What, according to you, is missing from this book? This missing piece can be data, analysis, or an argument. The missing piece can either strengthen or weaken a conclusion from the book.
Best Writer
What are the strengths and weaknesses of this definition? Analyze the definition with reference to all the criteria for a good definition of religion:
Module 05: Discussion – Defining Religion
Discussion Forum: Defining Religion
Purpose: To practice analyzing a definition of religion according to the criteria for a good definition.
Directions:
Before you write your initial post for this discussion, go to your first journal entry and read the analysis I have done of your own initial definition of religion. You can use that as a model for how you should analyze the definition you look at here and also for how you should analyze your classmates’ definitions. Before you write your initial post for this discussion, read through “How to Define Religion” then go to your first reflection assignment.
Initial post: (due mid-week) Identify and analyze a definition of religion from the list (or any other source):
Copy the definition and cite the source in your initial post (include URL for a webpage)
What are the strengths and weaknesses of this definition? Analyze the definition with reference to all the criteria for a good definition of religion:
Is this definition too broad or too narrow? Why?
Is this definition biased? In what way?
Does this definition address both the substance and function of religion? In what ways?
Is this definition comprehensive of several dimensions of religion? Which dimensions does it mention?
At the end of your analysis of the dictionary definition, copy your own initial definition from your journal activity #1
Reply to at least two of your classmates’ postings (pick someone who has not already received two responses):
If you think your classmate made any errors in their analysis, what alternative suggestions would you make? Explain why you interpret it differently.
apply the same analysis to your classmate’s own definition (full and complete on all criteria)
Grading: based on content of post—responds to each question prompt and a paragraph in length
Initial post = 10 points
Each reply = 5 points each
Write a summary paper on the History of Civilization
Write a summary paper on the History of CivilizationAssignment Directions:
Read the above listed document (you find the document IN your Revel online text book) and the attached article “Belgium’s King Leopold II has a nemesis”. Then post your answer to the questions (your original post should be at least around 200 words. Question 1 and 2 combined around 200 words). You need to incorporate some facts of the article (names and events) and your opinion on the newspaper article into your response! Points will be subtracted if you do not include the article in the above listed manner!
Read the posts of your peers and respond to at least 2 posts, offering substantive feedback that adds to the discussion topic (each peer comment around 100 words at least)
Questions:
1) Why were such atrocities committed in Congo? And what do you think about Belgium’s current reckoning with it’s colonial past?
2) How does this diplomat’s report compare with the image of the “White Man’s Burden”?
Write a definition paper on Configure Cloud Automation and Orchestration Software.
Write a definition paper on Configure Cloud Automation and Orchestration Software.
What are the Protocols for Controlling COVID-19 in School Settings in Florida should be stricter.
What are the Protocols for Controlling COVID-19 in School Settings in Florida should be stricter.1. Length: 4 to 6 minutes
2. Your topic must be logically debatable, meaning topics like chocolate chip
cookies are the best or why you should not smoke cigarettes will not work. I am
not suggesting you must tackle highly controversial topics like the death penalty,
abortion, etc. (although those topics work), but your topic must have two logical
sides that can be argued. This is not a pro/con speech, you take your position on
the issue and argue that position throughout the presentation.
3. Formal (full sentence) outlines and visuals (PowerPoint, Prezi, Google slides,
etc.) must be uploaded in the assignment window on Canvas before class begins
on the assigned due date. Your name must also be TYPED in the upper right-hand
corner of the outline. You will speak from a keyword outline (note cards or a
sheet, will be discussed during class).
4. Work Cited pages must comport with MLA guidelines.
5. The speech requires outside research. You can use online sources, but they
must be from REPUTABLE information providers, academic journals, .edus, .govs,
TedTalks of decent length. Basically, you must read the actual source material and
research your topic. This will be discussed at length in class; if you have any
questions concerning the validity of a potential source, I am always available. You
need at least five sources, no more than seven. Chapter 12 lists several solid
approaches for research.
