Best Writer

How did the lives of Native Americans change after the settlement of European Immigrants in
the colonies

Using a grand theorist from last week: Henderson. from the Discussion Board, propose a middle-range theory where you apply it to an actual population you work with and/ practice problem you experience. Be brief and simple. My Work Experience is: Nurse Care Manager for the geriatric population, I make home visits and create care plans to ensure these patients are safe in the community. Sample:Your response should simply look like this:1.Grand theory: Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Model2.Patient/client population and problem: Post-partum women who have experienced physical trauma during the birthing process3.My Middle-range theory: Self-Care Deficit in Post-partum Women4.Applying it: focuses on assessing her self-care needs and functioning, the demands on her attention (baby care, available support), and developing nursing interventions to address the deficit in between.

First attached is the form to guide you to do the whole paper so kindly follow it as it is.
You will find in the attached guide the health related indicators under each country. These are the five major indicators’ you will cover as in the attachment
1-Health Demographic Indicators, 2- Health Economic Indicators, 3- Health resources Indicators, 4- Disease Indicators, 5- Immunization indicators. Under each one of them you will include the health related only such as the ones included in the attached guide. It might differ from country to another you might find all data as requested on each table in the attached guide and you might find some of them only as long as they are under this guide and related to health it will be okay.
Moreover, kindly summarize the whole thing in a PowerPoint presentation of 11 to 12 slides if possible (use a nice design). Last, i want soft copies of the resources used.
Thank you…

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ase: p. 194, number 12. Part 1: What type of argument is it? What is the standard form of the argument? Complete Part 1 separate from Part 2. Part 2: Write an analysis of the argument. To do so, employ the following morally relevant features: 2, 3, 5, 10. Now, notice something very important: the argument is set-up not as a violation of a moral rule, but as the fulfillment of a moral principle. So, when you apply the morally relevant features you have to rewrite them in light of a moral principle having been fulfilled. For example, relevant feature 2 would now read: “What harms are being caused, avoided, and/or prevented by fulfilling the moral principle?” Be sure, when you finish your essay, t‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌hat you go through the following bullet-points before you submit it: Writing-Format Check List: My essay is double spaced. My margins are set at 1 inch all the way around. My essay is written in Times New Roman font. My essay is written in 12 font. My essays contain paragraphs approximately not more than 4 to 6 sentences. My essay contains my name on the right corner of the first page. My essay does not use the words “feel” or “believe.” My essay indents each of its paragraphs My essay does not contain any direct quotations from class lectures. My essay avoids obvious, basic grammatical errors. Please look at the uploaded picture for the case, and please read and follow instructions th‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌oroughly.

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ake a few minutes to re-read the handout “Performance Management”. Answer the following questions by replying to this thread: Relative to performance management, what causes “Management myopia”? What are some negative effects on an organization when occurs? How can it be mitigated? How do SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attain‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌able, Relevant and Timely) objectives aid in performance management? How does insurance mitigate uncontrollable factors from a organizational performance perspective? What happens to the risk associated with the insured performance attribute? What Accounting Performance Measures would you see as applicable to a Government organizat‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ion? Why?

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ASK FOUR Discuss with a partner whether opening a General-specific (GS) text with some statistics is possible in your field of study. Why are such openings potentially interesting for readers? Now look at this GS opening from a student paper in Economics and answer the questions below. 1 Between 1992 and 1995, an international lysine cartel that included five companies illegally colluded on prices around the world. 2 Lysine is an amino acid used as a feed additive for enhancing muscle growth in livestock. 3 Pr‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ior to the collusive agreement, worldwide sales of lysine were over $600 million annually and this figure increased by $200 million following the price-fixing arrangement. 1. What message is the author trying to convey in the first three sentences? 2. The purpose of this paper was to examine the extent to which economic models on collusion describe collusion in the lysine industry. Do you think this is an effective opening? Why or why not? 3. What is the purpose of Sentence 2? How important is this sentence‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌?

LO1: Identify and manage the first and second order contemporary environmental risks and sustainability issues affecting organisations in addition to the concept and key challenges of organisational risk.
LO2: Critically evaluate the most appropriate approaches to environmental and organisational risk management and sustainability for the organisation and develop ethical responses to these.
LO3: Critically assess the impact of environmental risk strategies and requirements on the organisation.
LO4: Identify the international character of risks.

