Best Writer

it is a research paper which talks about ( Addressing a Global Problem Through the Lens of Culture ) which is the metaverse, and answering questions such As:Will metaverse be addictive? orWhat are the risks of the metaverse?The formatting: formatted in MLA Manuscript Format, it should have top, bottom, right and left margins; be double-spaced and set in 12pt. Times New Roman fontMore information in the file below thank you.

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ubject : Explore what support is available to children at risk of abuse and critically examine its impact for safeguarding children in the Gyspy, Roma and Travellers. All UK based references. The written paper is 4000 words and makes up 100% of your module grade, it is based on the following question: Explore what support is available to children at risk of abuse and critically examine its impact for safeguarding children. Main argument – ensure you structure your argument using paragraphs for each point and show how your ideas answer the question. Good answers will signpost the reader through your argument to analyse your evidence. This paper will examine safeguarding focusing on specialists and general support available to your group of children. You will need to consider each of the points listed below to cover the assessment criteria (LO 1, 2, 3 and 4). Introduction – state which group of children is your focus and define your terms. Then identify areas you will cover in your answer. This will help to provide both clarity and depth to your writing. A good introduction will set the context for your written argument. It is important to identify your focus for the paper and link this to theoretical perspectives that cover risks children in your group face and the impact on their lives. Your choice of areas to explore will be guided by your reading. You will need to make use of essential reading together with evidence drawn from your own research of the literature. Part 1: identifies generic areas to explore in your paper to examine links between child abuse and child welfare. Examine historical perspectives of child abuse and legislation. You will need to examine policies on safeguarding and show their importance to understanding contemporary child welfare. You will need to make reference to current legislation and where appropriate protocols which shape professional practice. (LO 1 & 2) Part 2: Begin by setting the context of your chosen group of children. Then examine safeguarding from both a policy and practice context. Identify safeguarding policies relevant to your chosen group and link these to practice. Provide examples of provisions to show the use of intervention as well as support for children and their families related to your chosen group. You will need to examine the role of different providers who support your chosen group and their influence in shaping contemporary child welfare. You will include specialist support that is targeted and intended to support these children and young people. Consider the influence of ecological/psychological/ sociological theoretical on your chosen group, the risk factors they experience and safeguarding needs. Remember to write sensitively with consideration to the topic you are writing about. Conclusion – you will summarise your evidence, bring to a close your argument linking policy in relation to your chosen group with up to date Safeguarding policy, summarise your own views. Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller children – focus on aspects of neglect that can be linked to the education and welfare of these children. Lifestyle and community values would appear to lead to educational neglect (Cemyln, 2000). However, as Cremyn (2000) and Bhopal (2011) show these communities face harassment. Allen and Adams (2013) provide a summary of the impact on children and their families who experience racism and exclusion. The traditional values of these families and the ways in which children are socialised may lead to differences in expectations between boys and girls which have implications for their future. This is a new area of research and the position of these minority co‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌mmunities and impact on children’s lives is being examined from a children’s rights perspective (Murray, 2012). Very rough guide: Intro 500 Part 1 – 1500 Part 2 – 1500 Conclusion – 500 BUT NO MORE THAN 4000 TOTAL Learning Outcomes: . Knowledge and Understanding. Discuss in-depth historical and contemporary conceptualisations of child abuse. State which group of children is your focus and define your terms. Identify areas you will cover in your answer. This will help to provide both clarity and depth to your writing. A good introduction will set the context for your written argument. It is important to identify your focus for the paper and link this to theoretical perspectives which cover risks children in your group face and the impact on their lives. Your choice of areas to explore will be guided by your reading. You will need to make use of essential reading together with evidence drawn from your own research of the literature 2. Part and Understanding. Demonstrate an informed understanding of current legislation in the UK to safeguard children. Identifies generic areas to explore in your paper to examine links between child abuse and child welfare. Examine historical perspectives of child abuse and legislation. You will need to examine policies on safeguarding and show their importance to understanding contemporary child welfare. You will need to make reference to current legislation and where appropriate protocols which shape professional practice. (LO2) 3. Part 2. Intellectual, practical, affective and transferrable skills. Critically analyse the range of provision and partnership available to support children’s needs. Begin by setting the context of your chosen group of children. Then examine safeguarding from both a policy and practice context. Identify safeguarding policies relevant to your chosen group and link these to practice. Provide examples of provision to show use of intervention as well as support for children and their families related to your chosen group. You will need to examine the role of different providers who support your chosen group and their influence in shaping contemporary child welfare. Consider the role of individuals and ecological / psychological/ sociological theoretical influence to your chosen group. Remember to write sensitively with consideration to the topic you are writing about. Go on to discuss the safeguarding needs and experiences of your chosen group. You will include specialist support which is targeted and intended to support these children and young people. More articles have been posted on the Canvas to help you develop your written analysis. (LO3 & LO4) 4. , practical, affective and transferrable skills. Show ability to explore complex and sensitive issues in a constructive and ethically robust manner. You will summarise your evidence, bring to a close your argument linking policy in relation to your chosen group with up-to-date Safeguarding policy, summarise your own views. Harvard Referencing. spacing. Cabri font, size 11. Must include the following references at least: *The Munro Review of Child Protection 2011 *The Lord Laming Inquiry * NSPCC *The Childrens Families Act 2014 * The Care Act 2014 *The Childrens Act *Every Child Matters 2003 *Graded Care Profile tool to measure neglect. *And that everyone that comes into contact with children are responsible for the Safeguarding of Children.

