Instructions Week Three – HealthMap Investigation (ILO 2) & (CLO 2, 4, 5, & 6) East US/China/Japan The goal of this assignment is to investigate the healthmap.org website each week (1-4) and find a new and specific outbreak that has found its way into the general population. Your focus will be to record three new outbreaks in all various parts of the world- North, South, East, and West regions of the world throughout the four weeks of class. (15 points each week) Complete the following for each of the three outbreaks: Name the communicable disease Name the location- City, County, State, Region, Territory and so on Describe the specifics of the outbreak including causes and symptoms How many cases have been confirmed and who has been affected? What is being done to prevent the spread of the disease? Textbook: Harris, R. E. (2013). Epidemiology of chronic disease. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Best Writer
Quality Assessment in Health Service organization
As discussed in class, quality has a variety of different definitions depending on the individual, the organization, or the industry. We discussed five different types of quality in class. For your assignment, I would like you to compare and contrast quality in health care versus a more traditional “business” field. Take an organization in health care and one in business (For this paper we will use the University of Utah Hospital versus Apple). Visit these organizations, review their published information, and interview their employees, customers, or administrators. With these, and other methods that provide information; provide detail on the following (but don’t limit it to just these questions): – How does each assess quality, both in their products and services? (this is where people miss a lot of points. remember every organization has multiple products, and the service is the provision of that product. be specific about what products organizations provide, and the quality they assess on them, then do the same with services). – What are the important outcomes, including those based on the quality types we discuss, that each is interested in? – Are there differences in quality required between the two different organizations you’ve chosen? Why? What other organizations mandate quality for the organizations you chose? – How do consumers provide their feedback on quality in each organization? What about employees? – What are the main strengths/weaknesses in how quality is assessed by each of these organizations? What changes would you suggest based on your knowledge of quality? An overall summary of what you learned would also be helpful. Interviews and specific references to company materials (websites, quality reviews, etc) are STRONGLY preferred. Five main types of quality Transcendent -Ideal, condition of excellence Product-based -Product attribute User-based -Fitness for use Manufacturing-based -Conformance to requirements Value-based -Excellence at acceptable price I attached some supplemental resources but you can use others, Thank you!
Mental Health specialized Court
For this assignment you will be answering the following questions based on material from Chapter 6 Reading and PowerPoints. Please make sure to carefully think about which specialty court you choose and the motivation for why it was designed.
Choose a specialized court category that was presented in the reading or the PowerPoints that you believe would be impactful in the Rio Grande Valley and explain why you believe this specialized court would be necessary and successful in the RGV.
Identify and describe three distinguishing features as presented in the reading or PowerPoints that would be a part of the specialized court?
What are two possible threats as presented in the reading or PowerPoints that the court you chose might experience in the Rio Grande Valley?
Please remember that Drug Courts are geared towards users not traffickers, so make sure to be cautious and detailed in your choices.
Translation Frame work for DNP project
Translation Framework Paper
The purpose of the Translation Framework paper is to determine which framework may be most relevant to your DNP Scholarly Project. Choose the most applicable translation framework or change theory model for your project and provide your rationale. In addition, include a visual organizer/diagram of the chosen framework augmented with variables from your project.
Given your clinical problem, you will critically analyze your project as it relates to the chosen framework, including the intervention, the personnel implementing the change, and the organizational factors that impact the intervention.
For the framework chosen, include the following:
• Describe the elements of the framework
• Show how these elements relate to your project (problem, intervention, personnel implementing, and project site)
• Explain how the framework could be used to translate the evidence at your project site
• Critique how well the framework informs the translation effort aims for your problem, intervention, personnel, and project site
The paper should not exceed 3 pages (not including title page, reference list, or framework augmented for your project). This assignment should follow APA format and include appropriate citations. Your writing should be clear and concise, as well as free from grammatical errors.
Rehabilitation & Punishment of Criminals Outline Paper
Topic: Do we have a moral obligation to rehabilitate or punish criminals?
