Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections

PICOT Question: In patients that have urinary tract infections (P) how does Foley catheter placement (I), compared with patients that don’t have Foley catheters (C) affect their healing time from infections (O) within two weeks of being admitted to the hospital (T)?

This is a Change Project, I have uploaded the grading rubric for the assignment.
and have also included some of my research for the assignment..

This paper needs to be about how we need to have nurse driven protocols for catheter care and switching to the use of Pure-Wicks over Foley catheters in patients, except for certain problems, like trauma, and surgeries, or intubated patients.

Political Sciend Philospher paper

You are to pick two out of the seven political philosophers listed, & explain regarding one of them why you most favor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Then regarding the second political philosopher, explain why you most disfavor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Consider how they both viewed human nature and the equal/unequal nature of humans, and how that helps explain their worldview.

The length of your response for each philosopher should be 1-2 pages, double spaced with one-inch margins all around. If you quote someone, be sure to reference the quote, and everything else should be written in your own words.

Here is the list of political philosophers you can choose from: Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Marx and Nietzsche

personal essay

This week, we are writing a Personal Essay; a narrative account of a personal experience where you tell the audience what happened and how you thought or felt.
The reason these types of assignments are given so often is that anyone can write about their own experience and it doesn’t require any outside resources or research. However, even though anyone can tell a story about their life, that does not mean anyone can write a good essay about that experience.
Writing an essay about a personal experience or relationship can be a powerful way of both discovering the meaning of your own past and sharing that past with others. When you write about something in your past, you have two perspectives: your perspective in the present and the perspective you had at the time the event occurred. The space between these perspectives is usually where you will find significance in that event or relationship.
This assignment requires:
Telling a vivid a story from your past.
Explaining the significance of that story.
Finding the difference between your past perspective and present perspective of the event.
3-4 pages
Times New Roman, 12 pt font, double spaced, 1-inch margins
Proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation
Talk about any event you’d like (think: favorite vacations, lost loves, traumatic events, stories of siblings or parents, etc.) This is your time to tell YOUR story. Focus on something specific. Do not describe your whole vacation; instead, focus on the most important event and then fill in the necessary details.

Circe’s story, in Madeline Miller’s telling, is largely about her journey to understanding herself and her world. Choose some key moments and examine how Circe awakens and what she learns. Consider how this ancient story may be relevant in today’s world

Circe’s story, in Madeline Miller’s telling, is largely about her journey to understanding herself and her world. Choose some key moments and examine how Circe awakens and what she learns. Consider how this ancient story may be relevant in today’s world

Motifs in “The Rocking Horse Winner”

Motifs in “The Rocking Horse Winner”

Use two or three Foster’s motifs (quest, weather, seasons, water, etc.) to analyze this story how do these motifs offer clues to understanding the meaning of the story? Do you see any similarities in the way the writer uses these motifs in the novel we have been reading?

Should be at least 200 words long

**The required reading/source is attached to this listing**

Organisational Behavior

Section A: REVIEW
The topic is MOTIVATION
EXPLAIN THIS CONCEPT (motivation) IN YOUR WORDS.
*It is important that you review the concept and then write it down in your own words so that you can demonstrate to your Professor that you truly understand the material. DO NOT SIMPLY REGURGITATE THE CONCEPT STRAIGHT OUT OF THE TEXTBOOK AND DO NOT SIMPLY COPY AND PASTE FROM OTHER WEBSITES. If you do use other sources, YOU MUST INCLUDE THE IN-TEXT CITATIONS AND FULL REFERENCES AT THE END.
Section B: APPLICATION
In light of the above concept and based on what you have learned thus far,
What have you learned about yourself that has perhaps surprised you?
Is there anything that you will change in terms of your behaviour going forward? For
example, think of how you interact at work, what would you do differently now? Or what would you continue doing and why?

bank management

https://data.world/uci/bank-marketing/workspace/file?filename=bank-additional%2Fbank-additional-full.csv
needs to be written on this data set.

Course Development and Influencing Factors

Develop a 6-8 page course design to be included in the selected nursing curriculum chosen in Assessment 1 (attached).

Design a course to be included in your selected nursing curriculum. In your course design:
Describe an appropriate course to include in a selected curriculum.
Provide a rationale for adding a course to a selected curriculum.
Suggest a topical outline for a course to be added to a selected curriculum.
Explain with whom and how faculty members would collaborate when considering the new course within a selected curriculum design.
Explain and describe how internal factors such as organizational processes, curriculum committees, and internal review bodies affect curriculum design.
Explain and describe how external factors such as funding, stakeholders, and regulatory and accrediting agencies affect curriculum design.
Explain how the mission, philosophy, and framework of the program and parent institution impact curriculum design.
Describe the type of collaboration between external and internal stakeholders that will be needed throughout a process of curriculum development.
Course outline: Include the course outline as an appendix. The appendix will not be included in the page count for the assessment.

