Best Writer

Nursing Philosophy Statement:
Start with defining the word philosophy. Please, use and cite your reference. Then write your personal philosophy of nursing. The focus of this paper is on the application of your philosophy using the concepts of person, nursing, health, environment, nursing practice, education, administration and research. A description of the components of your personal philosophy should be presented in this paper in an organized and systematic manner. The content should flow and be easy to read. Please, use bold subheadings to make your paper easier to follow. The body of the paper should be no more than 3-5 pages long. A minimum of three (3) current references must be used (not including the text book). Please follow APA 7th edition guidelines to write the paper. There is no right or wrong philosophy, but follow the Template and Instructions and the rubric provided to receive full points. This is a QEP assignment.
Begin with an introduction to your topic
Compare and contrast two nursing theorists and note/explain how they inform your philosophy of nursing.
Elaborate using your personal definition for each of the concepts and how they fit into your unique nursing philosophy
Compare and contrast the philosophies of two health systems of your choice, i.e. Jackson Health System, Baptist Health, Cleveland Clinic, Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) or TENET and note/explain how their philosophies are demonstrated in the workplace.
Generate a concise reflective summary in the first person in which you include (1) what you learned from the assignment, (2) how it will impact your practice in the future, and (3) any recommendations you would make

Write a paper essay on “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligula” and “Metropolis”

Those films is what I need to write about so please watch the film and discuss some of the elements of German Expressionism for both films and then choose Metropolis to write about at the end give a in-depth reaction to the film.

Assessment Description
Performance management is, ideally, an ongoing quality-assurance-based process. The process provides an organization, its employees, regulatory agencies, accreditors, and other stakeholders with a structured means to support and accomplish mutually identified strategic goals and objectives.
Assume the role of a newly-hired risk management officer for a hypothetical new allied health organization in your chosen career field. You and your team will need to develop the organization’s policies.
The first item you will create will be a performance management plan. The HIM Briefings (2019) article, which includes Lean, Six Sigma, or PDSA, is located in the topic Resources. Using the resources in HIM Briefings or another qualified framework, craft a proposal (1,250-1,500 words) for a performance management plan for the new organization that includes the following:
Organizational Goals: Provide a statement of the organization’s goals regarding workplace safety, risk management, or quality improvement; select one area, and develop five goals for that specific area.
Outline of Organizational Objectives: Outline and provide a brief evaluation of specific objectives that support the organizational goals you previously identified, to include the use of an interdisciplinary approach to patient care.
Rationale: Evaluate the use of the interdisciplinary approach to patient care in the performance management plan. What provisions were planned in order to include this approach effectively?
Quality and Process Outcomes: Describe the importance of quality and process outcomes within one’s scope of practice.
Summary of Relevant Performance Measures: Summarize the steps and measures the new organization will adopt to measure performance. Consider (a) how well measures will align with the stated goals, (b) how these measures demonstrate the importance of quality and the relationship to positive health outcomes, (c) how the measures are able to be controlled by the organization (i.e., how the organization can affect change in this area), and (d) how the measures meet criteria related to reliability and validity, and are standardized.
Performance Baseline: Determine a performance baseline for the measures selected. This will enable the organization to conduct comparisons of desired goals versus actual results over time.
Performance Evaluation: Select one of three commonly accepted methods to measure provider quality. Summarize the features and why it applies best to the organization. Refer to the assigned reading, “The Measurement of Health Care Performance: A Primer from the Council of Medical Specialty Societies.”
Definition of Success: Define what success means to the organization. Now that you have chosen measures to assess organizational performance, identify what success means to the organization; otherwise, you are chasing a moving target. Be explicit in the level of performance you see as acceptable. This will change as an organization grows, but you need to start somewhere in order to get anywhere.
Provide a minimum of three scholarly resources from the readings, qualified websites, or the GCU Library in order to complete this assignment successfully.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information:
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
BS – Health Sciences
1.4: Evaluate the use of an interdisciplinary approach to patient care.
5.3: Describe the importance of quality and process outcomes within one’s scope of practice.