Develop an outline for the topic (Feel free to pick your side, for Rehabilitation or for Punishment). Provide brief details about the summary of both sides of the topic, your opinion, conclusion, and relevant questions. The outline should be approximately 1-2 pages in length and should include the major points and arguments. Please include the references.
Please no plagiarism, the outline will also be evaluated through Turnitin.
Review the information that the authors have presented on pages 479- 491 regarding how hospitals are paid, specifically noting reimbursement under the Medicare Part A program, and review the problem that the authors have presented on page 491.
Review the information that the authors have presented on pages 479- 491 regarding how hospitals are paid, specifically noting reimbursement under the Medicare Part A program, and review the problem that the authors have presented on page 491.
You are in-house counsel for a hospital that is losing money and the hospital’s CEO has asked you to come up with ways to improve Medicare reimbursement under the PPS system. Discuss 2 strategies that could be used to improve reimbursement. (There are some suggestions in the problem.) Discuss 2 ways you might go about lowering the cost of treating Medicare patients.
Mantram therapy may reduce hyperarousal
Proposal Assignment #1: Combines Introduction and Literature Review
This assignment is a draft–it is just to get you started. You can rewrite your introduction and question, and redo/refine your literature review right up until the final proposal is due, but the draft should indicate that you have put effort into developing an “answerable question” about a problem or program that you have documented with cited references. Your references for the Introduction can be from sources other than academic journals, but they should be “legitimate sources” from websites or documents that can be referenced in APA style. References for the Literature Review must be research articles from academic journals. Be sure to cite all your sources and DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. All papers (drafts and the final proposal) will be submitted via Turnitin and you get only 1 warning about plagiarism before losing points or failing the course.
1. Introduction (11/2 – 2 pages, 5 pts)
a. Descriiption of the program or issue to be investigated—what is the problem you are addressing or the program you are evaluating? This section might contain statistics of prevalence or incidence.
b. Statement and documentation of the significance of the program or issue and the rationale for studying it relative to social work. This part should describe why the problem is important, or evidence of the impact of the problem for society.
c. Purpose of the proposed study–formal statement of research question(s). Your question should be “well-built”– it can’t be vague or unclear; it must tell the reader precisely what you would like to investigate. The question cannot be an answer to a fact (e.g., what is the poverty rate in Kentucky compared to the poverty rate in the U.S.?) and cannot “discover” something that we already know from prior studies.
2. Literature review (11/2 – 2 pages, 5 pts; minimum of 3 research article references that should be attached to your paper)
a. Summary and integration of related research and findings/ identified gaps in the literature—you should summarize in your own words what you have learned about the topic; identify the gap(s) in our knowledge on the topic. (The discussion section of research articles is a good place to find these gaps.) The gaps you find in the literature should help you build your rationale for the study. Why is your study needed and what will it contribute to our knowledge base?
b. Framework for the proposed study including conceptual definitions of major concepts if needed—this part is to help define the parameters of your proposed study—its limits.
c. Restatement of research question(s) as refined by the literature review. Conclude this section with your research question(s).
3. References (5 pts.): Use the APA style to cite and reference your sources for your introduction and literature review; minimum of 3 references in your literature review must be research articles from social work or social science journals. This is the absolute minimum number; most of you will have more for your final proposal. BE SURE TO ATTACH YOUR 3 RESEARCH ARTICLES TO YOUR PAPER.
Proposal Assignment #2: Include your Introduction and Literature Review drafts—ideally modified based on the feedback provided and by updates in your knowledge of your topic. This assignment is a draft of your Methods/Methodology section—it should be based on and consistent with your Introduction and Literature Review. This is the third section of your proposal and should describe in detail how you plan to conduct your proposed study—if you are proposing to collect data from primary sources, you need to describe who your subjects will be and how you plan to recruit and protect them. If you are proposing to use secondary data, you need to describe how that data was collected and how you will get permission to use it. You then need to describe the data to be collected or used, measures used, and independent and dependent variables if applicable. Finally, you need to describe how you will analyze and use your data. You don’t have to identify specific statistics you might employ; just say you would report the most common responses, or compare the scores of two groups, or compare pre-test and post-test scores, for example. Again, this should tie back to your introduction–why you think your study is important and your findings would be significant for social work practice. Follow the outline below.
