Best Writer

The principles of unity & variety apply to all music, regardless of compositional style or historical period.

Now that you are familiar with the concepts in the first section of the course (Basic Musical Concepts), and you have seen how they work on different pieces of music, try your hand, mouse, and ears at how they operate in a music selection that you may not have heard yet.

Cherry Pink and Apple Blossom White (4:08)

Your analysis should include:
1. The number of different musical ideas you hear in the piece (can we say that there are two ideas A and B? Or is there only one?)
2. The timings (start and stop times) of the different sections of the piece. (Hint: Listen for changes in musical ideas and timbre, or for points when one instrument gives way to another.)
3. How the following elements contribute to unity and variety in the sections you identified (give timings):
Dynamics: Where does the music get louder or softer? Is there any apparent reason for those changes?
Timbre: Where do different instruments take over the melody?
Pitch: What is the general pitch level of the piece? Are there wide variations in pitch level?
4. Although there are sections that feature one instrument over others, do you think this is a piece for a solo performer or for an ensemble?
5. List of the characteristics of the musical style closest to the one this piece exemplifies. (Hint: Revisit the class titled Folk Music, Art Music, and All That Jazz)
6. Do you think this piece serves (or could serve) a specific purpose?
7. Does this piece have any specific connotation(s) for you?

Why is it relevant to have health insurance and how does it work? Please provide and example?

Assessment Descriiption
The rise of secular humanism to prominence in the scientific community has led to the mantra that there is no place for Christianity in scientific study. This assignment will explore the potential conflict of Christianity, science, and ethics, and will guide the learner to make conclusions regarding the appropriate influence of the Christian worldview on psychology research ethics.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Support all statements with appropriate, contemporary research. Cite and reference at least two scholarly sources other than those in the module and assignment readings.
Directions:

Write a paper (2,000-2,250 words) that addresses the role of the Christian worldview in the application of research ethics in the field of psychology. Address the following in your paper:

Is Christianity specifically incompatible with Ph.D. research in the field of psychology? Why or why not?
Is the Christian worldview compatible with research ethics in the field of psychology? Why or why not?
To what extent should the Christian worldview influence the type of psychology research conducted and the ethics of that research? Why?
To what extent do you perceive that the Christian worldview will influence the topic and ethics of your intended dissertation research? Why? Is this different than you expected? Why or why not? (Benchmarks Relationships, Spirit, and Self-Discovery C8.1: Appraise the evolution of one’s personal self and worldview.)

Rubric:
Compatibility of Christianity and Psychology Research
50 points
Criteria Descriiption
Compatibility of Christianity and Psychology Research
5. Excellent
50 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christianity and psychology research is thoroughly presented with rich detail and substantial support.
4. Good
43.5 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christianity and psychology research is present and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
39.5 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christianity and psychology research is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
37 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christianity and psychology research is present, but illogical or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christianity and psychology research is either missing or not evident to the reader.
collapse Compatibility of Christian Worldview and Psychology Research Ethics assessment
Compatibility of Christian Worldview and Psychology Research Ethics
50 points
Criteria Descriiption
Compatibility of Christian Worldview and Psychology Research Ethics
5. Excellent
50 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christian worldview and psychology research ethics is thoroughly presented with rich detail and substantial support.
4. Good
43.5 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christian worldview and psychology research ethics is presented and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
39.5 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christian worldview and psychology research ethics is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
37 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christian worldview and psychology research ethics is presented, but illogical or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the compatibility of Christian worldview and psychology research ethics is not presented.
collapse Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Research Type and Ethics assessment
Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Research Type and Ethics
37.5 points
Criteria Descriiption
Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Research Type and Ethics
5. Excellent
37.5 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence research type and ethics is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
4. Good
32.63 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence research type and ethics is presented and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
29.63 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence research type and ethics is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
27.75 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence research type and ethics is presented, but inaccurate or illogical.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence research type and ethics is either missing or not evident to the reader.
collapse Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Intended Dissertation Research (B) assessment
Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Intended Dissertation Research (B)
37.5 points
Criteria Descriiption
Extent to Which Christian Worldview Should Influence Intended Dissertation Research (C8.1)
5. Excellent
37.5 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence intended dissertation research is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
4. Good
32.63 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence intended dissertation research is presented and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
29.63 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence intended dissertation research is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
27.75 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence intended dissertation research is presented, but inaccurate or illogical.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the extent to which Christian worldview should influence intended dissertation research is either missing or not evident to the reader.
collapse Synthesis and Argument assessment
Synthesis and Argument
25 points
Criteria Descriiption
Synthesis and Argument
5. Excellent
25 points
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
21.75 points
Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
19.75 points
Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.5 points
Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.
collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment
Thesis Development and Purpose
25 points
Criteria Descriiption
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
25 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.
4. Good
21.75 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriiptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
19.75 points
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
18.5 points
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
12.5 points
Criteria Descriiption
Mechanics of Writing
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
10.88 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
9.88 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.25 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
collapse APA Format assessment
APA Format
12.5 points
Criteria Descriiption
APA Format
5. Excellent
12.5 points
The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
4. Good
10.88 points
Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
3. Satisfactory
9.88 points
Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.25 points
Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used.