Purpose
The purpose of this direct care project is for learners to apply the nursing process to assess if the nursing care provided by professionally certified nurses will result in improved patient outcomes. This is Part 1 of 4 in the Direct Care Project.
Direct Care Project Overview
There are four parts to the Direct Care Project.
There will be graded Project Check-ins that correlate to each part.
Review the table below for overview and due dates with each topic.
Carefully review the instructions, tutorials, templates, and rubrics for each of the four parts as you begin this Course Project.
Contact your instructor with questions.
Overview Points Due Date Project
Part 1: Assessment: Check-In 10 Wednesday of Week 2 Required, graded check-in on progress of assessing your choice of nursing certification.
Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis 200 Sunday end of Week 2 Assess the link between quality improvement of patient outcomes, clinical nursing certification, and leadership development.
Part 2: Planning: Check-In 10 Wednesday of Week 4 Required, graded check-in on progress of planning and creating the presentation.
Part 2: Planning the Presentation
160 Sunday end of Week 4 Create a presentation for your targeted population about the specific clinical certification including how it could impact patient outcomes and leadership.
Part 3: Implementing the Presentation
Required Schedule presentation Saturday of Week 5 through Saturday Week 6 Presentation of PowerPoint to identified targeted population. Includes pre-survey, post-survey, and attendance form.
Part 3: Implementation: Check-In 10 Wednesday of Week 5 Required, graded check-in on progress of implementing your presentation.
Part 4: Evaluation: Check-In 10 Wednesday of Week 6 Required, graded check-in on progress of evaluation of your presentation and project.
Part 4: Evaluating the Project 200 Sunday end of Week 6 Evaluate learning and reflect on project.
Course Outcomes
This direct care project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)
Part 1 enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)
Due Date for Part 1
Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT end of Week 2
Points Possible for Part 1
200  Points
Late Assignment Policy
If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Directions for Part 1
Review the Direct Care Project Overview above.
View the Direct Care Project Part 1 Tutorial (Click here to view) (Links to an external site.).
Download the Direct Care Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis templateunder Templates below.
Please address the following areas on the provided template:
State the clinical certification and target population including setting that were approved by your instructor in the Week 2: Direct Care Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis Check-In.
Thorough discussion of why this certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting
Describe the criteria for selected clinical certification
Process to obtain clinical certification
Cost of application and testing
Requirements prior to certification
Examination description
Renewal time and process
Required items for renewal
Provide APA reference for one peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article connecting patient outcomes, certification, and leadership skills.
From Chamberlain Library
CINAHL or ProQuest
Note: Do not use CINAHL Guides or Evidence-Based Care Sheets
Full Text only
No more than 5 years old
In English
Peer-reviewed
Include the permalink
For more information on finding Permalinks in the Chamberlain Library, see Learn the Library and Finding Permalinks (Links to an external site.)
Reference must be use APA format including author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available.
Summarize findings of article
Summarize the key points of the selected peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article in one or two paragraphs.
Be clear and concise.
Discuss how patient outcomes in the selected setting could be improved by certified nurses.
Discuss how certification can impact leadership skills in the selected setting.
Identify a problem (diagnosis) based on your assessment
Important: The problem you identify will be utilized in Parts 2, 3, and 4 of the Direct Care Project.
Write the problem diagnosis (See template)
Submit template through the Submit Assignment button on this page.
Templates
Direct Care Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis Template (Download here) (Links to an external site.)
Best Practices
Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
Use the template provided. If the template is not used, a deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed.
Scholarly Sources and Citations
One reference needed
Cite reference in APA format
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Rubric
NR447 – Direct Care Project Part 1 Assessment and Diagnosis
NR447 – Direct Care Project Part 1 Assessment and Diagnosis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApproved Items from Part 1 Check-in
Student states approved:
• Clinical certification
• Target population
• Setting
10 pts
Exceptional
Provides all three approved items Student states approved: • Clinical certification • Target population • Setting
9 pts
Exceeds
Provides all three items but one or more are not approved
8 pts
Meets
Missing one criterion
4 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing two criteria
0 pts
Developing
Provides no criteria
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of Certification Selection
Student thoroughly discusses why this clinical certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting
20 pts
Exceptional
Student thoroughly discusses why this clinical certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting
