Best Writer

Write a discussion paper on Community Sustainability across Alberta in the State of Rural Canada 2021.you are to write an opinion piece that would be intended for a lay audience that would be published on the editorial page of a newspaper. By tackling this topic of the day, you will be reaching not only your regular readers but also perhaps an elite audience of opinion-makers

Here’s a checklist to keep your opinion piece on track:

 Focus tightly on one issue or idea — in your first paragraph. Be brief.
 Express your opinion, and then base it on factual, researched or first-hand information.
 Be timely, controversial, but not outrageous. Be the voice of reason.
 Be personal and conversational; it can help you make your point. No one likes a stuffed shirt.
 Be humorous, provided that your topic lends itself to humor. Irony can also be effective.
 Have a clear editorial viewpoint – come down hard on one side of the issue. Don’t equivocate.
 Provide insight, understanding: educate your reader without being preachy.
 Near the end, clearly re-state your position and issue a call to action. Don’t philosophize.
 Have verve, and “fire in the gut” indignation to accompany your logical analysis.
 Don’t ramble or let your op-ed unfold slowly, as in an essay.
 Use clear, powerful, direct language.
 Emphasize active verbs, forget adjectives and adverbs, which only weaken writing.
 Avoid clichés and jargon.
 Appeal to the average reader. Clarity is paramount.
 Write 750 double-spaced words or less (fewer is always better) for newspapers (concise is always better).

Write a paper on Current Crime, Arrests, and Punishments (or lack of punishments) of Texas school-aged children 10-18 years of ageYour final assignment (other than the remaining exam, and final exam) for this course is a PowerPoint presentation. For this assignment, do 14 slides on this topic. You must include information in paragraph form, but please also add pictures, etc. to your slides. Please be sure to thoroughly research your topic, then submit 14 good slides with the information you find (4 of those slides can be personal opinion).

The text and the illustrations are visually appealing, clear, and colorful.
Exceptional idea development with supporting details written in the author’s own words, or correctly credited if quoted.
Images are highly engaging for content and audience.
No mechanical/punctuation, or grammatical errors.
Factual evidence on chosen topic is given.

Instruction from the Professor
A 5-page paper. Submissions should be no shorter than five pages and no longer than five pages. Document formatting must be: 1” (one inch) margins on all sides, double spacing, 12-point type, no title page, no “works cited”/bibliography/footnotes. Remember to proofread your work, eliminating any spelling or grammatical errors before submitting your paper. It is in your best interest to make an outline of your response prior to writing, since your papers will be judged on their clarity and coherence. No outside sources can be used for this project—students who employ information found elsewhere (especially on the internet) will be suspected of plagiarism. You must cite (= put in quotes) material from all of the primary sources mentioned in each question, and only material from the primary sources (Attention! Do not cite the professor’s lectures, the introductory sections or footnotes to the readings). Use only parenthetical references: e.g. (Mancall, 7)—

Instruction for the essay

1. Read closely the selections of our sources which refer to the indigenous peoples of North America (Mancall, Bogaert, and Greer). In all of these texts, we read about peoples whose cultures were unknown to Europeans and whose communities have long since disappeared or been wholly transformed. Although they are most known for their disparaging views of native peoples, Europeans did not have uniquely negative views about the indigenous inhabitants that they encountered. In your reading, make an
inventory of the various positive assessments of native cultures that are found in these
sources. In other words: What do the European authors see as praiseworthy in indigenous societies? Be sure to identify excerpts from all three texts (but do not refer to the pictures in any of them, since visual representations are often not primary sources in these works). Construct an argument that presents what you consider to be the reasons for greatest praise on behalf of the European authors of the seventeenth century whom we have read.
NB: Remember the sources do not discuss all indigenous peoples collectively; they
discuss specific groups. Your answer should likewise be specific, not generic. Do not
make generalizations that are not supported by the sources.

