Best Writer

For your Discussion Assignment, you will write about the setting of the science fiction world from the reading you chose in this week’s reading assignment. Was it believable? Can you see this happening in our future? Tell us why you think this story could happen or why you think there is no way a story like it could happen.

Instructions for Assignment: Write a well-developed 1-2 page essay and document sources on a work cited page if necessary. The essay should be no less than 300 words in APA format. All assignments must be typed in Microsoft Word, double-spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman.

Question:
Use http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html, and, using the party-name search tab, find Marbury-v-Madison (1803). Answer the following questions:

1. Identify each party of the case.

2. What is the legal question decided in this case?

3. Explain the decision handed down by the court.

4. Explain how this case set precedent to impact the decision of future cases of this type.

Topic for your final presentation (Right for Children to Education) this week you will need to construct your annotated bibliography using APA style. For this assignment, you need to select a minimum of 8 sources that you plan on using for your presentation and then construct the annotations for each source.
After you select a source and reference it in APA format, construct the annotation for the source. The annotation is really just answering a few questions about the sources itself and once you answer these questions this part of the assignment almost creates itself. Answer the following 6 questions for each source:
Main purpose of the source
Intended audience for the source
Relevance to your topic (or explain why it was not relevant to your topic)
Author’s background and credibility
Author’s conclusions or observations
Your conclusions or observations

Use these 2 references plus 6 more

References

Malala Yousafzai – Biographical.
NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. Wed. 26 Jan 2022.

Cimpian, J. (2018, April
23). How our education system undermines gender equity. Brookings.
Retrieved January 28, 2022, from

How our education system undermines gender equity

DESCRIBE
Observe the work. What do you see? Think of this as the alt-text for an image; how would you describe the project to someone who is visually impaired? Note design elements such as line, shape, color, pattern, texture, typography, symbols, images, composition, materials used, etc.

INTERPRET
Based on what you observe, what is the project saying? What is its purpose? What meaning and/or feeling is it communicating?

EVALUATE
Based on what you observe and interpret: How effective is the project in communicating its purpose? Does the project meet its goals? What are the project’s strengths and weaknesses?

RECOMMEND
What revisions would make this project (even) better? What questions does the project bring up for you? Offer clear, helpful advice for improvements.

“The Secret Life of Walter White” and “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty”
Homework questions
From the following list of questions, choose ONE to answer. Your answer should be one full page in length (double-spaced, 12 pt font). Please make sure to use a quote from the article or the short story as you answer the question. Engage critically with the question you choose. Avoid just summarizing. Instead, use both summary and analysis as critical, evaluative tools for setting forth your ideas.
1. What type of men are Walter Mitty and Walter White? What similarities do they share? Explain.
2. What do Walter Mitty and Walter White’s fantasies and efforts seem to promise them? What risks are they willing to assume? Explain.
3. In both titles what is implied by the word “secret”? Why do you believe John Wrathall borrowed this title for his article on Breaking Bad? Explain.
4. After reading both the article and the short story, explain what you believe to be the most important similarity between Walter White and Walter Mitty? What do you believe to be the most significant difference? Explain.

subject; Gender and Identity in Literature:

3-page paper due week 5, should
expand slightly on one of the close-readings you turned in for your
response paper assignment. This paper is more formal. Like the response
paper, it should utilize close-reading techniques, but the close reading
should support a thesis and have larger implications than an analysis of a
single passage. Please keep in mind the overarching questions we are
investigating and how the part relates to the whole
“This is a close reading assignment. Above, I’ve attached a hand-out that will help you to understand close-reading techniques, in case you aren’t familiar with them. You are meant to be practicing close-readings in your weekly response papers. This short, formal academic paper is a revision and expansion of one of your response papers. Like the response papers, it should be grounded in very specific textual or cinematic details. You should be choosing a passage, image, scene, shot, or you should choose a literary or filmic technique and ground your discussion of that technique in a specific moment. If you are treating a film, please indicate the precise time where it appears and describe the moment clearly. Quote the text! Unlike the response paper, this paper needs to have a thesis statement, an interpretative argument that you support through the textual details that you analyze. Show how the particular passage, scene, etc. relates to the whole.”