18 pts
Exceeds
Student discusses why this clinical certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting but lacks details
16 pts
Meets
Student discusses why this clinical certification was selected but does not address relationship to setting
8 pts
Needs Improvement
Student minimally discusses why this clinical certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting
0 pts
Developing
Student does not discuss why this clinical certification was selected in relationship to the selected setting
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of Certification Criteria
Student describes:
• Process to obtain clinical certification
• Cost of application and testing
• Requirements prior to certification
• Examination description
• Renewal time and process
• Required items for renewal
40 pts
Exceptional
Describes all six certification information criteria: • Process to obtain clinical certification • Cost of application and testing • Requirements prior to certification • Examination description • Renewal time and process • Required items for renewal
36 pts
Exceeds
Missing 1 criterion
32 pts
Meets
Missing 2-3 criteria
16 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 4-5 criteria
0 pts
Developing
Provides no criteria
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Selection
• One scholarly peer-reviewed article
• No more than 5 years old
• About link between patient outcomes, certification, and leadership
• English
• Full text
20 pts
Exceptional
Describes all five criteria: • One scholarly peer-reviewed article • No more than 5 years old • About link between patient outcomes, certification, and leadership • English • Full text
18 pts
Exceeds
Missing 1 criterion
16 pts
Meets
Missing 2 criteria
8 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 3-4 criteria
0 pts
Developing
Provides no criteria
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Reference
Student places reference in correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error). Permalink is provided.
20 pts
Exceptional
Reference is in correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error). Permalink is provided.
18 pts
Exceeds
Reference uses APA format including the items at left with 2–3 errors. Permalink is provided.
16 pts
Meets
Reference uses APA format including the items at left with 4-5 errors. Permalink is provided.
8 pts
Needs Improvement
Reference uses APA format including the items at left with more than 5 errors OR Permalink is not provided.
0 pts
Developing
No reference and permalink provided
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Summary
Student summarizes the key points of the selected article in one or two paragraphs. Summary is clear and concise.
40 pts
Exceptional
Student summarizes the key points of the selected article in one or two paragraphs. Summary is clear and concise.
36 pts
Exceeds
Student summarizes the key points of the selected article in one or two paragraphs. Summary is lacking clarity OR is not concise.
32 pts
Meets
Student summarizes the key points of the selected article in one or two paragraphs. Summary is lacking clarity AND is not concise.
16 pts
Needs Improvement
Student minimally summarizes the key points of the selected article.
0 pts
Developing
No summary provided
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Outcomes
Student thoroughly discusses how patient outcomes in the selected setting could be improved by certified nurses
20 pts
Exceptional
Student thoroughly discusses how patient outcomes in the selected setting could be improved by certified nurses
18 pts
Exceeds
Student discusses how patient outcomes in the selected setting could be improved by certified nurses but lacks details
16 pts
Meets
Student discusses how patient outcomes could be improved by certified nurses but does not address selected setting
8 pts
Needs Improvement
Student minimally discusses how patient outcomes could be improved by certified nurses.
0 pts
Developing
Patient outcomes not discussed.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership Skills
Student thoroughly discusses how clinical certification could impact leadership skills in the selected setting
20 pts
Exceptional
Student thoroughly discusses how clinical certification could impact leadership skills in the selected setting
18 pts
Exceeds
Student discusses how clinical certification could impact leadership skills in the selected setting but lacks details
16 pts
Meets
Student discusses how clinical certification could impact leadership skills but does not address selected setting
8 pts
Needs Improvement
Student minimally discusses how clinical certification could impact leadership skills
0 pts
Developing
Leadership skills not discussed
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Diagnosis Statement
Student completes the statement including certification, target population, setting, and patient outcomes
10 pts
Exceptional
Student completes the statement including certification, target population, setting, and patient outcomes
9 pts
Exceeds
Missing one criterion
8 pts
Meets
Missing two criteria
4 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing three criteria
0 pts
Developing
Provides no diagnosis statement
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Use
0 pts
No points deducted
Correct Template Used
0 pts
Points deducted – 20 Points Deducted (10% deduction)
20 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0 pts
No points deducted
Submitted on time
0 pts
Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% per day)
1 day late = 10 Deduction;   2 day late = 20 Deduction;   3 day late = 30 Deduction;   4 day late = 40 Deduction;  5 day late = 50 Deduction;   6 day late = 60 Deduction;   7 day late = 70 Deduction;   Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