As discussed in the lesson and assigned reading for this week, EHRs provide both benefits and drawbacks. Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table and include at least 3 items for each list. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you selected to include it on the respective list.
Refer to the Stage 3 objectives for Meaningful Use located in this week’s lesson under the heading Meaningful Use and the HITECH Act. Select two objectives to research further. In your own words, provide a brief discussion as to how the objective may impact your role as an APN in clinical practice.

Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:

Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.
Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.

Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

DISCUSSION CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Descriiption

Application of Course Knowledge

50

33%

The quality for this category is determined by the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lessons and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations.

Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources

40

27%

This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.

Interactive Dialogue

40

27%

The quality for this category is determined by substantive written responses to a peer and faculty member’s questions in the threaded discussion. Substantive posts add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion. Students must respond to least one peer in the threaded discussion. If no question asked directly from faculty, student must respond to questions posed to the entire class. Post must include at least one scholarly source.

Total CONTENT Points= 130

DISCUSSION FORMAT

Category

Points

%

Descriiption

Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format

20

13%

Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion

Total FORMAT Points= 20

DISCUSSION TOTAL= 150 Points

please watch video and answer the following questions:
video:

You must show evidence from the videos and cite them:

1.Describe at least three benefits of using simulators for a non-law enforcement audience. Are these useful tools for non-law enforcement? Explain your answer.

2.Did the videos change your mind about any police use-of-force issues? If not, can you see how they might for others?

3.What technologies might be more useful for a non-police audience to learn about police use of force realities?

From the video about the FAU SCCJ/FAUPD simulator:

Again, you must show evidence that you watched the video.

1.Do you see this as a useful tool for an academic department? Why or why not?

2.What are some potential groups that might benefit from using this tool? Explain why.

3.What aspects of this technology do you think are useful for training? Which might not be so useful?

4.Develop a scenario that you think might be a useful training scenario. Please include the potential audience (police, social worker, community leader, new driver, etc. The sky is the limit). What are some branching options? Tools available (handgun, taser, etc.)?
5.Given the realities of undergraduate classes at FAU, such as class sizes of 50-70 students being the norm, and a significant proportion offered online, how would you suggest we incorporate this technology in classes so that students might benefit from it?

To what extent, if at all, can the geopolitical theories of Mahan, Mackinder, and Air and Space power theorists, help us understand the geostrategic implications of a potential global shift of power to China and India? Be sure to include how the seminar themes of sea, land, air and space help us understand the implications of this potential shift.

Instructions
Your essay should not exceed 8-pages in length, not including references (there is no need for a title page, a table of contents, or any appendices). The paper should be submitted in Microsoft Word format, double-spaced, in 12 point font, and 1″ margins. Make sure to cite your sources (which may be from the course readings, and beyond), and use Turabian parenthetical citation style. For a brief guide, go to: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/citation-guide.html

1. 3-5 major take-home messages for each paper 2. For each article, mention 1-2 questions/comments posted by you after reading the article (the question you ask should have thoughtful meaning, do not ask a question that the paper already has an answer on it). The professor would like to see deeply thinking through the process. While you’re writing, if you do not have a question, you can put some comments. Please put your personal thought for each paper separately. And in conclusion, mention how these papers have similar ideas. APA format
3. Reading Material have uploaded, and Research on LEED and SITES certificate

The main points identified, and summarized
complete citation included
one page

1. title page
2. APA formatting of reference (article) used in correct APA annotated bibliography format.
3. a 2-3 paragraph summary of the article.
4. Evaluation of the article. Was it good, easy to read, too difficult to understand?
5. Would you recommend the article and why?

1. Please suggest “Research Topic” based on the attached “Topic 1-11” & “Research Paper Instruction” documents. This must be in relation to Human Rights in China

2. Please Provide a Proposal Outline (100-200 Words) before Actual Writing

3. Using a Secondary Methodology

4. Supervisor prefers to see our analytical, research, and critical thinking skills – demonstrate on the paper

5. even it is Human Rights in Chima, a lot of research might be written by authors from other regions, not just solely from China, can use English Langauge articles:
– The article written by Chinese author will be good to give a perspective in looking from China (within)
– The article written by Other authors (US, UK, HK) will be good to give a perspective in looking into China (varying view compare to Chinese authors)

5. Citation OSCOLA (1) In-Text Citation and (2) Bibliography

Note
– The stance of the Professor seems “Pro-China”, thus try to polish the paper in such a direction even there is criticism inside the Research Paper

– Please try to cite and use an Article or Paper Published by “Fu Hualing” (highlighted in Purple on Attachment Topic 2, 4, 5, 6, 9) because the supervisor is on the same stance as Fu Hualing. So understanding what Fu thinks will help with the paper too, so you know his stance toward Human rights in China

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rite reflective journal using DIEP method. 3 different topics. 4 or more academia sources to be used per journal. APA 7 referencing Topics Topic 3- How do you understand‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ individual characteristics? Topic- 6 How do you Make decisions and solve problems? Topic 10 – How do you Manage Change? Please follow guidelines,, 470 words per jour‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌nal

Create three monthly budgets using Microsoft Excel for A financial analysis. Please follow all directions and please use Strayer Writing Standards please will send in instructions.