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌his paper is for an Informative Speech. I have chosen the topic of the discovery of Penicillin. I have chosen some resources and created an outline already. Suzanne Messick Informative Speech Outline: Purpose: To inform Specific Purpose: Following my speech my audience will be able to explain how penicillin was invented. Central Idea: The invention of penicillin changed the face of modern medicine. A. Introduction (The introduction should grab the audience’s attention.) 1. If I asked you to name the most important discovery in the twentieth century I would no doubt get many answers. Most people would completely miss one of the most important discoveries of that century: penicillin. a. My topic is the invention of penicillin and its importance. b. The discovery of penicillin completely changed the face of modern medicine. c. Today I am going to speak to you about the discovery of penicillin, the importance of penicillin, and its impact on WW2. B. Body of Speech (Provides the audience with information regarding your topic) 1. Penicillin was discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928 a. Alexander Fleming went on vacation on week and came back to a petri dish with bacteria, save for one area that did not have any because of penicillium. b. While Fleming made penicillin famous in 1928 with its ability to inhibit bacteria growth, the compound’s potential wasn’t taken seriously until the summer of 1941. 2. Penicillin saved thousands of lives during WW2 a. Though penicillin was still a ways off from becoming the medicine that we know today, it still made huge advancements for our military in the latter stages of WW2. b. A lead scientist for the effort of producing penicillin wrote, “Whatever course we were to take, we had to be sure of that D-Day supply.” 3. Prior to the introduction of penicillin there was no effective treatment for infections like pneumonia, gonorrhea, and bronchitis. a. Before penicillin the average life expectancy was just 47 years old with infectious diseases being the main cause of death. b. The discovery of the penicillin mold led to the antibiotic revolution which completely changed our demographics and changed our leading causes of death. Informative Speech Requirements (5 to 6 minutes) 125 Points “Informative speeches share information with others to enhance their knowledge or understanding of the information, concepts and ideas you present.” “An Event, Discovery, Situation or Influential Person from the 20th Century (1900 to 1999) that Has Made a Significant Impact on Our Lives in the 21st Century” will be your general topic for the Informative Speech. This means your topic is historically based and has significance for us living in the 21st Century. Question older members of your family about events that have taken place during their lifetime or their parents’ and grandparents’ lifetimes. These family stories may help you choose a topic you are interested in researching. Jot down some ideas from class discussions to get your speech started! Your Task • Dazzle your classmates with little known or often forgotten information. • Organize your presentation in a simple yet interesting manner. • Facilitate recall and understanding by using interesting examples, anecdotes, etc. • Make sure I approve your topic. • Provide your instruct‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌or with a typed speech. • Use notecards! Length: Your speech should be approximately five to six minutes long. Maximum time is 6:30. Penalty is 3 points for every :30 seconds beyond 6:30. Instructor will not grade speeches under 4:00. Recommended timing to keep you within the time constrains: 1 minute for the introduction, minutes for the body of the speech, and 1 minute for the conclusion. Speaking to Inform Most presentations/speeches in the academic or professional realm are informative in nature. A good informative speaker provides an audience with relevant information in an unbiased and somewhat disconnected manner; he or she does not advocate a particular stance or point of view during the presentation. Know the audience Effort should be made to relate your topic to the average college student. Key principles for informative speeches 1. Be relevant. You have the responsibility of connecting the information you are presenting to the interests and needs of your audience. 2. Be organized. You should organize your information into clear, easily handled segments. 3. Be Interesting. Interest and learning are positively related. Find illustrations to support your points that your audience can relate. 4. Repetition works. Use more than one example to illustrate your key points. Cover less information in more depth. 5. Be prepared. Rehearse your speech alone and in the presence of others several times before you present it. Supporting your points, illustrating your material: The quality of an informative presentation is directly related to the quality of the information provided. Use credible sources to support your points. For example, Newsweek is a credible media source; is not. If you have questions about whether a particular source is credible, ask a reference librarian. Also, make sure you include enough examples, statistics, anecdotes, etc., to illustrate your main points. It’s better to have three main points and plenty of supporting evidence than to have five weakly supported main points. Supporting materials tips: Authorities – If you are using information from other sources, let your audience know who these sources are and where they can be found. For example, “Aristotle is quoted in his book ON RHETORIC as saying . . . ” Statistics – Include only relevant statistics and provide verbal illustrations that help the audience conceptualize the importance of the statistics. For example, after saying, “The average blue whale is about 80 ft. long,” say “That’s equivalent to three school buses parked back to back.” CAUTION: Too many statistical citations confuse even the most sophisticated audience. Facts – A statement is factual if it can be proved or disproved using the scientific method, everything else is opinion. Explanation – Explanations, examples and anecdotes improve the understanding of an informative speech. Provide explanations whenever there is even a remote chance the audience could be confused. Written speech: Must be fully written and typed, double-spaced. Instructor will not grade a speech that does not contain paragraphs. Delivery should not be word-for-word. In the real world, speeches are fully written. Visual Aids: At least 2 and no more than 5. Videos used during the speech may be no longer than 20 seconds. Extra Credit (up to 10 points): Assignment MUST be complete. Any additional information that you feel would help as I grade your speech; for example, your process for narrowing your speech to the appropriate time limit. This could be a paragraph describing the editing process or a first or second draft o‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌f your speech with clearly defined edits (highlight these).