Start your post by explaining, in your own words, what logical fallacies are and why they should be avoided in persuasive writing. For example, how might logical fallacies affect a writer’s appeal to ethos and logos? How is a fallacious argument different from a bad argument?

Then, find and identify at least three fallacies in one (or more) persuasive piece. Good places to locate logical fallacies are in
advertisements, political speeches, letters to the editor, cartoons, and articles in magazines or newspapers. Name the fallacy type and explain why the example is a fallacy (i.e. What is the flaw in the reasoning?). Include the images or a link to the article or
advertisement.

research at least two peer-reviewed journal articles to support your presurgical psychological evaluation plan based on the medical procedure you select below.
For this discussion, you will develop a presurgical psychological evaluation plan. Select one medical procedure from the list below.
Chronic pain control procedure
Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease
Gender transitioning or gender affirming surgery
Organ transplant
Reconstructive (plastic) surgery
Reversal of gender transitioning or gender detransitioning surgery
Spine surgery
Stem cell and bone marrow implantation
To successfully complete this discussion, include the following:
Identify which medical procedure you selected at the top of your initial post.
Create a one- to two-paragraph fictious client scenario pertinent to the medical procedure you selected. Include relevant demographics (e.g., age, gender, languages, ethnicity, family status, education, socio-economic status). Copy the scenario directly into the discussion forum in your initial post.
Create a list of culturally appropriate, ethical tests, and assessment procedures you would recommend for determining whether to recommend the client for the medical procedure. Be specific about what the tests measure and address the following question:
What types of test results would lead you to recommend or not recommend the client have the medical procedure at this time?
Copy this information directly into the discussion forum in your initial post.
Include APA-formatted in-text citations and a reference list to scholarly sources in the written portion of your post.

TASK
You can focus on ANY of the following;
-The structure of the U.S. Federal Government, as provided by the United States Constitution (i.e. the three branches of the federal government and the powers granted them by the U.S. Constitution.
Note: A link to the U.S. Constitution is accessible in the content section of your class page in d2l.
-Important action(s) recently taken or being contemplated by one or both chambers of the U.S. Congress (Legislative Branch)
-Important action(s) recently taken or being contemplated by the U.S. President/Executive Branch.
-Recent rulings by the United States Supreme Court that you agree or disagree with and are important to you.
-Something important to you that you believe the U.S. Congress should OR should not do.
-Something you strongly believe the President of the United States should OR should not do…make sure you keep in mind what the U.S. Constitution allows the president to do. In short, the president cannot do anything he/she wants. There are limits set forth in the Constitution.
-Any other political topic or issue that affect all Americans that is very important to you.
DO NOT SELECT A STATE OR LOCAL TOPIC. YOU MUST SELECT A TOPIC THAT AFFECT ALL AMERICANS AND IS VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU.

This is a graduate level course in Public Administration in Productivity Improvement in Public Sector. Someone with Public
Administration or Management experience is preferred. I need someone who is able to follow directions carefully!
and can deliver quality work the first time around. Answer the below essay question only USE UPLOADED MATERIAL AND CITE slide NUMBERS in your writing, as this is proper APA fortmatting.

Question:
Explain how the study of organization theory and public management might help the public manager who is interested in improving the perception of her agency?

This is a graduate level course in Public Administration
in Public Plan & Growth Mgmt. Someone with strong research experience and familiar with Public
Administration is preferred. I need someone who is able to follow directions carefully!
and can deliver quality work the first time around. Answer the below essay question only USE UPLOADED MATERIAL and only one additional source of your choosing (optional) to answer below question.

Question:
Evaluate which theory of decision making is most realistic
and practical and provide examples.
698069
2 hours ago
Correction: You are able to use two additional resources in addition to uploaded material.

In the context of Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory, what is meant by human agency? Describe the core features of human agency.