The 3 selections of work:
A journey into Mohawk and Oneida Country 1634-1635;
Envisioning America, English plans for the colonization of North America 1580-1640;
The Jesuit Relations, Natives and missionaries in seventeenth-century North America

write a literature review over the Hendry paper that we discussed in class.
Broad Learning Goal 3 for Evolution and Ecology:

Learning Apply both conceptual and empirical understanding to reading, interpreting, and critically assessing primary literature

For success on summaries, you should:
Summarize intro, methods, results, and discussion fully but as concisely as possible. Summaries 1 and 2 should be a MAX of 3 double-spaced pages
Describe each section using appropriate and clear scientific language, showing that you have a solid understanding of the scientific material
Only include the most important information to convey the importance, findings, and conclusions of the paper
Discuss the paper with others to get different opinions
ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PLAGIARIZE

Write a paper on the Child Welfare Advocacy.Pick a policy issue that is connected to Child Welfare.
Do research on this issue to analyze this policy issue with a critical lens. You will be required to cite any references used.
Pick either Illinois state representative or senator.
Do research as to why you selected this legislator. Provide how this legislator has responded to your issue/population in the past (e.g. political support, past votes on issue, etc.)
Once you are familiar with your representative, schedule an in-district virtual meeting with them or a staffer. This meeting can be by Zoom or phone.
Keep a phone call log of the times you have attempted to reach out to your representative. Be persistent! You most likely will not talk to anyone the first time you call. If you have attempted to call 5 times and still have not heard from them, please approach your field faculty for an alternative.
Make a fact sheet, which includes citations, to bring to your meeting with your representative.
Final Paper on the experience:
The paper should include the following:
Description and background of the issue you lobbied for
Description of who your legislator is and your experience meeting with your
legislator/staff, etc.

Reflection on experience: What lessons did you learn about advocacy and Illinois politics?
Include phone log
Include fact sheet with citations that you brought to conversation with politician.

Write a paper on Critique a mixed-methods or action research article.
(2) Were the majority of sources current? (Be sure to compare with the date of publication)
(3) Briefly describe the consensus (or main point) of this section
(4) Did this section adequately cover the body of knowledge related to the topic? Why or why not?

Section II: Submit the Literature Review section critique in the workspace below:

Section III
Methodology – Review the Methodology section of your chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.) Note: To answer questions 1 & 2, refer to the text – qualitative sampling, pages 167-169 and quantitative sampling, pages 191-199. To answer questions 3 & 4, refer to the text – qualitative data collection methods, pages 169-178 and quantitative data collection methods, pages 202-214.

(1) What type of sample was used?
(2) Did the sample adequately represent the population? Why or why not?
(3) What data were collected?
(4) How were the data collected?

Section III: Submit the Methodology section critique in the workspace below:

Section IV

Findings – Review the Findings section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)
(1) How were the data presented?
(2) Was the manner of presenting the data clear and understandable?
(3) Were the Findings directly related to the research question?

Section IV: Submit the Findings section critique in the workspace below:

Section V

Conclusions – Review the Conclusions section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)
(1) Were the conclusions solely based on the Findings of the study? Briefly describe.
(2) What populations can the conclusions be generalized to, and why?
(3) Why was the study design (quantitative or qualitative) the appropriate design?

Section V: Submit the Conclusion section critique in the workspace below:

Write a paper on the White coat ceremony.

Write a paper on Social Welfare Policy Analysis.Using the Outline from order number #365006074.
Part 3: Using the outline you created in Part 2 as a guide, post a critical analysis of the article on blackboard. (Now you may include your outline in your post for context) Answers can be in bulleted format. You do not need to compose a written paper. (3-4 paragraphs).

How has the article’s content enhanced your understanding of social welfare policy? How did this article make you think about “welfare” differently?
Why are discussions about “welfare” typically framed the way they are and not the way that Abramovitz (2001) frames the issue?
After having read this article, how will you talk about and explain “welfare” and social policy differently than you used to?

Write a paper on the sales demand forecasting in food industry.

Write a Critical Thinking and Fallacies on People use logical fallacies both intentionally and by mistake.
Watch these short fallacy videos, then discuss the following questions.

Discussion Prompts:

1. Identify a fallacy that you use or fall into regularly.
2. Share a specific (not hypothetical) example from your experience.
3. Generally, do you commit the fallacy intentionally or inadvertently?
4. Include a link to an online video that demonstrates the fallacy.

Refer to the following source and at least two additional sources.