Mary is a 72-year-old grandmother of six, who recently moved to your area to be closer to her older son who recently lost his wife. She lives with her son and two teenage grandsons. Mary has not had a physical exam in about 5 years, but she does not report any significant health issues. She has a history of hypertension that has been controlled with Lisinopril for the past five years. Discuss your health promotion priorities for Mary.
Best Writer
Write a paper Instituting a wealth tax (on the “very wealthy”) in addition to the current income tax.
Write a paper Instituting a wealth tax (on the “very wealthy”) in addition to the current income tax.The paper should include an Abstract or summary at the beginning of the paper. This is a very essay so I want you to make careful research of what you are writing. I also upload the reference. Please use it to have a general idea but please do not copy or paste. Please let me know if you have any question. Please use APA style for reference
What was the most convincing strategy that Joyce recommends in her article?
Please be sure to answer the following questions — and respond to at least three other students — in a thorough and substantive way. As a reminder, all this material may appear on the Final Exam. 1) What was the most convincing strategy that Joyce recommends in her article? Please explain why. 2) What was the least convincing strategy that Joyce recommends in her article? Please explain why. 3) Please explain which of strategies your parents did well, among her list? How? 4) Please watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsWFz32O7RI Someone could object to the argument in the video as follows: “The speaker is attempting to tell you how to raise ‘good kids.’ But think about what he actually argued. Was the advice to make ethical children who are conscious of how their actions help or hurt others? Or to make self-centered children who are overly preoccupied with their own self-actualization? Shouldn’t kids understand that the world is not all about me, me me? Shouldn’t they know that the ethical life sometimes requires you to focus on others and less on what makes only you happy?” Please explain your view on this objection, and whether the video was sound advice for raising ethical children (please give an example from his argument). 5) Please watch this video, and answer the question (below): Someone could object to the film in the following way: “I hear what is being said here, and we certainly need to fight our tendencies to being whiny, self-centered, and entitled. But the video is committing the ‘Hasty Generalization’ fallacy by pointing to virtually all of society’s ills and tying this directly to today’s children alleged deficiency in ‘Vitamin N.’ Society is always changing (and in ways we cannot easily understand) and there are often more than one plausible explanation for why we are the way we are. (Just take an ‘Introduction to Sociology’ class, and you will see all the competing theories of society, and how each of them has some plausibility but also significant weaknesses.) In fact, there is very good reason to believe that the lack of ‘Vitamin N’ visible today has significant beneficial effects on society. Think of all the millions of young people in the 1920s, for instance, who never developed themselves to the fullest, and had their personal creativities, drives, and passions squelched, because they were told discouraging ‘everyday truths,’ such as: ‘The sky IS the limit!,’ ‘You are burning your candle at both ends!,’ ‘Dreaming is for sleep — get back to work!,’ etc. We need the current generation of young people to feel self-confident in their own ideas to demand the ‘impossible’ from those of us who are too small-minded or frightened or lazy to see the world any differently than the way it is. Children need to be told ‘YES, it IS possible!,’ ‘You ARE entitled to demand a better world than what you have been handed by previous generations!,’ and ‘It is possible that you — that’s right, YOU! — may be the ONLY ONE in the world who can cure cancer, walk on Mars, end poverty, be an ethical role-model in your sphere of influence, etc.’ Indeed, it takes a lot of chutzpah to believe you can positively impact the world — but this necessary self-esteem will not develop if it is poisoned with too much ‘Vitamin N.'” What do you think of this criticism? Is it compelling or weak? Please explain. 6) Lafollette lists several objections to his proposal. Please choose the strongest objection among his list, and explain if his response is compelling or weak, and why. 7) Please study the following two ads, and explain what you think the main message is (note: there are multiple messages): 8) Imagine if someone read Lafollette’s article and concluded the following: “Look, it’s unrealistic to think actual licenses to parent will happen any time soon. However, it is more than clear that waiting until something happens, and only then intervening (with Child Protective Services, etc.), is not working. That’s our current approach — presume competence, and only if you demonstrate incompetence, will you be denied your rights. Imagine if we said: ‘Okay, I will presume you can drive safely, so here’s your license! But if you mess up, then we will have to take this away.’ Yet, we do that with innocent, vulnerable children every single day. At the present moment, we have no way of screening out beforehand those who are prone to serious abuse, violence, or neglect (except with adoptive parents, that is — as LaFollette points out — who are much, much safer for children to be with than one’s biological parents; this is because adoptive parents were screened so carefully beforehand). What I am proposing is not a license, but requiring prospective parents to watch, for instance, a 8 minute video about child-safety, and then they must pass a short Quiz afterwards in order to take their baby home. For example, a basic video like this: What if they fail the Quiz? Well, what if they do? Do you want to have YOUR child in the ‘care’ of someone who cannot pass a simple Quiz on child-safety? If not, then it is not fair to put another innocent child in potential danger, either. Maybe it should just be ‘recommended’ viewing for new parents, but not required? Well, please answer this: Would you study for a Quiz if you are guaranteed to pass beforehand? If they fail the Quiz, they can always come back to the hospital the next day to watch an hour long video on the same topic (all on the most elementary basics of child safety for new parents), and this time have a conversation with a social worker, who can answer any questions and will then administer another simple, brief Quiz over the material in the video. If they still do not pass (or if the social worker is told facts about their home that makes it clearly unsafe for children), then the prospective parents can still see their child in a supervised environment for as long as they like during the day or night. However, they cannot be alone with their child until they can demonstrate that they understand, and observe, the fundamentals of protecting children from easily preventable harm. They may apply as many times as they like to take the Quiz, but the consultation with the social workers will continue to lengthen (and why shouldn’t it?) with each failed attempt to show basic competence with child safety. There will, of course, be a clear and independently-reviewed process — with the goal of being as fair as possible — to appeal the Quiz results, to grant special accommodations for alternative testing for those who have difficulties concentrating on Quizzes, etc., and for all other exceptional situations. I am the first to admit that this would not be a perfect solution, but what we have now is not in any way acceptable. Not just anyone should be in charge of a little human being who has no voice and no defenses. The responsibility falls on us to make sure we do something at the front end (not after-the-fact, when it is sometimes, tragically too late). And, yes, it will be inconvenient, will have a financial cost, and will be stressful for new parents, etc., etc. But compare all this to the value of even one child being saved if we really put everything else to the side and made sure that child’s life and safety came first.” Answer each question.. it may seem long but the teacher is explaining Do you think this is a strong or weak response? Please explain. In your answer, please also mention if you already knew everything in that short video (the one on child safety mentioned above)? Or not?