Task 1. Early stages of a Systematic Literature Review in Physiotherapy.

We need to decide the topic together ( a systematic literature review not been done in the last 5 years).
Also, we need to ensure that we have at least 10 relevant studies available (RCT would be the best of course).

I’m looking for a reliable writer.

My favourite subjects are: (They have to be connected to physiotherapy somehow) but I’m open to suggestions as it’s also about finding the gap in the literature and something relevant.

1. Veganism
2. Benign prostatic hyperplesia
3. Spirituality
4. LGBTQ community
5. Epididymal cysts
6. Sympathetic nervous system
7.Bikram Yoga
8.Men Health
9.Clinical herbalism
10. Fasting
11.Varicocele

Task 2. Will be a different order and we need to answer the following questions:

– Give a brief description of the aspect of practice you want to evidence:
– Why do you think this is important?
– How did you identify this topic?
– Write your search question
– Identify Key words for your search including the use of Boolan Operators (AND, OR, NOT). Consider using PICO (population targeted, intervention/innovation, comparator, outcome) or SPICE (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation)
– Identify inclusion/exclusion criteria
– Identify databases to search including relevant websites

Select and read one of the following books:
• Wendy Brown. 2019. In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Rauna Kuokkanen. 2019. Restructuring Relations: Indigenous Self- determination, Governance and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fintan O’Toole. 2018. Heroic Failure: Brexit and the Politics of Pain. London: Head of Zeus.
• Anita von Schnitzler. 2016. Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno-politics After Apartheid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
. No independent research is required for this assignment. Your book review should show substantive engagement with four assigned course readings that we will have read and discussed before this assignment due date. This paper will be five pages double- spaced, which is approximately 1250 words. The book review will be evaluated based on the grading rubric provided in this syllabus and your responses to the following questions:
• What is the author’s central argument in the book?
• How do they support the argument? (ie. engaging with theoretical debates,
institutional history, jurisprudence, a transnational political movement, etc.)
• What is your main criticism of this book?
• What contribution does the book make to understanding globalization and world
orders today?
• Rinaldo Walcott. 2021. The Long Emancipation: Moving Toward Black Freedom. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

DISCUSSSION #1 Use the following format to reflect on the Week 6 iHuman Mental Health Assessment. This was the Amka Oxendine case. No refrence needed
Paragraph One: What went well for you in the simulation? Provide examples of when you felt knowledgeable and confident in your skills. Do you feel the scenario was realistic? Why or why not?
Paragraph Two: What would you do differently next time if you were caring for a patient similar to Ms. Oxendine? Describe at least one area you identified where improvements could be made, specific to Ms. Oxendine’s assessment. Were you surprised by any of the feedback you were provided by iHuman? If yes, please explain.
Paragraph Three: What did you learn from this simulation that you could apply to nursing practice? Or, what did this simulation reinforce that you found valuable? Do you have any questions related to the scenario?

Discussion Question 2#
A nurse colleague uses his personal cell phone to take a photo of a patient’s wound and then sends a message with the photo to the primary care provider via a text. Please consider the following in your discussion post:
2 refrences required
What principles of patient confidentiality might be an issue? Consider legal and ethical.
How might this nurse use a communication device to support safe patient practices?
What would your organization’s policy on ‘personal communication device use in a patient care setting’ reveal related to this case? (If your organization does not have a written policy, or you are not currently working in an organization, what do you think should be included in such a policy and why?)

Answer the following question using your text book and 1 peer reviewed references.
Where do you see your greatest challenge as a nurse working with oncology clients? Why?
Is the greatest challenge in hospice care? Why?
Is the greatest challenge in cancer prevention? Why?
Is the greatest challenge in cancer treatment? Why?
Has the lesson this week helped you realize ways you can meet that challenge? How?