork at the end of the paper and caption it (artist, title, date, etc.).
Grading Criteria:
Your paper will be graded based on the rubric below.
Incompetent: 0 – 69%
1. Identification: Work of art was not labeled or was incorrectly labeled
2. Introduction: Work of art was not introduced, there was no overview of the object or reason given as to why it was selected
3. Visual Analysis: The visual analysis was too brief, incorrect, or irrelevant. At least three important visual aspects of the work were insufficiently or inappropriately explored
4. Conclusion: Author did not share any personal insights, or did so in a manner that was not professional
5. Grammar & Completeness: The paper was overly short and missing the image and caption. There were numerous grammatical mistakes which made the paper difficult to follow.
Competent: 70 – 89%
1. Identification: Work of art was labeled, though the label may have been incomplete or incorrectly formatted
2. Introduction: Work of art was introduced, including a basic overview of the object and reason given as to why it was selected
3. Visual Analysis: The visual analysis was basic but coherent. It may have been incorrect or irrelevant in some respects, or it may have been too brief. No more than two important visual aspects of the work were insufficiently or inappropriately explored
4. Conclusion: Author shared at least one personal thought, though this may have been in a less than professional manner
5. Grammar & Completeness: The paper was somewhat short or was missing the image and caption. Some grammar mistakes, but the paper is comprehensible.
Proficient: 90 – 100%
1. Identification: Work of art was correctly labeled; the information was complete and was correctly formatted based on the sample provided in the prompt.
2. Introduction: Work of art was introduced in an engaging way. An overview of the object was succinct and thorough. The author gave a compelling explanation as to why he or she selected this object.
3. Visual Analysis: The visual analysis was thorough and coherent. All important visual aspects of the work were sufficiently and appropriately explored.
4. Conclusion: Author shared one or more personal opinions, in a professional manner, and in a way that suggested he / she had carefully thought about the object.
5. Grammar & Completeness: The paper was at least 2 full pages of text without the heading or picture. The picture is included with complete caption (title, artist, date, etc.). Few grammar mistakes; overall, well written.
Tips:
· Make sure you’ve considered all the elements and principles (the list of guiding questions on page 3 helps)
· Look over the prompt and grading rubric to help you ensure you have all of the points and components.
· Leave yourself time to edit! Read the paper aloud to a friend or family member. Reading your writing aloud forces a different part of your brain to engage with your writing and allows you to catch errors or awkward spots much more easily.

Discussion Human Service

Part 1 – 325 word count – 2 References

Discuss the purposes of conducting formative and process evaluations in human services and what information you can expect to find as a result.

Part 2 – 350 word count – 2 references

Can you think of an example when you might have had a negative assumption, attitude, or stereotype of a coworker or peer because they appeared to be different from you? Do you still feel that way today? If not, what changed?

View the scoring rubric. When writing your response, include the source(s) of that were used. You can demonstrate this by citing all sources and listing them as reference per APA formatting guidelines (7th Edition). In addition, discuss a specific Saint Leo Core Value or NOHS Ethical Standard and how it relates to the topic. [Note: Don’t forget to cite at a minimum the text as well as the SLU or NOHS websites.]

CALCULATING CAPM AND WACC FOR A REAL FIRM

Need a paragraph for 3 different discussion post…need a resource for each…will be posting 3 different days…3 seperate post…each file should be answered in paragraph form. however not as one entire paper. below Ill copy and paste the links choose one for one of the discussion
TUESDAY This is a great beginning to the discussion this week.. As promised, here are some videos covering some of the concepts/calculations from this week:

The first is a short video about the CAPM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDz_DgDJD5g;

The second has to do with the assumptions underlying the CAPM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvhu1w0gsvc.

Please watch and share what you think may be the limitations of this widely used model.

CAPM easy peasy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWsEJYPSw0k MBA BS.com

Part !! of above (1 hr) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH2BpIs1EF0

WACC Part 1 (9 min.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKJglPkAJ5o

WACC Part 2 (18 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_G1N4O5_M