Write a paper on the importance of the use of technology in mental health.
Write a paper on the importance of the use of technology in mental health.This essay will focus on the use of technology in the delivery of information and services for people experiencing psychological distress seeking to access mental health services and support in Australia. The aim of the assignment is to gain a greater understanding of how to use technology within mental health practice, to consider the strengths and limitations of technology, and the legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of technology. Please use the following headings: 1. How technology can be used in mental health practice. 2. Discuss the benefits and challenges of using technology when working with people with mental health issues 3. Identify legal and ethical considerations associated with the use of technology in mental health service provision Must all be Australian relevant, please. Use the attached document to answer the questions (and can include references at the back). It is a lengthy document. Please do not call my number, only correspond via email, thank you.
Identify and describe a leader who bought about radical change either during the Cold War (1945-1991) era of the 20th Century, or prior to but impacting Cold War events.”
“Identify and describe a leader who bought about radical change either during the Cold War (1945-1991) era of the 20th Century, or prior to but impacting Cold War events.” (Note: This leader does not have to be political, nor well-known) … it is expected that students will write persuasively, giving background, details on the transformative actions taken, and a position to argue, acknowledging counter-arguments, and using various aspects of leadership theory to validate their claim of this leader being noteworthy. Students must use in-text citations and have at least 10 internet sources in the references section of the paper. Note: You should know what a “Transformational Leader” is after reading having read Northouse, Chapter 9, p. 185-215 (digital copy of text provided) over Spring Break, and the week before. Also, “transformative” has a strike through on purpose, because the analysis needs to go deeper than assuming all transformation has or all transformational leaders have been good.
Write a research paper In APA format students will write 5-7 pages to “Identify and describe a leader who bought about radical change either during the Cold War (1945-1991) era of the 20th Century, or prior to but impacting Cold War events.”
Write a research paper In APA format students will write 5-7 pages to “Identify and describe a leader who bought about radical change either during the Cold War (1945-1991) era of the 20th Century, or prior to but impacting Cold War events.” (Note: This leader does not have to be political, nor well-known) … it is expected that students will write persuasively, giving background, details on the transformative actions taken, and a position to argue, acknowledging counter-arguments, and using various aspects of leadership theory to validate their claim of this leader being noteworthy. Students must use in-text citations and have at least 10 internet sources in the references section of the paper. Note: You should know what a “Transformational Leader” is after reading having read Northouse, Chapter 9, p. 185-215 (digital copy of text provided) over Spring Break, and the week before. Also, “transformative” has a strike through on purpose, because the analysis needs to go deeper than assuming all transformation has or all transformational leaders have been good.
Describe the category heading (e.g., what are bradyarrhythmia’s in general).
Describe the category heading (e.g., what are bradyarrhythmia’s in general), define each individual type of arrhythmia (e.g., what is L.B.B.B. and how is the EKG representatively altered), and any potential causes of the arrhythmia using an essay format and focusing on why you have ruled in or out the abnormality using the provided 12 lead EKG. You may consider using subheadings for the main categories here with discussion of each arrhythmia noted below and using separate paragraphs. Try to integrate the example tracing and your analysis into your discussion (include the example tracing or snipets from the tracing as necessary; e.g., “for illustrative purposes an example tracing is being used to analyze for several arrhythmias”).
Note: Certain arrhythmias would require additional information about the characteristics of a patient so for this assignment, simply consider the abnormal rhythm at face value. You certainly may add a comment that if you think an arrhythmia is present, more information about the health history of the individual would be necessary for a conclusive diagnosis.
Write a paper on your experience of a virtual Narcotics Anonymous meeting.
Write a paper on your experience of a virtual Narcotics Anonymous meeting.
Explain how the usage of cell phones in schools effect students social lives, learning ability, etc.
Explain how the usage of cell phones in schools effect students social lives, learning ability, etc.
Complete four pieces of reflective writing in response to provocative statements/ideas presented in class, workshops and readings over the first three weeks.
Complete four pieces of reflective writing in response to provocative statements/ideas presented in class, workshops and readings over the first three weeks. Each of the four pieces should explore a single topic/issue and explore views, beliefs, values and positioning on the topic. One of the four topics may be expanded in assessment 2. Your writing should consider the attitudes, beliefs and values that you encounter in readings and class discussions and identify how you understand your position both personally and professionally in relation to those. Do not summarise the content of a lecture session, instead, you should focus on a particular idea(s) and discuss this in relation to your personal and professional views on the issue(s) and/or idea(s). You are encouraged to draw on a range of material to support your writing. This could include reference to blog posts, YouTube (etc.) videos, and/or images, alongside the relevant academic literature. Each piece of reflective writing should be given a title, and supporting materials should be referenced in APA format at the end of each one. All four pieces of writing must be included in your submission to Turnitin.