Assignment – Artist / Artwork of Importance
1. You will choose a piece of artwork or an artist that speaks to you – strongly and deeply.
2. You will submit a three (3)
part submission about the chosen artwork/artist. Point #11.
3. Introduce the artwork / artist (artist, years active, title, medium, artwork etc…)
4. Is the piece a painting, photograph, drawing, lithograph, screen print, video or… What medium(s) does your chosen artist work in? Actor, dancer, musician etc…
5. Tell us clearly what you are presenting and WHY.
6. RESEARCH: The artist – who are they? Where were they born? Any interesting facts about the artist? Researching the artist can be done in books, online and through any others sources you may wish to access. Look at samples of other work. These exact same research methods can be used for researching a piece of art.
7. Understand the artwork / artist – take detailed notes when researching.
8. What new knowledge have you gained through your research?
9. PUT EVERYTHING IN YOUR OWN WORDS – not Wikipedia or Google etc…
10. For your research (books, online, gallery visit etc…) please keep a list of sources used and provide that list when you email in the assignment.
11. IMPORTANT: The 3 parts are:
a): In POINT FORM – one sheet handwritten OR typed with information about your chosen artist / artwork.
b): Send me one (1) YouTube link, VIMEO link, Website link or Google Image of your chosen artist / artwork. (Just ONE of the above).
c): Handwrite or type a strong 2 paragraph conclusion about your artist / artwork.
12. IMPORTANT – assignment should be: well-structured, great visuals, clearly handwritten or typed and excellent knowledge of material. PowerPoints are welcome but not required– be creative with your presentation. 15% of your total mark

Use the concepts and the material from the class regarding the science of fingerprints to write a 2–4-page paper answering the following three questions:

Part 1

Explain the principles and processes used in the analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification of latent fingerprints. Explain the ACE-V process. Break down each step, and explain what is done by an examiner, and why each step is vital to the process.

Part 2

Define class characteristics and individual characteristics of latent fingerprints. Present one example of each as they deal with forensic science, and also specifically with fingerprints. Explain how your examples fit the definitions. At what step of the ACE-V process are class characteristics and individual characteristics of a print looked at?

Part 3

Examine the print titled “Young Print” found in Course Documents. How many bifurcations do see, if any? How many islands do you see? Ridge endings? Based on the number of bifurcations, islands, and ridges found, is this fingerprint of high enough quality to be used to find a match? Could analysis be done on this print? Can comparisons be done of this print to prints on file? Could examination and evaluation be done on the print?

Write two paragraphs using at least three quotations from the textbook, RCG Part III, Chapters 1-5, pgs 199-243; and the film On Orientalism, that contribute to your overall discussion. Be sure to explain each quotation that you use. Paragraph One: Explain what Edward Said means by Orientalism, the history of it in European colonialism, and US policy towards Arabs and Muslims. Connect Said’s analysis with Bayoumi’s chapter. Offer three examples of Orientalism at work in the US. 300 words.