6. When citing sources, you must provide the creator (author, documentary
filmmaker, the person delivering the TedTalk, etc.) You must also provide the date
of creation. Lastly, you must provide the publication. When citing sources, refrain
from the following statements, “According to,” “I found a quote by.” You need to
work source material into your speech organically, which will be discussed at
length in class. Sources must be cited verbally during the speech as you use the
material to receive full credit.
Speeches must stay within the time parameters; speeches that are vastly under
or over the time limit are indicative of a lack of rehearsal. The speech is four to six
minutes and requires five outside sources (maximum of seven). Speeches more
than 30 seconds over or under the allotted time will be marked down: 20 percent
reduction in grade for every additional 30 seconds under or over the time limit.
Write a book review on china and Vietnam War 1950-1975.
Write a book review on china and Vietnam War 1950-1975.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of this definition?
Module 05: Discussion – Defining Religion
Discussion Forum: Defining Religion
Purpose: To practice analyzing a definition of religion according to the criteria for a good definition.
Directions:
Before you write your initial post for this discussion, go to your first journal entry and read the analysis I have done of your own initial definition of religion. You can use that as a model for how you should analyze the definition you look at here and also for how you should analyze your classmates’ definitions. Before you write your initial post for this discussion, read through “How to Define Religion” then go to your first reflection assignment.
Initial post: (due mid-week) Identify and analyze a definition of religion from the list (or any other source):
Copy the definition and cite the source in your initial post (include URL for a webpage)
What are the strengths and weaknesses of this definition? Analyze the definition with reference to all the criteria for a good definition of religion:
Is this definition too broad or too narrow? Why?
Is this definition biased? In what way?
Does this definition address both the substance and function of religion? In what ways?
Is this definition comprehensive of several dimensions of religion? Which dimensions does it mention?
At the end of your analysis of the dictionary definition, copy your own initial definition from your journal activity #1
Reply to at least two of your classmates’ postings (pick someone who has not already received two responses):
If you think your classmate made any errors in their analysis, what alternative suggestions would you make? Explain why you interpret it differently.
apply the same analysis to your classmate’s own definition (full and complete on all criteria)
Grading: based on content of post—responds to each question prompt and a paragraph in length
Initial post = 10 points
Each reply = 5 points each
And what do you think about Belgium’s current reckoning with it’s colonial past?
Assignment Directions:
Read the above listed document (you find the document IN your Revel online text book) and the attached article “Belgium’s King Leopold II has a nemesis”. Then post your answer to the questions (your original post should be at least around 200 words. Question 1 and 2 combined around 200 words). You need to incorporate some facts of the article (names and events) and your opinion on the newspaper article into your response! Points will be subtracted if you do not include the article in the above listed manner!
Read the posts of your peers and respond to at least 2 posts, offering substantive feedback that adds to the discussion topic (each peer comment around 100 words at least)
Questions:
1) Why were such atrocities committed in Congo? And what do you think about Belgium’s current reckoning with it’s colonial past?
2) How does this diplomat’s report compare with the image of the “White Man’s Burden”?
Identify the area of nursing education or the area in health care in which you will apply your MSN, education specialization skills, and knowledge.
Identify your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator. Address how this philosophy will guide you in the tripartite roles of a nurse educator – how it will guide your teaching, scholarship, and service. Support your philosophy with your knowledge of historical events that are pertinent to your work. In addition, identify the competencies that you see as critical to your role.
In sum, your philosophy statement should guide your practice as a nurse educator.
Your educator philosophy statement should do the following:
Identify the area of nursing education or the area in health care in which you will apply your MSN, education specialization skills, and knowledge.
Formulate your nurse educator philosophy statement, which should comprise of your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator.
Apply your philosophy statement to each of the tripartite roles of the nurse educator. What does your philosophy mean for your approach to teaching, scholarship, and service? As you discuss the role of teacher, be sure to address any theories (adult learning theory, learner-center education, and others) that shape your approach as an educator.
Analyze the relationship of significant historical events that have shaped the role you seek to fill.
Analyze the most essential nurse educator competencies necessary for this MSN-prepared nurse educator. Explain why you selected the competencies you did.
Conclude with a summary.
As a group what do your reflections have in common and where do they differ?
As a group, what do your reflections have in common and where do they differ?