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ require 2 chapters: 1. Literature Review (4500 words approx) – focussing on 3 key themes with discussion: a. Academic engagement by students when working online at Higher Education level. b. Strategies to encourage student participation / active participation in class / seminars. c. Methods of teaching specifically with international students and how to fully support them. 2. Methodology (3000 words appro‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌x) – Guidance: “Discussion of your chosen paradigm, methodological approach, data collection methods, analysis, triangulation, reliability and validity, and ethical issues” A mixed methods approach with 2 key aspects: a. interviews conducted with 2 academic tutors using the same cohort of 27 students for 2 different modules (History and Classics). b. Analysis of formative and summative results data‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

In this paper, you will present the information you have found through your research and relate this information to Ackerman’s book.

Here are possible choices of topics for your research/analytical paper.

Both assignment topics are based on Diane Ackerman’s book The Zookeeper’s Wife.

You can choose one of the topics listed below:

Research the history of the Righteous Among the Nations award, including the information on how it was established and to whom it is awarded, as well as the number of recipients so far and the countries of their origin. Select one recipient from one of the European countries occupied by the Nazis during WWII, and find detailed information about them (who they were, whom they rescued, and under what circumstances). Choose a recipient who, like the Żabinskis, received the award for hiding Jews. Ponder any similarities and/or differences between their story and the one recounted in Ackerman’s book. Of course, to do that, you will need to learn some specific information about the situation of Jews in the country your chosen recipient lived in.
Research the basic tenets of the Nazi ideology and relate your findings to Ackerman’s book, explaining, for instance, how the information you acquired may help one better understand some people and facts described in the book. You will need to learn more about the Nazis’ worldview and then discuss how Ackerman presents this worldview in action in her book.
Aim for at least two sources, not counting Ackerman’s book; the paper will have to be minimum five pages long.

Use the MLA system of documentation.

As you can see, this is not typical research paper, in which you just present the information you obtained from various sources. In this paper, you will have to apply what you found out through your research to Ackerman’s text.

Your research does not have to be very extensive: you are required to use minimum two sources apart from Ackerman’s book.

Some suggestions on how to organize your paper:

If you choose option # 1, you should first present the information about the Righteous Among the Nations award, then, briefly, introduce the rescuer that you want to compare with the Żabinskis (who also received it) and in the rest of your paper (and that should be its longest part) compare the two rescue efforts. This means that most of your paper should be structured like a comparison/contrast essay.

To write a meaningful comparison of the two rescue efforts, you must choose someone who received the Righteous Among the Nations Award for hiding Jews, like the Żabinskis, not for helping Jews in any other way, for otherwise the two rescue efforts would hardly be comparable.

Also, make sure that you choose a rescuer from another European country that was occupied by the Nazis during WW II; you could, for instance, choose someone from France or from Denmark.

Moreover, you need to decide on some reasonable criteria of comparison. To suggest a few, you could, for instance, consider the risk involved (that is, the punishment that the rescuers would face if they were caught; the punishment was not the same in all the countries occupied by the Nazis), the specific difficulties that the rescuers had to deal with every day, (having to do with feeding the hiding Jews, for instance), the character of the place where the Jews were hidden (was it an apartment, for instance, where one would have a lot of neighbors?), the attitude of the population toward Jews, the overall number of Jews in the rescuers’ country (which would, of course, influence the population’s attitude toward them), the amount of help the rescuers received, if any, from other individuals or from the underground organizations, the number of Jews they rescued, and the duration of the rescue effort.

Your thesis in this paper, placed in the introductory paragraph, should concisely compare the two rescue efforts.

All the information about the Zabinskis’ should be based on Ackerman’s book, from which you should quote to support your points.

If you choose the second option, you should first introduce the main ideas that the Nazis believed in, and then explain how these ideas were carried out in real life, based on Ackerman’s book, Concentrate on the actions (and/or beliefs) of the Nazis whom Ackerman describes in some details, analyze the Nazi policies implemented in Poland, their treatment of Jews and Poles. As for the organization of a paper responding to the second option, you should first devote one or more paragraphs to the presentation of Nazi ideology, and then, in the rest of your paper, you could focus each paragraph on one of the Nazi beliefs, discussing how Ackerman shows this belief in action in her book. and using quotations to support your points. As you can see, this paper will require a bit more analysis of Ackerman’s text. Your sources should help you understand better what the actions and policies of the Nazis stemmed from.

Your thesis in the paper responding to this option should briefly explain which people and events described in Ackerman’s book best illustrate the Nazi ideas in action.

Please remember that, whichever option you choose, the main bulk of your paper should involve working with the text of Ackerman’s book. If you choose the first option, you will be comparing the situation of a specific rescuer to that of the Żabinskis using the details from the text, and if you choose the second one, you will be analyzing fragments of Ackerman’s book to explain how they illustrate some of the Nazi ideas in action.

Please aim at using at least 15 quotations from all of your sources in this paper. Choose your quotations carefully, making sure that they illustrate your point well. Remember to integrate the quotations with your own sentences. Also, remember to use parenthetical citations after the quotes. If the online source you use has no page numbers, use just the author’s name. If there is no author, use just the title of the source. One more thing: if you are not using the exact quotation but are still including a lot of specific information from your source, you must use a citation too.