Paragraph Two: Explain some of the ways that racism intersects with sexism, nativism, anti semitism, and economic exploitation in relationship to issues of citizenship and belonging. Refer to the chapters by Haney-Lopez, Quintero, Chomsky, and Granick/Tevis for your response. 300 words.

M‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ust answer the following: 1) What issues in this disaster would make triage of victims a challenge? 2) What Public Health issues could happen, and ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌what can we do to mitigate the events? 3) How can interagency cooperation and local collaboration be effectively utilized? At least (5) reference‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌s

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌opic 1. How do contemporary Christians use the writings of Paul of Tarsus to justify their beliefs about sex and gender. Must: -include Paul of Tarsus’s contribution to contemporary Christianity – include Christian sexual ethics – include Weekly worship – explains aspects of religion and belief systems -describes and analyses the influence of religion and belief systems on individuals and society -describes and analyses how aspects ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌of religious traditions are expressed by their adherents -evaluates the influence of religious traditions in the life of adherents -organises, analyses and synthesises relevant information about religion from a variety of sources, considering usefulness, validity and bias -conducts effective research about religion and evaluates the findings from the research -applies appropriate terminology and concepts related to religion and belief syst‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ems

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ART 1: Please read Textbook Chapter 9 – Community Organizing & Building.The textbook is attached as (Neiger._Planning__implementing__and_eval.). Then read the attached files and these additional readings (https://apnews.com/article/Trayvon-Martin-death-10-years-later-c68f12130b2992d9c1ba31ec1a398cdd) AND (https://www.thecut.com/article/sybrina-fulton-trayvon-martin-interview.html) Take a look at the picture of the Time magazine cover below. 1) Who are these people? (if you’re not sure, Google “Time Magazine Parkland Students”). 2) Do you think their efforts can be considered “community organizing”? How and why? 3) What if, anything, do you think were some positive results of their actions? 4) Can you think of any O‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌THER modern-day examples of community organizing or advocacy efforts? 5) What makes you think so? Can you describe any results of these efforts thus far? ****************************************************** PART 2 1) Please watch this video in YouTube ( and explore the Girl Trek website below. 2) After watching the Girl Trek video and exploring the Girl Trek website ( take a stab at mapping and drawing a logic model for how you think this program “works”. You can create your logic model on a PowerPoint Slide or on Word document. *** I have attached an example of how the Logic Model on Powerpoint should look. Please use that as a guideline for Pa‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rt 2***

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌tudents should construct a formal essay that includes an introductory paragraph with a thesis, a body of paragraphs supporting or exploring the thesis, and a conclusion. The essay should be comprised of 1,250 or more words; and, as indicated below, students will be responsible for revising their essays. Essays must be typed in a highly legible font (fourteen-point font preferred), double spaced, and conform – in terms of form, grammar and style – to standard English. Students should provide a title for their essay, and they should provide their name at the top left-hand corner of their essay. Unless students cite outside sources, no documentation is required, but should students chose to document outside sources, the style of the Modern Language Association (MLA) is preferred. Of course, if students quote from the reading selection, they should place that material inside of quotation marks. Quotation from the reading selection should be limited to one or two lines. For understanding the nature of mythology, “On the Existence of San‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ta Claus and Miracle on 34th Street,” Link: On the Existence of Santa Claus and Miracle on 34th Download On the Existence of Santa Claus and Miracle on 34th For exploring the resurrection stories of Osiris and Jesus, Link: Osiris and Download Osiris and ESSAY PROMPT: Students should write an essay in which they address the characteristics of myths, examine the ancient Egyptian story of Osiris’ resurrection, and compare the story of Osiris with Christian accounts concerning the resurrection of Jesus. To what does the word “myth” refer; or what, in other words, are the characteristics of “myth”? What are some examples of myths and their truths? What is the story of Osiris’ resurrection, and what truths did the story of Osiris intend to convey to the ancient Egyptians? What is the story of Jesus’ resurrection, and what truths did the story intend to convey to Christians? What conclusion can be reached based upon these two stories? Students may use that conclusion as the thesis statem‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ent of their essay.