3. Methodology (2 – 3 pages, 10 pts.) This section should describe a feasible/doable research project.
a Descriiption of the proposed study design and strategy: research design (e.g., survey, classic experimental design, one-group pre-test post-test design, secondary data analysis, etc.)
b. Sampling design, descriiption of proposed sample/subjects, recruitment plan (who are you studying and how are you getting participants to participate?)
c. Plan to protect human subjects (given your proposed sample, how would you submit your study to the IRB? How are you recruiting your participants to ensure that they are volunteers? Do they fall into any groups that need additional protection? How are you ensuring informed consent, confidentiality, etc.?)
d. Descriiption of data collection procedures and instruments/measures (operational definitions of variables, instrument reliability & validity). Are you using existing measures–what are they? How are you determining if your measures are reliable and valid?)
e. Plan for analysis and use of data—do not describe specific statistical analyses unless you are sure you know what you are describing. If you plan to compare the results of two groups, you do not have to specify that you will use ANOVA or t-tests to do so–just tell me you will compare the results of the two groups and that will usually suffice. This part should also address what you expect to find, what the significance of your findings will be for social work practice, and what the weaknesses/limitations of your design are and what you might do if you had more time and resources.
4. References (0 pts.—for your benefit/feedback only.): Use the APA style; minimum of 5 references, 3 of which should be research articles from social work or social science journals. IF YOU HAVE CHANGED YOUR RESEARCH ARTICLES FROM YOUR INTRO/LIT REVIEW DRAFT, BE SURE TO ATTACH THEM. This is the absolute minimum number; most of you will have more by your final proposal.
The Adventures of Huck Finn
Ernest Hemingway proclaimed, “All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called Huckleberry Finn. American writing comes from that. There was nothing before. There has been nothing as good since.”
If this one novel is indeed the “source” of all American literature, then it must be representative, indeed a paradigm, of all that comes after it, If so, then it must incorporate every major theme in all of American literature.
With that being said, your first essay will argue how the novel incorporates the following themes:
The Journey from Innocence to Awareness
The American Dream
The Land and the Frontier
The Hero
Community
For each theme, you should use specific textual evidence to argue your point. In addition, comment on the role each theme plays in the novel or on what the novel reveals about each theme. Now is the time that completed chart will come in handy! For a review on incorporating textual evidence, see the following links in Course Resources:
Textual Evidence in a Response to Literature
Annoying Ways People Use Sources
MLA Works Cited Page for Books (for your textbook, use “Work in an Anthology”)
Find a current event- that relates to the topics we have discussed in class. Select either Control Theory, Conflict Theory or Control Deviance Theory. Do no discuss personal thought- you must use sociological prose and analysis. 2 pages minimum. The current event must be within the 2017-present time frame.
Find a current event- that relates to the topics we have discussed in class. Select either Control Theory, Conflict Theory or Control Deviance Theory. Do no discuss personal thought- you must use sociological prose and analysis. 2 pages minimum. The current event must be within the 2017-present time frame.
Nursing PDP Plsn
Plan the following question writing the questions that be answered and the word count for each area.:
Learning outcome 3 – Appraise/define and explain own development needs in relation to The Code
(NMC 2018).
LO3. Appraise and (assess the value and quality [make a judgement]) explain (and why it is [support with
evidence base]) own development needs (what do we need to do to get better) in relation to The Code
(NMC 2018 (please reference the code as this reflection is about your nursing)).
writing a reflection (will help you see where you need to develop), based on your practice experience
(theory, feedback, reflection will guide you to where you might find the knowledge, skills, values on how
to improve) thus helping you achieve the LO (map and reference the NMC 2018 the Code).