Women & Crime

This exam is made up of short answer questions (3 or 4 points each) Read the entire question, and provide a complete answer (150 word minimum) to receive full credit. Please write in complete sentences and use correct grammar and punctuation.

1. Discuss how gender norms and social control may explain the gender gap in criminal offending. (3 points)
2. Discuss the typical gendered pathway for a female to offending. What is gender-specific programming and why is this an important concept to help girls and women desist from crime? (4 points)
3. How do gender, class and race intersect to increase the chance of woman entering the criminal justice system? (4 points)

4. Based on the article “Empowering Women to Escape Prostitution” by Giobbe, why do prostitutes, even though often abused, not receive the status of victim or survivor (only offender)? (3 points)
5. How has the War on Drugs had a disproportionate negative impact on women and widened the net for entry into the criminal justice system? (4 points)
6. Discuss the need for care vs. the level of care for female offenders in the areas of mental health, substance abuse and medical care in women’s prisons. (4 points)
7. What is a systems approach to female offending? Discuss four components that would be necessary in a successful community corrections, prison, or re-entry program for female offenders. (4 points)
8. Which theory makes the most sense to you regarding female criminality? Why? (You must show me that you understand the theory!) (4 points)

Speech and Expression

Pick one of the discussion cases listed below and answer the associated questions.

Case 1: Sipple V. San Francisco Chronicle
In a split second, a man in a crowd deflects a gun aimed at President Gerald Ford. The Media celebrates the man as a hero. A reporter discovers that the man is homosexual, a fact of which his family is not aware. But everyone finds out when the reluctant hero’s sexuality becomes part of the national story. See Sipple v. San Francisco Chronicle, Inc. (1975) (Links to an external site.).
Questions:
In light of the public’s “right to know” and the First Amendment (Free Speech) did the press do the right thing? Do you think that overall social utility is obtained by adopting a “free press” rule where sensitive personal information can be published — should this rule allow newspapers to override individual privacy rights? Would your answer change if the story had been posted on-line? Whatever you decide is morally correct, would your answer change if you were the hero. If so, why? Give at least two reasons for your view.
Finally, suppose you write about this case on your blog. Your boss reads your blog and decides to fire you on the spot. Should employers be permitted to fire employee because of employee first amendment activity (while not at work)? Why/why not?
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Case 2: Compelled Speech
Suppose you are a musician who composes jingles and songs for paying customers. Your prior work includes a soundtrack for a small independent movie, several country songs sold to various artists, but most of your work is in writing jingles for commercials. You are approached one day and asked to write a song/jingle for an ultra conservative political commercial that bashes “gay lifestyles.” Your prospective client wants you to use the lyric “Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve” etc. Being tolerant and left of center, you politely refuse this work noting that the proposed message does not fit with your worldview. You also note that there are other jingle writers in the area that would happily take on this project.
The prospective clients are outraged and demand that you use your creative talents to do the work requested. They note that you are public business offering service to the public and cannot, legally or morally, reject taking on this project because of your bias against conservative world-views.
Questions:
1. Should you legally or morally be required to complete this work? Compare this case to Master Cake Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Commission (Links to an external site.).
2. In light of this case, what do you think of the following view. “We each get to be biased, irrational, and stupid . . . there are no . . . and there should not be . . . laws that generally prohibit being biased etc. Who you invite to dinner or who you marry may be biased, irrational, and stupid . . . these decisions may be even racist. The appropriate response to such bias and irrationality is shame, picketing/demonstrations, or ostracism . . . not incarceration or fines.”
3. Briefly discuss how you think J. S. Mill would say about the jingle case.
++++++++++++++++++
Case 3: Compelled Speech 2
You are a manager at a technology firm with 15 years experience. Given your time and experience, your job security is high . . . no one would think of firing you. Part of your job is to serve on various committees so that the mission of your unit (product development and market research) can occur in a timely and efficient manner. Some of this service is elected . . . that is, to serve on a specific committee requires a vote of the your bosses. The “oversight committee” in your unit is asking you to serve as the chair, which would be a great honor, if you were actually elected. Nevertheless, you are uneasy with being nominated and serving as chair because the unit has adopted language . . . an opening paragraph to be recited by the chair . . . at the start of each meeting. This paragraph has nothing to do with governance or oversight. Rather, it is a religious and political statement.
By your lights there are two issues with being required to start each committee meeting with this recitation. First, is the issue of compelled speech. The language, arguably, has nothing to do with governance. While you may actually agree with the points being made, being required to read this paragraph seems questionable. Second, you find the claims made in this “compelled speech” to be questionable . . . and some push a false narrative.
Questions:
1. What should you do? You could decline standing for election. You could stand for election and just read the paragraph. You could get elected and then refuse to read the paragraph. Other options?
2. Would your views on what to do change if your job security was not so strong? What if refusing to stand for election could get you fired? What if the language included positive claims about men’s rights or how women are irrational?
3. Briefly discus how one of our authors would view this case. What is the morally correction course of action according to Mill, or Kant, or Locke, or . . . (pick one author)?